The Anonymous Widower

Rail Engineer On New Platforms At London Waterloo

Reopening the Waterloo International station platforms for local services may seem to be some people to be a very easy project.

This article on Rail Engineer, which is entitled New Platforms At London Waterloo, is a detailed article about the conversion.

Some points from the article and a couple of my deductions.

  • The platforms were far to long for suburban services and had to be shortened for twelve-car trains.
  • Eurostar only ran five trains per hour (tph) into the station and Network Rail and South Western Railway have planned for four times this frequency.
  • Each Eurostar train has only 750 passengers, whereas a commuter train can handle twice as many.
  • This means a theoretical eight times more passengers need to be handled.
  • The platforms were designed for stationary trains, not for trains continually moving in and out.
  • The roof is a Listed structure.
  • Direct access to the Underground needed to be added.

The article concludes that with all the work, that needs to be done, the conversion is good value.

I suggest if you are sceptical about the costs, that you read the Rail Engineer article. As ever the magazine gives a good honest engineeringly-correct assessment.

Will The Passengers Like The Extension?

According to the article the number of passengers, that can be handled by Waterloo station will rise from 96 million to 120 million or an increase of twenty-five percent.

The link to the Underground will include three new escalators and there will be lifts and escalators everywhere to cope with the higher level of the tracks in the five new platforms.

Nothing is said in the article about the areas, that the increased services will serve, but in An Analysis Of Waterloo Suburban Services Proposed To Move To Crossrail 2, I showed that it would be possible to run a service with Crossrail 2’s characteristics terminating in Waterloo.

As Crossrail 2, is very unlikely to be built in the next ten years, will Network Rail and South Western Railway give passengers the same service levels a lot earlier?

Conclusion

It looks to me, that  this reopening project, is doing a good job to turn the Waterloo White Elephant, into something that will benefit passengers and train operators.

Can anybody explain to me, why we spent £120 million (£237 million in today’s money!) in the 1990s to create such a grand station to accommodate Eurostar trains, when something less grand could have been built?

 

December 12, 2018 - Posted by | Transport | ,

3 Comments »

  1. Agree that it’s better than a white elephant, but I still think it should be used for long distance services down to the south-west. The ‘international’ station would be differentiated from the rest of the ‘commuter’ station (Its a VERY long walk if youre watching the board at platform 1, and you see your train’s about to leave in two minutes from platform 25!). A tunnel could take long distance services from somewhere around West London Junction to Esher, bypassing the Wimbledon bottleneck and allowing CR2 to run above ground.

    This way, fast lines would be uninterrupted to Woking (where they would split for Portsmouth anyway), and many more long distance services could use the SWML- plus they’d now have their own dedicated terminus within Waterloo, separate to most commuters.

    Comment by j m | December 12, 2018 | Reply

    • I feel that South Western Railway and Network Rail will organise a timetable, so that crossing is minimised in the station throat.

      But I do suspect that Waterloo now has enough platforms to allow most destinations to have a dedicated platform.

      So if you’re going to and from Bournemouth it might be either Platform A or B.

      It does appear to be a bit random at present.

      https://anonw.com/2018/12/12/an-analysis-of-waterloo-suburban-services-proposed-to-move-to-crossrail-2/

      In this post, I showed it is should be possible to run four trains per hour to the four branches due to go to Crossrail 2, each from a dedicated platform at Waterloo.

      Ideally, they would be in four consecutive platforms.

      If all services were put into groups, that had consecutive platforms, it would be efficient for passengers and staff.

      Comment by AnonW | December 12, 2018 | Reply

    • I also think you illustrate a problem, that is common at many stations.

      Regulars know generally, from which platform their train will leave, but visitors don’t!

      We need a better system of platform information. Perhaps tickets should say on them, that your train will leave from Platforms 1-4 or something!

      Comment by AnonW | December 12, 2018 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.