My Scottish Borders correspondent has asked me about the first office Metier had in Ipswich.
Courtesy of Google Streetview, I was able to capture this image.
Note.
They were in the four story building with the yellow cladding.
I see it’s still called Pearl Assurance House.
Shadu Hair and Beauty used to be a rather good camera shop.
For those of you, who don’t know Ipswich, if you walk straight ahead and keep right, you end up in the centre of Ipswich.
It wasn’t very large, but it was certainly in better condition, than some of the offices we had in London.
This is the second office in Fore Street.
If I remember correctly, the office was found by Wendy, who responded to my advert in the East Anglian Daily Times, saying, that we were looking for an Office Dogsbody.
Are some of us learning things about ourselves during lockdown?
For myself!
Mental Health
I certainly think, that I’m handling the mental side well, as I’ve had several lockdowns in the past, usually when I want to get some software written.
Another programmer has told me, that he has used lockdowns to get software written in the past.
I am certainly getting bored though! You can only do so many serious puzzles from The Times.
Normally, if I feel bored, I get on a train or a bus and go somewhere interesting.
Exercise
I’m taking exercise regularly and go for a regular walk most days. I’d probably walk more, if I felt like taking public transport more. But, I do feel, buses and trains could be a place to catch COVID-19.
Drinking
My house tends to get a bit warm, so I’m drinking a lot.
Not strong alcohol, although there is quite a bit of 0.5% Adnams beer going down my throat, but mainly, still lemonade, tea and water.
The amount of fluid seems to have cured my periodic constipation.
On the other hand it does seem to have increased my INR, so I have reduced my Warfarin dosage from 4 to 3.5 mg. per day.
Sleep
I seem to be sleeping well! But then I always do!
Conclusion
Except for the boredom, I think, that I’m doing OK.
The Class 153 trains will be retired at the end of this week.
More Class 755 trains wll come into service in the coming weeks.
There is a software problem that restricts full operation, which should be fixed in a couple of weeks, which is described like this.
A new piece of software is due to be installed within a few weeks – but until then passengers heading east from Elmswell and west from Kennett are being taken by bus to the next station.
Both Elmswell and Kennett are simpler stations, with short platforms.
This Google Map shows Elmswell station.
And this Google Map shows Kennett station.
I wonder, if with these stations, selective door opening is needed the on one platform and the layout doesn’t fit the original software.
When you write software to work in a large number of situations, it’s difficult to make sure you cover everything.
Greater Anglian’s solution of a bus to get around the problem is not an ideal solution, but it should work, until the software is fixed.
One section is about a new ultrasound device from Butterfly Network.
Their product called Butterfly iQ; is an ultrasound sensor on a chip, that converts a smart phone into a full function medical ultrasound machine.
But as an engineer, who knows a bit about this sort of technology, I doubt that all the applications are medical ones.
Typical hospital ultrasound machines cost tens of thousands of pounds, but the price of the sensor on the Butterfly Network web site is in the order of a couple of grand. Software is probably extra, but even so, Southampton Hospital has bought four and one is in their paediatric ambulance.
I have one big question.
Is the device open source? This would enable, an imaginative programmer, as I once was, to convert the device, so that it is able to perform an important application.
I would be very disappointing if it wasn’t!
To get a snapshot of the power of ultrasound, read the Wikipedia entry for ultrasound.
A Video
I found this on the Internet.
As you can see, it’s not very big.
Conclusion
This is an amazing development and it will revolutionise so much of healthcare and other fields.
This article on the BBC is entitled Saudi Oil Attacks: Images Show Detail Of Damage.
Read this article and then say, that drones can’t be used to create death ad destruction or merely havoc, like flight disruption at a major airport.
Consider.
Automation is such, that drones can now be launched on a fire-and-forget basis.
You can’t jam an autonomous drone!
There is nothing to stop a top quality programmer creating evil software.
Much of the software, used for evil purposes, is probably also used to write business, research, engineering, scientific, educational and other types of software.
The genie is well and truly out of the bottle!
14/09/2019 will become a notorious date in history.
Boeing said it could halt production of the 737 Max jet on Wednesday as it reported the company’s largest ever quarterly loss following two fatal accidents involving the plane.
To my mind, this is a self-inflicted problem caused by trying to stretch a 1960s design too far past the end of its design life.
Boeing realised that they needed a new larger plane and developed the fuel-efficient Class 787 Dreamliner to replace 747s, 767s and 777s.
It was total management failure to not planning to replace the 737 with a smaller plane based on Dreamliner technology.
Will Boeing Solve The 737 MAX Problem?
Compare it with the Class 710 train, that also had software problems that delayed the launch.
The Class 710 train is a totally new train, with masses of new features, liked by operators, staff and passengers.
The Train Management and Control System of the Class 710 train was very challenging to design and program.
If a train fails, it only comes to an embarrassing stop.
On the other hand, the following can be said about the 737 MAX..
The 737 MAX is an update of a 1960s design.
The mathematics of the 737 MAX must be challenging.
The computer system hasn’t been properly designed, programmed and tested.
If a plane fails, it’s a lot more than an embarrassing stop.
Boeing seem to have made a tragic mistake for airlines, passengers and them,selves.
Engineers will probably solve the software problem,but will that be enough to save the plane?
I had this message read out on BBC’s Wake Up To Money this morning.
I have been involved in the programming of several first-of-their-kind computer systems dating back to 1969. They are always late ad usually need a couple of goes to get it right! Boeing didn’t do enough testing.
Although, I’ve been mainly involved in programming user systems and I’ve never controlled anything by a computer program, I have worked with a lot of people who have. One team, I worked alongside, programmed the world’s first computer to fully control a large chemical plant.
But even, when I was writing something as big and complicated as Artemis, you had to take into account, that not everybody using the system, thought the way you did.
Those that fly aircraft differ in one area, that has nothing to do with sex, racial type or religion. Their experience of flying aircraft varies from a couple of thousand hours upwards.
It is no surprise to me, that some of the great aircraft stories of safe landings in difficult circumstances have been done by very experiences pilots, often with years of flying less reliable military aircraft.
They have used their experience to get themselves and their passengers out of trouble
It should be noted that the pilots of both the Indonesian and the Ethiopian planes, had several thousands hours of experience.
On the whole, human beings are generally risk averse and pilots are no different to the rest of us.
We also don’t like surprises.
How many times have you installed a new copy of a popular software system to find that it is radically different and it takes you several weeks to get used to it?
When I was writing Artemis, I made sure, that, I didn’t create any surprises for customers all over the world. The software was also tested to destruction.
Getting a calculation wrong in Artemis, would be unlikely to have had fatal consequences.
Conclusion
Have Boeing with their MCAS computer software fix to cure the inadequacies of an obsolete air frame, made two big mistakes?
They have created an airliner, that goes against pilot experience?
What this blog will eventually be about I do not know.
But it will be about how I’m coping with the loss of my wife and son to cancer in recent years and how I manage with being a coeliac and recovering from a stroke. It will be about travel, sport, engineering, food, art, computers, large projects and London, that are some of the passions that fill my life.
And hopefully, it will get rid of the lonely times, from which I still suffer.