The Anonymous Widower

Bacon Factory Curve Action

As the train to Woodbridge passed onto the East Suffolk Line, north of Ipswich station, it would appear that at last work is starting on creating the Bacon Factory or Ipswich North Curve to allow trains, and especially heavy freight ones, to pass to and from Felixstowe without reversing in Ipswich station.

February 20, 2013 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , | 1 Comment

Container Ships Are Getting Bigger

i always trawl the BBC’s web site in the morning to look for thought provoking articles.  This one about the latest generation of container ships is fascinating. Describing the capacity of the ship it uses this paragraph.

Each will contain as much steel as eight Eiffel Towers and have a capacity equivalent to 18,000 20-foot containers (TEU).

If those containers were placed in Times Square in New York, they would rise above billboards, streetlights and some buildings.

Or, to put it another way, they would fill more than 30 trains, each a mile long and stacked two containers high. Inside those containers, you could fit 36,000 cars or 863 million tins of baked beans.

It also talks about the knock-on effects of such large ships for ports.

Ship owners also want vessels to be unloaded and loaded within 24 hours, which has various knock-on effects. More space is needed to store the containers in the harbour, and onward connections by road, rail and ship need to be strengthened to cope with the huge surge in traffic.

Felixstowe, which handles 42% of the UK’s container trade, has 58 train movements a day, but plans to double that after it opens a third rail terminal later this year.

Have we got the capacity on the railways to move that large number of boxes?

No!

The next big complaint from the public, will be the noise of freight trains rumbling through their neighbourhood at all hours of the day. The standard freight engines, the Class 66, are not the quietest of beasts.

So for a start, all of the freight routes, like Felixstowe to Nuneaton and Gospel Oak to Barking must be electrified.

But that will only be a stop-gap and we need to put in new lines to the north of the United Kingdom. At least HS2, if it is to be built will be a start.

 

February 19, 2013 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | 1 Comment

Railways In Afghanistan

In Modern Railways this month, there is an informative article about how they are starting to build railways from scratch in that trouble country.

Apparently, they never developed a railway system, like neighbouring countries, and only now, with the need to remove vast amounts of natural resources around and out of the country, that the railways are being proposed.

It is a daunting task, made worse by the mountainous terrain and the fact that surrounding countries have a variety of different gauges.

Let’s hope the engineers succeed in their aims, as it might bring some wealth, prosperity and freedom to the country. There is a Wikipedia article, which gives more details.

February 1, 2013 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , | Leave a comment

A Row In Radlett

There is the mother of all battles starting in Radlett about a proposed road and rail freight depot.

Underlying all of this is the need for suitable sites for this close to the M25 to satisfy London’s freight transport needs. and of course there are few sites available.

But then London has a serious freight problem and short of forcibly moving half the population out, you will not cut the amount of freight going into the City.

So there will be pain somewhere!

January 29, 2013 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , | Leave a comment

The Real Arguments For HS2 Start Now!

The government has announced the route of HS2 this morning, as is detailed in this article on the BBC.

There is going to be masses of opposition.

In fact, I think that the amount of opposition is such, that the line will not get built.  certainly, as I look forward at 65, I doubt I’ll ever see it.

Let’s face it, if you had a referendum, which asked if we wanted a high speed rail or more motorways, the man stuck in the jam on the M1 would vote for the roads.

HS2 also doesn’t help our biggest transport problem of the next twenty years. Or at least not directly! How do we get all the freight containers, to and from the major ports like Southampton, Felixstowe and Thames Haven? It deals with them indirectly, by making more paths available on the classic lines to the North and Scotland, especially if a few strategic freight by-passes are built and lines like Ipswich to Nuneaton are electrified.

There also seems to be a lots of opponents saying that London and the South East will be the biggest beneficiary. So perhaps we should built it from Birmingham to Scotland? Or at least that should be the first phase to open!

There is the classic opportunity here for a political party to fight an election on an anti-HS2 platform. I don’t think, any of the three major parties would do this, but who’s to say, some smaller party wouldn’t? After all, UKIP has said no to the project in this article on its web site.

January 28, 2013 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , | Leave a comment

Something Concrete About Cycle Safety

I was waiting for a bus, when I heard a voice repeating.

This lorry is turning left.

It turned out it was a recorded message on this cement lorry.

Something Concrete About Cycle Safety

Something Concrete About Cycle Safety

I think it could be a good idea.  Except for deaf cyclists.

December 6, 2012 Posted by | Transport/Travel, World | , , | Leave a comment

Another Ipswich First

Ipswich is now believed to have the first Development Consent Order to come into force. This will allow the construction of the Ipswich Chord to take freight trains directly from the Felixstowe Branch towards Peterborough.

It doesn’t seem that the good burghers of Ipswich are bothered and that no badger-toed newts have been found on the site. But then they know a good thing when they see it.  I suppose the only objectors could be truck drivers, as the scheme will cut a lot of road journeys.

September 30, 2012 Posted by | News, Transport/Travel | , | Leave a comment

The Rail Bridge At Primrose Hill

These pictures show the rail bridge at Primrose Hill.

It is now pedestrianised, but it wasn’t in 1970, when I used to walk across it twice to get to and from work.

There may well be development here, as some plans would mean adding the former Primrose Hill station, which used to be under this bridge, to a rerouted North London line. Wikipedia says this.

It has been proposed to re-open Primrose Hill station by bringing the short stretch of line between South Hampstead and Camden Road stations back into the regular passenger service by incorporating it into the London Overground network.

From this passenger’s point-of-view, it would be a good thing, but it is only part of a bigger plan, that might be needed to get the freight through London.

September 28, 2012 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | Leave a comment

London’s Freight Problem

I have hinted in my ramblings around the North London and Gospel Oak to Barking lines, that London has a rail freight problem, which mainly concerns getting large numbers of long heavy freight trains,  to and from London Gateway and the Haven Ports in the east and the West Coast and Great Western Main lines in the north and west.

Without repeating what London Reconnections have done, I would suggest, that before you pontificate down the pub, you read their three part analysis.

Part 1: Reshaping the Network

Part 2:The Freight Must Flow

Part 3: A Quart Into A Pint Pot

The title of part 3 sums up the problem so well.

At the present, all I can see that more and more freight traffic is going to pass through London.

For my own part, I would never buy any house, that was anywhere need the North London or Gospel Oak to Barking lines, as the noise problem is going to get horrific.

The following should also be done as soon as possible.

There should be electrification of the Felixstowe to Nuneaton rail line , so that freight trains from the Haven Ports to the Midlands and the North don’t have to go via London. This would have the benefit of opening up paths on the Great Eastern Main line and also making services from East Anglia to the Midlands electric-hauled.

The Gospel Oak to Barking line should be electrified.  There are always good environmental reasons for electrification, but here the main reason is that replacing noisy diesel engines with quieter electric ones will reduce the noise substantially.

But these will only be stop gap measures and surely in around 2020, the problem of getting the freight through is going to get worse.

Something radical will need to be done.

September 24, 2012 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 3 Comments

Why Are These Containers On the London Overground?

The North London Line of the London Overground is not only a passenger route, but a main freight artery.

Why Are These Containers On the London Overground?

As I waited at Homerton station today, this long train of boxes passed through.

Many of these trains are going to and from the Port of Felixstowe and the West Coast Main line.  As the North London line, is the only electrified route between the Great Eastern Main line and the West Coast Main line, there is virtually nowhere else the trains can go.

The main new route will be a more direct line from Felixstowe to Nuneaton. But this route is not complete yet and there are no plans to electrify it, so it may need an engine change or two.  It also requires reversing at Ipswich, due to the nature of the track layout, where the Felixstowe branch joins the main line.

There is also an alternative route via the Gospel Oak and Barking line of the London Overground.  This takes four freight trains an hour and by-passes eight stations on the North London line. But unlike the North London line, it is not electrified.

This problem is going to get worse when London Gateway, a new port on the Thames east of London starts operating in late 2013. Trains to and from London Gateway will probably feed in directly to the Gospel Oak and Barking line, via the London, Tilbury and Southend Railway.

As to the size and number of trains, read this press release from DB Schenker, who will be handling the rail traffic. Here’s an extract.

The agreement will see DB Schenker Rail introduce at least four rail freight services a day (four in, four out), subject to volumes, and will serve a range of inland terminals including potential new UK locations. Additional rail freight services will be introduced in the future. 

DB Schenker Rail will also pursue the development of rail freight services from London Gateway to mainland Europe using the Channel Tunnel.

Something most certainly needs to be done! In the meantime, I certainly wouldn’t buy a house that backed on to either the North London or Gospel Oak to Barking Lines.

September 18, 2012 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | Leave a comment