Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Maidstone
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about Kent and not surprisingly, the county town;Maidatone is mentioned several times.
The Medway Valley Line
The Medway Valley Line runs as its name suggests down the Medway Valley, from Strood station in the North to Maidstone West, Paddock Wood, and Tonbridge stations in the South.
I took these pictures on the line.
Note.
- Strood station is undergoing a major upgrade, which the hoardings claim will be finished this year.
- The Medway Valley Line has its own termial platform in Strood station.
- The line is double-track all the way.
- The line is run as a community rail service.
- There were several level crossings on the route.
- There were several new housing estates visible from the train.
The line would appear to be well run and I suspect that in the next few yeas, services could be increased.
Currently, the service is a two trains per hout (tph) shuttle with an Peak Hour service between St. Pancras International and Maidstone West.
Plans exist for an all day Highspeed service between St. Pancras International and Maidstone West and this would mean three tph along the Medway Valley Line.
I do feel though that if a way could be found to run four tph on the route, that this would be very beneficial.
Maidstone
I walked between Maidstone West and Maidstone East stations buying lunch on the way in a cafe.
These pictures sum up my walk.
If I do the trip again, which is likely, I’d go to Maidstone East station first, as the walk would be dowbhill. It would also mean, I could pick up my gluten-free lunch in Marks and Spencer and eat it by the River Medway.
Not that the liver, bacon and vegetables was at all bad!
Maidstone East Station
I’ve discussed Maidstone East station before in this post called Maidstone East Station.
The two visits have left me with the impression, thatr the service from Maidstone East station is crap.
It will improve when Thameslink starts its two tph service to Cambridge, which will give the station four tph to and from London.
Two developments would really improve Maidstone East station.
Development of the station is promised, with Wikipedia saying this.
In November 2012, initial plans for the regeneration of Maidstone East Station were submitted to Maidstone Borough Council to determine whether an Environmental Impact Assessment was required. MBC concluded in December 2012 that due to the additional road traffic, an assessment would be appropriate. Plans include a new railway station, new large foodstore, other retail units, bar, cafe, commuter and retail parking (approx 1100 spaces) and associated landscaping. The proposed plan involves the demolition of the existing station ticket office, a disused hotel/bar, retail units opposite County Hall and the adjacent Royal Mail sorting and enquiry office which is due to transfer operations to a new site in Park Wood, Maidstone late 2012
Kent’s county town certainly needs a better station.
The other development would be to get rid of the Class 465 trains.
The one I got home was unreliable and according to fellow passengers, this is not uncommon.
But the speed it was keeping on the line to London was a measily 30 mph at times.
It was definitely, one that could be named a Notworker.
Hopefully the new franchise holder will obtain a new fleet of trains to kick the problem off the White Cliffs.
Conclusion
I learned a lot of the good and bad points about Southeastern today.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Longfield Station
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways has made me ask questions about how services to various stations in Kent will be affected.
Longfield station is probably best described as a typically busy commuter station with three trains per hour (tph) for most of the day.
These pictures show the station.
This Google Map shows the layout of the station.
I had lunch with a friend whilst I was there and a problem he flagged up was that parking can be difficult, especially if you want to travel later n the day.
Parking At longfield Station
He said sometimes the only alternative to driving, is to cut across toEbbsfleet International station and put up with the higher prices of the Highspeed sewrvice.
Note how the car parking at Longfield station is all over the place.
The Price Of The High Speed Service
I have heard several complaints about the cost of the service into St. Pancras and I do wonder that if Victoria could be used as a second terminal, as I examined in Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal, that this could have the affect of bringing prices down.
Trains Through Longfield
I travelled out to Longfield in a 100 mph Class 377 train, but I travelled back in a 75 mph Class 466 train.
The former are just about fast enough, but the latter are too slow for a journey between ictoria and Dover or Ramsgate.
As I indicated in Track Improvements, Network Rail believe that the key to faster services is better signalling and faster trains.
The signalling problem is being addressed by the East Kent Re-Signalling Project, but new trains are needed that can operate at a higher speed on the lines in Kent.
Using a version of the Class 395 train is a possibility, but so is an entirely new train from another manufacturer. Having ridden in an Aventra and read the armours that the train can have a 125 mph capability, I’m sure Bombardier can come up with a Kent Coast Express.
Surely, more Class 395 trains must be the most likely, as six-car trains, working on most routes as 12-car units, is something that appears to work well for the current operator.
I think that the most likely scenario in future will be.
- The stopping service currently run by 75 mph Class 466 trains will be run by 100 mph Class 377 trains.
- The two semi-fast services will be run by new faster trains.
- All services would be twelve-car trains.
As each service would be run by a faster train, there would be journey time savings.
Will Longfield Lose Any Of Its Three Trains Per Hour?
I think this is unlikely, as when this is tried, there is usually a bitter row, that train operating companies try to avoid.
Will There Be Any Victoria to Thanet Services via Bromley South And High Speed One?
These services would take the following route from Victoria to Ashford International station.
- Bromley South station
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Ebbsfleet International station
- High Speed One
After Ashford, they could go to Dover, Hastings or Ramsgate.
There are two capacity constraints.
- Between Victoria and Bromley South.
- Between Ebbsfleet International and Ashford International
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a fast service from Victoria to Thanet in the timetable.
It would be ideal, if a train to both Dover and Ramsgate were possible in an hour.
Conclusion
It is my view that Longfield station will not have an inferior service to the present time, when the new franchise is awarded.
But services will be different! And hopefully faster!
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Track Improvements
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks mentions a few track improvements.
Ashford Spurs
This enables more Continental trains to call at Ashford International station. I discussed it in Ashford Spurs.
The Link Between High Speed One And The Marshlink Line
This is needed to get the Highspeed trains from St. Pancras to Hastings, I I discussed in Highspeed to Hastings.
The Modern Railways article says this about the creation of the link.
It will be an uphill struggle to fund necessary layout changes at Ashford International during Control Period 6 (2019-2024). A realignment of the track would be needed to join the track serving the London end of platform 2 (which is accessible from the Marshlink route) to the Ashford spurs that link through to High Speed 1.
This diagram from Wikipedia shows the lines through Ashford International station.
Note how the two main tracks of High Speed One use a flyover to get out of the way of Ashford International station. The Ashford Spurs connect the lines through the two platforms to High Speed One.
This Google Map shows the London end of Ashford International stations.
There are three island platforms, which are as follows from the bottom.
- Platform 1 and 2 for third-rail domestic services and the Marshlink Line
- Platform 3 and 4 for Continental services
- Platform 5 asnd 6 for Highspeed domestic services.
The two lines visible beyond platforms 5 and 6 are High Speed One on the flyover.
At the London end of the station, there is already the following links to High Speed One from the station.
- Platform 3 to London for Continental services
- Platform 4 from London for Continental services
- Platform 5 to London for Highspeed services
- Platform 6 from London for Highspeed services
It could be quite complicated connecting even one of Platform 1 and 2 to High Speed One.
But at least as these pictures show, there is plenty of space.
Note.
- The pictures were taken from a Highspeed train leaving Platform 5 for London.
- The first picture was taken just to the London side of the bridge shown in the Google Map.
- The domestic Platforms 1 and 2 are on the far side, in this first picture.
- The
I do feel that after some of the engineering on Crossrail and Thameslink, that an affordable solution is possible.
In addition to the space, I don’t think any trains thunder through here at high speed, as they use the flyover for that.
I also feel that Hitachi might be the key here.
As I said in Highspeed to Hastings, I believe that batteries not diesel will be used to power the trains on the Marshlink Line.
So if necessary, battery power could be used to power the trains between High Speed One and Platforms 1 and 2.
Hitachi could probably do the change between power sources under the wires of High Speed One, so this would mean that there would be no extra overhead electrification at Ashford International station.
As most of the train frequencies between High Speed One and Ashford International station are not by any means high, I wonder if there is a simple solution in there somewhere.
The most difficult connection would be to get trains from London across three tracks.
- The Highspeed line from Platform 5 to London
- The Continental line from London to Platform 4.
- The Continental line from Platform 3 to London
A single track unelectrified dive-under or even a flat junction might be possible to connect High Speed One to Platforms 1 and/or 2.
Connecting Platforms 1 and/or 2 to High Speed One to London is much easier, as no other lines need to be crossed.
I also wonder if the funding problem and probable subsequent delay of building a link could lead to an interim solution to give Hasting the service it needs.
Network Rail’s Options For The Link Between High Speed One And The Marshlink Line
This document from Network Rail gives their options for the link.
- High Speed One To Platform 2
- High Speed One To Marshlink via Platform 3
As the second option would leave Continental services with just one bi-directional platform, I think it is unlikely to be used, as what happens if a train fails in the platform?
This diagram from the Network Rail document shows the traqck layout for the first option.
Note the only track work would appear to be two or three new cross-overs, which are shown as being electrified with both third-rail and overhead line.
Note the following.
- The trains that will be working the Marshlink Line and High Speed One will have either diesel or battery power for the Marshlink Line.
- Modern trains like Hitachi’s Class 800 trains can change from one mode to the other at linespeed, raising and lowering the pantograph as necessary.
- Automation can aid the driver in selecting the best power source.
So could we see the cross-overs built without electrification to save money and probably time as well?
I suspect this could be possible, although there may be operational reasons to add third-rail electrification.
Network Rail say this about their scheme with dual-power cross-overs.
Although this seems a fairly simple proposal, the technicalities of installing the crossovers, power supplies and signalling enhancements add significantly to the challenges of the scheme, which would cost in the region of £15-35M.
Surely, as the trains will have a dual-power capability for the Marshlink Line, this would reduce the challenges and cost of the scheme.
, The Fawkham Junction Link
The Fawkham Junction link will enable Highspeed services to use another terminal in London, which will probably be Victoria.
I discussed this link in Fawkham Junction Link.
General Track Improvements
This document from Network Rail is the Route Specification for the South East and it details two projects, that will improve times on the lines between Victoria and shford International station.
- Journey Time Improvement – Reduce impact of Permanent Speed Restrictions
- Maidstone signalling interlocking renewal – Renewal of interlocking and external equipment
The document indicates they could be completed in 2019.
The document also uses this phrase in several places.
Increase speed to rolling stock and signalling capability
As the East Kent Re-Signalling Project seems to be improving the signalling, it does appear that one of the keys to better services in Kent may well be faster trains.
It should be noted, Network Rail have been particularly successful in upgrading the speed of the Midland Main Line in recent years, so with a faster third-rail train available, they might be able to speed up services on the East Kent Lines.
An Interim Solution For A Highspeed Service To Hastings
As I said earlier connecting the Marshlink Line to High Speed One might be delayed because of funding.
Network Rail’s planned improvements will deliver journey time improvements between Victoria and Ashford International stations and along the lines in East Kent, provided some faster trains are procured.
There is not much point in having tracks with a capability in excess of 110 mph, if the trains can’t make use of it.
But these trains, be they Ultimate Class 395 trains or a product from another manufacturer, will be needed to bridge the electrification gap of the marshlink line.
Once the modifications at Ashford are complete, these trains will be able to use High Speed One.
Conclusion
Track improvements are a key to making the new Southeastern franchise a lot better.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Ultimate Class 395 Train
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about the need for more Class 395 trains.
The Class 395 train has the following features.
- 140 mph capability on 25 KVAC overhead electrification
- 100 mph capability on 750 VDC third-rail electrification
- Six-cars
- The ability for trains to couple and uncouple automatically in a couple of minutes.
- Modern interiors.
Upgrades, that I can see in a new batch of trains are discussed in the next three sections.
Batteries To Enable Working To Hastings For The New Southeastern Franchise
The Modern Railways article says this about the Highspeed service to Hastings.
What form the new trains would take is asnother question; Kent County Council is keen on Class 800s, to give bi-mode capsability over the Romney mashes so that Hastings and Bexhill could be given a high-speed service to London via Ashford.
However, question marks continue to hang over any such service: there is some doubt as to whether diesel tanks would be allowed in the London tunnels of HS1 (so battery electric could be an option)
It should be noted that, Hitachi have experience in the field of battery electric trains and I think that their engineers will find a solution to bridge the twenty-six miles of the Marshlink Line, between Ashford International and Ore stations, that is not electrified.
The key could be that a passing loop is needed at Rye station for efficient operation of the trains. As Rye is under sixteen miles from Ashford and under eleven miles from Ore, it might be feasible to electrify the passing loop, so that trains could have a quick battery top-up, whilst stopping at Rye station.
Electrification around the station in a town like Rye would mean safety would be easier to ensure, than in some of the remoter parts of Romney Marsh.
Wi-Fi And 4G Capability
These facilities will probably be required of the bidders for the new franchise.
Up To 125 mph Capability On 750 VDC Third-Rail Electrification
The Class 395 trains can obviously go safely at a lot higher speed and Network Rail have the knowledge and engineering to turn 100 mph lines into ones with an operating speed of 125 mph, if the topography of the line is suitable.
125 mph wouldn’t probably be needed but the ability to run at 110 mph might be particularly useful on various of the lines in Kent.
In a Network Rail document about the East Kent lines, Network rail says this.
Increase speed to rolling stock and signalling capability.
As the East Kent Re-Signalling Project seems to be improving the signalling, the faster Class 395 trains would set the desired operating speed.
Network Rail have been particularly successful in upgrading the speed of the Midland Main Line in recent years, so with a faster third-rail train available, they might be able to speed up services on the East Kent Lines.
I doubt all of this has not occurred to Hitachi and the other train manufacturers.
It should also be born in mind that High Speed One is not unique amongst dedicated high speed lines in the world and other countries and operators must want to mix high speed long distance and commuter services on the high speed lines.
So if Hitachi can demonstrate their skills between London and Kent on the way to the iconic Channel Tunnel, it can’t be at all bad for the company.
It also probably means, that the companies bidding to take over the Southeastern franchise will get a good deal for extra Class 395 trains.
Or would Bombardier come up with an Aventra with a 140 mph capability on High Speed One?
Other Applications Of Class 395 Trains
Most of the third-rail electric trains south of the Thames like the Class 377 trains are 100 mph trains.
But as there is a need for more and faster services South of the Thames, there will probably be a need for a faster train.
This probably explains why South Western Railway are bringing the Class 442 trains back into service on the Portsmouth Direct Line, as these trains are capable of more than 100 mph.
An alternative might have been to buy some Class 395 trains with a 110 mph or higher capability on third-rail lines.
Conclusion
The next versions of Class 395 trains and trains of similar performance from other manufacturers will not be limited to High Speed One and Kent.
Hitachi can easily create a third-rail train with a capability of running at over 110 mph and if Network Rail upgrade the tracks and signalling to accommodate higher speeds, we could see improved services all across the South of England.
Routes where they would bring improvement include.
- Waterloo to Portsmouth
- Waterloo to Southampton, Bournemouth, Poole and Weymouth
- Ashford to Southampton via Brighton and Portsmouth.
As energy storage gets better will we be seeing Waterloo to Salisbury run by electric trains, using battery power to and from Basingstoke?
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Fawkham Junction Link
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways discusses the Fawkham Junction Link, which was originally used to allow Eurostar trains to get to Waterloo station. It is now used as a siding for old Eurostar trains, that are waiting for the scrapyard.
I wrote about this link in Connecting Ebbsfleet International To South London, which connects the Chatham Main Line to Ebbsfleet International station and High Speed One.
A quick look on Google Maps appears to show, that the third-rail electrification is still in place, which must make the link easier to reinstate.
Obviously, Network Rail and the TOCs (train operating companies) have a cunning plan to create extra services using the reinstated link and High Speed One.
Ebbsfleet International Station
Bear in mind, that Ebbsfleet Internation station is an important transport hub.
- Services to and from the Continent call.
- Highspeed services between St. Pancras and Thanet call.
- There is masses of car parking.
If Ebbsfleet Interbational has a problem, it is badly connected to the local area and only serves St. Pancras in London.
London Victoria To Thanet Services
At present, services between Victoria and Thanet services that go through Bromley South and Swanley stations are as follows.
- 1 tph – Victoria to Ramsgate via Longfield and Chatham.
- 2 tph – Victoria to Dover Priory via Longfield and Chatham
- 1 tph – Victoria to Canterbury West via Swanley and Maidstone East
- 1 tph – Victoria to Ashford International via Swanley and Maidstone East
Note that in all these services the first stop is Bromley South station.
Could the plan be as simple as this?
- Some services between Victoria and Broadstairs, Canterbury, Dover Priory, Ramsgate and Thanet Parkway stations would be run by Class 395 trains or similar trains with a 140 mph capability on High Speed One.
- Trains would go to from Victoria to Swanley, with just the single stop at Bromley South station, as they do now, and then join High Speed One via the Fawkham Junction Link.
- Once at Ashford, they take the routes to Thanet as used by the current Highspeed services.
I suspect this would give times from Victoria as follows.
- Broadstairs in ninety-seven minutes as against 111 minutes now.
- Canterbury West in seventy-two minutes as against 125 minutes now.
- Dover Priory in seventy-six minutes as against to 122 minutes now.
- Ramsgate in ninety minutes minutes as against to 124 minutes now.
Times could probably be improved further with a bit of work in Thanet and between Swnley and Victoria.
This could mean.
- Nearly all trains in Thanet are Class 395 trains., so tracks and stations could be designed accordingly.
- The Class 395 trains use the Thanet paths into Victoria from Swanley.
- Provision would have to be made for stations losing their services to High Speed One.
It could all be very efficient and a simple way to improve timings to Thanet.
Thameslink Services
Thameslink services serve Swanley station and could easily be extended to Ebbsfleet International, if that was desired via the Fawkham Junction link.
Bromley South Metro Services
The Southeastern Metro service on the Bromley South Line could use Ebbsfleet as an alternative terminal to Petts Wood station, by using the Fawkham Junction link.
Conclusion
There are lots of possibilities, with perhaps the most important being to create a second Highspeed terminus in London, to relieve the inadequate capacity at St. Pancras.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Elimination Of Slow Trains
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways discusses the improvements that may be made by the new franchisee of the Southeastern franchise.
Southeastern‘s current fleet includes.
- 112 x Class 375 trains – 100 mph capable
- 36 x Class 376 trains – 75 mph capable.
- 8 x Class 377 trains – 100 mph capable.
- 29 x Class 395 trains – 140 mph capable.
- 147 x Class 465 trains – 75 mph capable.
- 43 x Class 466 trains – 75 mph capable.
The slower 75 mph trains are generally older and lack customer-friendly features like wi-fi and good information screens.
The article says that Class 465 trains are still used on the Maidstone East Line and possibly on Tunbridge Wells stoppers.
I can confirm in my trip to Longfield Station, that they are still used on that route.
Running these slow trains in with the faster 100 mph units like the Class 375/377 trains, is like allowing milk-floats on motorways.
It could be that the reason, stations on the Maidstone East Line only get two trains per hour (tph), is because some services are or could be run by the slow Class 465 trains.
Implications For The Maidstone East Line
Currently, Maidstone East to Ashford International station takes about thirty minutes.
Given that modern trains like Southeastern’s Class 375 and Class 377 trains and Thameslink’s Class 700 trains are also very much better and faster at carrying out a station stop, could it be that even if the train stopped everywhere on the Maidstone East Line, that substantial savings in time could be made?
Could this mean, that Thameslink’s future Cambridge to Maidstone East service could be extended to the much better connected Ashford International?
I think it could be mathematically possible and it would mean that all the intermediate stations on the Maidstone East Line would have a doubling of service frequency to 4 tph.
This is a simple example in the Southeastern area, but in how many other places on their network, do the 75 mph trains cause timetabling problems.
It is my belief, that all trains incapable of operating at 100 mph, should either be modified so they can operate at 100 mph or be scrapped.
The Minimum Train Specification
A minimum electric train specification should probably be something like this, to satisfy passengers and train operating companies.
- 100 mph capability
- Designed for a fast station stop with minimum dwell-time
- Regenerative braking
- Efficient traction motors
- Wi-fi in all classes
- The capability to fit boosters for 4G signals.
Southeastern’s Class 465 trains fail on all points.
Metro Operations
But surely, they are OK when running a Metro service like Victoria to Dartford?
Currently, this service takes 49 minutes with eleven stops.
This means that a train takes two hours to go from Victoria and Dartford and back, so to achieve the required service frequency of 2 tph, four trains will be needed.
But supposing a modern train is used on this route. Train manufacturers will claim that a modern train saves about two to three minutes a stop.
So if two minutes a stop is saved, modern signalling is used to advantage and the driver uses the extra speed and acceleration with alacrity, I feel that the forty-nine minute journey could be brought down sufficiently, so that the round trip would be under an hour.
Not only would passengers see a faster service of under thirty minutes in a much better equipped train, but the operator could run the 2 tph service with just two trains instead of four and a big saving in electricity.
The operator may have to alter staff practices because of the faster journey, but I doubt it would be anything controversial.
Could Class 707 Trains Be Used On The Southeastern Franchise?
The Class 707 trains, which are unwanted by South Western Railway are 100 mph units and are probably up-to-scratch for the train operator.
But they may need to be retrofitted with wi-fi.
I suspect, that one of the conditions of the new Southeastern franchise, is that free wi-fi is offered. Now that Crossrail is throwing in 4G access, I suspect all bidders will offer this too!
Conclusion
All trains incapable of running a service at 100 mph should be eliminated, just as the two operators;Greater Anglia and South Western Railway, are planning to do.
There’s going to a lot of slow trains going cheap!
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Highspeed Routes
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about the Southeastern Highspeed routes through Kent.
Some principles are laid down.
- All six-car services would be extended to twelve-car services.
- Trains could be divided at Ashford International station to serve multiple destinations.
- Maidstone West station would get an hourly Off Peak service.
The article gives an estimate that at least another twenty Class 395 trains are needed of which perhaps three would have batteries for operation along the Marshlink Line between Ashford International and Ore stations.
The new timetable proposed in the article is similar to that now, with the following changes in each hour.
- All Day – A St. Pancras – Ashford – Dover Priory service runs once per hour and splits at Ashford with one six-car train going to and from Hastings and the other six-car train going to and from Dover Priory.
- Off Peak – A new St. Pancras – Ashford – Canterbury West service runs once per hour.
- All Day – A new St. Pancras – Ebbsfleet service runs twice per hour.
- Off Peak – A new St. Pancras – Gravesend – Strood – Maidstone West service runs once per hour.
In addition all trains passing Thanet Parkway station will stop after it opens.
The Fawkham Junction Link
The article talks about reinstating this link , which connects the Chatham Main Line to Ebbsfleet International station and High Speed One.
I wrote about this link in a related post called Fawkham Junction Link, which shows how it can be used to create additional Highspeed services between London and Thanet.
- Victoria becomes a second terminal for Highspeed services.
- Victoria gets a Highspeed connection to Ebbsfleet International and Ashford International stations for Eurostar.
- Most if not all of the Thanet services become Highspeed services.
- Thanet services are faster with more capacity.
Obviously, Network Rail and the TOCs (train operating companies) have some cunning plan to use the Fawkham Junction Link.
Should All Victoria To Thanet Services Be Run By Highspeed Trains?
In my trip to Longfield Station, I came back iat a leisurely pace in a Class 465 train, that had started at Dover or Ramsgate.
As the routes to Thanet from Victoria can all be run by twelve-car trains and the platforms in East Kent are accessible to twelve-car Class 377, Class 395 and Class 465 trains, I wonder if Class 395 trains or a train with a similar performance, should run all these routes in an identical manner to the slower trains.
Consider.
- Calls at many stations would only be made by twelve-car Highspeed trains, which must make station design simpler and station stops easier and faster.
- Highspeed trains would be able to take advantage of any line speed improvements on the route.
- Highspeed trains are fitted with modern signalling systems including ERTMS, which would allow more capacity on busy sections of the routes. Between Victoria and Swanley could benefit.
- Crossrail and Thameslink trains already have ERTMS, so this must give advantages, on shared routes.
- A single unified fleet to Thanet must ease servicing and maintenance, which is done currently at Ashford and Ramsgate.
- High Speed One could be used as a diversion route if required.
- Victoria could be used as a diversion for Highspeed services, if there were problems on High Speed One to the West of Ebbsfleet station.
The outcome would surely be that even the Victoria to Thanet stoppers would be several minutes faster.
What would faster services be worth to the new train operating company?
Conclusion
Highspeed services could be increased in frequency and developed to a second terminal at Voctoria.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see all services to Thanet run by a single uinified fleet of Highspeed trains.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Historic Routes
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about the historic routes through Kent.
The existing fleet is being enlarged and updated.
- Class 375 trains are being refurbished.
- More Class 377 trains are arriving and will probably be refurbished.
- Class 465 trains will be transferred to Metro services.
- The Class 707 trains, unwanted by South Western Trains may arrive.
But there are problems, with issues like.
- Depot space,
- The lack of wi-fi.
- Crossrail’s Aventras have 4G and passengers will expect it.
- The Class 465 trains are only 75 mph units.
If we take a quick look at Greater Anglia, they are replacing all their fleet to increase capacity and they are having to build a new depot about half-way from London.
So expect to see a new depot, somewhere in Kent to accommodate the increased fleet.
More Highspeed Trains
I believe that for reasons of better services and efficiency, that a new batch of Class 395 trains or similar will take over some or all historic routes to Thanet.
If this happens, it could also mean, that because Highspeed trains are serviced at Ashford and Ramsgate, depot space was released at the London end of the routes.
A New Fleet Of Trains
I wouldn’t be surprised to see a new fleet of trains joining the fleet for the new South Eastern franchise.
If we look at the characteristics of Bombardier’s new Aventra we see the following.
- Up to 100 or even 125 mph capability.
- Superb interiors.
- Wi-fi and 4G capability.
- Wide doors and lobbies for fast entry and exit.
- Automatic coupling and uncoupling – Hitachi trains do it, so why not other manufacturers?
- Regenerative braking – Is it handled by on-board energy storage?
- Remote train warm-up!
- Improved automation for the driver.
- Less energy usage.
- Modern signalling systems including ERTMS, which is used by Thameslink and Crodssrail.
Judging by my journey on The 10:35 From Liverpool Street To Shenfield, the customer experience is Jaguar to the successful Electrostar’s Ford.
The fast station stops of these modern trains from the major manufacturers means the following.
- Less trains are needed for the same frequency of service.
- The frequency of services can be improved.
- Extra stops can be added with less of a time penalty.
In some cases semi-fast trains can be replaced by trains calling at all stations with no journey time penalty.
The Modern Railways article also hints that we’ll see more joining and splitting of trains to make sure capacity and frequency is tailored to the needs of a particular route.
Terminal Capacity In London
This could become a problem for Southeastern, but certain things can be done.
- Increasing Crossrail and Thameslink capacity.
- Extending Crossrail to Ebbsfleet and/or Gravesend.
- Splitting and joining services.
- Improve signalling to allow trains to run at higher frequencies.
- Cascade or scrap any train that can’t operate at 100 mph to create more paths.
In the long term, the solution is probably to rebuild Charing Cross station across the Thames, so that the platforms can accept three five-car trains working as one unit.
Higher Frequencies On Busy Routes
The North Kent Line from Abbey Wood station eastwards to Ramsgate will get increasingly busy through the Medway towns.
The East Kent Re-Signalling Project will help, but if all trains east of Abbey Wood were modern trains equipped with ERTMS, it would probably be easier to manage the trains, so that frequencies as high as ten trains per hour ran on a substantial part opf the route between Abbey Wood to Rainham stations.
There are probably several places where better signalling and modern trains can increase the frequency of trains.
Conclusion
The historic routes will be improved.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Thameslink
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about Kent and Thameslink.
This is said.
Under the Thameslink plans, due to come in next May, are two trains per hour (tph) Maidstone East to Cambridge and 2 tph Rainham to Luton, while the longstanding Sevenoaks via Bat & Ball to Blackfriars service will be extended to Welwyn Garden City in the peaks.
The Rainham to Luton service effectively creates a four tph service through the Medway towns to Abbey Wood, Greenwich, London Bridge and beyond.
The Maidstone East to Cambridge service, also creates four tph between London and Otford.
Onward From Maidstone East
I do wonder if the powers that be, looked at extending the service to Maidstone East station to the well-connected Ashford International station.
Consider.
- With the opening of the Ashford Spurs in Spring 2018, South East London and a lot more of Kent would have good access to Continental services.
- Thameslink would have a Southern access to Thanet to complement the Northern access at Rainham.
- Stations on the Maidstone Line could get four tph.
As Maidstone East to Ashford International takes thirty minutes, I suspect the extra time needed, makes scheduling trains difficult.
On the other hand, the Class 700 trains, probably execute stops faster than the current trains.
Could Thameslink Serve Ebbsfleet International Station?
If the Fawkham Junction Link is reinstated, this is a possibility.
Could A Catford Interchange Improve Thameslink?
The Maidstone East and Sevenoaks services both go through Catford station, which is close to Catford Bridge station.
Transport for London have said several times, that they would like to create a consolidated Catford Interchange station.
If one were to be created, could there be a bit of tidying up of services through the area, in much the same way as Gatwick Airport station acts as an important interchange on the Brighton Main Line?
Could Thameslink Capacity Be Increased?
I feel that Thameslink’s decision to serve Maidstone East and Rainham stations is a good one, but I suspect there are strips of paper on the Timetabling Room floor with other Kent and Sussex stations on them, like Ashford International, Canterbury, Dover, Hastings and Uckfield.
I also think too, that there may be stations, where additional trains could be desirable.
So could the current twenty-four trains through the central core of Thameslink be increased?
I think the answer is probably in the affirmative, as signalling, driver aids and the drivers themselves will get better, as the system develops.
In this article in Rail Engineer entitled Crossrail – approaching the final stages, this is said.
When the new Elizabeth line opens, 24 trains per hour will operate in each direction through the centre of London. The new signalling system will incorporate Automatic Train Operation to support this service, with the capacity for higher frequency of 30 trains per hour in the future. As a consequence, Siemens is installing the Communications-Based Train Control system (CBTC). It is similar to one already successfully installed in Copenhagen, so expectations are high.
So could similar techniques be used in Thameslink to create another six paths an hour.
That would still only be one train every two minutes.
I suspect too, capacity could be increased by lengthening some trains from eight to twelve cars.
Conclusion
Thameslink is very tied up with the Southeastern franchise.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Crossrail
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
Kent On The Cusp Of Change – Crossrail
The Kent On The Cusp Of Change article in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways talks about Kent and Crossrail.
This is said.
In December 2018, the Elizabeth Line is due to reach its south-eastern terminus at Abbey Wood, where there will be interchange with the North Kent line.
A wide range of new journey opportunities will open up, which over time will influence many choices over work and home locations. A train every five minutes from Abbey Wood to Canary Wharf and central London is expected to have a dramatic effect in North Kent.
The article goes on to say that a working group called Crossrail Gravesend is pushing to extend the Elizabeth Line to Ebbsfleet International station for High Speed One.
Current Services Between London, Abbey Wood And The Medway Towns
Adding together current services at Abbey Wood station as given in Wikipedia with the proposed Thameslink service between Rainham and Luton, which I wrote about in Thameslink To Rainham, gives the following service level at Abbey Wood station.
Westbound;
- 6 trains per hour (tph) to London Cannon Street via Greenwich
- 2 tph to London Charing Cross via Lewisham
- 2 tph to Luton via Greenwich.
All trains will call at London Bridge station, which after rebuilding for Thameslink is complete, will be a formidable interchange to other services, such as the Underground, buses and Shank’s pony.
Londoners tend to think of Crossrail, as London’s most important rail project, but I do think that the rebuilding of London Bridge station in a few years time will be considered the second most important.
In addition, as Abbey Wood will be connected to Crossrail, there must be few places in Central London, to which travel is difficult from Abbey Wood station.
Eastbound;
- 2 tph to Barnehurst via Slade Green returning to London via the Bexleyheath Line
- 2 tph to Dartford
- 2 tph to Gillingham (Kent)
- 2 tph to Rainham (Kent)
- 2 tph to Crayford via Slade Green returning to London via the Dartford Loop Line,
This map from carto.metro.free.fr shows the lines around Dartford station.
Note.
- Barnehurst is on the Bexleyheath Line.
- Cayford station is on the Dartford Loop Line.
- The North Kent Line goes East from Datford station to Gravesend , the Medway Towns and Thanet.
In addition at Abbey Wood station, using their separate platforms and separate tracks to the Crossrail tunnel, 12 tph will be providing the Crossrail service.
Future Services From London To The Medway Towns
Looking at the Southeastern services to Gillingham and the Thameslink services to Rainham, the following can be said
- These are the only services, that go more than a few miles past Abbey Wood station.
- The Gillingham service is a Southeastern Metro service, so probably needs to be run by faster modern trains, rather than the current Class 465 trains.
- The combination of the Gillingham and Rainham services will hopefully give a very passenger friendly train every fifteen minutes between Abbey Wood and Gillingham, via Dartford, Gravesend, Rochester and Chatham.
- The Gillingham service calls at Lewisham, Blackheath, Charlton and Woolwich Arsenal between London Bridge and Abbey Wood.
- The Rainham service calls at Greenwich between London Bridge and Abbey Wood.
I do wonder, if it would be better if the Southeastern service from Charing Cross to Gillingham were to be extended to Rainham and always run by a twelve-car train.
- Rainham is only four minutes further from London than Gillingham.
- Rainham has a twelve-car bay platform.
- Gillingham’s bay platform may not be able to take a twelve-car train.
- Four tph can be handled in a single bay platform.
This would give a high-capacity four tph service between Abbey Wood and the Medway Towns, with two tph from Thameslink and two tph from Southeastern.
But the major factor would be that passengers would surely find it a very easy service to use.
Service Frequencies East Of Dartford
Note that of the eastbound trains, only 6 tph go through Dartford, as the other 4 tph loop back to London.
Between Dartford and Rochester, there is only the 4 tph to Gillingham/Rainham, although they are joined by 2 tph Highspeed trains between Gravesend and Rochester.
It would thus appear that the maximum frequency between Abbey Wood and Rochester is probably 6 tph.
When you consider that the trains through the area, will all be modern trains fitted with the latest ERTMS signalling, handling these numbers of trains and perhaps 4-8 tph for Crossrail between Abbey Wood and Gravesend in the future, will be well below the 24 tph handled by Crossrail and Thameslink in their central tunnels.
The New Track Layout At Abbey Wood Station
Looking at the new track layout at Abbey Wood station, it appears to be very simple with just a reversing siding to the East of the two Crossrail platforms 3 and 4.
Cross-overs appear to be provided so that the following is possible.
- Trains from Crossrail can continue towards Dartford after calling at Platform 4.
- Trains from Dartford can continue towards Crossrail after calling at Platform 3.
It looks to me, that the track layout is designed, so that Crossrail trains can easily run to and from Dartford or any other station that the planners decide is the terminus.
Capacity Between Abbey Wood And Rochester
As the double-track line between Abbey Wood and Rochester with modern signalling can probably handle up to probably 24 tph, there is capacity for a lot of Crossrail trains to go past Abbey Wood.
Suppose Crossrail is extended to Gravesend with 4 tph extended to the new terminal and trains stabled at a new depot at Hoo Junction to the East of the town.
The following frequencies to and from London would apply at various stations.
- Abbey Wood – 10 tph + 12 tph Crossrail
- Belvedere – 10 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Erith – 10 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Slade Green – 10 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Dartford – 6 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Stone Crossing – 4 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Greenhithe – 4 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Swanscombe – 4 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- Gravesend- 4 tph + 4 tph Crossrail + 2 tph Highspeed
North Kent is going to get a better train service.
Hoo Junction
Hoo Junction, which is a few miles to the East of Gravesend station, has been identified by Crossrail planners, as a suitable area for a depot to serve an extended South-Eastern branch of the line.
Chris Gibbs, in his extensive report on GTR’s performance, suggests that the Hoo Junction area , be used as a depot for Thameslink services to North Kent. I wrote about this in Gibbs Report – Hoo Junction Depot.
In addition, Southeastern are running short of space in Slade Green Depot.
But that’s just the railways.
This report on the BBC indicates that the new Lower Thames Crossing will cross North-South between Gravesend and Hoo Junction.
Should there be a Park-and-Ride station at Hoo Junction?
It would have a four tph service between London and the Medway Towns with a stop at Abbey Wood for Crossrail.
In Gibbs Report – Hoo Junction Depot, I came to the following conclusion.
Crossrail, the Department of Transport, Kent County Council, Network Rail, Southeastern, Thameslink and all other stakeholders and residents should sit round a large table and agree a common long-term philosophy that is in all their best interests for the future.
What happens at Hoo Junction, will be tremendously important to transport infrastructure in the South East of England in general and Kent in particular.
Crossrail To Ebbsfleet International Station
The article talks about extending Crossrail to Ebbsfleet International station, by adding two new tracks through Slade Green and Dartford stations, serving existing stations.
As I showed in the previous section, I think extra tracks are not necessary, as modern signalling can handle the required number of trains with ease. I suspect though, that the 75 mph Class 465 trains will need to be retired from the North Kent Line, as their performance is just not good enough.
The report says this about the connection at Ebbsfleet.
There would be a new station that would have pedestrian access with Ebbsfleet HS1 station and Northfleet on the historic line – this could be the terminus, or the new line might reach as far as Hoo Junction on the east side of Gravesend.
I’ve always felt that Ebbsfleet International station was a logical South-Eastern destination for Crossrail, mainly because of the space at the station for platforms, depots and car parking.
Consider.
- St. Pancras station may have too few platforms for Continental services in the future, so Ebbsfleet International may end up being a terminus for some of these services.
- Southeastern is developing the Highspeed commuter services to East Kent and East Sussex, which probably need a connection to Crossrail and/or Thameslink.
- The Fawkham Junction link connects Swanley and Ebbsfleet International stations, and it could be used by extra Highspeed services or Thameslink.
I’ve always felt that there’s a simple solution in there, but vested interests and politicians seem to stop railway planners from finding it.
So why not use upgrade Northfleet station with the following features?
- The ability to accept the services along the North Kent Line – 4 tph + 4 tph Crossrail
- The ability to accept twelve-car trains.
- A pedestrian link to Ebbsfleet International station based on something a bit sexy. Perhaps a fast travelator or some other form of people mover.
This Google Map shows that there is plenty of space between the stations.
Northfleet station is to the North-East of Ebbsfleet International station.
Could it be that a simple solution would work?
- Belvedere, Erith, Slade Green, Dartford, Stone Crossing, Greenhithe and Swanscombe become Crossrail and North Kent stations.
- Northfleet station is connected to Ebbsfleet International station in a passenger-friendly way.
- The four tph service through the Medway towns to London Bridge continue and are better-integrated with Thameslink at London Bridge.
- The Swanley link to Ebbsfleet is reopened to allow more service opportunities.
But then what do I do know?
Is Abbey Wood Station A Cross-Platform Interchange?
One thing that the Modern Railways article says, is that Abbey Wood station has been designed with cross-platform interchange, in such a way that any delays to Kent services don’t have any knock-on effects on the new services.
The Modern Railways article says that Abbey Wood station is a cross-platform interchange, as do other articles.
This map from carto.metro.free.fr shows the layout of lines at Abbey Wood station.
Compare this with this track layout, that I posted in Abbey Wood Station – 29th August 2016.
Note the following.
- The older layout shows cross-platform interchange.
- The current one has two pairs of platforms, with Platforms 3 and 4 for Crossrail and Platforms 1 and 2 for other services.
- The current layout probably connects better to the existing lines to Dartford.
These pictures were taken on the 28th June 2017.
They show a similar layout, of two Northern platforms (3 & 4) for Crossrail and two Southern platforms (1 & 2) for all other services.
Note.
- The two cross-overs to the West of Abbey Wood station to get the Crossrail trains to and from the right platforms.
- The station building and the two footbridges over the lines.
- The solid wooden fence between the two pairs of lines.
- The robust nature of the overhead wiring.
I suspect, that if they had wanted to have Eastbound and Westbound lines each share an island platform, it would have required a flyover, which would have been a large expense.
But at least with this layout, Crossrail trains can have their own pair of lines to the East, running to the North of the current tracks. The Modern Railways article says this.
Mindful of this, the working group is proposing two new dedicated tracks for the extension, running alongside the line through Slade Green and Dartford, with platforms serving the existing stations.
This Google Map shows the route through Dartford.
In some places putting in two extra tracks would be very difficult and extremely expensive and very disruptive to local residents.
Given the capabilities of modern signalling, now being demonstrated on Thameslink in Central London, I believe that something practical for the train companies and friendly for the passengers will emerge.
But one thing is certain. There will not be cross-platform interchange between Crossrail and other services at Abbey Wood station.
Interchange Between North Kent Services And Crossrail
I have a feeling, that this will come down to personal preferences.
After the opening of Crossrail to Abbey Wood in 2018 and the opening of Thameslink to Rainham, passengers will probably have to use Abbey Wood, where it will be an up-and-over via escalators, lifts or stairs.
If and when Crossrail is extended to Gravesend, any of Abbey Wood, Dartford and Gravesend, could be used as a same-platform interchange.
It would also be possible to take a Highspeed service from Ramsgate and change to Crossrail at Gravesend. Would this avoid the extra charge for High Speed One?
I think that Gravesend could become the interchange of choice, as it could have the following London-bound trains, if Crossrail is extended.
- 2 tph – Thameslink to Luton
- 2 tph – Southeastern to Charing Cross
- 2 tph – Highspeed to Ebbsfleet International, Stratford international and St. Pancras.
- 4 tph – Crossrail
There could be a need to improve the platforms to cope with the increase of passenger numbers.
Conclusion
Crossrail will get very involved with the new Southeastern franchise.
See Also
These are related posts.
- Abbey Wood Station
- Ashford Spurs
- Elimination Of Slow Trains
- Fawkham Junction Link
- Highspeed Routes
- High Speed To Hastings
- Historic Routes
- Longfield Station
- Maidstone
- Reading To Tonbridge
- Thameslink
- Thanet Parkway Station
- Track Improvements
- Ultimate Class 395 Train
- Victoria As A Highspeed Terminal
To know more read Kent On The Cusp Of Change in the July 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.









































































