The Anonymous Widower

Coalition At War Over Wind Farms

This headline is on the front of today’s Sunday Times. The row is also reported here in the Telegraph.

It is to be expected.

I must be one of the few green individuals, who is totally opposed to onshore wind farms. Offshore ones are a different matter.

I’ll give you a simple personal example, which is not about wind farms, but about visual intrusion.  My previous house had one of the best views in Suffolk.  But it wasn’t perfect, as a water tower on the horizon spoilt the view. Now I only joked about it and on some of the photos, I air-brushed it out.  And it was after all several kilometres away on the outskirts of Haverhill. If they decided to knock it down, I’d have bought drinks all round. Now that was one water tower, how would I have felt about a line of wind turbines on the intervening ridge. It would have probably made my house unsaleable.

So I can understand why people get upset about visual intrusion.

But let’s face it too, most who live in the countryside are some of the most energy wasteful people you could want to meet.  Many have large uneconomical vehicles that they drive up and down from London every weekend. And they often live in large energy-inefficient houses.  So asking them to accept wind turbines is like asking a vegan to eat meat every day.

No wonder the countryside, which generally votes Tory,  doesn’t want wind turbines.

In fact I find it rather surprising that anybody, anywhere in the world, wants wind turbines on a beautiful landscape. It’s just like sticking fake moles all over the Mona Lisa.

I am surprised that wind farms haven’t come under physical attack from their opponents.  But I can’t find any incidents on the Internet.

Offshore wind farms though should be developed.

There is so much less visual intrusion and I believe innovative designs can make them bigger and at less cost per watt. I’m possibly back to my old favourite of the Balaena.

November 25, 2012 Posted by | World | , , , | 2 Comments

RBS, Donald Trump and the Dreaded Wind Farms

The more I read about Donald Trump and the wind farms, I just think how funny it would be if either the golf course or the wind farms had been all or part funded by the Royal Bank of UK Taxpayers.

After all something Sir Fred did is going to jump up and bite us, so when it does, it might be something with a good laugh in it.

April 26, 2012 Posted by | Finance & Investment, News | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scots Put Wind Up Donald Trump

I can’t say I warm to Donald Trump and I don’t think, that I’d want to be anywhere near his golf development, as it will probably attract a lot of the sort of people, that I find odious.

So I read the report about his spat with the Scottish Parliament with interest and a small bit of pleasure. I’m not really in favour of wind turbines and especially those onshore, but offshore ones, if the economic case is there are a much better option. Let’s hope he gets a nice line of pylons across his golf course.

April 25, 2012 Posted by | News, Sport | , , , | Leave a comment

RSPB and Wind Farms

The RSPB is usually to be found on the list of those organisations lined up against a wind farm.

But now they are oputting up a wind farm on their headquarters site.

Can they have it both ways?  It would appear they can!

I’m not a fan of wind power, as I believe there are much better methods like using tides creatively.

April 20, 2012 Posted by | News | , , | Leave a comment

Donald Trump, Alex Salmond and Wind Turbines

There’s an interesting article in Friday’s Guardian, called Donald Trump wind turbine fiasco could be defining for Scotland. The first part is about Donald Trump opposition to several large offshore wind turbines by his new golf course near Aberdeen and how he is going to fund the opponents of wind power in Scotland.

By the way the Birther Movement mentioned in the Guardian article, as part-funded by Trump,  are a group of conspiracy theorists, who believe President Obama was not born in Hawaii. So Trump has form, when it comes to funding opposition groups that might help his personal ambitions or business interests.  There’s more on the movement here.

There is one statement after Trump and that is this.

But the idea of Trump as good business versus loony-greens hellbent on no-jobs is nonsense. Bloomberg New Energy Finance recently suggested onshore wind will be cost competitive with gas and coal generation by 2016.

I hope Bloomberg is right, as the waters around these island certainly have a lot of wind.

In some ways, the second part of the Guardian article is in some ways the more significant. It talks about how a wind turbine is being built at Portobello in Edinburgh. I wonder what the good burghers of Scotland’s capital think of the project?

 

February 26, 2012 Posted by | News | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Could a Balaena-Like Structure Be Used As a Wind Power Platform?

Last night I was watching reports on the BBC about the Ormonde Offshore Wind Farm.

Again, I can’t help thinking that a Balaena like structure could be used. It would be tall and thin and the wind-turbine could just be lifted onto the top.

It would be built in a shipyard horizontally and would have a steel tank at the bottom to give it stability.  As with the original Balaena weight and the gum-boot syndrome would keep it in place.

It would also be towed out horizontally and then upended by filling the tank.  I proved that this would work nearly forty years ago and I’m sure if you get the sizes right, it would be very stable. You then just lift the power unit on the top in the normal way.

But then I’m no structural engineer.  On the other I have a memory like an elephant and never forget anything useful.

Where is Buckminster Fuller when you need him?

August 16, 2011 Posted by | News | , , , , | 3 Comments