The Anonymous Widower

RSC Urges GWR To Provide Stratford Improvements

The title of this post is the same as that of an article in Issue 860 of Rail Magazine.

This is the first paragraph.

The Royal Shakespeare Company and the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust have written a joint letter to Great Western Railway Managing Director Mark Hopwood, urging him to improve services between London and Stratford-upon-Avon should GWR retain the Great Western franchise.

Stratford-upon-Avon station may have step-free access, but the services are not of a level for such an important tourist destination.

  • 2 trains per hour (tph) to Birmingham Snow Hill and Stourbridge Junction.
  • 1 train every two hours to Leamington Spa with some continuing to London Marylebone.

It really isn’t enough trains.

Coventry And Stratford-upon-Avon

In 2021 Coventry will be the UK City Of Culture, so surely there should be a direct rail link between one of the most important cities of the West Midlands and one of its biggest cultural attractions.

But no there isn’t a direct link, despite the rail lines being in place.

You have to change at Leamington Spa. But the journey only takes a reasonable 70 minutes.

I have read somewhere, that West Midlands Trains are going to link up these two services.

  • Nuneaton and Coventry
  • Coventry and Leamington Spa

This would create a single service between Nuneaton and Leamington Spa stations..

Could this service be extended to Stratford-upon-Avon?

  • They are acquiring eight Class 172 trains from London Overground, to run services in Warwickshire.
  • All the tracks are in place.
  • The service would connect the West Coast Main Line and the Chiltern Main Line to Stratford-upon-Avon.

How long would it take?

These are current average times for the three legs

  • Nuneaton to Coventry – 22 minutes
  • Coventry to Leamington Spa – 12 minutes
  • Leamington Spa to Stratford – 35 minutes

This totals to 69 minutes.

  • There are thirteen stations stops, one of which is a reverse at Leamington Spa station.
  • There will be a need to add a few minutes for turnround at Nuneaton and Stratford-upon-Avon stations.
  • The Class 172 trains are 100 mph trains, whereas the current Class 153 trains are only 75 mph trains.
  • Much of the track has an operating speed of 100 mph.

If a round trip can be done in under three hours, the following number of trains would be needed.

  • One tph would need three trains.
  • Two tph would need six trains.

The number of trains are actually the same that would be needed, if the routes were run as three separate sections. But by joining them together passengers don’t need to change trains.

With the faster trains, I do wonder if a round trip of two hours is possible, which would mean that just four trains would be needed for a two tph service.

Hopefully, a better service will be in place before Coventry is UK City of Culture.

An Improved Chiltern Service

Chiltern Railways don’t have the capacity on the Chiltern Main Line to run more direct services to Stratford, but I feel they could improve the current service.

If you are going to Stratford from Marylebone, most of Chiltern’s Birmingham services offer a one-change route to Stratford. But it is not always the same interchange station and I have found routes with changes at Birmingham Moor Street, Dorridge and Leamington Spa.

The Chiltern service to Stratford could be improved by just ensuring that to go between Marylebone and Stratford, you always changed at the same station and waited just a few minutes.

This map from Wikipedia, shows the rail connections around Leamington Spa.

Note the lines to Stratford and Coventry.

The direct service to Stratford is one train every two hours, whereas the service to Coventry is two trains per hour running fifteen minutes apart.

As I said earlier, perhaps what is needed is a unified Nuneaton to Stratford service, which ideally should do the following.

  • Run every thirty minutes.
  • Be timed to connect with Chiltern’s London trains at Leamington Spa.
  • Run a bit quicker than the current Class 153 trains.

The problem would be that a Chiltern service would be replaced with one run by West Midlands Trains.

Avon Rail Link

Under Possible Future Development in the Wikipedia entry for Stratford-upon-Avon station, this is said.

The Shakespeare Line Promotion Group is promoting a scheme to reopen the 9 miles (14 km) of line south of Stratford to Honeybourne where it would link to the Cotswold Line. Called the “Avon Rail Link”, the scheme (supported as a freight diversionary route by DB Schenker) would make Stratford-upon-Avon station a through station once again with improved connections to the South, and would open up the possibility of direct services to Oxford and Worcester via Evesham. The scheme faces local opposition. There is, however, a good business case for Stratford-Cotswolds link.

This is the scheme, that has prompted, the letter from the RSC and SBT to GWR.

The link would connect Stratford to Oxford, Reading and Paddington.

I suspect that you could argue that it would create a useful railway in an arc connecting the Thames Valley to the West Midlands.

A lot of things said about the East West Rail Link, would probably apply to this railway.

Honeybourne station on the Cotswold Line between Worcester and Oxford, would be the Southern end of the Avon Rail Link, where a connection to the privately-owned herotage raily; the Gloucestershire Warwickshire Railway, has been allowed for by Network Rail.

This section entitled North From Honeybourne on the Wikipedia entry for the Gloucestershire Warwickshire Railway, says this about building the extension.

The section between Stratford and Stratford Racecourse has been utilised to improve road access around the town, especially the A4390, making reinstatement of rail to the main station at Stratford extremely difficult.

Given the local opposition, it looks like it will be a struggle to get this line built.

Conclusion

There are three ways to improve rail access to Stratford-upon-Avon.

  • The relatively easy and quick, enhancement of the rail services in Warwickshire.
  • Provide better one-change routes using Chiltern Railways.
  • The more difficult re-connection of Stratford to the Cotswold Line at Honeybourne.

As the last project will take years to implement, I feel, it is important that services to Stratford from Birmingham, Coventry, Leamington Spa and the West Midlands are substantially increased.

I also believe that the responsibility of providing a local service between Leamigton Spa and Stratford should be given to West Midlands Trains.

 

August 31, 2018 - Posted by | Transport | , , ,

5 Comments »

  1. the route between Nuneaton and Leamington is the so-called NUCKLE line (see summary from a couple of years ago at https://www.railfuture.org.uk/article1646-White-NUCKLE-ride), the improvement of which includes a new platform at Coventry http://www.coventry.gov.uk/info/113/regeneration/2657/rail_station_masterplan. The new station at Kenilworth opened in the spring http://www.slcrail.co.uk/project-kenilworth_station.php though the introduction of longer trains on N-C has been delayed after the timetabling fiasco https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/local-news/nuneaton-to-coventry-train-railway-14888224
    Not sure extending this line to Stratford makes sense, as trains would have to reverse at L.
    See http://www.shakespeareline.com/arl for Avon Rail Link, which is progressing slowly. Wouldn’t hold my breath though 🙂

    Comment by Peter Robins | August 31, 2018 | Reply

    • I feel that as West Midlands Trains are getting eight x two-car 172 trains, which have very much a commuter interior with no tables and plenty of standing space, that they will use them on increased Warwickshire services, vonnecting Nuneaton, Coventry, Leamington, Stratford and Warwick. I wonder if these trains, which are under 50 metres long are quicker to reverse than say a 165, as drivers seem to get in the cab and get away quickly at Gospel Oak. After all they were built for that line, where timing has to be precise. I wonder if WMT will fit wi-fi and power sockets!

      Comment by AnonW | August 31, 2018 | Reply

  2. a priority for the recent Midlands Connect strategy https://www.midlandsconnect.uk/media/1178/18-19-priorities-final-digital.pdf is direct services Coventry-Leicester. According to https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/direct-trains-leicester-coventry-more-1778845 “Leicester and Coventry are the largest two cities in such close proximity in the country without a direct rail service.”
    Having been on the current N-C line at rush hour, I can confirm that the current service is totally inadequate.

    Comment by Peter Robins | August 31, 2018 | Reply

    • I travel on the Goblin regularly and the 172s are nice trains, which rarely seem to have a problem except too many passengers. They are 100 mph trains and they can join up to make longer trains. So they should reduce journey times too and handle karge crowds at the Ricoh. But the interior might be a bit spartan for Coventry-Leicester to generate a lot of traffic.

      Comment by AnonW | August 31, 2018 | Reply

    • Just done a quick estimate and I reckon that Nuneaton to Stratford round trip would take about ten minutes under three hours including teverses at Leamington and Coventry (?). So a one tph service would beed three trains and a two tph service would need six. Convenient?

      Comment by AnonW | August 31, 2018 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.