Nick “Loophole” Freeman On Chris Huhne
Nick Freeman aka Mr. Loophole has just pronounced on the Chris Huhne case on BBC Radio 5.
He said that in 2003, there was probably all sorts of errors in the summons and he could probably have got Huhne found not guilty.
You could say that he would say that wouldn’t he, but it does appear he usually gets his clients the result they want.
Perhaps, though Huhne didn’t want to employ a solicitor, who went to Uppingham School and whose father was in retail.
How disgusting that Nick Freeman thinks he could have got Chris Huhne off the points charges on a technicality. No wonder they call him “Loophole”!
It is one rule for the rich/privileged/well-connected and another rule for the rest of us.
Comment by Janice Mermikli | March 11, 2013 |
The technicality was well-known at the time and any good solicitor should have known about it.
I suspect that Huhne disobeyed Rule One of dealing with solicitors. Never let them see how rich you are, as they’ll take half of it.
Comment by AnonW | March 11, 2013 |
Point taken (if you’ll pardon the pun)!
Comment by Janice Mermikli | March 12, 2013