Should The World Call A Halt To Large Nuclear Power Stations?
When I left Liverpool University in the 1960s with an engineering degree, my fellow graduates and myself felt that nuclear power would be a sensible way to provide the electricity we need. Aberfan and other disasters had ruined coal’s reputation and not one of my colleagues joined the National Coal Board.
Over the intervening years, nuclear power has suffered a greater proportion of adverse events compared to other forms of electricity generation.
Large nuclear has also suffered some of the largest time and cost overruns of any energy projects.
My optimism for nuclear power has declined, although I do hope and feel, that small modular factory-built reactors, like those proposed by Rolls-Royce and others, might prove to be as reliable and economic as gas-fired, hydro-electric and tidal power stations, or solar and wind farms.
The smaller size of an SMR could be advantageous in itself.
- Smaller factory-built power stations are more likely to be built on time and budget.
- The amount pf nuclear material involved is only about twenty percent of that of a large nuclear station.
- A smaller site would be easier to protect from terrorists and Putinistas.
- Would the risk of a serious accident be reduced?
- SMRs would be less of a blot on the landscape.
- SMRs would not need such a high-capacity grid connection.
- An SMR integrated with a high temperature electrolyser could be the easiest way to generate hydrogen for a large customer like a steelworks.
Overall, I believe an SMR would be involve less risk and disruption.
Zaporizhzhya
Zaporizhzhya is probably the last straw for large nuclear, although the incident isorchestrated by an evil dictator, who is much worse, than any of James Bond’s cruel adversities.
I doubt Putin would get the same leverage, if Zaporizhzhya were a gas-fired or hydroelectric power station.
Conclusion
I feel, the world must seriously question building any more large nuclear power stations.
Where Is Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant?
I have been looking on Google Maps to find Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine.
This Google Map shows the power plant with respect to the Black Sea.
Note.
- Zaporizhzhya Nuclear Power Plant is marked by the red arrow above the Black Sea., at the top of the map.
- The River Dnieper runs between the Black Sea and the power plant.
- Crimea is the piece of land with Sevastopol marked on it.
This second Google Map shows the location of the power plant.
Note the wide River is the Dnieper, with what looks to be a series of breakwaters or a port enclosing a square patch of water towards the West.
This third Google Map shows the power plant in the North-East corner of the port.
Note that each of the red dots is one 3 GW nuclear reactor, which were built in the 1980s.
It appears that at this time of year, that the prevailing wind is in the East so Moldova will get any radiation.
But luckily, at the time of writing, everything seems OK.
The Anonymous Widower 