The Anonymous Widower

Super Injunctions and Deep Searching Software

I have written software that in the past has been used to deep search the Internet.  I did it when a company asked me if I could help trace anybody stealing their IPR.  I didn’t find anything at all and in that case that was a good result, as it meant there had been no theft.

However software like that could be easily written to deep search the Internet for relationships that shouldn’t be happening.  Let’s say two well-known Premiership managers decided to have a good lunch together after the season in a good restaurant. As well they might! Someone might see them and put the story in a blog or tweet and unless someone else was searching for it deliberately it wouldn’t be found.  But the deep search software would find it, if it was properly set up, say with a database of the names of all Premiership managers and footballers.

So just as Google tracks the links with its search terms, other software can be written to find relationships.

So celebrities had better be even more careful.

May 9, 2011 Posted by | Computing, News | , , | Leave a comment

Terrorism Arrests at Sellafield

There have been arrests under the Terrorism Act at Sellafield.

I have been over nuclear facilities in both the UK and the United States and am pretty sure, that untrained people without the right technical background could learn anything of use, that they couldn’t get from something like Wikipedia or Google. They certainly wouldn’t get inside.

In fact all they’ve done is draw attention to themselves and get arrested.

I’d do them for wasting Police time.

May 3, 2011 Posted by | Computing, News | , , , | 1 Comment

Andrew Marr Comes Clean

Having watched Have I Got News For You and seen what Ian Hislop has said since Andrew Marr has come clean over the superinjunction, I think that he made his statement just in time.  I think if Marr hadn’t broke his silence, it would have been all over the place within a week.

This always happens in the end, as someone makes a mistake or perhaps sadly one of the parties dies and then it gets published.

These privacy superinjunctions may have their place in some areas, like the protection of children  But in many places they are just being used by indivduals and companies to hide wrong doing.  Or should I say delay publication, as inevitably that’s what happens.

It would appear now that the tabloids are looking for the next person to come clean.

There is also a serious side to all this.  Read this article in the Daily Mail. One person, who has found a serious health problem with paint, has even been prohibited from talking to his MP. It’s getting to be all very Kafka!

The Mail is also getting its claws into Fred the Shred in this article. At one time the injunction said that we couldn’t refer to him as a banker.

I’ve just typed his real name coupled with the w-word into Google.  You get a lot of very funny articles.

Superinjunctions have now created this new game of Googling the Internet to find out the truth.  You usually can! The google Toolbar is particularly useful, as it knows the common searches. Let’s say I’m a sportsman, who say has been associated with a Z-list celebrity, but I’ve taken out a super injunction to stop my wife finding out and divorcing me, thus relieving me of a lot of my money and half my salary, which would mean I’m unattractive to bimbos.  If I continually type my name and that of the celebrity into Google, I can check that no stories are appearing.  But all I’m doing is making it easier for people to find the association.

You can run, but you can’t hide.

April 27, 2011 Posted by | News | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Do Large Organisations Cut Themselves Off From the Internet?

I sometimes criticise (and praise) companies and organisations on this blog.  Here are a few examples.

Most of those comments are positive, as I don’t want to get a reputation for not being fair.  However, the really interesting one is about John Lewis, where I didn’t hold back in criticising their performance. If you read the comments on the post, you’ll see that Customer Support at John Lewis found it and asked me to e-mail them. The problem I had been having was resolved.

So if say you are the manager of the Islington Upper Street branch of the Midland Bank, other than being immortal, do you check what is being said about your branch on the Internet?  And if you do, do you check blogs and forums?

I have a feeling that John Lewis might be an exception here.  But surely, any business interested in what its customers think about it should be searching what is on the Internet, even if some of it is perhaps abusive or badly-written. To take my bank example, it is very easy to set up a Google Alert for Midland Bank, Upper Street, Islington.

I have a feeling that companies often spend fortunes on market research finding out what customers and others think of them.  But do they need to, when with a bit of training and perhaps some affordable software, of the sort I can write, it’s all out there waiting to be delivered?

April 12, 2011 Posted by | Computing | , | Leave a comment

Building Scientific Models with Computers

This was the title of a lecture at University College London, that I attended yesterday lunchtime.

It was an excellent lecture and in some ways it was like going back forty years to when I worked at ICI Plastics in Welwyn Garden City. In fact two topics, that were discussed by Professor Catlow, were similar to problems I tackled all of those years ago.

The first was the problems of turbulent and other flows.  We had been interested in what happened inside an extruder as you used it to force plastics, such as polyethylene, polypropylene and PVC into moulds to produce the products needed.  It was an intractable problem then and I suspect it might be almost as bad today. Although computers are now bigger and can handle many more nodes than the hundred or so, we could handle on our PACE 231R or with IBM 360/CSMP.

I also found his discussion of the various forms of molecules and how they could be predicted fascinating and if we’d had someone with his knowledge, we’d have got a lot farther with another problem.

When you create polymers, you create long chains of molecules like ethylene and propylene etc. which lock together like a series of odd-shaped Lego bricks. These chains then bind together to form the items we need.

At the time, ICI were trying to create an engineering plastic, which would be stronger and have a greater temperature range. I won’t name it here, as I don’t want to break any confidentiality, but suffice to say that the monomer or polymer building block, needed to be created as a straight molecule for the integrity of the plastic. It was known that several forms of monomer could be created and that there was a rather complicated separation process to extract the straight ones.  Just as in Professor Catlow’s example yesterday, water in the reaction, was one of the factors, that  affected the proportion of desired monomer.

Now I’m not a chemist but I was asked to look at the physics and dynamics of the reaction, with respect to removing the errant water from the reaction vessel as soon as possible after its creation, to reduce the damage it could do.  In the end, I made myself very unpopular, as I often did, by finding a method that removed the water.  I can remember searching Chemical Abstracts and finally found the data I wanted in a paper published by a Chinese researcher working in Canada in 1909. We don’t know how lucky we are with Google and the Internet.

I left ICI soon after I completed this work, so I don’t know the final outcome!

But to me, the exercise proved the value of using dynamic computer models based on differential equations, to understand difficult systems.

In some ways, I was able to do this work, because I was properly taught calculus and how to form differential equations at school.  Would such an important subject now be taught to sixteen-year-olds  as was regularly done in the 1960s at schools similar to the one I attended?

January 21, 2011 Posted by | Computing, World | , , , , | 2 Comments

Coeliac Disease and Ischemic Stroke

I’m up early and playing on the Internet with Google.  I’ve just typed “stroke coeliac” into the search engine with a couple of modifiers to cut out some of the things I already know about.

I have now found this paper by El Moutawakil B, Chourkani N, Sibai M, Moutaouakil F, Rafai M, Bourezgui M and Slassi I working in Casablanca in Morocco, entitled Coeliac Disease and Ischemic Stroke. This is the extract.

INTRODUCTION: Neurological manifestations of celiac disease are various. An association with ischemic stroke is not common and has not been well documented. We report two cases.

OBSERVATIONS: The first patient had experienced several transient ischemic strokes in the past 2 years and then had an acute ischemic stroke involving the territory of the right posterior cerebral artery. Investigations revealed celiac disease with no other recognizable etiology. The clinical course was marked by persistent visual aftereffects, but no new vascular event. The second patient had been followed since 1998 for celiac disease confirmed by pathology and serology tests. She was on a gluten-free diet. The patient had an ischemic stroke involving the territory of the left middle cerebral artery. Apart from a positive serology for celiac disease and iron deficiency anemia, the etiological work-up was negative.

DISCUSSION: The mechanisms of vascular involvement in celiac disease are controversial. The most widely incriminated factor is autoimmune central nervous system vasculitis, in which tissue transglutaminase, the main auto-antigen contributing to maintaining the integrity of endothelium tissue, plays a major role. Other mechanisms are still debated, mainly vitamin deficiency.

CONCLUSION: Being a potentially treatable cause of ischemic stroke, celiac disease must be considered as a potential etiology of stroke of unknown cause, particularly in young patients, and even without gastrointestinal manifestations.

I’d always fancied going to Casablanca to see the ghost of Humphrey Bogart.

March 20, 2010 Posted by | Computing, Health | , , , , | 1 Comment

Google Flu Trends

I found reference to Google Flu Trends in The Economist in an article about how Google are searching blogs and other information to find out what is going on.

An interesting graph is shown, but why are the UK, Finland and Denmark left out?

I wonder if the same techniques could be used to check for relationships.  For instance, I wonder if my being a coeliac means that I am more likely to have strokes.  So what if there are a lot of blog posts, with these two words in them?  Obviously, it would need powerful and correct statistical analysis.

As an aside here, some years ago I wrote a program that used Google to deep search the Internet, create a database of all possible results and then display them in a Daisy chart.  It showed a lot of promise, but I then had other things to do.  That’s my life all over.

March 20, 2010 Posted by | Computing | , , , , | Leave a comment