The Anonymous Widower

US Interior Secretary: ‘No Future For Offshore Wind Under This Administration’

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said at a press conference on 10 September that offshore wind has no future in the US under the Trump administration and that the government was reviewing five offshore wind projects that are now under construction.

There is also this quote from Burgum.

Offshore wind was too expensive and not reliable enough.

Many of those projects weren’t really about electricity, they were about tax subsidies

I think the fact that the subsidies have been either cut back or limited means that it is likely that there will not be future offshore wind built in America.

He also added that there were concerns that wind turbines interfered with whales and radar systems.

I asked Google AI a few questions.

Is Offshore Wind Extremely Expensive?

Google AI replied.

No, offshore wind is not considered extremely expensive when compared to other energy sources, particularly gas-fired power stations, and its costs are projected to fall further. While initially more expensive to construct than onshore wind due to the marine environment, the higher and more consistent wind speeds offshore generate more power, leading to a competitive or lower overall levelised cost of energy (LCOE) in many regions. Recent economic challenges like inflation and supply chain disruptions have increased costs temporarily, but the sector’s financial position is recovering, and cost reductions are expected to continue.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Is Offshore Wind Reliable?

Google AI replied.

Yes, offshore wind is a reliable energy source because it generates power more consistently than onshore wind due to higher, more dependable wind speeds at sea, and can be integrated with other renewables and energy storage to provide continuous power. Offshore wind turbines operate almost all the time, and the power can be backed up by grid-level storage to ensure a steady electricity supply, even when the wind isn’t blowing.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Are Subsididies And Tax Breaks Important For Offshore Wind?

Google AI replied.

Yes, subsidies and tax breaks are important for the offshore wind industry, which faces high upfront costs and inflationary pressures, to make it more cost-competitive with fossil fuels and secure financing for projects. These incentives help reduce costs for developers, de-risk investments, and ensure the technology can meet climate targets by fostering investment and ensuring long-term viability.

That looks pretty fair to me, but if you were in the oil and gas industry you might think differently.

On the other hand some countries like Norway and the UK, are encouraging the linking of offshore wind farms to offshore oil and gas production to decarbonise offshore operations.

Does Offshore Wind Kill Whales?

This article on the BBC is entitled Fact-Checking Donald Trump’s Claim That Wind Turbines Kill Whales.

It goes into detail about Trump’s claims about wind turbines and marine life.

These are four paragraphs.

“We know what the main threats are to humpback whales: it’s very much the impact from things like fishing and ship strikes,” says Rob Deaville from the Zoological Society of London’s Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme.

“To talk about wind farms being a problem takes away discussion around the very real threats that are a problem for those species.”

Many other areas with high numbers of wind farms have not seen an increase in whale mortality.

For example, the UK is home to the world’s four largest wind farms, but no humpback whale strandings there have been conclusively linked to the impact of those farms.

That looks pretty fair to me.

But because of our massive portfolio of offshore wind farms and top universities, who research the marine environment, the UK is in a unique position to expose fake science, that was made up on the back of a used envelope.

Does Offshore Interfere With Radar?

Google AI replied.

Yes, offshore wind farms can interfere with radar by reflecting radar signals, causing “radar clutter” or false echoes that can obscure real targets, like aircraft or ships, or create phantom images on a radar display. This interference, also known as a “blade flash,” can negatively impact air defense, air traffic control, and maritime navigation, leading to reduced accuracy and potential safety risks.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Have Wind Turbines Caused Any Air Accidents?

Google AI replied.

Yes, wind farms have caused air accidents, though they are rare. These incidents primarily involve light aircraft colliding with wind turbines or experiencing loss of control due to turbulence from turbine wakes. Examples include a pilot crashing near a wind farm due to turbulence and another fatal crash involving an aircraft hitting a turbine blade.

That looks pretty fair to me.

I learned to fly light aircraft in the 1970s and I remember being told about wake turbulence from airliners, which has been strong enough in some cases to flip an aircraft like a Cessna 150 upside down or into a spin.

What Are The CAA’s Rules For Flying Near Wind Turbines?

Google AI replied.

The primary CAA rule for flying near wind turbines is related to their visibility and safety, focusing on lighting requirements and potential hazards like turbulence. Structures 150 meters or higher require medium-intensity red lights. Pilots must avoid dazzling lights with their own, and wind turbine developers must assess and mitigate risks such as turbulence, radar interference, and impact on Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs).

That looks like what I would have expected.

Conclusion

I have tried not to be selective with my evidence, but if you are there are reasons that could be used to ban wind turbines.

I am also happy to add any other questions.

 

September 13, 2025 - Posted by | Energy, Environment | , , , , , , , , ,

4 Comments »

  1. Trump and his right wing friends aren’t interested in wind or solar power as there is no money in them for his billionaire friends. Coal and oil on the other hand make mega bucks for already filthy rich people. To hell with the environment 💲💲💲💲💲💲💲

    Comment by Maurice Reed | September 13, 2025 | Reply

    • On the other hand, it does seem that some big players are unhappy at the cancellation of Revolution Wind

      Comment by AnonW | September 13, 2025 | Reply

  2. I asked Google Gemini if Trump personally benefits is any way for his support of fossil fuels over renewables. This was the response:

    While a direct link showing Donald Trump personally profiting from specific fossil fuel policies is not publicly available, there are significant indications of a transactional relationship between his political support and the financial interests of the fossil fuel industry.

    • Fundraising and Policy Promises: During his campaign, Donald Trump reportedly held a dinner with oil executives and made a direct proposal: he asked them to raise $1 billion for his campaign, promising in return that he would immediately reverse environmental regulations and approve new projects. While the industry did not meet the $1 billion target, it contributed hundreds of millions of dollars to his campaign and related PACs, becoming a significant source of funding.
    • Benefits to Key Donors: After his election, policies have been enacted that directly benefit major fossil fuel donors. For example, a spending bill signed into law includes provisions that expand tax credits for carbon capture, a technology that companies like Occidental Petroleum—whose CEO, Vicki Hollub, personally lobbied Trump—have invested in. These changes are seen as a significant financial boon for the companies involved. The industry is also poised to benefit from new incentives and regulatory rollbacks that support energy-intensive operations like data centers, with companies like Energy Transfer—whose chair, Kelcy Warren, was a major Trump donor—already seeing increased requests for fossil gas to power these new facilities.
    • Broader Industry Benefits: Beyond individual companies, the fossil fuel industry as a whole is receiving substantial financial benefits from the current administration’s policies. These include billions of dollars in new tax breaks, a fund to subsidize oil, gas, and coal developments, and the extension of bonus depreciation rules that allow companies to write off the full costs of drilling rigs in a single year. These policies, which cost taxpayers tens of billions of dollars, are seen as a reward for the industry’s political support.
    • Indirect Personal Gain: While Trump’s personal investments are not always transparent, the close relationship between his political actions and the financial gains of his key donors creates an environment where there is a strong appearance of a transactional quid pro quo. His personal wealth is also tied to real estate and business ventures that could benefit from a strong economy, which his “drill, baby, drill” policies are intended to promote.

    Comment by HW | September 14, 2025 | Reply

  3. Thanks for that! Some politicians are going to accuse AI of writing fake news.

    Comment by AnonW | September 14, 2025 | Reply


Leave a reply to HW Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.