The Anonymous Widower

The Mathematics Of A Hydrogen-Powered Freight Locomotive

If we are going to decarbonise the railways in the UK and in many countries of the world, there is a need to replace diesel locomotives with a zero-carbon alternative.

In looking at Airbus’s proposal for hydrogen powered aircraft in ZEROe – Towards The World’s First Zero-Emission Commercial Aircraft, it opened my eyes to the possibilities of powering freight locomotives using gas-turbine engines running on liquid hydrogen.

A Hydrogen-Powered Equivalent Of A Class 68 Locomotive

The Class 68 Locomotive is a modern diesel locomotive used on UK railways.

This is a brief specification

  • It can pull both passenger and freight trains.
  • Iy has an operating speed of 100 mph.
  • The diesel engine is rated at 2.8 MW
  • It has an electric transmission.
  • It has a 5,000 litre diesel tank.
  • It weighs 85 tonnes.
  • It is 20.5 metres long.

There are thirty-four of these locomotives in service.

Rolls-Royce’s Staggering Development

Staggering is not my word, but that of Paul Stein, who is Rolls-Royce’s Chief Technology Officer.

He used the word in a press release, which I discuss in Our Sustainability Journey.

To electrify aviation, Rolls-Royce has developed a 2.5 MW generator, based on a small gas-turbine engine, which Paul Stein describes like this.

Amongst the many great achievements from E-Fan X has been the generator – about the same size as a beer keg – but producing a staggering 2.5 MW. That’s enough power to supply 2,500 homes and fully represents the pioneering spirit on this project.

This generator is designed for flight and the data sheet for the gas-turbine engine is available on the Internet.

  • It has a weight of under a couple of tonnes compared to the thirteen tonnes of the diesel engine and generator in a Class 68 locomotive.
  • It is also more powerful than the diesel.
  • It looks to be as frugal, if not more so!
  • Rolls-Royce haven’t said if this gas-turbine can run on aviation biofuel, but as many of Rolls-Royce’s large engines can, I would be very surprised if it couldn’t!

Rolls-Royce’s German subsidiary is a large producer of rail and maritime diesel engines, so the company has the expertise to customise the generator for rail applications.

Could this generator be modified to run on liquid hydrogen and used to power a Class 68 locomotive?

  • The size must be an advantage.
  • Most gas-turbine engines can be modified to run on hydrogen.
  • It’s power output is electricity.
  • There’s probably space to fit two engines in a Class 68 locomotive.

In addition, a battery could be added to the transmission to enable regenerative braking to battery, which would increase the efficiency.

Storing Enough Hydrogen

I believe that the hydrogen-powered locomotive should carry as much energy as a Class 68 locomotive.

  • This Class 68 locomotive has a fuel capacity of 5,000 litres of diesel
  • This will have a mass of 4.19 tonnes.
  • Each kilogram of diesel can produce 47 Mega Joules of energy
  • This means that full fuel tanks contain 196,695 Mega Joules of energy.
  • Each litre of liquid hydrogen can produce 10.273 Mega Joules of energy

This means that to carry the same amount of energy will need a 19,147 litres or 19.15 cubic metres of liquid hydrogen.

  • This could be contained in a cylindrical tank with a diameter of 2 metres and a length of 6 metres.
  • It would also weigh 1.38 tonnes.

Note that I used this Energy And Fuel Data Sheet from Birmingham University.

Conclusion

I feel that all the components could be fitted into the body of a diesel locomotive the size of a Class 68 locomotive.

September 25, 2020 - Posted by | Hydrogen, Transport | , , ,

6 Comments »

  1. There is no doubt Hydrogen is the fuel that we need to maintain mobility in high power forms of transport if we want to maintain what we have without killing the planet. Trouble is it takes more energy to extract it than your left with and even more is needed to get it liquefied. So it needs cheap energy production or an acceptance there is a price to pay to eliminate carbon but then you have the issue of building such plants or trillions of solar panels in itself creates an energy burden as well so there are no simple answers here.

    That said there should be a demonstrator just take an old class 47 and kit it out and get it on the network to see what the issues are fuelling it and operating it.

    Comment by Nicholas Lewis | September 27, 2020 | Reply

    • Hydrogen production will come down in price, as electrolyser technology improves. At least we have a world-class manufacturer in ITM Power. It appears from their web site they are aiming to produce hydrogen at the offshore wind farms.

      There is also going to be a lot of development of hydrogen power for buses and large trucks.

      Some of the generation of hydrogen and refuelling will be co-located.

      There must be any number of diesels, that can be used. It would only need to be diesel electric, with a spacious body.

      I suspect, the choice will seem unusual to some.

      I’d probably pick a Class 66, as there are so many that need replacing.

      Comment by AnonW | September 27, 2020 | Reply

      • You still can’t get past the energy input required in the first place to create Hydrogen although I acknowledge that research is going into seeking more efficient methods. Unfortunately saving the planet still doesn’t have the urgency that solving Covid does where an extraordinary worldwide effort was mobilised over weeks to seek a vaccine. If only the same level of crisis was attached to dealing with climate change im in no doubt we would solve the the Hydrogen conundrum.

        Anyhow thank you for continuing posts many of which i very thought provoking

        Comment by Nicholas Lewis | September 27, 2020

  2. I think the urgency is coming and those with money seem to be backing the technology, even if Trump doesn’t. But most EU nations, the UK, Australia, India, Japan and South Korea seem to be backing it. Eben the Chinese have stated recently, they want to go csrbon-free.

    Comment by AnonW | September 27, 2020 | Reply

  3. Fueling refill speed is a data point not covered, and may be critical to high utilisation and depot layouts.

    I don’t know the answer either way, my guess is H2 might be quite a bit slower or more complex to match speed wise in a safe way.

    Comment by MilesT | September 28, 2020 | Reply

    • There is a lot of work being done by hydrogen companies to improve hydrogen refuelling.

      It should be remembered that hospitals and others have been taking large deliveries of liquid oxygen for decades and there’s not much difference to handling the two gases as liquids.

      Comment by AnonW | September 28, 2020 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.