Will There Be An Eight-Month Closure On The Gospel Oak To Barking Line?
This has been stated in several articles on the Internet, but I’ll use this article from London 24 entitled Barking to Gospel Oak Overground line “to close for EIGHT months this year”. This is said.
A closure is necessary so the diesel stock can be replaced with electric trains and to increase capacity on the hugely-overcrowded route.
A £60m contract was awarded to J. Murphy and Sons to electrify the line in September last year but there has been no announcement from the Department of Transport, Network Rail or TfL.
London24 understands negotiations have been ongoing between the organisations over the length and nature of the closure while electrification takes place.
Shutting it will cause mayhem for thousands of passengers who will have to find alternative routes, which will often take longer and be more expensive.
I have also heard from a reliable source that there will be an eight month closure and the Gospel Oak to Barking Line (GOBlin) will open with new trains.
I feel that Murphys are electrifying the line in a novel way and I wrote about it in Are We Seeing A New Approach To Electrification On The Gospel Oak To Barking Line?
I have no specific or private information, but only what I have read in the media or seen with my own eyes.
I will of course be using my own experience of many years of supporting and observing large projects.
What Would Be An Acceptable Closure?
In Summer 2015. the Victoria Line was closed for two months, to replace a cross-over at Walthamstow Central. This was just about acceptable to the locals, but the alternative routes and Rail Replacement Buses coped.
At the right time of the year, I suspect that the residents of North London could endure a closure of perhaps 3-4 months. But of course, they’d prefer it, if there wasn’t any closures, except for odd days at weekends.
At least there are alternative routes.
- The upgraded Victoria Line can help between Walthamstow and Upper Holloway, with assistance from buses.
- After the 17th April, there would appear to be no North London Line closures.
- The Victoria Line to Highbury and Islington can partly replace going to Gospel Oak for the North London Line.
- There are a couple of out of station interchanges.
Freight trains can be routed via the North London Line.
How Much Work Can Be Done?
The key to doing anything, is the number of hours that work can be done and the amount of resources that can be used.
This is the current list of closures on the GOBlin.
- Sun 31 Jan 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sun 07 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 14 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 21 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 28 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 06 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 20 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 27 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 03 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 10 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 16 to Sun 17 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 23 to Sun 24 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 30 Apr to Mon 02 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 07 to Sun 08 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 14 to Sun 15 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 21 to Sun 22 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 28 to Tue 31 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 04 to Sun 05 Jun 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 11 to Sun 12 Jun 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 18 to Sun 19 Jun 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 25 to Sun 26 Jun 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 02 to Sun 03 Jul 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 09 to Sun 10 Jul 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 16 to Sun 17 Jul 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 23 to Sun 24 Jul 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
No long closure seems to have been announced yet!
Note the following.
- There doesn’t appear to be any working day closures, so it would appear that Transport for London/Network Rail are looking after the passengers! And the revenue!
- I should also say, that an engineer working on an unrelated station project in London, said that it was typical to work on a twenty-four hour basis. Thus a weekend closure could give over fifty continuous hours for working.
- There are two longer closures in May at the Bank Holidays, so what is planned for these weekends?
- None of the work is in tunnels!
- The line could be blockaded at night to allow work to continue all through the night.
- Important freight could use the North London Line.
- The line connects a string of roads together, where there are various facilities like cafes and shops. I bet if someone is peckish at two in the morning, they can get a sandwich.
- I would suspect, that they will apply some of the lessons learned at Dawlish.
- J Murphy and Sons have a reputation for using lots of sub-contractors.
- A lot of the work is taking place close to Murphy’s depot!
- They can get the lights out and use the summer months to great advantage.
- Days can be used to get everything ready for the following night’s work.
- The extension of the line to Barking Riverside can be done later after the GOBlin has reopened.
I think that someone is doing a universe-class project management job and has realised that by clever working practices and selected weekend and overnight closures, there could be masses of time and resources available for the job.
Could this explain, that when the eight month closure is discussed, Mike Stubbs from London Overground is always quoted as saying no final decision has been made?
Perhaps every day, project managers are telling him a smaller and less disruptive figure.
Have the freight companies been told, that the line will be closed to them for eight months, so they can plan accordingly? It would be very sensible and I suspect they have already made alternative arrangements.
I think that Murphy’s orange army will get an amazing amount of actual work done before the end of 2016.
If the electrification gets delivered on time and budget, a great number of men and women, will be telling their grandchildren exaggerated tales about how they rebuilt London’s railways!
Trains
One problem is the Class 710 trains, as they can’t be delivered until 2018, so I suspect that opening after the eight month closure with new trains, should be opening with four-car electric trains.
In a section in my related post entitled Where Are The Trains?, I said this.
I believe that the Class 387 trains, are the only acceptable and available trains, that will be available to open the service after an eight-month blockade.
Nothing else except some old trains from British Rail’s dustbin are available.
The Class 387 trains will be available as Bombardier have sorted the production. I wrote about this in Class 387 Trains On Track
Political Considerations
In May we have the London Mayoral Election and if there is an eight-month blockade of the GOBlin, I don’t think it would be to Zac Goldsmith’s advantage.
But supposing by mid-April a plan has been published and evidence of masts and wires is creeping along between Gospel Oak and Barking!
So why has the eight months closure been so widely publicised?
I’m no spin-doctor, but wouldn’t it be better to give people low expectations and then say that there’ll be new electric trains at the end of the year.
A couple of months ago, Modern Railways published an editorial saying Network Rail needed a win to restore their image in the eyes of the general public.
Could this be their strategy to go for a win?
If it fails, it will be an own goal of horrendous proportions.
Conclusions
I am led to the following conclusions.
- Between now and December 2016, there is a very large number of man-hours available to electrify the GOBlin.
- The line can be blockaded every night and work could continue under lights
- Eight four-car Class 387 trains could be borrowed to start the electric service.
- Zac Goldsmith, Boris Johnson, Network Rail and Peter Hendy, and J. Murphy and Sons have a lot to gain if this line is electrified on time and on budget.
I have a feeling that if we don’t get biblical rain, plague and pestilence, London is in for a surprise.
January 28, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Gospel Oak And Barking Line, London Mayor, Project Management, Trains | 1 Comment
Central Masts At West Ham Station
West Ham station has been upgraded over the last couple of decades. Wikipedia says this.
In 1999 platforms were re-established on the line from Fenchurch Street, now operated by c2c.
So it would appear, that the following pictures showing the overhead electrification, which dates from around 1999.
Almost uniquely for the UK rail network, the masts are in the mid-point of the two lines, with the wires cantilevered on either side.
Flimsy they are not! They have certainly been designed to survive a direct impact from a runaway Class 66 locomotive pulling several hundred tonnes of imported Chinese steel.
But as I said, the central masts probably date from 1999, so I suspect if similar structures were to be used in the electrification of the Gospel Oak to Barking Line, they would be designed to look better and probably be stronger and lighter too! I used to know a lot about using structural steel, and remember an expert telling me, that lighter structures are sometimes actually stronger.
Look at this picture from Upper Holloway station.
It would appear that Murphys have piled around the crossing by the signal box to put a traditional portal frame across the railway to support the overhead wires. Some fifty metres behind me is a bridge that is being rebuilt over the railway.
So could the wires be installed through the station, by supporting them on the frame by the signal box, the bridge and several central masts, designed to fit between the tracks in the station area.
After seeing what was done in 1999 at West Ham station, I believe that an expert structural engineer could design a central mast to support electrification in the challenging conditions of Upper Holloway station and all the other difficult locations on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line.
There are advantages to this method.
- All of the platforms are untouched by electrification works.
- The number of piles to be driven at the side of the railway is reduced. This type of piling has caused problems in the past.
- Piles are positioned in the firm track-bed between the rails.
- Some piles will be positioned on viaducts. I suspect, that as the viaducts of the line seem sound, this would not be a very difficult problem.
- All work can probably be done by using a crane on the railway.
It does seem to me, that central masts could make the electrification easier.
January 28, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Engineering, Gospel Oak And Barking Line | 1 Comment
Are We Seeing A New Approach To Electrification On The Gospel Oak To Barking Line?
Over the years, I’ve followed several electrification schemes starting with the Lea Valley Lines through Southbury in the 1960s.
The electrification of the Gospel Oak To Barking Line (GOBlin), is not a particularly large or important one, in the overall scheme of things, but after the well-publicised problems of the electrification of the Great Western Main Line and the Trans-Pennine routes, Network Rail don’t want another train-load of bad publicity.
Take a ride down the line and you see the following.
- A collection of quite run-down stations, only a few of which are step-free. And some of those have extensive and somewhat tortuous ramps.
- The western end of the line from South Tottenham station sits in the middle of a wide track bed, with a few convenient metres of grass and scrub on each side of the line.
- The eastern end of the line from Leyton Midland Road station is on a viaduct, with the platforms either side of the track.
- Several of the station p[platforms are not long enough, but there are often disused sections that can be brought back into use.
- I don’t think there is any points or crossings between West of Blackhorse Road and East of Wanstead Park stations, which is all the viaduct section of the line.
- The line terminates in two bay platforms at Gospel Oak and Barking stations.
I suspect a few objectives have been laid down for the design and installation of the electrification and updating of the stations.
- Simple and affordable.
- Well-proven techniques.
- Installation in a minimum time, with as little disruption as possible.
- Ability to handle six-car trains after simple upgrades. This was not built-in to the North London and East London Lines
- As step-free as possible.
The following sections show what has been achieved so far and some of the problems and helpful factors of the electrification.
IPEMU
I like the IPEMU or Independently Powered Electric Multiple Unit and feel that it has a place in many electrification schemes.
We have to remember that the Class 710 trains destined for the GOBlin can be fitted with an IPEMU-capability.
So how could an IPEMU help in making the GOBlin an electric railway?
- The extension to Barking Riverside is only a few kilometres and could be run totally by IPEMUs charging on the rest of the line. Imagine the kudos, that would give the development at Riverside and the electrification costs it will save.
- During the construction phase, IPEMUs could provide a service from an electrified line over a section, where the wires were still being erected.
Whether we believe it or not, the IPEMU is coming and it’s just whether it will make its debut on the GOBlin.
Where Are The Trains?
One rumour from a reputable source (NC!), says that the line will be closed from June or July 2016 for eight months, whilst electrification is completed on the line and testing takes place. It will then open (Feb/Mar 2017?) with a full electric service.
If you look at Bombardier’s production schedule, the Class 710 trains destined for the GOBlin will not enter service until 2018.
So bang goes the reason for the eight-month suspension of service, as passengers won’t accept all that pain for no gain.
Perhaps, there could be some Class 315, Class 317, Class 321 or even some of the very ugly Class 319 trains available. After all only eight four-car units are required!
But I don’t think anybody would be pleased if a new flagship service was to be started after an eight-month closure, with the contents of British Rail’s dustbin.
It is often said, that someone else’s troubles is somebody else’s gain and the problems on the Great Western electrification, means that there could be some almost-new Class 387 trains available.
It should not be forgotten, that a Class 379 train, was used as the demonstrator in the IPEMU trial in Essex, and 379s are very much cousins of 387s.
I believe that the Class 387 trains, are the only acceptable and available trains, that will be available to open the service after an eight-month blockade.
Power Supplies
Often supplying power to the overhead wires is an expensive business, with the need for massive transformers and connection to the electricity supply.
The GOBlin has good connections to electrified lines and short sections that are already electrified.
- A connection to the North London Line at Gospel Oak
- A short electrified section at South Tottenham.
- A connection to the Great Eastern Main Line at Woodgrange Park.
- A short electrified section between Woodgrage Park and Barking.
So getting the power is one problem, that won’t challenge the engineers.
The Pattern Of The Piles
Look at any overhead electrified line in the UK and every fifty metres or generally less, you’ll see a masts and/or a portal frame to support the overhead wires, which is supported from both sides of the track. This Google Map shows Woodgrange Park station on the GOBlin.
Note the frames supporting the wires everywhere, in the station, on the disused sections of the platforms and on the way to Barking,which is to the East (right).
If you look at the piles that have been put in to support the masts for the overhead wires on the western end of the GOBlin, they show a totally different pattern to that which I would expect. Here’s a few pictures.
My observations lead me to define the pattern of piles as follows.
- Piles are paired, with one on each side, as expected.
- There are none in stations.
- There isn’t even any tell-tale paint, to indicate where the masts will go in the stations.
- Piles seem to stop thirty metres or so before stations and overbridges.
Murphys were so keen to get the piling started, they were thumping away on Christmas night, so given the days and nights available since them, there doesn’t seem to be too many piles in the ground.
So short of using skyhooks or drones, or perhaps calling on the services of someone like Jasper Maskelyne, what is going to happen?
In my view, there is only one possible solution and that is to put central masts between the two tracks.
I also suspect that some of the substantial road bridges over the GOBlin, will be used to support the overhead wires, as I’m sure that the engineers have a solution for that method of fixing. This picture shows an ancient fixing, under the arch at Stoke Newington station.
I’m sure the modern product, is more elegant! And less corroded.
Central Masts
Normally in the UK, the overhead wires are supported from the sides of the track. But look at this picture from the Sheffield Supertram.
Note how the overhead wires are supported from a central mast between the tracks.
Furrer + Frey, who are a well-respected Swiss manufacturer of equipment for railway electrification and a big supplier to Network Rail, have a wide range of methods shown in this page. One method is to use a central mast to support wires on both sides over the two tracks.
I feel that given the challenging constraints and demanding time-scale of electrifying the GOBlin, that central masts could help considerably.
They would need to be sturdy, but if you analyse the stresses in a typical central mast, the wires on both sides balance each other. It’s like a milkmaid carrying two buckets.
There may be other advantages in the installation of central masts, as the work will probably be done on a flat surface, using a rail mounted crane, whereas installing a portal frame over the railway may need scaffolding to be erected.
The latter method might also mean closing the businesses in the many arches under the line for the duration of the work.
The Upper Holloway Bridge
One of the problems of the work, is that in the middle of all this electrification, the bridge at Upper Holloway station is being replaced with the electrification work going on at the same time.
According to this document from TfL, the bridge deck is due to be replaced over Christmas 2016 and the project will be completed by the end of 2017.
Surely, this blows the time-scale of the whole project, as until the bridge is finished, surely electrification can’t proceed!
Or does it?
If the overhead wires through the station are supported centrally between the tracks, with the assistance of two strong portal frames outside the station/bridge area, it might be possible to change the bridge deck, using some of innovative techniques that were used at York, which I wrote about in Dancing With Cranes And A Bridge With Help From Lego.
This Google Map shows the station/bridge area.
Note that there is more space along the railway, than on the main road.
I think we need a new word to describe the nature of replacing this bridge, in just a few days over Christmas.
I suspect the bridge deck has been designed as a series of components, that are small enough to transport into the area, either by road or train, and then bolt them together like Meccano. It could be the most exciting live television of Christmas 2016.
To sum up, I believe that engineers have found a solution to electrify the line before the bridge deck is replaced.
I went to the station today and had a chat with an engineer.
He told me, that the bridge will be replaced bit-by-bit and indicated that there will be no big closure.
So could Transport for London have had a change of heart and decided to fit a new bridge over the gap, that will allow the wires to be put up at the same time, with the bridge assembled from a kit of smaller more manageable pieces?
The next few months will give an answer.
Whilst I was at Upper Holloway station, I took this picture, which shows the layout of lines to the West of the station.
Note.
- There is only one pile in the picture and it is between the stacked-Portakabin signal box and the grey cabinet about ten metres further on, on the left.
- There are no piles or paint markings in the station area.
- There is plenty of space to extend the platforms, if that should be required.
- The crossing, which will need to be fully electrified, allows freight trains to access the Midland Main Line.
This all leads me to believe, that if overhead wires are going through this station, then they might well be supported on central masts.
Obviously, portal frames could still be attached to the platforms, but there is a lot of work going on to add two nice waiting rooms to the station. Surely, good project management would put up the masts and frames first!
Obviously, the wires can also be supported on the bridge, which was about thirty metres behind me, when I took the picture.
So you would have a solid road bridge at one end of the station and a very sturdy portal frame over the crossing by the signal box at the other to support the catenary, with some help from a couple of central masts in the station area.
Harringay Green Lanes Station
Harringay Green Lanes station is the nearest station on the line to my house, and to get there I just get a 141 bus direct too the station.
These pictures show the station.
It should be said, that the station sits in the middle of an area, that Harringey Council want to redevelop and that this will involve a new station. I wrote about stations in the area in The Piccadilly And Victoria Lines, Manor House Station And Harringay Green Lanes Station.
You can understand why it needs a rebuild.
Typical portal frames to support the overhead wires would either have to reach from outside the platforms or be mounted on the platforms themselves. In the case of the former, there are extensive ramps and staircases in the way and in the case of the second, the platforms may be able to support a lot of passengers, but would they need substantial rebuilding to bear the weight of the portal frames?
Incidentally, there has been some piling to both the east and west of the station, so perhaps they’ll be two strong frames about twenty to thirty metres from the platforms? Obviously, to future-proof the station, they would be far-enough away to allow any possible platform extensions.
Between the platforms the wires could be supported on central masts. The pictures show, that the space between the tracks is probably wide enough for the installation of central masts.
Traditional electrification might be difficult or even impossible, but I’m sure there are clever engineers, who can get round the problems of stations like Harringay Green Lanes.
Leytonstone High Road Station
Leytonstone High Road station is typical of the viaduct-mounted stations towards the eastern end of the line. Leyton High Road and Wanstead Park are similar.
These pictures show the station, the viaduct to the east of the station and a nearby bridge.
Note the following.
- The unrestored platforms, that could be brought back into use for longer trains.
- The industrial units under the station.
- The generous width between the platforms.
- No sign of any electrification works or even markings on the platforms.
I believe that these stations and the viaduct between them, could be electrified using central masts to support the overhead wires.
Arches, such as used to hold up the viaduct and house the industrial units are some of the strongest forms around. Look at any medieval cathedral or castle!
These arches may have been built by the Victorians, but you don’t hear many stories of sixty-eight tonne Class 66 locomotives and dozens of freight wagons and containers falling through.
Obviously, the masts would be properly anchored into the arches.
Could the viaduct section of the line be electrified using central masts from a company like Furrer + Frey?
Conclusion
Someone has got a very firm grip on this project and the finish date is very much up for grabs.
But it does seem, that they could be using the space between the tracks to support the overhead wires.
I also think that there could be a well-respected Swiss company somewhere in there rolling around.
Have they looked at Network Rail’s problems and applied their expertise of running electric trains in some of the most difficult terrain in Europe?
January 26, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Furrer + Frey, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, Trains | 1 Comment
Passengers On The GOBlin
I wonder if it is worth looking at the numbers of passengers using the Gospel Oak to Barking Line by station in 2014/15.
- Woodgrange Park – 751,000
- Wanstead Park – 846,000
- Leytonstone High Road – 1,002,000
- Leyton Midland Road – 1,355,000
- Walthamstow Queen’s Road – 541,000
- Blackhorse Road – 1,102,000
- South Tottenham – 1,047,000
- Harringay Green Lanes – 1,293,000
- Crouch Hill – 832,000
- Upper Holloway – 1,166.000
Compare these with similar stations on the North London Line.
- Kentish Town West – 1,983,000
- Caledonian Road and Barnsbury – 1,595,000
- Dalston Kingsland – 6,289,000
- Homerton – 5,240,000
- Hackney Wick – 1,674,000
The big difference in this rather crude analysis is that passenger figures on the higher-frequency electrified line are generally higher.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a narrowing of the gap, when the two-car Class 172 trains are replaced with four-car Class 710 trains.
The other difference, is that whereas the use of various stations on the North London Line varies between stations, usage on the GOBlin is much more constant.
Without seeing a detailed analysis from Transport for London, I do wonder if passengers on the GOBlin use it for much shorter distances or to travel to places where they can get a bus or another train to their ultimate destination.
The reason, I’m mulling this over, is that with the stories about line closure for up to eight months, as I talked about in A Story And A Rumour About The Gospel Oak To Barking Line.
If there was a station on the line with very heavy usage, then it would make a long closure difficult.
In fact most of the stations on the GOBlin have an alternative of another station or lots of buses.
- Barking – District/Metropolitan Line and c2c
- Woodgrange Park – OSI to Manor Park and buses
- Wanstead Park – OSI to Forest Gate and buses
- Leytonstone High Street – OSI to Leytonstone and buses
- Leyton Midland Road – Buses only
- Walthamstow Queen’s Road – OSI to Walthamstow Central
- Blackhorse Road – Victoria Line
- South Tottenham – OSI to Seven Sisters and buses
- Harringay Green Lanes – OSI to Harringay , Walk to Manor House and buses
- Crouch Hill – Walk to Finsbury Park and Archway and buses
- Upper Holloway – OSI to Archway and buses
- Gospel Oak – North London Line
I have a feeling that closing the line completely and running a Rail Replacement Bus service might not be the great inconvenience, it would be on some other lines.
These recent upgrades and other factors will help in any long closure.
- The new crossing and higher frequency on the Victoria Line.
- The signalling improvements to the Northern Line.
- The higher-capacity S stock trains on the District and Metropolitan Lines will take the pressure off at Barking.
- The recently improved interchange at Whitechapel will make journeys between Barking and Gospel Oak easier.
- The opening of Lea Bridge station in Spring 2016.
- The North London Line is now fully-equipped with five-car trains.
- The improved service on the Shenfield Metro through Forest Gate.
Hopefully, if the line is closed, it will not be the usual crowded buses stuck in traffic.
When I first saw the story in London 24, which is entitled Barking to Gospel Oak Overground line “to close for EIGHT months this year”, I thought it was bad, but then other sites had predicted worse a year or so ago.
I wonder if this story is the worst that will happen and that someone is getting the bad news in first.
After all, you wouldn’t want to announce a long closure of an important rail link in North London just before the election of a new Mayor. But if say you announced a definite plan in April, which said there would be a three month closure in the summer months to deal with something important and there was evidence of wires all around, North London would grit its collective teeth and grin and bare it.
As I believe my brief analysis shows, closing the line is not the complete disaster, that closing some lines would be.
January 24, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line | 2 Comments
A Trip To Barking
In A Story And A Rumour About The Gospel Oak To Barking Line, I reported on a rumour that an LO staffer had said that the electrification will be complete by June.
I think this is impossible, as according to this document on the TfL web site, the bridge at Upper Holloway station will only be completed before the end of 2017. I don’t think I’m alone in thinking that the bridge must be completed before the electrification.
Surely,if the electrification is to be completed by June, then there will be evidence of construction all along the line.
Today, I went to Barking station and had a look around.
- The GOBlin terminates in Platform 1 at Barking station and there is no evidence of any construction there.
- There was no evidence of piling between Barking station and the short length of electrification between Barking and Woodgrange Park station.
- There was also no evidence of any work tro create supports for the catenary on the elevated section of the line between Woodgrange Park and Leyton Midland Road stations.
On a quick look too, there didn’t appear to be any construction cabins, that would be normal for such an undertaking, as electrifyimg a dozen miles of railway..
I then had a think about the objectives of all the work on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line.
- Replace the two car Class 172 diesel multiple units with four-car Class 710 electric multiple units.
- Allow freight trains to be hauled by electric locomotives.
- Extend the line to Barking Riverside.
This map from carto.metro.free.fr shows the lines at Barking station.
Note the following.
- The GOBlin (orange) terminates in the bay platform 1, on the North side of the station.
- Freight trains to and from London Gateway, Tilbury and the East, go through the two Barking Tilbury Line junctions and then access the GOBlin using a flyover and the Barking Station junction.
- Barking Riverside station is on a spur off the Tilbury Line to the South East.
So I asked myself, what electrification needs to be done to get electric-hauled freight trains off and on the GOBlin.
As c2c runs electric services in and out of Liverpool Street at certain times, I suspect that the wiring to get electric-hauled freight onto the GOBlin is already there.
So we’re left with the only electrification at Barking being platform 1 and the extension to Barking Riverside. The total length is probably under ten kilometres.
According to Bombardier, all Aventra trains like the Class 710 will have an energy storage capability.
So could we be seeing an extension to Barking Riverside like this?
- Between Barking Station junction and Barking Riverside station, the Class 710 trains run on their batteries.
- Eastbound and westbound services both use Platform 1, so the GOBlin has its own single-platform at Barking. Recently, Network Rail has built several single-platform stations.
- Platform 1 is not electrified.
- The line through Platform 1 is extended under the station to give a direct connection to Barking Riverside. This might need another flyover or some extra points and crossings.
- The branch line to Barking Riverside and the station are not electrified.
Effectively, using the IPEMU capability of the Class 710 trains, has simplified the project and reduced the length of electrification required by a large amount.
Whilst I was at Barking station, I took this picture.
Note how the conductor rail is protected by a yellow wooden shield.
Why?
Is it to protect passengers or the work-force?
January 23, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Barking Riverside, Class 710 Train, Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, IPEMU | 6 Comments
A Story And A Rumour About The Gospel Oak To Barking Line
This article on London 24, which is entitled Barking to Gospel Oak Overground line “to close for EIGHT months this year”, appeared yesterday.
The headline sums up the contents of the article well.
I have also received this comment off-line to Thoughts On The Gospel Oak To Barking Electrification.
You noted the works schedule ends 31 May. That tallies with a conversation I had with a LO staffer, who told me the electrification project should be finished by June. I don’t know whether this is true or not.
The article and comment would appear at first look to contradict each other.
I shall be keeping my eyes open and my ears pinned.
You can postulate any number of scenarios that will see four car electric trains running between Gospel Oak and Barking.
January 22, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line | 2 Comments
Platform Extensions At South Tottenham Station
The platforms at South Tottenham Station need to be lengthened for the new four-car Class 710 trains, that will run on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line from 2018.
This pictures show the lengthening is in process, at the same time as lifts are being added to the station.
This Google Map shows the station a couple of years ago.
Note that as the bridge doesn’t appear to be the blue colour it now is, I would assume this picture is from before the bridge was replaced at Christmas 2014.
You can gauge the length of the extension by the position of the rail crossing between the two tracks.
January 10, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, South Tottenham Station | Leave a comment
Thoughts On The Gospel Oak To Barking Electrification
The electrification of the Gospel Oak To Barking Line (GOBlin), is the closest I’ve been to an electrification project since the nineteen-sixties when I was travelling up and down between London and Liverpool, through the electrification on the West Coast Main Line.
Yesterday, I took a look at the start of work at Gospel Oak station. Thinking about what I saw, it strikes me that everything is much better organised than it has been in some places in the past.
Perhaps, they’re doing their project management in a lot better way.
Signalling
As an illustration of project performance, I have read that not knowing where signalling cables were buried, was a big problem on the electrification of the Great Western Railway. So out of curiosity, I searched the Internet for any reports about the state of the signalling on the GOBlin.
I found this web page on the Sweett Group web site, which is entitled Gospel Oak To Barking Electrification. This was a brief summary of the work they did.
Sweett Group was engaged by TfL to review and validate the Grip 3 estimate prepared by Network Rail in order to assist TfL in the determination of their funding contribution.
Reading the whole of the report, leads me to the conclusion that TfL wanted to make sure, that the only surprises they get on this project, will be positive ones.
As to signalling, very little is said, except this.
In addition, modifications to existing signalling had to be carried out in order to overcome conflicts with signal sighting caused by OLE support structures and to accommodate the introduction of longer freight trains.
So in answer to my original question on signalling, it looks like most of it is in good order.
Line Closures
Will planned closures of the line tell us anything? This web page from TfL details all their line closures for the next six months.
Those specific to the GOBlin are.
- Sun 10 Jan 16 – South Tottenham to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 17 Jan 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 24 Jan 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sun 31 Jan 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sun 07 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 14 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 21 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 28 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 06 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 20 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 27 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 03 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking until 12:00
- Sun 10 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 16 to Sun 17 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 23 to Sun 24 Apr 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 30 Apr to Mon 02 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 07 to Sun 08 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 14 to Sun 15 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 21 to Sun 22 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
- Sat 28 to Tue 31 May 16 – Gospel Oak to Barking
There are also a few closures of the North London Line, that start at Gospel Oak.
- Fri 01 Jan to Sun 03 Jan 16 – Gospel Oak to Stratford from 22:00
- Sun 21 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Stratford
- Sun 28 Feb 16 – Gospel Oak to Stratford
- Sun 06 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Stratford
- Sun 20 Mar 16 – Gospel Oak to Stratford
The first is an interesting one, as it is this weekend, when the contractors are known to be piling for overhead wires, late into the night.
On all the other four Sundays, the GOBlin is closed all or part of the day.
Surely, you wouldn’t close both routes across North London, unless you wanted to work on both at the same time!
Could the contractors be wiring up Gospel Oak Junction and Platform 3 at Gospel Oak station?
These are my overall comments.
- Monday to Friday passengers won’t have to suffer many replacement bus services.
- Something is planned for the Spring Bank Holiday Weekend
- As there is no closures scheduled in June, it looks like May 31st will mark a natural break in the project.
- Someone has been doing some very good project management.
It will be fascinating to take a look on Mondays for the next few months, to see what has been completed.
Space To Work
I wonder if anybody has ever done any research on the performance of the amount of space available to building projects.
What surprised me yesterday, as my train trundled between Harringay Green Lanes and Gospel Oak stations, was how much space was available and it had all been cleared of vegetation.
I hope this is a sign that they mean to carry on as they’ve started.
Having looked at many large projects in the actuality, I strongly believe that a project with lots of space, that is kept tidy, is more likely to be delivered on time and on budget.
Today, I also followed the line on a Google Map and virtually all the way from Gospel Oak station to Leyton Midland Road station, there are green verges, several metres deep on both sides of the tracks.
Look at this section of the line from Crouch Hill to South Tottenham stations.
Note all the green space, especially where the line crosses the East Coast Main Line, where a chord is to be electrified.
This space must contribute to a successful project.
Obviously towards the east, where the line is on a Victorian embankment is going to be more challenging.
Murphy’s Contract
A lot more detail on the GOBlin electrification is given in this article in Rail Technology Magazine, which is entitled J Murphy & Sons to carry out electrification of Gospel Oak-Barking route. This is said.
J Murphy & Sons Limited will carry out electrification works along the 12-mile line from Gospel Oak to Barking on the Anglia route, after winning the £56.9m contract from Network Rail.
The contract, which was awarded three months later than originally expected, will allow work to start on the ‘Goblin’ project in October.
In some ways, I was surprised, the contract was awarded to Murphy, as I didn’t think they were noted for doing rail electrification. I know them as a well-respected London contractor, who have been around since my childhood. Their premises are actually close to the line, which must help.
I know it said that the project would start in October and it just made a start in 2015, but at least it’s got going. The article says this about the project timeline.
The electrification contract runs until April 2017 but, if carried out according to the planned timeline, “major on-site works” will commence in June 2016 with services ready to operate a year later. Network Rail’s official classification of the works is for GRIP stages 4-8: ‘Main Works – Civils, Structure, Building, Track, & Bonding’.
This gives the intriguing prospect, that the electrification could take twelve months. This question has to be asked – Have major on-site works already started?
Even if they haven’t, judging by the noise at Gospel Oak something has started and that completion date of April 2017, is starting to look very feasible and just in time for the May 2017 timetable change.
Stations
Not all stations can accept the new four-car Class 710 trains or are to the standard passengers expect these days.
- Gospel Oak – Disabled access, lifts, coffee stall – Platform needs extending.
- Upper Holloway – Disabled access, ramps – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections – Road bridge by station is being replaced by the end of 2017.
- Crouch Hill – Stairs-only access – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections
- Harringay Green Lanes – Disabled access, ramps – Platforms need extending
- South Tottenham – Disabled access, lifts – Platform needs extending.
- Blackhorse Road – Stairs-only access – Disabled access in planning – Platforms need extending
- Walthamstow Queen’s Road – Disabled access, ramps – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections
- Leyton Midland Road – Stairs-only access – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections.
- Leytonstone High Road – Stairs-only access – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections.
- Wanstead Park – Stairs-only access – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections.
- Woodgrange Park – Stairs-only access – Platforms need extending by reopening closed sections.
- Barking – Disabled access, lift
So of the twelve stations on the line seven need platforms to be extended by reopening closed section, four need new extensions and six need improvements to the disabled access.
It will be interesting to see what is completed other than the necessary platform extensions, before the electric trains run.
Electrification
The Rail Technology Magazine article also details the scope of the electrification.
In addition to wiring from Gospel Oak to Barking and both the terminal platforms, the following will be electrified.
- Carlton Road Junction to Junction Road Junction – Connects to the Midland Main Line
- Upper Holloway Reception Line
- Harringay Park Junction to Harringay Junction – Connects to the East Coast Main Line
Note that there is no mention of the extension of the line to Barking Riverside.
Electrification work has obviously started at the easier Gospel Oak end of the line, so I think we can assume that Murphy and a lot of sub-contractors are pulling out all the stops to get this job finished on time.
One problem they don’t have is getting power to the new electrification, as it connects to several electrified lines.
There is also only twelve miles to electrify.
I think we could well be seeing, the electrification completed and the platforms lengthened, before the Class 710 trains are delivered.
Class 710 Trains
The Class 710 Trains ordered for the line are unlikely to arrive before May 2018. But I suspect that TfL will find something to run services.
They could even hire some of Porterbrook’s speculative build of Class 387 trains, or perhaps borrow some of the redundant and very ugly Class 319 trains.
After all, they only need eight trains of four-cars each.
Extension To Barking Riverside
It looks like, that this will be done, after the main project has been completed.
Conclusion
It looks like the following will happen.
- Due to some rather excellent project management, that finally the Gospel Oak to Barking Line will be electrified and capable of running four-car electric trains.
- It’s not the biggest of projects, that could be fairly straightforward.
- The completion of the electrification project could be as early as April 2017.
- The trains, unless they rustle up some from elsewhere, will probably be delivered later.
- There will be little if any interruption to the important Monday to Friday service of the line during electrification.
- More freight trains will be hauled by electric locomotives in the near future.
I can’t see anybody complaining about all that!
January 1, 2016 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, Project Management | 3 Comments
Electrification Work Starts At Gospel Oak Station
My Google Alert on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line picked up this article from the Camden New Journal, which is entitled Noisy railway work disturbs Gospel Oak residents on Christmas Day.
So I went to have a look at Gospel Oak station.
Note the piles in the ground covered by a piece of wood.
That was what all the noise was about!
This Google Map shows the station.
Note that there is a two-car Class 172 train in the station.
From this image, it would appear that the platforms will have to be lengthened for the four-car Class 710 trains.
Giving the map a close scrutiny, I wonder if they ever wanted to install a Platform 4 for future eastbound services on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line, if it would be possible.
I don’t think London Overground have any plans to do this, but services from the GOBlin past Gospel Oak have been suggested in the past.
Note the
December 31, 2015 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Class 710 Train, Electrification, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, Gospel Oak Station | 1 Comment
There’s A Lot Happening Around Tilbury And Gravesend
Look at this Google Map of the Thames around Tilbury and Gravesend.
The North (Tilbury) Bank
Note the following.
- The Port of Tilbury with the Container Port on the west side.
- Tilbury Town station on the Tilbury Loop, where the trains between Fenchurch Street and Southend are run by c2c.
- Grays station is the next to the west and East Tilbury station is the next to the east.
- Not far to the west of Grays is the Lakeside Shopping Centre served by Chafford Hudred Lakeside station.
- On the river, at the eastern end of the port is the London Cruise Terminal, where there appears to be a ship in dock.
- There used to be a station called Tilbury Riverside by the river, which had a service to Upminster via Grays
- To the east of the port is Tilbury Fort, which is in the care of English Heritage.
- Go a few miles further east and there is the massive port and logistics development of London Gateway.
Interspersed between the developments is the usual estuarine mix of creeks, salt-flats, a couple of nature reserves and lots of wildlife.
It may not be everybody’s idea of a place to have a good time, but there is a lot going on.
Developments On The North Bank
Several factors will drive developments in the area.
- London needs housing and is already developing large numbers of houses and flats at Barking Riverside, which is a few miles to the East.
- Will there be more housing developments along the river?
- Crossrail will arrive in the next few years and will pass a few miles away to the North, through Romford station.
- London Gateway might want their staff to come and go by train or light rail.
- There is a need for another Thames crossing and how does a possible Lower Thames Crossing, which could cross Thames by East Tilbury, fit into the mix?
Many would argue that there should be better public transport along the north bank of the river.
The Gravesend (South) Bank
Note the following.
- The Swanscombe Peninsular in the top left corner of the map.
- Swanscombe and Northfleet stations on the North Kent Line, which runs to the North of Ebbsfleet International station.
- According to Wikipedia, the walking routes between Northfleet and Ebbsfleet International stations are not the best.
- Gravesend station is in the middle of the town and the Ferry to Tilbury is within walking distance.
- Hoo Junction, which is just off the map to the East is safeguarded as the end of a possible extension to Crossrail.
In contrast to the North Bank, the South Bank seems to have much more housing and a lot less green space and industrial development.
Developments On The South Bank
Like the North Bank, there is also development on the South.
- As with the North Bank there is a lot of housing development.
- A Garden City called Ebbsfleet Valley is proposed.
- A theme park called Paramount London is being built on the Swanscombe peninsular close to Ebbsfleet International station.
- Greenhithe station, which is linked to the Bluewater Shopping Centre is just to the west of Swanscombe.
- Crossrail will arrive in 2019, a few miles to the west at Abbey Wood station.
- The possible Lower Thames Crossing, could reach Kent to the East of Gravesend.
- More Highspeed services into St. Pancras are planned to Kent and East Sussex, and the Continent.
I don’t know the Gravesend and the South Bank well, but on my walks in the last few months, it strikes me that there needs to be some public transport improvements.
Transport Improvements
Transport improvements in Tilbury, Gravesend and the surrounding area fall into three categories.
- Tilbury and the North Bank
- Gravesend and the South Bank
- Cross-River
In some ways the last is the most difficult, as other factors like a new Thames Estuary airport and a higher Thames Barrier must also be considered. The Wikipedia entry for the Lower Thames Crossing gives some options and says this about Option C.
A new road crossing connecting the M2 and M20 motorways in the south with the M25, which might be linked via a proposed new Thames flood barrier. The route from the north would pass close to South Ockendon, Orsett, Chadwell St Mary, West Tilbury, East Tilbury, across West Tilbury Marshes before it crossed the Thames just to the east of Gravesend and Thurrock. It would join the M2 in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and in the Special Landscape Area. This proposed link is also within the Kent Downs AONB and special landscape area. According to the DfT, this long route would have “considerable environmental impacts”.
It won’t be a small fight to get that option built.
I will list the possible public transport improvements in the area.
Crossrail
Crossrail is more than just a major East-West route across London.
It is effectively a four-branch railway.
- Abbey Wood – Connecting to Kent
- Heathrow
- Reading (or Paddington) – Connecting to the West Country and Wales
- Shenfield or Liverpool Street) – Connecting to East Anglia
I believe that Crossrail should be considered as a two line railway, by including the equally capable Thameslink, which connects at Farrington and adds the following major branches.
- Bedford (or St. Pancras) – Connecting to the East Midlands and Sheffield
- Brighton and Gatwick
- Peterborough (or Kings Cross) – Connecting to Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, the North East and Scotland
The major lines not connected to either Crossrail or Thameslink are the West Coast Main Line and the lines out of Waterloo and Marylebone.
Although care is being taken to create a good passenger link between the Bakerloo Line and Crossrail at Paddington.
The connectivity of the Crossrail/Thameslink system will be further improved by some smaller schemes.
- Many stations such as Bedford, Luton Airport, Romford, Shenfield and Slough might be improved to enable interchange to fast long-distance services.
- There are plans to create an interchange at a new Old Oak Common station with HS2 and the West Coast Main Line.
- Extension of Crossrail up the West Coast Main Line.
- Feeder lines like Basingstoke to Reading, Peterborough to Lincoln and the East and West Coastway will be improved.
There are two possible feeder lines in the area I am considering in this post.
- Romford To London Gateway
- Crossrail Extension to Gravesend
Whatever happens Crossrail will become important to those in Kent, who want to get to the Southern part of Essex, as it will be a walk across platforms at Whitechapel.
At present from Abbey Wood to Shenfield takes about ninety minutes with two changes, but when Crossrail opens with a ten metre level walk at Whitechapel, it could be as short as fifty-two minutes.
Don’t underestimate how Crossrail will change the lives of everybody, who, lives, works or visits.
A Romford To London Gateway Train Service
I strongly believe that a train service from Romford to the London Gateway will eventually happen.
Consider the following.
- As London Gateway develops, it is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs, which in turn will put enormous pressures on the roads.
- A full service would improve connectivity to the large Lakeside Shopping Centre.
- This could become an important feeder route to Crossrail.
- The northern part of the route is the Romford to Upminster line, which is operated by London Overground as a shuttle using a dedicated train and platforms at the ends of the line.
- London Overground is increasing services on the Romford to Upminster Line, so they must believe there is a need.
- Track and electrification for the line is complete, although there would need to be some changes at Upminster.
- c2c and London Overground are both very ambitious train operating companies.
We have evolving needs, an ease of creating the service, and ambition, which all work in favour of implementing the service.
This route map from Wikipedia shows the stations in the area.
A full service on the route could call at these stations?
- Romford – for Crossrail and some longer distance services to Chelmsford, Colchester and Ipswich.
- Emerson Park
- Upminster
- Ockendon
- Chafford Hundred Lakeside – for Lakeside Shopping Centre
- Grays
- Tilbury Town
- East Tilbury
- London Gateway
The service could also call at Tilbury Riverside, as services used to do. This would serve the London Cruise Terminal and Tilbury Fort.
I wrote Exploring Tilbury Riverside about this area.
This is one of those ideas, that should be filed under Watch This Space.
Crossrail Extension To Gravesend
I wrote Crossrail Extension To Gravesend on this and the extension brings benefits.
- It will give vastly improved connections from Central London to East Kent and East Sussex.
- It would make Crossrail an even better option than driving across the Dartford Crossing.
- It would mean that Heathrow Airport had a direct link to Continental rail services at Ebbsfleet International.
- Ebbsfleet International is one of the few stations that could be an enormous Park-and-Ride station.
- The proposed depot at Hoo could be good for both Crossrail in terms of flexibility and East Kent, in terms of employment.
I think this extension of Crossrail will happen.
Barking To The Dartford Crossing
I’m including this map, as it shows the nature of the area.
Barking is in the top left and the The Dartford Crossing is in the bottom right of the map.
Note the following.
- The east-west main road just north of the river is the A13.
- Dagenham Dock station is on this road with the Barking Riverside development below it and to the south-west.
- To the south-east of the station, there is a large amount of industry.
- The Beckton Sewage Works are on the North Bank, with Crossness on the south.
- As you get towards the Dartford Crossing, the green space is Rainham Marshes RSPB Nature Reserve, with closer to the crossing Purfleet.
It is an area for those with imagination.
The Gospel Oak To Barking Line
The Gospel Oak To Barking Line is to the west and is being extended to Barking Riverside, where tens of thousands of homes are being developed.
The Transport for London Plan for 2050, says this.
An extension of the Gospel Oak to Barking Line to Barking Riverside is currently being planned to open up development of a major new quarter with 11,500 new homes.
A potential further extension could involve crossing the river to Thamesmead and Abbey Wood, where there are major regeneration needs and major opportunities for new housing developments.
My view is that if you give Barking Riverside connections to the north, west and south, perhaps a connection to the east to Dagenham Dock station on c2c is needed as well.
The Docklands Light Railway
The original plan for the area envisaged extending the Docklands Light Railway to Dagenham Dock. Wikipedia says this.
It is unlikely to go ahead as there are plans to bring the London Overground Gospel Oak to Barking Line to Barking Riverside giving better links to Barking and East London and via Barking station to Central London. This will however cause the Docklands Light Railway to not head east and have connections to c2c rail services at Dagenham Dock, so this extension could still take place and the two services would have an interchange at Barking Riverside.
I do think that some transport planners look with disdain at the Docklands Light Railway, but generally the over a hundred million rides taken on the system every year, give another view.
With the emphasis on leisure and with green issues to the fore, I could see the system reaching the Nature Reserve at Rainham.
The Docklands Light Railway is East London’s good fairy and she has ways of surprising everybody.
The Poor Connectivity Of HS1
HS1 must be one of the worst designed railways in Europe.
Currently, HS2 is being designed and great care is being taken to ensure that there is good connectivity all along the route. These are a few examples.
- Old Oak Common station will be a hub in North West London.
- Tram routes will reach Birmingham Curzon Street station long before HS2 does.
- Birmingham Interchange will be linked to Birmingham Airport
- Trams have already reached the area of the Nottingham HS2 station at Totton.
- HS2 will call at Crewe, which is a major railway hub.
On the other hand, two of HS1’s intermediate stations have very poor connectivity.
- Stratford International only has a direct link to the Docklands Light Railway.
- Ebbsfleet International has very poor direct links to classic lines.
Neither station has a direct connection to Crossrail.
HS1 seems to been designed with very limited objectives in mind, one of which was to win the Olympics for 2012.
Crossing The River
There is no doubt that there is a need for more capacity across the lower Thames and there are several plans for a Lower Thames Crossing.
Other plans have included a combined rail and road link between Medway and Canvey Island and the latest proposal has been London’s plan for a Gospel Oak to Barking Line Extension to Abbey Wood.
It is also worth noting, that the distance between Tilbury Riverside and Gravesend is probably about the same as the distance spanned by the Emirates Air-Line at Greenwich.
Also, could modern ferries provide a better and more reliable link?
The only plan being implemented that will help get people cross the Thames at the present time, is Crossrail. It will be interesting to see how Dartford Crossing traffic changes, when Crossrail opens.
I think Crossrail could be part of quite a proportion of Cross-River traffic.
- It links with the twenty-four trains per hour North-South links of Thameslink and the East London Line.
- It links with West London and Heathrow.
- If it served Ebbsfleet International, that would become a valuable Park-and-Ride station.
- It passes right through the heart of London, as opposed to HS1 and the classic lines from the South, which terminate slightly to the North and South respectively.
- I think one of the limiting factors on people switching from car to Crossrail, may well be the availability of car parking at Crossrail stations and especially those like Abbey Wood and Shenfield.
It is a pity that HS1 was so badly designed, as if Stratford International and Ebbsfleet International stations, were both better connected, then the Highspeed services on the line would be a valuable cross-River link.
I wrote about the poor connectivity of Ebbsfleet Internation to classic lines in So Near And Yet So Far!
My personal preference for another connection would be to build a bridge between Barking Riverside and Thamesmead, to take the Gospel Oak to Barking Line over rather than under the Thames, if this was possible. I would use tram-trains on the railway, that if required did a walkabout around the estates as trams on both sides of the river. The bridge would also be open to cyclists and pedestrians.
Properly designed, the bridge could be a visitor attraction in its own right!
Will Floods And Europe Solve The Problem?
If Crossrail/Thameslink is one elephant in the room, then flood protection for London and Europe are the others!
This is a Google Map of the Thames Estuary from Tilbury and Gravesend in the West to Southend in the East.
As I write this piece, the North West of England is suffering the ravages of Hurricane Desmond. Weather seems to be getting more extreme and the North Sea hasn’t had a major disaster since the North Sea Flood of 1953. This is from Wikipedia.
A combination of a high spring tide and a severe European windstorm over the North Sea caused a storm tide; the combination of wind, high tide, and low pressure led to a water level of more than 5.6 metres (18.4 ft) above mean sea level in some locations. The flood and waves overwhelmed sea defences and caused extensive flooding. The Netherlands, a country with 20% of its territory below mean sea level and 50% less than 1 metre (3.3 ft) above sea level and which relies heavily on sea defences, was worst affected, recording 1,836 deaths and widespread property damage. Most of the casualties occurred in the southern province of Zeeland. In England, 307 people were killed in the counties of Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex. Nineteen were killed in Scotland.
Desmond is very much a pussy-cat compared to what nature can and will throw at us.
In 1953, we had fewer casualties than the Dutch because our warnings were better and one would hope that because of universal television and better communications another North Sea Flood on the scale of 1953, would probably be less costly in lives lost.
The Dutch have determined that the sea shall not have them and have created impressive defences all along the coast call ed the Delta Works.
We have improved the defences along the Thames Estuary and London is now protected by the Thames Barrier.
In a section on the Future of the Thames Barrier in Wikipedia, this is said.
The barrier was originally designed to protect London against a very high flood level (with an estimated return period of one hundred years) up to the year 2030, after which the protection would decrease, whilst remaining within acceptable limits. At the time of its construction, the barrier was expected to be used 2–3 times per year. It is now being used 6–7 times per year.
It also says that the barrier would be replaced after 2070.
My cautious nature says that is a date that is too far in the future.
So why will Europe have such a large affect on the Thames Estuary?
Many predictions say that over the future, London will grow and become an even more powerful magnet for the people of Europe.
Europe itself will also become more prosperous, so we will see massive increase in both freight and road traffic across the channel.
The Channel Tunnel is unique amongst many major fixed cross-water links, in that it can be easily augmented by ferries, but I believe that people, vehicles and freight, will increasingly be on longer journeys on rail. Think about the effect of these developments.
- The destinations served by direct train from St. Pancras will increase.
- Cross-channel car traffic will increase.
- The Dutch and the Germans have built th Betuweroute, which is high-capacity freight route.
- Vehicle imports and exports are increasingly handled by special trains.
- Liverpool is building a massive new container port. A lot of the freight could go by train to Europe.
I believe that a second fixed-link across the Channel will be built, which will in itself generate more trains to and from London and vehicular traffic to and from everywhere in the UK.
Improving the rail and road networks both suffer from the same problem – London.
- Freight trains can get to and from Barking on HS1, but there is little spare capacity through London.
- Passenger trains will increasingly be constrained by lack of capacity at St. Pancras, but using Ebbsfleet International and an extended Crossrail, would be a more than acceptable alternative for many travellers.
- Road traffic will clog the Dartford Crossing and the Southern section of the M25.
The only solution is to create a new road and rail corridor to get around London.
As London will need a new flood barrier, probably we should start with an idea similar to Option C for a new Lower Thames Crossing.
A new road crossing connecting the M2 and M20 motorways in the south with the M25, which might be linked via a proposed new Thames flood barrier. The route from the north would pass close to South Ockendon, Orsett, Chadwell St Mary, West Tilbury, East Tilbury, across West Tilbury Marshes before it crossed the Thames just to the east of Gravesend and Thurrock. It would join the M2 in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and in the Special Landscape Area. This proposed link is also within the Kent Downs AONB and special landscape area. According to the DfT, this long route would have “considerable environmental impacts”.
Given enough time to generate a full plan, we can probably come up with a better route, perhaps further to the East.
December 5, 2015 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Barking Riverside, Docklands Light Railway, Gospel Oak And Barking Line, Lower Thames Crossing, River Thames, Trains | 5 Comments
About This Blog
What this blog will eventually be about I do not know.
But it will be about how I’m coping with the loss of my wife and son to cancer in recent years and how I manage with being a coeliac and recovering from a stroke. It will be about travel, sport, engineering, food, art, computers, large projects and London, that are some of the passions that fill my life.
And hopefully, it will get rid of the lonely times, from which I still suffer.
Why Anonymous? That’s how you feel at times.
Charities
Useful Links
Top Posts
- Platforms 11 and 12 At Stratford
- Will The Victoria Line Go To Herne Hill?
- From October 24th 2022, It Looks Like Bond Street And Oxford Circus Stations In London Will Share An Out Of Station Interchange!
- Bermondsey Dive-Under - 10th April 2016
- A Tunnel Under Brixton
- £100m 'Global Players' Wind Farm Deal To Create 300 Jobs
- 92 Clubs
- Beeching Reversal - A New Station At Waverley In Sheffield
- A Bankruptcy Story
- FirstGroup Adds Leeds-based J&B Travel To Growing Coach Portfolio
WordPress Admin
-
Join 1,882 other subscribers
Archives
Categories
- Advertising Architecture Art Australia Banks Battery-Electric Trains BBC Buses Cambridge Coeliac/Gluten-Free Construction COVID-19 Crossrail Death Decarbonisation Design Development Docklands Light Railway Driving East Coast Main Line Electrification Elizabeth Line Energy Engineering Entertainment Floating Wind Power Flying Football France Freight Germany Global Warming/Zero-Carbon Good Design Gospel Oak And Barking Line Greater Anglia Great Western Railway Heathrow Airport High Speed Two Highview Power Hydrogen-Powered Trains Innovation Internet Ipswich Town King's Cross Station Law Liverpool London London Overground London Underground Manchester Marks and Spencer Network Rail New Stations Offshore Wind Power Olympics Phones Politics Project Management Religion Research Scotland Shopping Solar Power Stations Step-Free Stroke Television Thameslink The Netherlands Trains United States Walking Weather Wind Power Zopa
Tweets
Tweets by VagueShot










































