Power Lines Disappear From Cornish Beauty Spot
The title of this post, is the same as this news item from National Grid.
This is the sub-heading.
Visitors to a North Cornwall beauty spot will be able to enjoy improved views after overhead power lines were removed by our engineers.
These three paragraphs add more detail.
They took down more than a mile of poles and lines at Hawkers Cove, near Padstow, which have been replaced by underground cables.
The cove is a popular destination known for its coastal scenery and views across the Camel Estuary, and we worked with Cornwall National Landscape, Cornwall Council, local landowners and a tenant farmer to identify which overhead equipment could be removed.
This resulted in more than a dozen poles and 15 spans of high and low voltage conductors covering 1,600 metres being taken down.
It appears that National Grid work in partnership with National Parks and National Landscapes, to identify and prioritise schemes.
I posted this story, as in Burnham’s speech, he said he would be setting up Great British Grid.
Will this mean, if you vote Labour, you’ll get ugly cables removed from around your house, so that it goes up in value?
First Engine Start For First Hydrogen-Powered Locomotive
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article in the Windhoek Observer.
These three paragraphs add more details.
CMB.TECH Namibia’s has said the engine start for Namibia’s first hydrogen-powered locomotive represents an important step in the project’s development.
It is the first hydrogen dual fuel engine to be started in Africa and the first hydrogen dual fuel engine to be started in a locomotive worldwide.
The company revealed that a combined team of eight electrical, mechanical and software engineers, together with the engine commissioning engineer, worked into the night to prepare the locomotive for its first engine start.
These are a few points from the rest of the article.
- During the initial run, the BeHydro engine idled for approximately 30 minutes while the team carried out a series of checks.
- This 2,250-horsepower BeHydro dual fuel engine can operate on both diesel and green hydrogen, with the hydrogen to be produced locally at CMB.TECH Namibia’s facility in Walvis Bay.
- Namibia has a large fleet of idled locomotives that can be repowered with this cost-effective and future proof technology.
I first wrote about the Belgian BeHydro dual fuel engine in Green Tugboats? ‘Revolutionary’ Hydrogen Ship Engine Unveiled In Belgium.
Is History Repeating Itself?
Thirty or forty years ago, I was friendly with a steam locomotive enthusiast called Dick.
- Dick and his mates were helping various African countries, get their steam locomotives running again.
- The Chinese had sold Africa lots of diesel locomotives to replace European steam locomotives, that often dated from before the Second World War.
- But now these Chinese diesels were falling apart.
My friend and his mates were dragging the old steam locomotives out of the sidings and getting them going again.
So with a little help from the Belgians, are the Namibians bringing the ancient Chinese diesel locomotives into the net-zero world of the twenty-first century?
More About The Project
These paragraphs in the Windhoek Observerer describe the project.
- The project is the result of a strategic partnership between three companies firmly rooted in Namibia including TransNamib Holdings Limited, Africa Global Logistics and CMB.TECH Namibia.
- TransNamib is responsible for managing and operating the national rail network and freight services.
- Africa Global Logistics (AGL) is an established logistics operator active in Namibia, playing a key role in freight, transport and logistics operations across the country, with a strong focus on strengthening strategic transport corridors.
- AGL also manages operations at the Walvis Bay Multipurpose Bulk Terminal and operates one of Africa’s largest integrated logistics networks, with a presence in over 50 countries connecting ports, corridors and multimodal supply chains.
- These partners will operate Namibia’s first heavy‑duty freight service running on locally produced green hydrogen.
- Initially, 50 round trips will be covered between the Port of Walvis Bay and the Container Depot near Windhoek during the trial period, with the option to extend operations.
- Green hydrogen for the project will be produced off‑grid at CMB.TECH Namibia’s hydrogen plant in Walvis Bay.
Note.
- It seems very much a Namibian project.
- Namibia has plenty of wind and sun to make the green hydrogen.
- Would they be using an efficient process like HiiROC?
This OpenRailwayMap shows the location of Walvis Bay and Windhoek.
Note.
- Walvis Bay is indicated by the blue arrow.
- Windhoek is East of Walvis Bay, where there is a major railway junction.
- Windhoek and Walvis Bay are about 224 miles apart and a train journey takes between 9 and 11 hours.
It will probably be one of the longest hydrogen-powered rail journeys in the world.
Subsea Micropiles To Invest GBP 5 Million In Expanding Manufacturing, Offshore Ops At Scottish Port
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.
This is the sub-heading.
Subsea Micropiles is investing GBP 5 million (approximately EUR 6 million) over the next three years to expand its manufacturing and offshore operations at Montrose Port in Scotland, supported by GBP 1.45 million (approx. EUR 1.7 million) from Scottish Enterprise.
These three paragraphs add more details.
The company plans to expand its infrastructure and manufacturing capabilities at the port to support the production and maintenance of subsea technology for offshore survey and construction. The investment is expected to create around 80 jobs over the next three to five years.
Subsea Micropiles announced the investment on 28 September, during a visit to its Montrose facility by Scotland’s First Minister John Swinney and Scottish Enterprise’s Managing Director of Investment and International, Reuben Aitken.
As reported today, SSE also announced that it has selected Montrose Port as the O&M base for its 1.4 GW Berwick Bank B offshore wind farm.
This Google Map shows the town of Montrose and its port at the South.
Note.
- Montrose station is on the West side of the town, on the main Edinburgh and Aberdeen railway.
- Montrose looks to have a major beach.
- Montrose Port is on both sides of the River South Esk.
- There looks to be plenty of space for Subsea Micropiles to build their micropiles.
Subsea Micropiles have a comprehensive web site.
They appear to have offices in Dublin and Aberdeen and say this about micropiles.
We are leading the adaption land-based micro piling technology to create superior marine foundation and anchor solutions.
Micropile has a Wikipedia entry.
A New Entrance/Exit For King’s Cross Station – 27th September 2026
A new fully step-free entrance to King’s Cross Station has opened on the South side of Euston Road.
As I was passing this morning I took these pictures.
Note.
- The tunnel under Euston Road is level.
- It connects on the North side to tunnels and lifts to King’s Cross station, St. Pancras station and all the Underground lines.
- On the South side it connects to a new office block.
- There are lots of signs.
- The tunnel has stairs and lifts to the surface on both sides.
- The South entrance has a single lift.
- A kiosk appears to have been built in the South entrance.
- There are bus and tube maps in the new entrance.
These are some of my thoughts.
Westbound Buses From King’s Cross and St. Pancras Stations
I believe this could be a big benefit of the new entrance.
Within fifty metres to the West of the new entrance is Bus Stop A.
This has a good selection of buses including according to Google AI, these buses.
- 30: Towards Euston Bus Station
- 73 / N73: Towards Oxford Circus / West End
- 91 / N91: Towards Trafalgar Square / Central London (Note: Route 91/N91 may have temporary local diversions nearby)
- 205 / N205: Towards Paddington / Marble Arch
- 390: Towards Victoria Bus Station
Note.
- The 30, 73 and 205 buses provide a link to Euston.
- The 205 bus provides a link to Paddington and Marylebone.
- The stations have gained a step-free Westbound bus terminal.
I would expect this list of Westbound buses to be improved.
Later, I arrived at the Bus Stop A and took these pictures from the bus, as I arrived and as I walked back to the entrance.
Note.
- I arrived at King’s Cross after taking a 73 bus from Angel.
- Buses twist their way onto Euston Road in front of the two stations.
- Bus Stop R is beside a crossing to in front of the King’s Cross station.
- The area in front of King’s Cross, isn’t one of London’s most salubrious.
- There are a number of trees along Euston Road.
- Bus Stop A is in front of St. Pancras station.
- Some of the side roads could have cheaper hotels.
- The walk between Bus Stop A and the new station entrance is slightly downhill.
Once inside the station complex it was an easy walk to the trains.
There May Be Some More Affordable Hotels On The South Side Of Euston Road
If they are the new entrance will help travellers find them.
If You Have Heavy Cases You May Find The Buses Easier Between Stations
Euston to King’s Cross has been easy for many years. Now the reverse is true.
As I walked Through The New Entrance About Four Illegal Migrants May Have Taken Up Residence!
Two guys about sixteen had their sleeping bags down in the new entrance.
Irizar Hydrogen Coach With Bosch 190 kW Fuel-Cell System Faces Test Operation In Madrid
The title of this post, is the same as that of an article on Hydrogen Central.
Irizar have a page on their web site, which describes their hydrogen-powered coaches.
This paragraph describes their range.
The way our clients operate will not be changed, because the Irizar i6S Efficient Hydrogen has a range of up to 1000 km and minimal charging times, of around 20 minutes. In addition, it can run in 100% electric mode for short times, if required.
All hydrogen-powered coaches seem to claim a 1,000 km. range.
TRISO-X Completes Vertical Construction Of TX-1 Fuel Fabrication Facility
The title of this post, is the same as that of this news item from X-energy.
These two bullet-points act as sub-headings.
Completion of vertical construction marks major milestone for first-in-the-nation commercial scale advanced nuclear fuel fabrication facility
Project advances into interior buildout, fuel fabrication equipment installation and construction of supporting facilities
These two paragraphs add more detail.
TRISO-X, LLC (“TRISO-X” or the “Company”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of X-Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq: XE) (“X-energy”), today announced the completion of vertical construction at TX-1, its first-in-the-nation advanced nuclear fuel fabrication facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The milestone completes the primary building structure of the 214,000-square-foot facility and enables the project to advance fully into its next phase of construction, including interior buildout, installation of fuel fabrication equipment and continued construction of supporting facilities.
“Completing vertical construction is a major milestone for TX-1 and another tangible demonstration of the progress our team is making in Oak Ridge,” said Joel Duling, President of TRISO-X. “We are moving from constructing the core and shell of the facility to building out the interior utilities, installing manufacturing equipment, and constructing key support capabilities. Every milestone brings us closer to establishing a new domestic source of advanced nuclear fuel and supporting the deployment of the next generation of American nuclear reactors.”
Note.
- Oak Ridge is one of the United States premier nuclear facilities.
- It would be like building a similar facility for specialist nuclear reactor fuel at Harwell in the UK.
This is without doubt a very professional start to the X-energy programme.
I also feel that the fourth paragraph has important information.
Once operational, TX-1 is expected to produce approximately 700,000 TRISO-X fuel pebbles annually, equivalent to 5 metric tons of uranium (“MTU”), with capacity to provide fuel for up to 11 Xe-100 reactors. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) granted TRISO-X a 40-year Special Nuclear Material License for the facility earlier this year, the first-ever NRC Category 2 fuel fabrication license issued for the processing of high-assay low-enriched uranium. TX-1 is expected to be the first new commercial-scale advanced U.S. nuclear fuel fabrication facility built in more than 50 years.
Note.
- TX-1 will be able to support eleven Xe-100 reactors.
- Four Xe-100 reactors will be built initially at Dow’s Seadrift site.
- In Hartlepool Nuclear Reactor Moves To UK Regulatory Assessment, I said that Hartlepool will eventually be a 12-pack site.
I can envisage a fuel strategy based on TX-1, which is something like this.
TX-1 will provide the TRISO fuel for the four reactors at Dow’s Seadrift site.
TX-1 will provide the TRISO fuel for the initial reactor or reactors at a new site like Hartlepool, or for other licensees like Amazon or North Western.
TX-1 will be cloned as necessary to create TX-2, TX-3, TX-4 etc. as more Xe-100 reactors are built.
I am sure, that there is relevant expertise to make TRISO-X fuel pebbles safely in Japan, Korea and the UK of the known partners of X-energy.
The Wikipedia entry for the Dragon reactor finishes with these three paragraphs.
The choice of helium coolant was made after a long debate within the UKAEA between proponents of helium and carbon dioxide, with helium ultimately selected. Groundbreaking occurred in 1960. It operated from 1965 to 1976, and is generally considered extremely successful.
Dragon’s construction was followed by similar work in the US, leading ultimately to the much larger Fort Saint Vrain Nuclear Power Plant. This suffered from a number of problems due to corrosion and the customer soured on the design. Contracts for similar models in the US that were being signed were cancelled, and although Dragon suffered none of these issues, no orders were forthcoming in Europe either. By this time the market had largely standardized on the pressurized water reactor (PWR) for the large buildout that occurred during the 1970s and 80s, and the decision was made to shut down Dragon.
As of 2023, Dragon is being decommissioned.
Note.
- It appears only two reactors using TRISO fuel have been constructed.
- The 20 MW Dragon reactor was extremely successful.
- The 330 MW Fort Saint Vrain reactor had corrosion problems.
- Both reactors used helium gas as a coolant.
- The Wikipedia entry for the Fort Saint Vrain reactor details the corrosion problems.
- According to Google AI fuel for Fort Saint Vrain was fabricated at the General Atomic Fuel Fabrication Facility in San Diego, California.
- According to Google AI fuel for the Dragon reactor was fabricated on-site at Winfrith.
After writing these seven points, I have concluded that TRISO-fueled helium-cooled nuclear reactor designs better suited to small reactors?
What does Google AI think?
I asked Google AI “Are TRISO-fueled helium-cooled nuclear reactor designs better suited to small reactors?” and received this reply.
TRISO-fueled, helium-cooled reactor designs are exceptionally well-suited for small and micro-modular reactor applications because their physical properties scale down efficiently to provide inherent safety and high-temperature operation.
Why They Suit Small Reactors
Inherent Safety (Walk-Away Safe): Each TRISO fuel particle acts as its own tiny containment system, capable of withstanding extreme temperatures (well over 1,600°C) without melting or releasing radioactive fission products. In a small reactor design, the high surface-area-to-volume ratio allows residual decay heat to dissipate passively through the reactor vessel walls, meaning the reactor cannot suffer a catastrophic meltdown even if active cooling completely fails.
Simplified Helium Cooling: Helium is chemically inert and does not absorb neutrons or become radioactive. In smaller reactor configurations, helium’s single-phase gas state eliminates the high-pressure water loops and massive containment structures required by traditional large light-water reactors.
High-Temperature Process Heat: Because helium can operate at very high temperatures without boiling off, small TRISO-gas systems can deliver high-grade industrial heat (useful for chemical plants or hydrogen production) alongside electricity.
Compact Footprint: Small modular reactor (SMR) and microreactor developers (such as X-energy and Ultra Safe Nuclear Corporation) leverage these traits to design factory-fabricated units that can be transported and sited near urban or off-grid industrial locations.
Key Challenges
Power Density and Size: Helium has a lower volumetric heat capacity than water, meaning gas-cooled cores can be physically bulkier per megawatt than water-cooled equivalents, placing a premium on optimizing core geometry for micro-scales.
Supply Chain and Cost: High-Assay Low-Enriched Uranium (HALEU) and specialized TRISO manufacturing face immature supply chains and higher first-of-a-kind costs.
The more I read about X-energy’s technology, the more I like it.
Under The Railway At Oxford Station – 24th September 2026
I took these pictures as I walked under the railway using the new Botley Road underpass.
Note.
- I walked to the far side and then back again.
- Where I walked, there was also a cycle track.
- It looks like, when the station upgrade is completed, it will be possible to access both sides of the station from the underpass.
I can see this underpass winning some awards.
Electric Open-Top Bus In Oxford – 24th September 2026
I hadn’t intended to write about these buses from Wrightbus today, but Oxford is a lot easier to get to than Glasgow, which also has these buses.
I took these pictures.
Note.
- They seem to run about every fifteen minutes from the station.
- I am rather surprised that only Glasgow, London and Oxford have battery-electric open-top buses.
- I thought more mayors had big egos!
This article on the BBC is entitled Oxford Sightseeing Fleet Gets Eight New Electric Buses, gives more details.
Between Oxford And Reading Stations – 24th September 2026
Returning from Oxford to Reading, I took a nine-car Class 800 train, that was travelling between Oxford and Paddington stations.
- It was pathed at 125 mph.
- It only stopped at Reading.
- It was running on diesel
- I was sitting on the left side of the train in the sixth coach.
These are some pictures I took out of the window.
Note.
- There seems to be a lot of car parking at Oxford station.
- The Student Castle Oxford is student accommodation and has this Internet link.
- The Cowley Branch leads to BMW’s Mini factory and is being updated to a two-station branch for passenger trains as well.
- The Cowley branch appears to be double track, which should allow for two trains per hour, which is the initial desired frquency.
- There appears to be signs of more electrification.
- There is a solar-powered sewage farm as you approach Reading.
I am very puzzled about image of an electrification stanchion between Oxford station and the Cowley branch.
Consider.
- Between Oxford North junction, where the Chiltern Line joins the Cotswold Line and the Cowley branch is about 3.5 miles and takes about seven minutes, with a stop at Oxford station.
- The Cowley branch is only three miles long.
- There are also some electrification stanchions between the Cowley branch and the Great Western Main Line.
- There are no signs of electrification work in Oxford station.
This OpenRailwayMap shows the Cotswold Line through Oxford station.
Note.
- The Cotswold Line through Oxford is shown in orange.
- There is no current electrification and original plans have been dropped.
- At the North-East corner of the map, the Chiltern Line joins from Oxford Parkway station at Oxford Canal and Oxford North junctions.
- The blue arrow marks Kennington junction, where the Cowley branch joins the Cotswold Line.
- The BMW terminal is at the Eastern edge of the map.
Chiltern Railway’s trains will need to go between Oxford Canal junction and the two stations on the Cowley branch and return.
Are There Any Plans To Electrify The Chiltern Line?
I asked Google AI this question and received this answer.
There are no fully funded or confirmed plans for complete electrification of the Chiltern Main Line, but Chiltern Railways and Network Rail are developing a business case for discontinuous electrification combined with battery-electric trains to replace the ageing diesel fleet from the early 2030s.
Current Plans and Decarbonisation Strategy
Discontinuous Electrification:Instead of wiring the entire route from London Marylebone to the West Midlands, the proposal relies on wiring select sections (such as north of High Wycombe towards Oxford or Banbury) to charge battery-electric rolling stock while avoiding costly bridge modifications and clearance issues.
Business Case Progress: Chiltern Railways has completed a strategic business case and is working with Network Rail and the Department for Transport (DfT) on an outline business case.
Interim Fleet Upgrades: As part of its 2030 Vision, Chiltern is introducing newly leased Mark 5A carriages to boost capacity and reliability, while continuing long-term discussions regarding a power supply and infrastructure package for cleaner trains.
It would appear to me, that if the Southbound line between Oxford Canal junction and Kennington junction, that this would be enough electrification to allow Chiltern’s Oxford services to serve the Cowley branch and return.
Could GWR’s Cotswold Services Be Run On Batteries?
Consider.
- Didcot Parkway and London Paddington is fully electrified.
- Battery-electric Class 800, 801 and 802 trains have an off-wires range of around 120 miles.
- Between Oxford and Great Malvern is 75.9 miles.
- Between Oxford and Hereford is 86.3 miles.
- Between Oxford and Worcester Shrub Hill is 57 miles.
I believe with charging at the country end, these services could be run using battery-electric Hitachi trains.
With Federal Funding Windfall, X-energy Advances Small Nuclear Reactor
The title of this post, is the same as this article on Canary Media.
This is the sub-heading.
The Amazon-backed firm is aiming to build up to 144 of its novel Xe-100 reactors as the U.S. government seeks to revitalize an industry beset by rising costs
These three initial paragraphs add more detail.
The federal government has thrown its weight into reviving America’s long-stagnant nuclear industry, and X-energy’s first-of-a-kind reactor project is among the biggest beneficiaries so far.
The U.S. Department of Energy last month said it would award $1 billion to X-energy, an Amazon-backed advanced nuclear startup working to bring four novel 80-megawatt electric reactors online at a Dow Chemical facility in Seadrift, Texas, in the early 2030s.
The award nearly doubles the federal government’s commitment to X-energy, following a $1.2 billion investment in early 2021. Both tranches were structured as 50-50 cost-sharing agreements under the DOE’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program, launched in 2020 to commercialize next-generation nuclear technologies.
Note.
- It looks like X-energy are well-funded.
- It also looks like they have received funding under two different presidents.
- I like Dow’s concept of using nuclear to power a chemical complex, which needs both lots of electricity and heat.
- If they build 144 reactors, this will be twelve of the 12-pack power station, that they have said they will build at Hartlepool and I wrote about in Hartlepool Nuclear Reactor Moves To UK Regulatory Assessment.
The next phase would appear to be up to the regulators.
The article on Canary Media is well worth giving a full read.
These are some important highlights.
Dow Seem Enthusiastic And Would Be An Ideal First Customer
In any large project the first customer is always important.
- Dow seem to fit the part well.
- I also suspect, that as Dow turned over around $40 billion in fiscal year 2025, they know what they want.
Even in nuclear power, the customer is generally right.
Has X-energy Found Any Customers For The Xe-100?
I asked Google AI, this question and received this answer.
Yes, X-energy has secured major commercial customers and strategic partners for the Xe-100 reactor.
Key Customers and Partners
Dow: Partnering to deploy an Xe-100 four-pack plant at the Seadrift chemicals manufacturing site in Texas to provide low-carbon heat and power.
Amazon: Bankrolling and collaborating on up to 12 Xe-100 units via Energy Northwest in Washington state, alongside broader clean energy scaling for AI infrastructure.
Centrica: Partnering in the UK to deploy a potential fleet of up to 6 GW (10 to 20 reactors), targeting the Hartlepool site.
Energy Northwest: A Washington public power utility working collaboratively on project deployment frameworks.
Note.
When, the four partners, of which I was one, started to develop the Artemis project management system, the salesman of the four, did a survey of who might buy.
A proportion of these became valuable clients.
As X-energy also has a world-class engineering partner from Japan and Korea, I feel that they have done their preparation thoroughly.
Where Is The TRISO Fuel To Be Made?
According to the Canary Media article, it will be made near Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee.
- This could be handy for support.
- It could ease recruiting some of the staff with the right experience.
- There may also be useful sub-contractors in the area, with the right experience and certification.
The location is an excellent one.
Has Centrica Been Recruited Because They Are British?
According to its Wikipedia entry, the Dragon reactor, which used TRISO fuel, was generally considered extremely successful.
So by inviting Centrica to be involved, will X-energy be able to get access to the British files concerning the details of the Dragon reactor?
Their interpretation may be the difference between success and failure of the project.
I wouldn’t be surprised that there is a very trustworthy and knowledgeable network of very elderly British nuclear engineers, who enjoy meeting in pubs, with only the best real ales.
