The Anonymous Widower

Is TransPennine Going For A One-Class Fleet?

This report on Rail News announces the awards of the two rail franchises in the North.

It says that First TransPennine will be committed to acquiring forty-four new trains comprising 220 vehicles. The article also says this about increasing services.

The frequency on many routes will be increased, so that there will be six trains an hour between Manchester and Leeds, and 35 a day between Manchester and Scotland — twice as many as now. A new route between Liverpool and Scotland will be introduced in 2019.

The numbers say they are five-car trains, which will certainly sort out some of their capacity problems.

At present First Transpennine has the following fleet.

All except the Class 350 are diesel-powered.

Add up the current carriages and you get two hundred and three.

So if some of diesel multiple units were retained, there would be a useful increase in fleet size.

But surely from the train maintenance and staff points of view, it would be better if there was one fleet of all the same type of train.

There may also be a slight problem with Scottish services, especially as the number of them is more than doubled.

This will mean that between Preston and Glasgow, they will need extra paths on the overcrowded West Coast Main Line.

I think we’ll see trains between Manchester Airport and Liverpool, and Glasgow, joining and splitting at Preston, as this will mean that Liverpool to Scotland services will not need any extra paths on the West Coast Main Line. Some could also split at Carstairs, with one train going to Glasgow and the other to Edinburgh.

I’ve used the Class 350 trains from Glasgow to Preston and despite being too small, they are also only 110 mph trains, whereas the Class 390 Pendelinos used by Virgin, usually run at 125 mph.

Simple common sense says, that if all trains cruised up the West Coast Main Line at the same speed, this maximises capacity. Also as parts of the TransPennine network in the East are also 125 mph lines, this might be desireable design speed. The government press release about the franchise award also talks about 125 mph trains.

But the biggest problem as is pointed out in the press release is that full electrification is not expected to be complete until 2022.

So trains will need some form of independent power source to bridge the gaps in the electrification.

  • Five carriages
  • The ability to run in pairs.
  • 125 mph cruising speed.
  • Some form of independent power.

Logic says that this means they will be Hitachi Class 800 trains, which would use their on-board diesel engines as required.

Currently, the factory at Newton Aycliffe is busy with Class 800/801 trains for Great Western Railway and Virgin Trains East Coast and EMUs for Scotland, so like the extra Class 800s for the South Western routes, they would probably have to be built in Japan.

Would this mean that early introduction into service would be very difficult?

The only alternative would be to stretch the current four car Class 387 trains to five cars and make them IPEMU variants, which would then use their on-board energy storage to bridge gaps in the electrification. If the technology can be proven for a route like Leeds to Manchester, then they could probably start to be delivered next year.

These are some points and questions about Class 387 trains and Bombardier’s IPEMU technology.

  • Class 387 trains are built in Derby by Bombardier.
  • There are currently a total of fifty seven four-car Class 387 trains either built or on order.
  • There must be some standard Class 387 trains sitting in sidings, as they are destined for routes on the Great Western Railway, where there are no overhead wires.
  • I doubt it would be difficult to lengthen the trains to five cars, as the closely-related Class 378 trains have received an extra car twice.
  • This report in the Derby Telgraph, says that Bombardier have recently received an award for their IPEMU technology.
  • This article in Rail Technology Magazine, states that Bombardier are doing extensive testing of the batteries at Mannheim
  • IPEMU trains could be more efficient, as regenerative braking is used to recover energy instead of always recharging from external sources.
  • As IPEMU technology improves, the range will get longer making it possible for electric trains to serve more destinations in the TransPennine network.
  • Bombardier’s next generation train, called the Aventra, will all be wired for the fitting of on-board energy storage,
  • The new franchise for First TransPennine has effectively started, as it just a continuation of more of the same. So early train delivery would show they meant business and it wasn’t just jam tomorrow.
  • The standard Class 387 trains could be introduced on Scottish services as soon as trains were delivered.

If the IPEMU technology can be proven to be viable on First TransPennine, a lot of companies and groups will benefit.

  • Network Rail will be able to avoid a lot of difficult, sensitive or expensive electrification.
  • Bombardier could sell a few more trains.
  • Passengers will get new electric trains in many places, as fast as they can be built.
  • Some politicians and others could get a lot of credit.

It’ll be interesting to see what First TransPennine have decided to do!

 

 

December 9, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | 6 Comments

By Rail From Bedford To Northampton

One of my Google Alerts picked up this article from the Northampton Chronicle, which is entitled Rail campaigners reject calls by St James residents to re-open Northampton link road.

There used to be a Bedford to Northampton Line, but it has been gradually abandoned, despite interest in using it for the following.

  • As an extension to Thameslink to Northampton.
  • As a freight route to the West Midlands.

I also feel that with Bedford likely to be an important station on the East-West Rail Link, surely the rail link to Northampton shouldn’t be compromised, so that it can’t be reinstated.

  • It would make journeys between Cambridge, Ipswich and Norwich and Northampton and the West Midlands a lot easier.
  • Freight from between Felixstowe and the West Midlands would have an alternative route.

I don’t think anything will happen soon, but the expansion of Thameslink and the East West Rail Link to Bedford will make everybody think.

December 9, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | Leave a comment

Tilbury Town Station

Tilbury Town station shows how you can take a basic station and by trying hard can make it acceptable to most visitors.

I never visited the station in say the nineteen-sixties, but I suspect it is a lot better now!

I very much liked the step-free bridge that is available to everybody who wants to cross the line easily and safely, whether they intend to travel on the trains or not.

What I didn’t like was that the A1089 road outside the station, from where you walk to Tilbury Fort or the Ferry Terminal, as it is a race-track for heavy trucks.

The Google Map shows Tilbury Town station and its position with respect to the Port, the London Cruise Terminal, the Ferry Terminal and Tilbury Fort.

Tilbury

Tilbury

Tilbury Town station is at the top of the map by the A1089 road and the London Cruise Terminal is on the river. Conveniently there is a cruise ship alongside.

The railway to Tilbury Riverside station, which was next to the London Cruise Terminal  was removed in 1992.

I would suspect that quite a few movers and shakers in the Tilbury area, feel that the closure of Riverside station was something that shouldn’t have been done, when they look back.

December 5, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , | Leave a comment

There’s A Lot Happening Around Tilbury And Gravesend

Look at this Google Map of the Thames around Tilbury and Gravesend.

Tilbury And Gravesend

Tilbury And Gravesend

The North (Tilbury) Bank

Note the following.

Interspersed between the developments is the usual estuarine mix of creeks, salt-flats, a couple of nature reserves and lots of wildlife.

It may not be everybody’s idea of a place to have a good time, but there is a lot going on.

Developments On The North Bank

Several factors will drive developments in the area.

  • London needs housing and is already developing large numbers of houses and flats at Barking Riverside, which is a few miles to the East.
  • Will there be more housing developments along the river?
  • Crossrail will arrive in the next few years and will pass a few miles away to the North, through Romford station.
  • London Gateway might want their staff to come and go by train or light rail.
  • There is a need for another Thames crossing and how does a possible Lower Thames Crossing, which could cross Thames by East Tilbury, fit into the mix?

Many would argue that there should be better public transport along the north bank of the river.

The Gravesend (South) Bank

Note the following.

  • The Swanscombe Peninsular in the top left corner of the map.
  • Swanscombe and Northfleet stations on the North Kent Line, which runs to the North of Ebbsfleet International station.
  • According to Wikipedia, the walking routes between Northfleet and Ebbsfleet International stations are not the best.
  • Gravesend station is in the middle of the town and the Ferry to Tilbury is within walking distance.
  • Hoo Junction, which is just off the map to the East is safeguarded as the end of a possible extension to Crossrail.

In contrast to the North Bank, the South Bank seems to have much more housing and a lot less green space and industrial development.

Developments On The South Bank

Like the North Bank, there is also development on the South.

I don’t know the Gravesend and the South Bank well, but on my walks in the last few months, it strikes me that there needs to be some public transport improvements.

Transport Improvements

Transport improvements in Tilbury, Gravesend and the surrounding area fall into three categories.

  • Tilbury and the North Bank
  • Gravesend and the South Bank
  • Cross-River

In some ways the last is the most difficult, as other factors like a new Thames Estuary airport and a higher Thames Barrier must also be considered. The Wikipedia entry for the Lower Thames Crossing gives some options and says this about Option C.

A new road crossing connecting the M2 and M20 motorways in the south with the M25, which might be linked via a proposed new Thames flood barrier. The route from the north would pass close to South Ockendon, Orsett, Chadwell St Mary, West Tilbury, East Tilbury, across West Tilbury Marshes before it crossed the Thames just to the east of Gravesend and Thurrock. It would join the M2 in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and in the Special Landscape Area. This proposed link is also within the Kent Downs AONB and special landscape area. According to the DfT, this long route would have “considerable environmental impacts”.

It won’t be a small fight to get that option built.

I will list the possible public transport improvements in the area.

Crossrail

Crossrail is more than just a major East-West route across London.

It is effectively a four-branch railway.

  • Abbey Wood – Connecting to Kent
  • Heathrow
  • Reading (or Paddington) – Connecting to the West Country and Wales
  • Shenfield or Liverpool Street) – Connecting to East Anglia

I believe that Crossrail should be considered as a two line railway, by including the equally capable Thameslink, which connects at Farrington and adds the following major branches.

  • Bedford (or St. Pancras) – Connecting to the East Midlands and Sheffield
  • Brighton and Gatwick
  • Peterborough (or Kings Cross) – Connecting to Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, the North East and Scotland

The major lines not connected to either Crossrail or Thameslink are the West Coast Main Line and the lines out of Waterloo and Marylebone.

Although care is being taken to create a good passenger link between the Bakerloo Line and Crossrail at Paddington.

The connectivity of the Crossrail/Thameslink system will be further improved by some smaller schemes.

There are two possible feeder lines in the area I am considering in this post.

Whatever happens Crossrail will become important to those in Kent, who want to get to the Southern part of Essex, as it will be a walk across platforms at Whitechapel.

At present from Abbey Wood to Shenfield takes about ninety minutes with two changes, but when Crossrail opens with a ten metre level walk at Whitechapel, it could be as short as fifty-two minutes.

Don’t underestimate how Crossrail will change the lives of everybody, who, lives, works or visits.

A Romford To London Gateway Train Service

I strongly believe that a train service from Romford to the London Gateway will eventually happen.

Consider the following.

  • As London Gateway develops, it is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs, which in turn will put enormous pressures on the roads.
  • A full service would improve connectivity to the large Lakeside Shopping Centre.
  • This could become an important feeder route to Crossrail.
  • The northern part of the route is the Romford to Upminster line, which is operated by London Overground as a shuttle using a dedicated train and platforms at the ends of the line.
  • London Overground is increasing services on the Romford to Upminster Line, so they must believe there is a need.
  • Track and electrification for the line is complete, although there would need to be some changes at Upminster.
  • c2c and London Overground are both very ambitious train operating companies.

We have evolving needs, an ease of creating the service, and ambition, which all work in favour of  implementing the service.

This route map from Wikipedia shows the stations in the area.

North Bank Lines

A full service on the route could  call at these stations?

The service could also call at Tilbury Riverside, as services used to do. This would serve the London Cruise Terminal and Tilbury Fort.

I wrote Exploring Tilbury Riverside about this area.

This is one of those ideas, that should be filed under Watch This Space.

Crossrail Extension To Gravesend

I wrote Crossrail Extension To Gravesend on this and the extension brings benefits.

  • It will give vastly improved connections from Central London to East Kent and East Sussex.
  • It would make Crossrail an even better option than driving across the Dartford Crossing.
  • It would mean that Heathrow Airport had a direct link to Continental rail services at Ebbsfleet International.
  • Ebbsfleet International is one of the few stations that could be an enormous Park-and-Ride station.
  • The proposed depot at Hoo could be good for both Crossrail in terms of flexibility and East Kent, in terms of employment.

I think this extension of Crossrail will happen.

Barking To The Dartford Crossing

I’m including this map, as it shows the nature of the area.

Barking To The Dartford Crossing

Barking To The Dartford Crossing

Barking is in the top left and the The Dartford Crossing is in the bottom right of the map.

Note the following.

  • The east-west main road just north of the river is the A13.
  • Dagenham Dock station is on this road with the Barking Riverside development below it and to the south-west.
  • To the south-east of the station, there is a large amount of industry.
  • The Beckton Sewage Works are on the North Bank, with Crossness on the south.
  • As you get towards the Dartford Crossing, the green space is Rainham Marshes RSPB Nature Reserve, with closer to the crossing Purfleet.

It is an area for those with imagination.

The Gospel Oak To Barking Line

The Gospel Oak To Barking Line is to the west and is being extended to Barking Riverside, where tens of thousands of homes are being developed.

The Transport for London Plan for 2050, says this.

An extension of the Gospel Oak to Barking Line to Barking Riverside is currently being planned to open up development of a major new quarter with 11,500 new homes.

A potential further extension could involve crossing the river to Thamesmead and Abbey Wood, where there are major regeneration needs and major opportunities for new housing developments.

My view is that if you give Barking Riverside connections to the north, west and south, perhaps a connection to the east to Dagenham Dock station on c2c is needed as well.

The Docklands Light Railway

The original plan for the area envisaged extending the Docklands Light Railway to Dagenham Dock. Wikipedia says this.

It is unlikely to go ahead as there are plans to bring the London Overground Gospel Oak to Barking Line to Barking Riverside giving better links to Barking and East London and via Barking station to Central London. This will however cause the Docklands Light Railway to not head east and have connections to c2c rail services at Dagenham Dock, so this extension could still take place and the two services would have an interchange at Barking Riverside.

I do think that some transport planners look with disdain at the Docklands Light Railway, but generally the over a hundred million rides taken on the system every year, give another view.

With the emphasis on leisure and with green issues to the fore, I could see the system reaching the Nature Reserve at Rainham.

The Docklands Light Railway is East London’s good fairy and she has ways of surprising everybody.

The Poor Connectivity Of HS1

HS1 must be one of the worst designed railways in Europe.

Currently, HS2 is being designed and great care is being taken to ensure that there is good connectivity all along the route. These are a few examples.

  • Old Oak Common station will be a hub in North West London.
  • Tram routes will reach Birmingham Curzon Street station long before HS2 does.
  • Birmingham Interchange will be linked to Birmingham Airport
  • Trams have already reached the area of the Nottingham HS2 station at Totton.
  • HS2 will call at Crewe, which is a major railway hub.

On the other hand, two of HS1’s intermediate stations have very poor connectivity.

  • Stratford International only has a direct link to the Docklands Light Railway.
  • Ebbsfleet International has very poor direct links to classic lines.

Neither station has a direct connection to Crossrail.

HS1 seems to been designed with very limited objectives in mind, one of which was to win the Olympics for 2012.

Crossing The River

There is no doubt that there is a need for more capacity across the lower Thames and there are several plans for a Lower Thames Crossing.

Other plans have included a combined rail and road link between Medway and Canvey Island and the latest proposal has been London’s plan for a Gospel Oak to Barking Line Extension to Abbey Wood.

It is also worth noting, that the distance between Tilbury Riverside and Gravesend is probably about the same as the distance spanned by the Emirates Air-Line at Greenwich.

Also, could modern ferries provide a better and more reliable link?

The only plan being implemented that will help get people cross the Thames at the present time, is Crossrail. It will be interesting to see how Dartford Crossing traffic changes, when Crossrail opens.

I think Crossrail could be part of quite a proportion of Cross-River traffic.

  • It links with the twenty-four trains per hour North-South links of Thameslink and the East London Line.
  • It links with West London and Heathrow.
  • If it served Ebbsfleet International, that would become a valuable Park-and-Ride station.
  • It passes right through the heart of London, as opposed to HS1 and the classic lines from the South, which terminate slightly to the North and South respectively.
  • I think one of the limiting factors on people switching from car to Crossrail, may well be the availability of car parking at Crossrail stations and especially those like Abbey Wood and Shenfield.

It is a pity that HS1 was so badly designed, as if Stratford International and Ebbsfleet International stations, were both better connected, then the Highspeed services on the line would be a valuable cross-River link.

I wrote about the poor connectivity of Ebbsfleet Internation to classic lines in So Near And Yet So Far!

My personal preference for another connection would be to build a bridge between Barking Riverside and Thamesmead, to take the Gospel Oak to Barking Line over rather than under the Thames, if this was possible. I would use tram-trains on the railway, that if required did a walkabout around the estates as trams on both sides of the river. The bridge would also be open to cyclists and pedestrians.

Properly designed, the bridge could be a visitor attraction in its own right!

Will Floods And Europe Solve The Problem?

If Crossrail/Thameslink is one elephant in the room, then flood protection for London and Europe are the others!

This is a Google Map of the Thames Estuary from Tilbury and Gravesend in the West to Southend in the East.

Gravesend And Tilbury To Southend

Gravesend And Tilbury To Southend

As I write this piece, the North West of England is suffering the ravages of Hurricane Desmond. Weather seems to be getting more extreme and the North Sea hasn’t had a major disaster since the North Sea Flood of 1953. This is from Wikipedia.

A combination of a high spring tide and a severe European windstorm over the North Sea caused a storm tide; the combination of wind, high tide, and low pressure led to a water level of more than 5.6 metres (18.4 ft) above mean sea level in some locations. The flood and waves overwhelmed sea defences and caused extensive flooding. The Netherlands, a country with 20% of its territory below mean sea level and 50% less than 1 metre (3.3 ft) above sea level and which relies heavily on sea defences, was worst affected, recording 1,836 deaths and widespread property damage. Most of the casualties occurred in the southern province of Zeeland. In England, 307 people were killed in the counties of Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex. Nineteen were killed in Scotland.

Desmond is very much a pussy-cat compared to what nature can and will throw at us.

In 1953, we had fewer casualties than the Dutch because our warnings were better and one would hope that because of universal television and better communications another North Sea Flood on the scale of 1953, would probably be less costly in lives lost.

The Dutch have determined that the sea shall not have them and have created impressive defences all along the coast call ed the Delta Works.

We have improved the defences along the Thames Estuary and London is now protected by the Thames Barrier.

In a section on the Future of the Thames Barrier in Wikipedia, this is said.

The barrier was originally designed to protect London against a very high flood level (with an estimated return period of one hundred years) up to the year 2030, after which the protection would decrease, whilst remaining within acceptable limits. At the time of its construction, the barrier was expected to be used 2–3 times per year. It is now being used 6–7 times per year.

It also says that the barrier would be replaced after 2070.

My cautious nature says that is a date that is too far in the future.

So why will Europe have such a large affect on the Thames Estuary?

Many predictions say that over the future, London will grow and become an even more powerful magnet for the people of Europe.

Europe itself will also become more prosperous, so we will see massive increase in both freight and road traffic across the channel.

The Channel Tunnel is unique amongst many major fixed cross-water links, in that it can be easily augmented by ferries, but I believe that people, vehicles and freight, will increasingly be on longer journeys on rail. Think about the effect of these developments.

  • The destinations served by direct train from St. Pancras will increase.
  • Cross-channel car traffic will increase.
  • The Dutch and the Germans have built th Betuweroute, which is high-capacity freight route.
  • Vehicle imports and exports are increasingly handled by special trains.
  • Liverpool is building a massive new container port. A lot of the freight could go by train to Europe.

I believe that a second fixed-link across the Channel will be built, which will in itself generate more trains to and from London and vehicular traffic to and from everywhere in the UK.

Improving the rail and road networks both suffer from the same problem – London.

  • Freight trains can get to and from Barking on HS1, but there is little spare capacity through London.
  • Passenger trains will increasingly be constrained by lack of capacity at St. Pancras, but using Ebbsfleet International and an extended Crossrail, would be a more than acceptable alternative for many travellers.
  • Road traffic will clog the Dartford Crossing and the Southern section of the M25.

The only solution is to create a new road and rail corridor to get around London.

As London will need a new flood barrier, probably we should start with an idea similar to Option C for a new Lower Thames Crossing.

A new road crossing connecting the M2 and M20 motorways in the south with the M25, which might be linked via a proposed new Thames flood barrier. The route from the north would pass close to South Ockendon, Orsett, Chadwell St Mary, West Tilbury, East Tilbury, across West Tilbury Marshes before it crossed the Thames just to the east of Gravesend and Thurrock. It would join the M2 in the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and in the Special Landscape Area. This proposed link is also within the Kent Downs AONB and special landscape area. According to the DfT, this long route would have “considerable environmental impacts”.

Given enough time to generate a full plan, we can probably come up with a better route, perhaps further to the East.

 

 

 

December 5, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 5 Comments

East West Rail Moves On Phase 2

East West Rail is the project to create an electrified 100 mph railway from Oxford to Ipswich and Norwich via Milton Keynes, Bedford and Cambridge.

This map from the East West Rail web site, indicates the route.

East West Rail

East West Rail

Phase 1 is now almost complete with the linking of Bicester to Oxford.

Services are running between Oxford Parkway and London Marylebone via Bicester Village. Hopefully, Oxford will be reached in Spring 2016.

A statement by East West Rail entitled Alliance contracts awarded for East West Rail Phase 2, has been relkeased about the award of contracts for Phase 2 of the line to connect Bicester, Milton Keynes and Bedford. This is said.

An alliance of four equal parts between Network Rail, Atkins, Laing O’Rourke and VolkerRail will build East West Rail Phase 2 (EWR2) – linking Oxford, Milton Keynes and Bedford, and Milton Keynes with London Marylebone via Aylesbury.

The contracts will enable the following services.

  • Oxford – Milton Keynes (calling at Oxford Parkway, Bicester, Winslow and Bletchley)
  • Oxford – Bedford (calling at Oxford Parkway, Bicester, Winslow, Bletchley, Woburn Sands and Ridgmont)
  • Milton Keynes – Aylesbury – London Marylebone (an extension of the existing service between Marylebone and Aylesbury Vale Parkway, with stops anticipated at Bletchley, Winslow, Princes Risborough and High Wycombe)
  • Increased capacity for freight services

The following work will be done.

  • A new station at Winslow
  • Two new platforms at Bletchley – Click for some details
  • Construction of 18 new overbridges.
  • Construction of 22 new footbridges/subways
  • Changes to 97 railway crossings

It is not a small project.

I find it interesting that the work is an alliance of four companies.

This method of working has been used successfully at Stafford, in the Stafford Area Improvements Program to relieve the bottle-neck at Norton Bridge Junction on the West Coast Main Line.

Hopefully, it will avoid another Great Western Railway style of fiasco.

 

December 4, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , | Leave a comment

HS2’s Interactive Map

For those who are worried, need to know or just plain curious, HS2 have put a very good quality interactive map on their web site on this page.

These are some images, I have captured.

Stations are shown by red dots

Euston, St. Pancras and Kings Cross Stations With HS2

Euston, St. Pancras and Kings Cross Stations With HS2

Euston, St. Pancras and Kings Cross Stations With HS2

The map clearly shows the three stations and the route of HS2 into Euston.

Note the following.

  • HS2 clearly arrives at Euston on the western side of the station.
  • The pedestrian route to St. Pancras could be more difficult than planners think.
  • The station would appear to be extended towards Euston Road.
  • Whilst the station is built, I suspect, that a good connection to the Metroipolitan/Circle can be created.

I think we’ll see some plans in the next few years, that make the connection between the three stations a lot better.

Old Oak Common Station

Old Oak Common Station

Old Oak Common Station

The map shows the myriad of lines in the area.

I believe that for many people using HS2 to and from London, will use this station, as its connectivity is so much more comprehensive than Euston.

Birmingham Interchange Station

Birmingham Interchange Station

Birmingham Interchange Station

 

Birmingham Curzon Street Station

Birmingham Curzon Street Station

Birmingham Curzon Street Station

Birmingham Moor Street and Birmingham New Street stations are to the south of the new station.

HS2 East Of Birmingham

HS2 East Of Birmingham

HS2 East Of Birmingham

This map clearly shows how trains for the North via Birmingham will go into Birmingham and then reverse direction in Birmingham Curzon Street station.

Handsacre And HS2

Handsacre And HS2

Handsacre And HS2

This map shows where HS2 joins the West Coast Main Line at Handsacre.

Conclusion

The interactive map is a real credit to modern computing.

Every project that could benefit should have one.

Will we be seeing one for Crossrail 2?

December 4, 2015 Posted by | Computing, Transport/Travel | , , , , | Leave a comment

Government “not pursuing” HS1-HS2 Rail Link

This is the title of an article on Global Rail News.

The report entitled High Speed Two: East and West The next steps to Crewe and beyond considers it is just too difficult.

Section twelve of the report entitled Connecting to High Speed 1, goes into details.

They suggest an enhanced pedestrian link and say this for rail.

For rail, we considered a range of direct link options. It was, however, not possible to identify a viable rail option capable of meeting the strategic aspirations whilst successfully addressing stakeholder concerns. This was because the options were complex and expensive to construct and would have delivered infrequent, less attractive train services for HS2 passenger travelling to European destinations. As a result we do not intend to take forward proposals for a direct rail between HS2 and HS1 or include active or passive provision to support the construction of such a link in the future.

In my view, the only direct rail link possible, without demolishing half of Camden, would be a totally tunnelled double-tracked route from a few miles north of Euston to somewhere like Barking to connect with the Channel Tunnel Rail Link. It could also be used to get freight trains between the West Coast Main Line and the Channel Tunnel and the ports in the South East.

But it would have a cost of almost the level of the tunnels for Crossrail or Crossrail 2. Have we got a spare ten billion pounds?

The Pedestrian Link

From drawings of Euston station after HS2 is opened, it would appear that the HS2 platforms are on the western side of the station.

Does this make the pedestrian link difficult?

The Crossrail Alternative

When HS2 opens in2026, it will stop at Old Oak Common station, where it will interface with a myriad of lines including Crossrail.

Crossrail at present only goes as far as Abbey Wood, but the route is safeguarded to Gravesend. As I showed in Crossrail Extension To Gravesend, extending Crossrail to Ebbsfleet International station, would not be a multi-billion pound project.

As the HS2 station at Old Oak Common is not finalised yet, I do hope when it is, that it is simple interchange between HS2 and Crossrail.

With a simple interchange between Crossrail and HS1, the link between HS1 and HS2 via Crossrail would not be as simple as a direct link, but it could have other advantages, when you look at the using Crossrail as a preferred link.

Convenience For Passengers

If Crossrail served Ebbsfleet International, this would mean that passengers from many more places would have a direct or one-change link to Continental services.

But the biggest winners would be those wanting to go between Heathrow and the Continent. What the direct frequency would be between  Heathrow and Ebbsfleet International would be up to the planners, but I can’t expect there would be less than four trains per hour

I live close to Dalston Junction and might prefer to use Crossrail from Whitechapel to Ebbsfleet, at certain times of the day, when my routes to St. Pancras are extremely busy!

I believe that Crossrail should go be exected to Ebbsfleet International as soon as is feasible!

St. Pancras Is Too Small

I believe that in a few years time, London to Paris and London to Brussels will be turn-up-and-go services.

Given too, that plans exist for direct services to Amsterdam/Rotterdam, Marseilles and Cologne, it strikes me that a four-platform St. Pancras station will be too small in perhaps ten years.

Also, what would happen if say easyRail or RyanRail wanted to run low-cost services to Europe, which is or will be allowed by European Union competition rules?

With Crossrail linked to Ebbsfleet International, where there is plenty of space for more platforms, it would be possible that services could terminate there and use Crossrail to and from Central London.

Customs And Immigration

Once Crossrail is a feasible route to Continental services and the travel statistics start to be reliable, it might be possible so sort out our archaic customs and immigration arrangements.

When I travel between say Brussels and Frankfurt, I just have to have a valid ticket, but how long before I need to show my passport and have my baggage scanned on a journey like this?

Incidentally, if you travel on some long-distance trains in Spain, your baggage is scanned.

I think that with all the problems of terrorism and illegal immigration, that cross-border trains within the Schengen area, will come under tighter security rules in the near future.

Will  regulations like this mean, when I am travelling from say Cologne to London, that I would undergo the same checks as another passenger going from Cologne to Brussels?

I certainly hope so!

Modern Ticketing

Surely with e-passports and contactless bank cards, we should be able to do something a lot better than exists today.

Imagine turning up at any major station on either side of the Channel, where you can board a train for the other side.

You put your e-passport on the turn-up-and-go terminal, which checks you against the passport. You just indicate on a screen where you want to go, choose your train and, pay for it and then walk through to the waiting area.

If you have already bought your ticket, the terminal would recognise you and after checking the bar code on your ticket or your bank card, you would also be let through.

The only thing to do before boarding, who be the personal and baggage scan.

All the technology to create a ticketing system like this is available today.

On the other hand, I would hate to see a system that was so slow, that you had to spend an hour in a station before travelling.

Thoughts On The Camden HS1-HS2 Link

After writing the previous sections and reading this section on Wikipedia about the link, I had the following thoughts.

  • Trains between the Continent and HS2 would not stop in Central London. This might cause logistical problems for groups of travellers.
  • To call at St. Pancras, trains would need to reverse at St. Pancras. Would there be enough platforms?
  • Would Customs and Immigration services have to be provided at every HS2 station?

I suspect others have had the same and other thoughts and have thus decided that a pedestrian route is the best way to change between Euston and St. Pancras.

Journey Times

I wouldn’t use Ebbsfleet if the total journey time was a lot longer.

The following assumptions and facts can be considered.

  • Ticketing, boarding or disembarking at St. Pancras or Ebbsfleet shouldn’t take different times.
  • From Eurostar’s timetable St. Pancras to Ebbsfleet takes twenty minutes.
  • From Eurostar’s timetable St. Pancras to Paris by the fastest train takes two hours sixteen minutes.
  • From Eurostar’s timetable Ebbsfleet to Paris by the fastest train takes two hours five minutes.
  • From Crossrail’s predictions, Old Oak Common to Abbey Wood will take thirty two minutes.
  • I estimate that Abbey Wood to Ebbsfleet International would take perhaps fifteen minutes.
  • I estimate that Old Oak Common to |St. Pancras via a direct HS1-HS2 link would take perhaps fifteen minutes or a bit more, if the train had to reverse at St. Pancras.

This would give the following estimated times.

  • Old Oak Common to Paris via St. Pancras would take two hours thirty-one minutes.
  • Old Oak Common to Paris via Crossrail would take two hours fifty-two minutes.

So not building a direct link means that passengers using HS2 to get to Paris take another twenty-one minutes.

On the other hand, how many would book separate trains with a generous connection time and whilst crossing central London would have a relaxing meal?

Conclusion

I think that to save twenty-one minutes in a journey from HS2 to Paris, but completely rebuild the lines North of Euston and St. Pancras is a trade-off not worth making.

 

 

December 3, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , | Leave a comment

Great Western Railway Launches Lobster Class

Great Western Railway serves the best food on a British scheduled train, but this article on Rail News entitled Lobsters ‘take the train’ to London is not a piece of fun. This is an extract.

Live lobsters are now being transported by rail from Cornwall to top London restaurants.

Sending produce by rail will be faster than road, ensuring the lobsters are fresher when they arrive. It will also help to lower carbon emissions by reducing road freight.

Great Western Railways and InterCity RailFreight Ltd will be delivering the lobsters daily on the 1739 Penzance to London Paddington service. WEGO Carbon Neutral Couriers will then take them to their final destination.

It’s good to see innovative uses of resources.

December 2, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , | Leave a comment

More Thoughts On Dalston Junction To Hayes

In February this year, I wrote Should Trains Run From Dalston Junction To Hayes?

I finished the post like this.

So is New Cross the least used direct southern destination on the East London Line? Also, was it only included in the East London Line for historic reasons, as it had been a Metropolitan Line destination?

If so, it might be an idea to see if extension of the four trains per hour services terminating at the station is possible. Perhaps two could go Hayes and two to Orpington, which would double the frequency to both places from New Cross.

I could also have said in the summing up, that this would give four trains per hour from Dalston Junction to Lewisham, with all its connections to South East London and Kent.

This morning, I was reading  an article on London Reconnections about extending the Bakerloo Line, entitled Death, Taxes and Lewisham: Extending the Bakerloo.

So it got me thinking!

I returned to my original article and had the following blasphemous thought.

Is Transport for London, so obsessed with using the supposed spare capacity on the Bakerloo Line, that it doesn’t think straight about what to do with this line?

Consider the following points.

  1. Passengers like the Overground model and many rate it higher than the Underground.
  2. When Crossrail and Thameslink and the East London Lines are up to capacity of twenty-four trains per hour, the increase in capacity will change London’s transport system dramatically, as there will be an H-shaped network with interchanges at Farringdon, Whitechapel and possibly some other places.
  3. Most trains going to Kent and South East London start from Victoria, which is not well placed for some of the important parts of Central London. Would extra connections to a twenty-four trains per hour East London Line at Penge and Brockley be a better route for many passengers?
  4. I feel that there would be a backlash, if the Hayes Line became part of the Bakerloo Line, just like there was when Thameslink wanted to stop all Sutton Loop Line trains at Blackfriars! If you’ve been commuting for years in First Class from Hayes into Cannon Street for the City, I don’t think you’d be happy if your train was a smaller one-class, crowded Underground train. But you might accept an Overground train to Canada Water for the Jubilee Line or Whitechapel for Crossrail and the Metropolitan/Circle/District Lines.
  5. Thameslink together with the Bakerloo Line and an upgraded Jubilee Line will create a resilient North-West to East routing, that could withstand the occasional serious failure. The East London Line provides that resilient link in the East.
  6. Thameslink doesn’t connect with the Central Line, but the East London Line could at Shoreditch High Street.

I’m coming more to the conclusion that there is no way that a long extension to the Bakerloo Line would be needed. Perhaps it should be extended in a loop down the Old Kent Road to Camberwell, to get high-quality rail services into that area.

Should East London Line Services To New Cross Go Further?

Four services per hour on the East London Line have their Southern terminus at New Cross station and could these venture further into South London?

At the moment these services terminate in a bay Platform D, which is just a walk across from the trains going South. But when coming North, you have to go over the step-free bridge to get from Platform A to Platform D.

In the next few years, various developments will  happen, that will affect travel in the area bordered by New Cross, Cannon Street and Whitechapel.

  • London Bridge and Thameslink will be improved, so interchange between Cannon Street services and Thameslink will be much easier.
  • Hopefully, access to the Underground at London Bridge will be eased by the redevelopment of the station.
  • Will the Thameslink improvements increase the capacity into Cannon Street?
  • Crossrail will open.
  • The Metropolitan/District and Circle Lines will have been fully upgraded with bigger trains and new signalling.
  • The Jubilee Line will have been upgraded.
  • Bank station will have been upgraded.
  • There will be large numbers of office developments around the City, increasing the numbers of needed final destinations.

I believe that the increasing flexibility will mean passengers will be less likely to use the same route.

I also believe that  passengers will switch between London Bridge/CannonStreet and  the East London Line destinations of Canada Water, Whitechapel  and Shoreditch High Street.

Many more will want to change at New Cross!

If the East London Line services started South of New Cross and just called at Platform A on their way North, just as London Bridge/Cannon Street services do, this would this give a simple change for Northbound passengers.

If you were on a Tunbridge Wells to Cannon Street train and wanted to go to Whitechapel for Crossrail, you would get off at New Cross and wait for an East London Line train on the same Platform A.

This interchangeability of Northern destinations, is unlocked by sending East London Line trains past New Cross.

Can East London Line Services To New Cross Go Further?

After Crossrail and an upgraded Thameslink opens, it will take some time for passenger numbers to stabilise.

These figures will decide if it is worthwhile to extend the services past New Cross.

The other constraint will be whether paths are available to continue to Lewisham and beyond.

The simplest plan would be to run the four trains per hour to Lewisham and then run two trains to both of Orpington and Hayes.

Extra Interfaces On The East London Line

I would also build the following interchanges on the East London Line.

  • Central Line at Shoreditch High Street. This can’t be done until Crossrail opens.
  • A New Penge station to connect to the Chatham Main Line
  • A high-level Brockley station to link to the Nunhead to Lewisham Line.

There may also be scope for linking the East London Line to Thameslink. It is probably a pity, that the East London Line serves West Croydon rather than East Croydon, as the latter station has so much better connectivity.

Today, I visited South East London and I can make these observations.

New Cross Station

I wrote Changing At New Cross, when I looked at New Cross station.

I can’t see any obvious reason, why East London Line trains have to terminate at New Cross. I suspect, that it’s only for historic reasons, as that’s what the Metropolitan Line did many years ago.

St. Johns Station

I wrote Investigating St. Johns Station, when I looked at St. Johns station.

My only feeling about this station is that if it were to be upgraded to the standard passengers expect, it could be a valuable step-free interchange station between an extended East London Line and the services into and out of Cannon Street.

Lewisham Station

I wrote Changing At Lewisham, when I visited Lewisham station

If it were to be served by four trains per hour on the East London Line, with two trains per hour going to Hayes and the other two to Orpington, Lewisham would be an important interchange to increase the connectivity between South East and North East London.

Catford and Catford Bridge Stations

I wrote An Opportunity At Catford, when I looked at the twin stations of Catford and Catford Bridge and can say this.

  • Currently, all trains through Catford Bridge station are going to and from Hayes.
  • All trains through Catford are Thameslink ones between Blackfriars and Sevenoaks.
  • Track exists to send trains between Catford Bridge to and from Orpington.

If cross-platform interchange could somehow be provided between the two northbound and the two southbound lines at Catford/Catford Bridge, this would give passengers from Hayes and Orpington a big choice of Northern destinations.

Effect On Dalston Junction

If the four trains per hour shuttle service between Dalston Junction and New Cross was replaced by two trains per hour to each of Orpington or Hayes, it probably wouldn’t have much overall effect on the Dalston Junction to New Cross section of the line, but what would the timings look like?

Currently trains leave Dalston Junction in the Off Peak at 04, 19, 34 and 49 past the hour taking twenty-two minutes to get to New Cross. They then return at 07, 22, 37 and 52.

So the 04 train gets to New Cross at 26, returns at 37 and gets back to Dalston Junction at 59, which means it waits eleven minutes at New Cross and six at Dalston Junction.

New Cross to Hayes takes thirty minutes, so that would be fifty two minutes from Dalston Junction to Hayes.

Would that be fast enough for each train to do one trip each hour?

I suspect that one of Transport for London’s timetabling experts could devise a pattern.

More Trains Through The Thames Tunnel

At present there are sixteen trains per hour through the Thames Tunnel.

  • 4 – Dalston Junction to New Cross
  • 4 – Dalston Junction to West Croydon
  • 4 – Highbury and Islington to Crystal Palace
  • 4 – Highbury and Islington to Clapham Junction

Which means that as there is a theoretical limit of twenty-four trains per hour, there are another eight paths available.

In Increased Frequencies On The East London Line, I wrote that London Overground have plans to introduce the following extra services.

  • From 2018, there will be an extra two trains per hour between Dalston Junction and Crystal Palace.
  • From 2019, there will be two additional trains between Dalston Junction and Clapham Junction.

So that would mean that there are still possibly another four paths available.

I would assume that the extra trains would be accommodated at the Northern end by just tightening the turn-round times.

I can’t believe that it won’t be long before Transport for London come up with ways of using the remaining four paths.

If they are planning to turn back two extra trains from Crystal Palace and two from Clapham Junction at Highbury and Islington, I can’t believe that they couldn’t turn back another four services at Dalston Junction. Assuming the extra trains to Crystal Palace and Clapham Junction, this would give the following frequencies.

  • 12 tph between Highbury and Islington and Dalston Junction.
  • 24 tph between Dalston Junction and Surrey Quays.

The core section of the East London Line will interface in 2020 with the following lines.

  • Crossrail at Whitechapel will be 24 tph
  • The Jubilee Line at Canada Water will be 36 tph
  • The Victoria Line at Highbury and Islington will be 36 tph by 2016.

Father and son, Marc and Isambard Brunel, will be spinning in their graves, to see what their Nineteenth Century engineering curiosity-turned-marvel has become.

The Emergence Of Overground Transport Hubs

More trains on the East London Line between Dalston and Clapham Junctions is to be welcomed.

I use the well-connected Clapham Junction, if say I’m going to Southampton, Portsmouth or many other places, as it means I can avoid the difficulty of getting to Waterloo or Victoria.

The one problem with Clapham Junction in my view is that Thameslink or the Gatwick Express doesn’t call at the station.

Even so, Clapham Junction, Dalston Junction and Stratord are evolving as the major hubs on the Overground Network.

In the next few years, the following stations will become major hubs.

  • Whitechapel because of its important location on Crossrail
  • Old Oak Common because of its connections to Crossrail and HS2
  • Hackney Interchange (Central plus Downs) because it joins the North London Line to the West Anglia Lines.

Will Lewisham, Crystal Palace or other stations join this elite group?

Southeastern

Southeastern is the train operating company that operates most of the train services to South-East London. Kent and East Sussex.

The company has three sub brands.

  • Highspeed operates high-speed service on the Channel Tunnel Rail Link using Class 395 trains.
  • Mainline operates traditional long distance services to Kent and East Sussex.
  • Metro runs services to South East and South London.

London Overground makes to secret of the fact that it would like to bring the Metro services under its control.

I would very much welcome this takeover for the following reasons.

  • As a North Londoner, who grew up in the North, South London trains are very much a mystery to me and Southeastern’s information could be substantially improved.
  • The East London Line and Southeastern services could be properly co-ordinated.
  • When the Overground took over the West Anglia Lines, there was a definite improvement in stations and customer service.
  • The whole of Southeastern’s Metro and Mainline network needs to be brought into Transport for London’s Oyster and contactless bank card ticketing.

Hopefully, the takeover will happen, when the franchise is up for renewal in 2018.

Crossrail Extension To Ebbsfleet International And Gravesend

I wrote Crossrail Extension to Gravesend after a visit to the area and I feel that it would be possible to extend Crossrail, so that it served both Ebbsfleet International and Gravesend stations.

This would enable a direct link between Heathrow Airport and Continental trains and you’d only need to change once if you were going to Gatwick, Luton or Stansted Airports.

Conclusions

On a brief look, there is a lot of potential to extend the New Cross branch of the East London Line to Lewisham, Hayes, Orpington and perhaps some more places.

Get it right and it might not be the best thing to have a long extension of the Bakerloo Line.

 

 

 

November 30, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 3 Comments

Changing At Lewisham

Lewisham station is a major station in South East London, where several routes meet. The Docklands Light Railway also serves the area.

This Google Map shows the lines in the area.

Lewisham Station

Lewisham Station

Note how there are two pairs of platforms, with one pair going off top the East towards Kent and another pair going South towards Beckenham and Hayes. These are pictures of the station.

According to a section called Services in the Wikipedia entry for the station, there are typical off-peak service in trains per hour.

  • 4 to London Charing Cross
  • 8 to London Cannon Street
  • 2 to London Victoria
  • 2 to Orpington
  • 4 to London Cannon Street via Sidcup or via Bexleyheath both returning via Greenwich
  • 2 to Hayes
  • 4 to Dartford via Bexleyheath
  • 2 to Gillingham via Woolwich Arsenal

In addition there are twelve services on the Docklands Light Railway to Bank

Some of these services come via New Cross.

It would seem to me, that if Transport for London achieve their aim of taking over some or all of Southeastern’s services, there could be scope for simplification, or even a simple extension of the historic New Cross service to Lewisham.

But if you look at the Google Map of the station, I think it would be very difficult to create a terminal platform.

So it would seem easier for services to go past Lewisham to stations like Hayes and Orpington.

 

November 30, 2015 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , | 1 Comment