June 15, 2016 12:45 pm
These pictures show the Gospel Oak and Barking Line (GOBlin) between Walthamstow Queen’s Road and Leyton Midland Road stations.
This part of the route isn’t as interesting as the section I covered in The Bridges Of Walthamstow.
Note.
What I find strange about this line is the lack of a station at Bakers Arms. It’s not that there ever was one, but as the line crosses the major Lea Bridge Road and on this line, that is usually a good enough reason for a station, I’m surprised the Victorians didn’t build one.
The Barking Gospel Oak Rail User Group suggest one in this page on their web site.
There may be a lot of reasons to build a station at Bakers Arms.
But contrary to that.
It should probably have been built, when one of the adjoining developments was constructed.
Posted by AnonW
Categories: Transport/Travel
Tags: GOBlin Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, Leyton Midland Road Station, Walthamstow Queen's Road Station
Mobile Site | Full Site
Get a free blog at WordPress.com Theme: WordPress Mobile Edition by Alex King.
I go past this every day! I saw that one track had been removed (presumably to put in some cabling to do with the electrification works) and I said to myself “So that’s why they had to close a large portion of the line!”. Well, that and the fact that on the viaduct section between Queen’s Road and Woodgrange Park (largest section I think), there is nothing in the way of reversing facilities, so it’d have to be “one engine in steam” for a while, over one track. I guess this would have been more complicated to achieve than its worth.
By Joshua on June 15, 2016 at 1:18 pm
I suspect that the track needed replacement, as they’ve pulled up a lot of the Gospel Oak-bound track and have started to replace it. When this track is complete, they’ll do the Barking-bound track. They seem to be using a crane on the existing track.
When they renew the track, I suspect they’ll might add an extra crossover somewhere.
It looks like they’re burying a plastic duct to carry electrical cables. But the power for the overhead cables will probably come from the two ends of the line from existing electrification. Connecting to the grid is an expensive business, so it is preferable to connect to existing systems.
By AnonW on June 15, 2016 at 2:05 pm
Ah, that makes a lot of sense. I figured they may have been using the opportunity to do general track replacement.
An extra crossover on or near the viaduct section certainly would be nice. I wonder if they’d have any space to do it on the viaduct itself. I believe there is space at the ramp which descends from the bridges down to the cutting to the west of Queen’s road.
Connecting the supply at either end sounds the best solution too, as it’s not such a long route and limited space/inconvenient to put in a substation in the middle of the route.
By Joshua on June 16, 2016 at 4:43 pm
I know this line! I used to take it go get to Blackhorse station
By Thursday on June 17, 2016 at 12:06 pm
When it’s done up with new electric trains, it’ll be a big asset to the area.
By AnonW on June 20, 2016 at 7:07 am
The reason for removing the tracks is to lower them to give sufficient clearance under the bridges for the 25kv catenary. One track(Gospel Oak to Barking direction) has been replaced with slab track through Queens Rd and now the other line has been replaced. Work on lowering the platforms at Queens Rd seems to be taking place. I haven’t yet visited other sections.
By Maurice Reed on August 13, 2016 at 6:47 pm
I must go and have a look. They cetainly seem to be dsoing it properly.
By AnonW on August 13, 2016 at 7:38 pm