The title of this post, is the same, as that of this article in The Times.
These are the introductory paragraphs.
British scientists have hailed a “huge breakthrough” in the fight against Covid-19 after a cheap drug was declared the first to save lives.
Dexamethasone, a decades-old steroid that costs about 50p per day, was found to reduce deaths by up to one third for the sickest patients. NHS hospitals were advised to begin using it immediately.
According to a retired Senior Hospital Pharmacist friend, Dexamethasone has been around a long time and is used in shock. She added “So don’t know why not tried before.”
The Times article says this about previous use.
While it had been administered to Covid patients in China and elsewhere its use was controversial, with no definitive proof that it worked.
Could it be that the research was discounted on ageist grounds against the drug?
Wikipedia also says this about the drug?
it was the 259th most prescribed medication in the United States, with more than a million prescriptions.
That is about 1-in-327 of the US population.
Dexamethasone And Coeliac Disease
Out of curiosity, I typed “Dexamethasone and coeliac disease” into Google.
I found this page on SpringerLink, which is entitled The Role of Corticosteroids In Celiac Disease.
This is the first sentence.
Since Dickie first described the benefits of a gluten-free diet in the 1940s and 1950s, this diet is the standard of care for all patients with celiac disease. For patients with a new diagnosis, dietary compliance can be difficult to achieve, possibly resulting in a clinical course marked by delayed recovery and persistent symptoms. This is of particular concern for patients in the developing world, where gluten-free food items may be difficult to obtain or to identify. While dietary modifications are likely to remain the treatment of choice in celiac disease, the use of adjuvant corticosteroids in newly diagnosed patients is a topic that has been addressed previously.
I’m no medic, so what follows in the scientific report is beyond my limited medical knowledge.
However in A Thought On Deaths Of The Elderly From Covid-19, I estimated that there are around 120,000 undiagnosed coeliacs in the UK, who are over 65. I used data from Age UK and Coeliac-UK.
According to Joe West of Nottingham University, diagnosed coeliacs on a gluten-free diet have less chance of getting cancer!
Could it be that this group of people, of which I am one, have a strong immune system?
So could the reverse be true and that undiagnosed coeliacs on a typical gluten-rich diet have a compromised immune system?
My son was an undiagnosed coeliac, with a poor diet who smoked. He died at just thirty-seven from pancreatic cancer!
Could some of the patients, who recovered from COVID-19, when given dexamethasone, have been undiagnosed coeliacs?
I, of course don’t know.
But the role of coeliac disease in the recovery from COVID-19 must be investigated.
A quick way to test my theory would be to survey the catering departments of all hospitals and see how much gluten-free food was being sent to wards, where COVID-19 is being treated.
Coeliacs, whether diagnosed by doctors or self-diagnosed, will probably be vociferous in their need for gluten-free food. I certainly was, when I had my stroke in Hong Kong.
Give me the data and I’ll analyse it!
I would also like to hear from any coeliacs, who have been given dexamethasone!
June 16, 2020
Posted by AnonW |
Food, Health | Coeliac/Gluten-Free, COVID-19, COVID-19 And Coeliac Disease, Dexamethasone, Oxford University |
4 Comments
The title of thispost, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.
The article takes the form of the BBC’s Transport Correspondent; Tom Edwards interviewing Crossrail’s Chief Executive; Mark Wild.
This is an extract.
But the big challenge is the 40% of work left to do on the safety checks known as “assurances”.
The management team say it is working to the opening date of the summer 2021 for the Paddington to Abbey Wood section under central London.
To make up for lost time, Crossrail wants to carry out blitz testing in August and September.
I asked Mr Wild if he could guarantee 100% if Crossrail will open in summer 2021.
He said: “I guarantee that this project team and myself, will do everything humanly possible to do it.
“I must say we are working pretty effectively – 2,500 people working off-site and we are making great progress on the assurance work.
“Clearly we have to do that safely but there’s no doubt Covid has had an effect and we are working now on a plan to recover lost ground.”
Having watched many projects, that were in dire straits, being recovered by top class project management, I feel that there is a good chance that if Mark Wild and his team, are up to scratch that Summer 2021 could be a realistic possibility.
I remember the tale of British Leyland’s MiniMetro plant, that was recalled in Michael Ewardes‘s book.
- The complicated machine, that assembled the bodies wasn’t working.
- It was then found out, that it had hit a motorway bridge on the journey from Germany.
- Good project management saved the day, by reorganising and accelerating the commissioning of the second line, so that it came into production early enough to save the day.
As British Leyland were Artemis customers, I do wonder how much the software, I wrote in a Suffolk attic, played a part in that episode.
Let’s hope that Mark Wild and his team have some good project management software on their team.
June 16, 2020
Posted by AnonW |
Transport/Travel | Artemis, British Leyland, Crossrail, Project Management |
Leave a comment
I ask this question as I have just written a post, which is entitled Grant Shapps Announcement On Friday, where I detail a project called Altalto, which its developers hope will convert waste into aviation biofuel.
But there are other factors at work, that will have effects on passenger flying.
Electric Aircraft
Despite the technological problems electric aircraft, I can see that in a couple of years, an electric plane will be available with the following specification.
- 9-15 passenger capacity
- 100-200 mile range
- Half-hour recharge time
These will improve as technology improves. But then everybody who uses a battery in their product says this.
Lightweight Structures
If you’ve ever looked at a high-performance glider, you’ll see that they are the featherweights of the aviation world and are built mainly from ultra lightweight composites.
Boeing have gone this route with the 787 Dreamliner and the aircraft has been a success.
Unfortunately, Boeing’s accountants have trashed the company, by trying to prolong the life of the obsolete 737 too far, instead of developing a composite replacement.
By the end of this decade all aircraft will be made from lightweight composite structures.
Interstingly, the only all new electric passenger aircraft; the Eviation Alice has a fully-composite airframe.
Lightweight structures will help create lower carbon emissions on traditional aircraft, by reducing fuel burn, but will really help in creating new aircraft types. Some of which will look very unusual.
Better Aerodynamics
Aerodynamics are getting more efficient and this will reduce fuel burn and have two effects on aircraft design.
- They will make existing designs more efficient.
- They will improve the design of electric aircraft designed on a clean sheet of paper.
Expect to see some very weird looking aircraft. Look at Eviation Alice, which could evolve into a twenty seat aircraft with a range exceeding six hundred miles.
Hybrid-Powered Aircraft
I can’t with current technology, see an all-electric aircraft powered by batteries having a range greater than perhaps six hundred miles and a capacity of greater than perhaps 20 passengers. The mathematics and the physics say no!
Some aero engine manufacturers are talking about hybrid power, where a small turbofan engine is paired with a battery and electric motors.
I think it could be a way to extend the range of electric aircraft, without creating significant emissions. Aviation biofuel would fit well with a hybrid aviation powerplant, as it would further remove emissions.
Completely Automatic Flight
The pilot of a modern airliner does very little flying and there is no reason, pilots couldn’t do as little to fly the plane, as a driver on a Victoria Line tube has done since 1967 to drive the train.
When a train is ready to depart, the driver presses a button and the train moves automatically to the next station.
If anything unusual happens, the driver takes control.
Why not with airliners?
Point-To-Point Air Services
In MagniX Electric Aircraft Engines Take To The Skies, I put this quote from magniX, who make the electric motors for electric aircraft.
magniX says 45% of all airline flights cover less than 800 km, while 5% of flights are sub-160 km.
These flights will be the first to go electric.
But they are not really suited for an airport like Heathrow or Gatwick, as each plane needs a separate take-off and landing slot to fit in with conventional flights.
Heathrow want a third runway to increase capacity.
Perhaps it should be for electric flights only!
- Electric aircraft will be low-noise and create no pollution.
- It would have its own terminal.
- Charging facilities would be built into the terminal.
- Taxi distances would be short.
- The runway would only need to be short.
- Passengers would have to arrive and leave by zero-carbon transport.
- There might even be space for two runways; one for landing and one of take-off.
I can see a network of both smaller airports and satellites at major airports developing, that are designed for electric aircraft.
- Some airports, like possibly London City, might convert to all-electric, due to their sensitive locations.
- Other important towns and cities without an airport, might develop new all-electric airports.
- Hubs might develop at convenient locations in the UK, for short trips to the Continent and Ireland. Perhaps a high speed rail-connected Manston Airport would be ideal for electric flights to Belgium, The Netherlands and Northern France.
Frequent point-to-point electric flights could create a zero-carbon short-haul network for flights of up to about six hundred miles.
Rail Journeys Less Than Four Hours
It is accepted by many analysts and rail companies, that if a train takes less than four hours, then it is a viable alternative to flying.
- Could the success of Eurostar’s London and Amsterdam route, be partly down to the that it’s four hours?
- First Group subsidiary; East Coast Trains have stated they will target air passengers, with a sub four-hour, one-class £25 train journey between London and Edinburgh.
- High Speed Two is currently promising three hours and forty minute journeys between London and Edinburgh/Glasgow, when their service starts.
I believe that rail companies all over the world will see tempting air passengers to use rail, as a market to develop.
Zoom And Other Internet Techniques
During the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses, families and others have started using Internet conferencing in a big way.
But will other software develop, that will have the effect of both cutting flying or making it more zero-carbon.
Suppose, I wanted to visit several cities in the United States. Is there an Internet site that tells me how to do it to create the least amount of CO2?
Biofuel For Short Flights
When I laid out the factors, I only mentioned aviation biofuels once.
That was in conjunction with hybrid aircraft, that use both jet and electric power.
If the hybrid technology succeeds, it may mean that flights up to about a thousand miles are possible and this would include a lot of short haul flights around the world. With biofuels and hybrid powerplants, carbon dioxide emissions will be greatly reduced and could probably be managed by carbon offset measures like tree-planting.
Biofuel For Long Flights
As aircraft get more efficient using biofuel will help to reduce the amount of emissions, to a level that could be balanced by carbon offset.
This will be an expensive process for airlines, as probably most fleets will need to be replaced with more fuel efficient planes.
But this is happening, as 757s and A380 are being replaced by Dreamliners and other more fuel efficient types.
Conclusion
By 2035, most short haul flights will be electric or some form of hybrid power, although a lot will be replaced by high speed rail.
Biofuel won’t save long-haul flights, but it will make them economic for the airlines.
I suspect that there will be a lot of aluminium aircraft going for scrap.
June 16, 2020
Posted by AnonW |
Transport/Travel | Altalto, Boeing 747, Boeing 787, Flying, Global Warming/Zero-Carbon, Heathrow Airport, High Speed Rail, Sustainable Aviation Fuel |
2 Comments