Powered By HVO
I took these pictures yesterday at Peterborough.
Note the locomotive is named Benjamin Gimbert GC.
DB Cargo have issued a press release on these trials of HVO.
Wikipedia also give more details of HVO.
I took these pictures yesterday at Peterborough.
Note the locomotive is named Benjamin Gimbert GC.
DB Cargo have issued a press release on these trials of HVO.
Wikipedia also give more details of HVO.
Interesting wiki article on HVO but not much about the make up of the exhaust I.e. levels of carbon monoxide, nitrous oxide etc
I assume these are lower than normal diesel but they are still carbon-based fuels being burnt so some levels of noxious fumes must still be emitted.
Comment by Maurice Reed | August 5, 2021 |
I suspect in a port or depot, where staff are walking amongst the exhausts, hydrogen must have an advantage, as there would only be water.
Certainly, the average Class 66 locomotive puts out a lot of fumes.
Comment by AnonW | August 5, 2021 |
Interesting idea. Not sure how much power is is produced compared to normal diesel, and how it affects engine life and whether it is a cheaper source of power. Most of the non fossil fuel alternatives appear to cost up to eight times the cost per unit of normal fuels.
Comment by jagracer | August 5, 2021 |
I wonder whether these bio-fuels are economically usefull. What effect does it have on engine life? Wiki is light on information for hydrogenated fuels. Emissions are not advertised as much less than diesel either. A Deltic on full chat was no better than a steam engine when being coaled, with lots of black smoke, nice noise though!
Comment by jagracer | August 5, 2021 |
They’re doing an extended trial to find out how well the fuels work.
It will give a base cost, when converting to hydrogen.
Comment by AnonW | August 5, 2021 |