Walking From Hampton Court To Kingston
I hadn’t intended to walk, but when I saw the distance was 3.5 miles and it was sunny, I thought why not!
It took me twenty minutes over the hour and I had lunch in Bill’s by the river before taking the train home.
Will We Be Seeing More Railway Stations?
I didn’t put any qualification like UK or London in the title of this post, as it is a question that applies to all railways.
The post was prompted by an article in the January 2017 Edition of Modern Railways, which is entitled Funding Buds For New South Wales Stations.
The article talks of two possible stations.
- A Cardiff Parkway station near St. Mellions.
- A Magor Walkway station between Newport and Severn Tunnel Junction stations.
Cardiff Parkway station seems the more conventional of the two and is proposed to support a proposed new business park, with car parking and a bus station,
This article on Wales Online is entitled Plans revealed for huge new development and train station in Cardiff that could create 15,000 jobs, gives more details.
On the other hand, according to The Magor And Undy Walkway Station Website, the second station at Magor Walkway appears to be less conventional.
But the two stations do illustrate two common reasons for developing new stations.
A New Station To Support Development
Cardiff Parkway station falls into this category and there are several for this reason in the pipeline.
- Barking Riverside
- Battersea Power Station
- Beaulieu
- Brent Cross Thameslink
- Meridian Water
- Old Oak Common
- Woolwich
We will see a lot more, as having a station at a new development, has many positive effects on the project.
A New Station To Provide Better Transport Opportunities
Magor Walkway station falls into this category and others include.
- Brinsford Parkway
- Camberwell
- Cambridge North
- Edinburgh Gateway
- Watford Vicarage Road
- Worcestershire Parkway
There are also schemes for airport links to Glasgow, Liverpool, Leeds and Luton.
Why New Stations Don’t Get Built
Obviously, some stations don’t get built for reasons of practicality and cost.
The traffic may be there, but the proposed site is difficult, so a new station might be impossible to fit the space available.
When a re-opened station like Lea Bridge is reported to cost £11million, without car parking, new stations don’t come cheap.
So new stations need a good financial case to get built.
Another factor that is often ignored by campaigners for new stations, is the knock-on effects they will have on services through the station.
Stopping trains at a station on a single or double-track line will effectively block the line, thus slowing other traffic in the area.
But Innovation Is Making It Easier To Build New Stations
In the following sections, I shall detail some of the ideas and innovations that will make the building of stations easier.
The Rise Of The Single-Platform Station
Single-platform stations are not that common in the UK, and the first new one of this type I saw was James Cook station, which I wrote about in James Cook Station – The Reinvention Of The Halt .
Other recently built stations in this category include.
Note there is a parkway station on the list and Galashiels is a major train-bus interchange.
A good proportion of the list are also on newly opened lines.
Consider the advantages of a single-platform station.
- There is no need for an expensive footbridge., that is part of the station.
- Only one set of shelters, ticket machines and information displays are needed.
- Single platform stations can be easily made long enough for the largest trains that will call.
- Interchange to cars, buses and taxis is quick and easy.
- Modern signalling makes bi-directional operation safe.
There may also be advantages in fitting a station into a restricted space, like shopping centres, airports, sports grounds or an historic town centre.
I think we’ll see a lot more single platform stations in the future.
The Express Stop Train
Next time, you’re on a train, notice how long it takes to perform a stop at a typical station.
It is often not a quick process.
- Passengers have to lift children, buggies, bicycles and heavy cases over the step up or down between train and platform.
- Passengers coming on get in the way of passengers getting off.
- On a crowded train, that is not working under driver-only-operation (DOO) rules, the guard often has to struggle to get in position to open the doors.
- Older trains without information systems, often mean that passengers aren’t ready to get off, so cause delays at the stop.
But look at the new trains for Merseyrail, I wrote about in Thoughts On Merseyrail’s New Trains.
- They are designed to eliminate the gap between station and train and for passengers to step or roll across quickly.
- They will have wide doors and probably ample lobbies, to ease entry and exit.
- They will be information-rich trains, as are all modern trains.
- They will be DOO, which avoids guard delays on crowded trains.
- They will have high performance with respect to braking and acceleration.
I also wonder if braking and acceleration will be automated, so that they are fast, smooth and very safe in all weather and track conditions.
On Merseyrail, this will result in faster trains and a saving of nine minutes between Southport and Hunts Cross is quoted.
New trains on Greater Anglia, will also give substantial help in enabling a headline-grabbing Norwich in 90 and Ipswich in 60 service for all trains.
I suspect that as new trains improve their stop times, it will make it easier for a new station to be fitted into an intense schedule on a main line with extensive services.
Stations Without Electrification
Often electriofying stations is an expensive business, in planning, execution and in operation.
With the development of bi-mode and battery trains and especially ones that can switch mode automatically, I think we’ll see a lot more stations left without electrification, thus eliminating health and safety and heritage issues, whilst reducing costs.
The Station On A Train
Merseyrail’s new trains will be DOO and from the reports, it appears that all the CCTV needed for safe operation will be on the train, rather than the station.
So will this allow Merseyrail to simplify their stations, with the only CCTV needed on stations being only that for passenger and station security.
I wonder if the driver will have access to a station’s CCTV as he approaches. Being able to assess crowd density in a station on approach must be to the driver’s advantage.
Ticket Machines On A Train
Operators might even put a card-only ticket machine on the train, so the number of machines in stations can be cut to save costs.
I have seen this is in several places in Europe, but never in the UK.
Tram Style Operation Of Local Trains
There are two basic types of through platforms in the UK, served by local or regional passenger trains.
- Platforms where some freight and passenger trains pass through without stopping.
- Platforms where all trains stop.
Merseyrail’s Northern Line and some of the branches of the Wirral Line would be examples of the second.
What would be the implications for station design, if say a branch line worked exclusively by one type of train ran to say a tram speed limit and the visual rules a tram driver would obey in the centre of Birmingham, Manchester or Nottingham.
Could we see new two platform stations built like say this station on the Croydon Tramlink?
Passengers would just walk across the tracks to get to the other side.
I believe that Merseyrail’s new trains could work in this way.
Consider.
- Stadler have enormous experience of trams and tram-trains.
- Merseyrail’s new trains can be fitted with batteries, so for perhaps fifty metres either side of the station, the third rail can be removed.
- The new trains look like trams, although they are trains.
- There will always be a driver in the front of the train with a big horn, as the train enters the station.
- Trains would be restricted to tram speeds in the station area.
Imagine a station on a network like Merseyrail or perhaps a branch line like the Walton-on-the-Naze Branch of the Sunshine Coast Line.
A train stopping at the station would go through the following procedure.
- A safe distance from the station, after ascertaining, that the line in the station is clear, the driver initiates the automatic stop procedure or halts the train.
- The train slows automatically from line speed to the tram speed perhaps fifty metres from the station.
- The train proceeds automatically to the station at tram speed using onboard stored energy, as there is no electrification.
- The driver would open the doors, so that passengers and their belongings can be unloaded and loaded.
- Once everything is ready, the driver closes the doors and initiates the automatic leave sequence.
- The train leaves the station at tram speed.
- Once electrification starts and the train is connected, the train automatically accelerates back to line speed.
Note.
- The train is not at line speed anywhere near the station.
- The driver can take control at any time.
- The procedure is not very far removed from that used on the Victoria Line since 1967!
Effectively the operation of the train through the station is train-tram-train.
I wonder if Merseyrail have been thinking this way to create a tram-train link to Liverpool Airport.
Conclusion
Various innovations will mean that stations will cost less.
- Simpler design.
- Step-free without footbridges.
- Less expensive features.
- Equipment moved from station to train.
In addition, trains will find it easier to fit stops into busy timetables.
This will mean that the available station budget will go further and more stations will be built.
|Aberthaw Resumes Cement Dispatch
This is the title of another article in the January 2017 Edition of Modern Railways.
I wasn’t sure where Aberthaw was, so I looked it up on the Internet and this Google Map shows Aberthaw Cement Works, Cardiff International Airport and the Vale of Glamorgan Railway, that links Cardiff Central station in the East to Bridgend in the West.
Note.
- The red arrow indicates the cement works.
- The Airport terminal is on the North side of the long runway,.
- Rhoose Cardiff International Airport railway station is on the other side of the runway and connected to the Airport by a sguttle bus.
- The line was closed by Beeching to passenger traffic in 1964, but was reopened in 2005.
Could Cardiff Airport benefit from the same sort of train-train link, that has been proposed for Glasgow that I wrote about in The Glasgow Airport Rail Link Will Be A Tram-Train?
But the map does illustrate the benefit of rail access to the cement works.
- The works is close the Vale of Glamorgan Line.
- Trains from the cement works can go East to places that need the product, including surprisingly, the South West of England.
- The rail link could cut the number of truck movements by 25%.
This would seem to be an ideal use for rail freight.
Are we doing enough to develop similar links, from other large factories all over the UK?
As the line is supposed to be electrified in a few years, could it be that a proper review of the line should be done first, to see whether any other projects should be done at the same time.
The reason I say this, is that the history of the line is much the same as that of the Grand Old Duke of York and his soldiers.
Both Sides Of The Bermondsey Dive-Under – Before Christmas 2016
The Bermondsey Dive-Under is on track to be completed by Spring 2017. This page on Thameslink gives more details and the latest progress.
These pictures were taken on the 20th of December, from a train going between London Bridge and East Croydon stations.
And these pictures were taken on the 24th of December, from a train going between Deptford and Cannon Street stations.
Compare them with those in Both Sides Of The Bermondsey Dive-Under – 26th August 2016
In Praise Of Ancient And Modern
I last visited Deptford station nearly three years ago and wrote about the station in Deptford Station Is Almost Finished.
Today, it certainly was finished, as the pictures show.
It certainly is a good mix of Ancient (Actually 1836!) and Modern!
I wouldn’t be surprised if White Hart Lane and Hackney Central stations amongst others,develop the arches in the same way.
I suspect a few decades ago, British Rail used to despair at the number of brick arches and bridges they were responsible for.
Now, they have realised that they are an asset to exploit!
Why I’m In Favour Of Cycling Superhighways
Near me there is a junction, which drivers access, like Lewis Hamilton going into the pits at Silverstone.
It means they can get through to the City quicker.
But over the last few weeks, the number of drivers taking the bend quickly and putting pedestrians in danger has dropped significantly. I’ve also seen drivers go hurtling off doiwn the road only to come back a couple of minutes later, with faces like thunder.
I just give them a knowing look!
So why has a dangerous junction become a lot safer?
Cycling Superhighway 1, goes across the rat-run and it has been used to choke off the rats, as the pictures show.
I’m now very much in favour of the Cycling Superhughways despite being told by every taxi-driver I use, that they are a complete pain!
But then I don’t drive!
Will DOO Mean DOO on Thameslink?
On Thursday I took a Thameslink Class 700 train from St. Pancras to Blackfriars.
At Blackfriars an announcement said that the doors would open automatically.
Which they did without any of the usual intervention from passengers after the driver had released the doors.
This is how DOO works on the London Underground.
It is surely better, especially if you are getting off and your hands are otherwise engaged.
Stadler On A Swiss Roll
Over the past couple of years, I have written about several orders for new trains or deliveries, where the manufacturer is Stadler Rail or a company controlled by the Swiss group.
- More Class 68 Locomotives On The Way
- The Class 88s are Coming
- Enthusiasm For Class 68 And Class 88
- Glasgow Subway Orders New Trains From Stadler
- Vossloh’s Product Sheet For The Class 399 Tram-Train
- Thoughts On Merseyrail’s New Trains
- Making Sense Of The New East Anglia Franchise
- The Glasgow Airport Rail Link Will Be A Tram-Train
If there is one theme that goes through these articles, it is that a lot of the products involved are innovative., whether they were designed by Stadler or other companies the group now owns.
Locomotives
The Class 68 locomotive has proven itself, as a capable locomotive for hauling express passenger trains with Chiltern Railways and will be doing a similar task for TransPennine. A total of 32 have been delivered or are on order.
The Class 88 locomotive is an electro-diesel version of the Class 68 and is just starting to be delivered. Will it find its home on the front of passenger or freight trains? A total of ten is planned for this go-anywhere locomotive.
Sheffield’s Tram-Train
The Class 399 tram/train has rather stalled in the sidings at Sheffield, probably more to do with Network Rail’s inability to get a job done on time, than anything to do with the tram/train, which runs successfully in Germany and Spain.
Greater Anglia’s Flirts
Electric and bi-mode versions of the Stadler Flirt will make an appearance in East Anglia in the next few years. Very little is known about the trains, except for visualisations for the press like this.
This press release on the Stadler web site says little of substance. This is a typical paragraph.
The trains are designed to provide a significantly enhanced passenger experience that will transform rail travel for the people of Norfolk and Suffolk. The FLIRT trains to be used on the East Anglia franchise will be equipped with air-conditioning; ‘2×2’ seating; Wi-Fi and power points throughout the train; a low floor design, allowing easier access to platform from the train; passenger information systems with real-time information; and have regenerative braking.
But then it’s not for serious consumption and could be said by any manufacturer about their trains.
This is a section from the Specification section in the Wikipedia entry.
The FLIRT is a new generation of multiple units, even though it has a striking resemblance with GTW vehicles. The trains can have two to six sections and electric variants are available for all commonly used power supply systems (AC and DC) as well as standard and broad gauge. It has jacobs bogies between the individual sections, with wide walk-through gangways. The floor height at the entrances can be chosen by the operator, providing level boarding at most stations. Automatic couplers of either Schwab type (on all Swiss units) or Scharfenberg type at both ends of the train allow up to four trains to be connected.
Look closely at the press picture and you can see, that there are two cars either side of a smaller power section. In A Train With The Engine In The Middle, I described a Stadler GTW, that I saw in Kassel.
So it looks like East Anglia’s bi-mode Flirts could have a power car in the middle. Stadler says this about the power car in the product specification for the GTW.
The GTW is a low-floor single-decker regional train. The drive unit is arranged between the carriages, but the train can still be accessed throughout.
Is the train in my picture considered to be a two-car or three-car train?
I obviously haven’t ridden one of Stadler’s trains with a power unit in the middle, but is the full-accessible toilet in the power car? It would seem logical that it could be!
Glasgow And Merseyrail
This visualisation shows Glasgow’s proposed tram-train link to the Airport.
And this visualisation shows Merseyrail’s new train.
Could they be related?
- The Merseyrail train is definitely to be built by Stadler
- Stadler are building the new vehicles for the Glasgow Subway.
- The rail routes to Liverpool and Glasgow Airports are very similar in nature.
- Both vehicles are reported to possibly use onboard energy storage.
- Stadler have all the tram-train technology.
- Supporting a small number of vehicles in Glasgow could be expensive, but having similar vehicles in Liverpool must make it easier.
I said that the two routes to the airports are similar in nature.
- In Glasgow, the train starts at Glasgow Central station and goes to Paisley St. James station using the Inverclyde Line’s 25 KVAC overhead electrification and then could use onboard stored energy to run as a tram on a dedicated track without electrification to Glasgow Airport.
- In Liverpool, the train starts to the North of the City, calls at Moorfields and Liverpool Central stations in the City Centre and then goes to Liverpool South Parkway station using the third-rail electrification and then could use onboard stored energy to run as a tram on a dedicated track without electrification to Liverpool Airport.
I don’t know, but it would surely mean that the vehicles needed for the Glasgow Airport tram-train, would be substantially cheaper, if they were one of Merseyrail’s vehicles with a modified exterior and interior.
Conclusion
Stadler seem to be picking up all of the small and tricky rail vehicle projects, by applying large dollops of innovation and a fair helping of common sense.
I wouldn’t give odds, that Stadler will land the contract to build new trains for the Docklands Light Railway!
Porterbrook Launch A Tri-Mode Train
In Bi-Mode Ate My Electrification, I asked this question.
Could We See A Tri-Mode Train?
Little did I suspect that just a few hours later, one would arrive.
This article on Global Rail News is entitled Northern and Porterbrook to convert electric trains to bi-mode.
This is the opening paragraph.
Leasing company Porterbrook is developing a bi-mode variant of Northern’s Class 319 EMU.
But that is not all, as this is said later.
Porterbrook said the design requires minimal modifications to the train. Additional batteries could also be fitted to improve performance on non-electrified sections.
So Northern will have a Class 319 Flex train that can run from electric, diesel or battery power.
That sounds like tri-mode to me.
Is It A Quad-Mode?
Some might even think it a quad-mode, as it could also run using 750 VDC third-rail electrification. It would help the trains charge the batteries at Southport, Ormskirk and Kirkby stations, which are terminals of Merseyrail’s third-rail network.
Will A Class 319 Flex Work Like A Hybrid Bus?
Several types of hybrid buses work, by driving the wheels using electric motors powered from a battery, that is charged from a small diesel engine.
When the battery is full, the engine is switched off.
So could, the Class 319 Flex be using hybrid bus methods to power the train?
The power-packs would keep the battery charged and the train would be driven from the battery or the external electrification.
One advantage of doing this, is that say on arrival at Blackpool with batteries without much power, the power-packs could charge the batteries before the train left for Preston and the overhead wires.
The driver would drive the train as an electric train, using electrification or battery automatically. The control system would cut the power-packs in to charge the batteries as necessary.
If they do go this route, could they be raiding the parts bin of the UK’s hybrid-bus manufacturers?
The 4.5 litre diesel engine and a 75 kW-hour battery, used by London’s Routemaster would surely be certified for use in a rail application and their performance and reliability will be well-documented.
Why Convert A Class 319 Train?
Who’d have thought that they’d convert a Class 319 train.
Consider.
- The class was built in the late-1980s.
- They are not the most stylish of trains, with all the panache of a house built by a Local Authority in the 1950s.
But over the last year or so, Northern have been refurbishing the trains and have probably found that under the skin, there are no serious problems and they have solutions for the minor ones.
They also scrub up pretty well and I suspect that if a bit more was spent on the interior, they could probably be better.
In my travels to Liverpool over the last year, I have talked to several drivers of Class 319 trains.
- Generally, they seem to like them.
- One told me, that on the West Coast Main Line, they will still hold 100 mph, so they are no suburban trundler!
- I have heard lavish praise for the brakes.
The only complaint, was that because of the softish suspension, the first few trains didn’t ride too well over Chat Moss.
They also have other things in their favour.
- There are 86 of the four-car trains, of which Northern has 32.
- The creation of a prototype, shouldn’t be a long process, unless Network Rail take forever to certify the train.
It should also be noted, that some of the similar Class 321 trains are having their traction equipment updated. So there may be some lessons from each program that can be applied to the other, especially as Wabtec are involved in both projects.
Will The Class 319 Flex Have Regenerative Braking?
The one problem with the Class 319 is that the trains don’t have regenerative braking.
If they did and they had onboard energy storage then the braking energy could be stored when a train stops at a station and recycled to get the train started after passengers have left and joined the train.
This would improve the energy efficiency and extend the range of the train, when running on lines without electrification.
How Will A Class 319 Flex Perform On Inclines?
Some of Northern’s routes like the Ribble Valley Line, climb into the hills.
Will the performance of the trains be sufficient to work these lines?
How Much Automation Will There Be On A Class 319 Flex?
The trains aren’t particularly complex, but with at least three power sources, it would probably help the driver, if changeover from one system to another was an automatically controlled.
It would also probably help if pantograph raising and lowering was automatic and could be at line speed.
Could A Class 319 Flex Be Able To Run Under Tram Rules?
In Zwickau in Germany, diesel multiple units, run through the town at slow speed under rules similar to those used by trams.
From Zwickau HbF to the Zwickau Zentrum stop, the diesel multiple units run on a line designed to the following rules.
- Slow tram-like maximum speed.
- A track with electrification just for the trams with which the trains share the line.
- Rail signalling.
- Simple stations, designed to fit the trams and trains working the line.
- Passengers can walk across the lines, as they can on any tramway.
- There’s even a couple of level crossings.
Zwickau’s system is more complicated than would be needed in the UK, as the trams and trains are of different gauges, so there is an unusual three-rail track, to accommodate standard- and metre-gauge vehicles.
Note that the system in Zwickau does not use a purpose-built tram-train, as the trains are standard Deutsche Bahn diesel multiple units, which were built by Stadler. They are very much like Class 172 trains. They just behave like trams away from the main line.
They are best described as Train-trams!
Will a Class 319 Flex be certified to do the same?
In a simple example, a Class 319 Flex could go through the buffers at Blackpool South station and continue through the car parks to a stop by the football ground.
Where Will Northern Use A Class 319 Flex?
Windermere To Manchester
When the franchise responsible for Windermere station changed from TransPennine to Northern, there was talk of electrifying the Windermere Branch Line , so that it could have an electric train service to Manchester or Manchester Airport.
But Network Rail’s electrification performance, stopped that, so passengers between Windermere and Manchester have to change at somewhere like Oxenholme Lake District station.
From Windermere, there is one direct train per day to Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Airport, which takes two and a half hours and an hourly shuttle to Oxenholme.
I’m sure that Windermere to Manchester is the sort of route that Northern would like to cover with a direct hourly electric train. From December 2017 if Network Rail perform, the only part of the route from Windermere to Manchester Airport, that will not be electrified will be the ten miles of the Windermere Branch Line.
If Network Rail haven’t performed, the trains could use the electrified route via Nreton-le-Willows and the West Coast Main Line.
As it will take something like five hours to go from Windermere to Manchester Airport and back, it will need five trains yo provide an hourly service all day. Alternative power sources would only be used on the Windermere Branch.
Blackpool To Manchester And Liverpool
I would suspect that an early objective of the design of the Class 319 Flex, would be the ability to do a return trip between Preston and Blackpool, as this would enable services between Blackpool and Crewe, Liverpool, Manchester and Warrington.
The Blackpool Branch has the following characteristics.
- It is without electrification.
- It is only about fifteen miles long.
- It is has two current termini in Blackpool North and Blackpool South stations.
- There have been proposals in the last few years to reinstate services on the Fleetwood Branch Line to a new Fleetwood station.
The return trip would be about 30 miles on to each terminus, but trains could use their power-packs if needed to charge their on-board energy storage before returning to Preston.
Blackpool North to Liverpool Lime Street would only need a Class 319 Flex train to be delivered.
Blackpool to Manchester Victoria, Piccadilly or Airport, would need the Preston to Manchester electrification to be completed, unless they could sneak down the West Coast Main Line.
It looks to my simple mind, that as regards Liverpool, Manchester and Prestojn to Windermere and Blackpool, the Class 319 Flex is a very workable solution, whether Network Rail finish the electrification of Manchester to Preston or not!
As the residents and visitors of Blackpool should understand trams, I could see Class 319 Flex trains running to Blackpool South and Fleetwood through simplified stations without any electrification, under rules similar to trams.
If the Germans can do it in Zwickau, then surely Lancastraians can do it in Blackpool.
Being able to run four-car Class 319 Flex trains to Blackpool South would also help to increase services to the area, if the Open Championship were to be held at Royal Lytham. A simple station could even be built adjacent to the course.
Blackpool South To Colne
The East Lancashire Line spans the Preston between Blackpool South and Colne stations.
After a long chat with an off-duty conductor on a crowded train in Summer 2016 on this line, I’ve thought it was a line , that could do with an improved level of service and more capacity.
Since then I’ve experienced severe overcrowding after Ipswich played at Blackburn on the same day that Blackpool played at Accrington.
Consider.
- Blackpool South to Preston is about fifteen miles.
- Preston station is electrified.
- Blackburn station has recently been rebuilt.
- Trains going between the Manchester to Preston Line and the East Lancashire Line can bypass Preston station.
- Blackburn station has a West-facing bay platform.
- Preston to Blackburn is about ten miles.
- Preston to Burnley is about twenty-five miles
- Preston to Colne is about thirty miles.
It would certainly appear that the following services would be possible using Class 319 Flex trains.
- Blackburn to Blackpool South
- Blackburn to Blackpool North
- Blackburn to Manchester via Bolton
- Blackburn to Manchester via the West Coast Main Line
- Blackburn to Liverpool.
This opens up all sorts of possibilities for integrated services centred on Preston.
If Blackburn to Preston were to be electrified, this would probably bring Colne and Burnley into the operational range of Class 319 Flex trains.
Northern could have tremendous fun planning those services!
Colne To Skipton
This missing link in Northern’s network could be a worthwhile line to reinstate.
So why not create a single-track line without electrification between Colne and Skipton stations?
Consider.
- The missing track between the two stations is just 11.5 miles.
- The reinstatement would probably only need one expensive bridge, that would be North of Colne station.
- The line could be a valuable piece of tourist infrastructure.
- A Leeds to Blackpool service via Burnley and Blackburn through the Pennines would be possible.
It could be designed to be easily worked by Class 319 Flex trains.
I somehow like the concept of 1980s British Rail electric multiple units, built to bring commuters to and from London, being redeveloped as a tourist train, through some of the most beautiful parts of The North.
The Ribble Valley Line
The Ribble Valley Line could be an interesting challenge to run using Class 319 Flex trains.
Consider.
- The Southern section of the line is twelve miles between a hopefully electrified Bolton station and Blackburn.
- The Northern section is ten miles between Blackburn and Clitheroe stations.
- The Northern section is a climb into the hills.
- The Ribble Valley and East Lancashire Lines share tracks sround Blackburn station.
I think that if Preston to Blackburn were to be electrified, Class 319 Flex trains, might be able to reach Clitheroe.
Stalybridge
In the January 2017 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article entitled Extra Platforms At Piccadilly Abandoned?.
In this article it suggests that electrification between Manchester Victoria and |Stalybridge might be late. This is also said.
However, any delay in wiring the section crates problems for Northern in that its plans for the move to additional electric services sees them terminating at Stalybridge rather than at Manchester Victoria, freeing up -platform capacity.
But Stalybridge is under nine miles to the East of Manchester Victoria, so a Class 319 Flex could be used to bridge the gap.
So do we have the bizarre result of obtaining some bi-mode trains freeing up platform space?
Manchester Victoria To Huddersfield
Once Network Rail get Manchester Victoria to Stalybridge electrified, Huddersfield is only another twenty miles, so could be in reach of a Class 319 Flex.
Southport And Kirkby To Manchester
North of Liverpool, there are two routes, which go between Wigan Wallgate station and Southport and Kirkby stations.
There are also three routes from Wigan Wallgate to Manchester.
The line between Bolton and Wigan Wallgate was supposed to be electrified by December 2017, but no work appears to be ongoing yet.
But when Manchester to Preston and Wigan to Bolton are electrified, there will be an electric route to Manchester Victoria, Piccadilly and Airport stations from Wigan Wallgate.
So could Wigan Wallgate to Southport (20 miles) and Wigan Wallgate to Kirkby (16m iles) be bridged by a Class 319 Flex?
One great advantage at Southport and Kirkby is that 750 CDC third-rail electrification is available. So could the batteries be charged using this electrification, whilst the train is turned back..
A Train Designed For A Specific Route
It seems that one of the great features of the Class 319 Flex trains, is that the number of different power sources will mean that trains can be designed for a particular route.
So if say on a route, like the Ribble Valley Line to Clitheroe, more power might be needed, then an extra battery might be added, as has been stated in some of the various Press Releases for the train.
Routes In The East
I have only looked at the routes I know in the West of the Northern franchise.
But as it is an extensive franchise providing services over a wide area, there could be routes in the East, where the Class 319 Flex could provide an increase in capacity and quality of service.
Porterbrook
I must say something about Porterbrook’s involvement in this development.
Porterbrook are a leasing company and they are not participating in this venture out of charity.
By financing the increase in the capabilities of this train, they are doing themselves a big favour by turning a Class 319 train of limited use and value into a more desirable asset for a train operating company, that they can lease for a higher price.
- Northern get a train they need to increase capacity and expand electric services.
- Passengers travel in a refurbished faster four-car electric train instead of a two-car diesel train of possibly dubious quality.
- Hopefully, the better train service will create economic activity and jobs.
Porterbrook will of course expect to make a return on their investment.
Other Customers
This article on the European Railway Review is entitled Porterbrook and Northern to jointly develop bi-mode Class 319 Flex trains. It says the following.
The first Bi-mode Class 319 Flex trains will be in Northern passenger service by 2018. The units will then become available to operators who wish to make full use of electrically powered rolling stock on partially electrified routes.
It will be interesting to see, who leases the trains.
Conclusions
I am drawn to the following conclusions.
- Nothing about the technicalities of the Class 319 Train is difficult and with my limited experience of project management in railway engineering , if Wabtec give a delivery date, it will likely be achieved.
- There are lots of ways to run these trains, especially if modes can be switched automatically.
- The trains would be more efficient and have a longer range, if they had regenerative braking.
- The trains will be incredibly useful in providing electric services across the Northern franchise.
- I believe that used on a line like Harrogate Line, they will also show whether a line should be electrified.
I think the concept is very sound and good for Porterbrook, Northern and their passengers. It will also create economic ctivity and jobs.
If the Class 319 Flex proves to be a success, I feel that other trains will be upgraded in this way.

























































