The Anonymous Widower

Britain Goes Nuclear

With the delaying and possible demise of the Severn Barrage, it would appear that we are going to bet on nuclear for our energy for the next few decades.

I don’t particularly mind, as I believe that nuclear is totally safe and of course carbon-free if it is properly designed, built and managed. THe only question is will the opponents of nuclear power stop the stations being built.  Or if they don’t stop them from being built, will it be the decision that gets the coalition turned out at the next election? The public always feel that anything nuclear is dangerous.  That is why you have an MRI Scan at the hospital, rather than an NMRI one. The N refers to the nuclear resonance of the molecules in your body to the magnetic fields imposed on them.

I still think that the Severn Barrage will be built but it will be very different to any scheme so far proposed. Except possibly the one by Sir Frederick Snow.

It will of course have a high and a low lake split by a central spine, so that reversible turbines can either generate electricity as water flows downhill or store energy by pumping water from the low to the high lake.  The trick that makes wind energy viable is being able to store the excess and pumping water uphill is the easiest way to do it.

Whether the spine will have an airport is a more difficult question to answer.  I think it will, and as the need to airports decreases through this century, if the fast rail (Note not high-speed!) was there, then it could replace airports at Cardiff, Bristol, Birmingham and to a certain extent, Heathrow.

As I reread my reflections on my trip to Scotland, then this could be an alternative south-western terminal of the West Coast Line. After all, the airport would be within two hours of most of London and Birmingham.

All this says is that we need to think boldly! In fact, we need to think very boldly!

We tend to base our planning on what we do today, not what we will be doing in thirty years time.

I’m just about to watch football on the television.  In 2040, will I be watching any match I want to in some form of immersion 3D system? And will I use the same technology to have business meetings with colleagues and clients?

October 18, 2010 - Posted by | News, Transport/Travel | , , , ,

3 Comments »

  1. Since you consider nuclear power to be completely safe, are you suggesting they build a reactor next to your farm?

    The “nuclear” in MRI relates to the magnetic polarity of the hydrogen atoms in the nuclei of cells, no radioactive substances are used. CT, PET and x-ray do use radioactive sources.

    Comment by Liz P | October 19, 2010 | Reply

  2. I’d far rather be close to a nuclear power plant than a chemical works. When Flixborough blew up a friend had to scrape 4,000 dead pigs off a wall on his farm which was nearby.

    Comment by AnonW | October 19, 2010 | Reply

  3. I used to work on NMR at ICI in Runcorn in 1970, so I have some sort of grounding in how it works.

    Comment by AnonW | October 19, 2010 | Reply


Leave a reply to Liz P Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.