The Anonymous Widower

Northumberland Line ‘Phased Reopening’ By Summer

The title of this post, is the same as that as this article on the BBC.

These are the first three paragraphs.

The Northumberland Line will partially reopen this summer days after it was announced it would not be in service until the end of 2024.

Conservative county council leader Glen Sanderson said there had been “challenges” with the project, but when fully reopened the rail line would be a “game changer” for travellers.

The stations due to be open in the summer are Seaton Delaval, Ashington and Newsham.

In my lifetime, the Victoria, Jubilee and Elizabeth Lines in London, have opened on a phased manner.

So why shouldn’t the Northumberland Line?

In fact given the route, it could be opened with a shuttle between Ashington and Newcastle stations, to train drivers and test the concept.

  • The intermediate stations could be added over a couple of years.
  • I would add a station with lots of parking early.
  • If the views live up to the pictures, a lot of passengers will have a day out for the views.
  • I’m sure enthusiasts and locals, especially with their kids will be exploring this short railway in droves.

To me, this is definitely a line, that will suffer from London Overground Syndrome.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the railways to the North of Newcastle.

Note.

  1. The red track is the electrified East Coast Main Line.
  2. Ashington station is at the top of the map and is marked by a blue arrow.
  3. The blue track is the Tyne and Wear Metro.
  4. Newcastle station is where the Metro crosses the East Coast Main Line at the bottom of the map.
  5. The black trackrunning North-South to the East of the East Coast Main Line is the Northumberland Line.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the railways to the North of Ashington.

Note.

  1. The red track is the electrifed East Coast Main Line.
  2. Ashington station is at the bottom of the map and is marked by a blue arrow.
  3. There are a few disused colliery lines to the North of Ashington.

I believe that these railways to the North of Newcastle could and should be developed.

The East Coast Main Line Is Congested

Consider.

  • The East Coast Main Line has only two tracks.
  • It is one of only two rail routes between England and Scotland.
  • It carries local services as well as long distance express services.
  • In recent years more services have been added by Lumo and TransPennine Express.

It is my belief that applying digital signalling between Newcastle and Edinburgh via Berwick, should be a high priority project to increase the capacity of the East Coast Main Line.

Local Services Can Be Extended

The Northumberland Line opens up possibilities for extension, where track already exists..

  • From Ashington to Newbiggin-on-Sea and Lynemouth.
  • From Bedlington to Morpeth and the East Coast Main Line.
  • From Bedlington to North Blyth.

It would appear that it might be possible to run a new line North from Ashington to connect with the East Coast Main Line.

Distances Are Short

Consider.

  • Ashington and Newcastle is 20.6 miles
  • Newcastle and Morpeth is 16.6 miles
  • Newcastle and Berwick is electrified.
  • In The Data Sheet For Hitachi Battery Electric Trains, I stated that Hitachi’s battery-electric express trains have a range of 43.5 miles on one battery. A slower commuter train would certainly achieve this distance.

I have a feeling that a passenger-friendly network of battery-electric trains can be developed along and around the Northumberland Line and the East Coast Main Line.

 

January 18, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Slow Tourism Train Operator Launches First Service

Tyhe title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.

These are the first two paragraphs.

FS Group’s recently formed tourist train business FS Treni Turistici Italiani has launched its first service.

Branded Espresso Cadore, the overnight service between Roma Termini and Calalzo-Pieve di Cadore-Cortina will run every Friday night until mid-February. On arrival, a connecting bus takes passengers to Cortina d’Ampezzo in 45 min. The return train departs on Sundays, arriving at Roma Termini on Monday morning.

It is surely an interesting concept and I believe it could work on several routes in the UK.

There must also be a couple of routes in Scotland and Wales.

As the three routes, I named are electrified at both ends, there is a possibility that they could be run by quiet battery-electric trains.

January 15, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Leisure Market Boom? GWR’s Vision For Direct Bristol-Oxford Services

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Rail Magazine.

This is the first paragraph.

Great Western Railway has hopes on running direct services between Bristol Temple Meads and Oxford from September 14, subject to approval of its new trial proposal by the Department for Transport and Network Rail. The move is a test of growth in demand for leisure travel by train.

It is an interesting idea.

These are some points about the service, given in the article.

  • The route will be via Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa.
  • Fastest journey time would be 71 minutes.
  • The route will be aimed at the leisure market.
  • There will be two trains per day (tpd) in each direction on Saturdays.

This is GWR’s handy route map.

These are my thoughts.

Will The Trains Call At Didcot Parkway?

This OpenRailwayMap shows Didcot Parkway station and the large triangular junction, that connects Oxford to the Great Western Main Line.

Note.

  1. The red tracks are the Great Western Main Line.
  2. The blue arrow indicates Didcot Parkway station.
  3. Oxford station is about ten miles to the North.
  4. Chords in the junction allow trains to go between Oxford and Paddington and Oxford and Swindon, with or without a stop at Didcot Parkway station.

The article says that GWR  has asked to run the following services.

  • 1018 Bristol Temple Meads-Oxford – Would arrive at Oxford at 1129.
  • 1155 Oxford-Bristol Temple Meads (via Didcot) – Would arrive at Bristol Temple Meads at 1306.
  • 1518 Bristol Temple Meads-Oxford – Would arrive at Oxford at 1629.
  • 1712 Oxford-Bristol Temple Meads – Would arrive at Bristol Temple Meads at 1823.

Note.

  1. I suspect that the 1155 will reverse at Didcot Parkway station.
  2. There is a two train per hour (tph) service between Didcot Parkway and London Paddington stations.
  3. It looks like the four services could be run by a single train shuttling up the Great Western Main Line.

Would it be sensible if all Oxford and Bristol trains called at Didcot Parkway station, so that travellers could use the London service to their advantage?

But, calling at Didcot Parkway station would slow the service as there would need to be a reverse.

What Class Of Train Would Be Used?

Consider.

  • A Bristol and Didcot Parkway via Bath Spa service takes 55 minutes.
  • This is an average speed of 71.1 mph over a distance of 65.2 miles.
  • 24.4 miles at the Bristol end of the route is not electrified.
  • 10.3 miles at the Oxford end of the route is not electrified.
  • The four services can be run by a single train shuttling up the Great Western Main Line.

It looks to me, that a bi-mode train with good performance is needed.

So I suspect that a five-car Class 800 or Class 802 train will be used.

Will The Train Be Battery-Electric Powered?

This is an interesting possibility.

  • An ideal route for a battery electric train, is surely one with a long electrified section in the middle, which can be used to fully charge the train’s batteries.
  • The train would have to run for 48.8 miles on its own power at the Bristol end of the route.
  • The train would have to run for 20.6 miles on its own power at the Oxford end of the route.

The data sheet for a battery-electric Class 800/802 train can be downloaded from this page on the Hitachi web site.

In a section on the page, which is entitled Intercity Battery Trains, this is said.

A quick and easy application of battery technology is to install it on existing or future Hitachi intercity trains. Adding just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%.

Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance. Hitachi Rail’s modular design means this can be done without the need to re-engineer or rebuild the train and return them to service as quickly as possible for passengers.

The range of 70 km is 43.5 miles, which would appear to be a little bit short to go from the end of the electrification at Chippenham to Bristol Temple Meads and back.

But various measures could be taken to make sure the train can handle the route.

  • The regenerative braking strategy could be used to conserve battery power.
  • A second battery could be added to the train.
  • Methods to charge the train at Bristol Temple Meads could be installed.

As London Paddington and Bristol Temple Meads is an important route, I suspect that Hitachi and Great Western Railway have a strategy to handle trains from Chippenham and sending them back.

Could This Route Be A Trial Route For Battery-Electric Trains?

Consider.

  • Hitachi and Great Western Railway wouldn’t want to introduce an unreliable train without full full testing.
  • Trains can probably limp to either Stoke Gifford or Reading depots, after a battery failure.
  • Great Western Railway could test a new route.
  • A full test only needs one train.
  • Passenger reaction to a battery-electric train can be assessed.
  • Staff need to be trained.
  • The route can be run by a standard bi-mode if required.
  • It could be the world’s first high-speed battery-electric train.
  • Enthusiasts would flock to have a ride.

Could this be a trial service to make sure everything goes right?

 

January 14, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Great Western Railway Updates EHRT On Its Upcoming Operational Trial Of Fast Charge Tech

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Electric and Hybrid Rail Technology.

This is the sub-heading.

Great Western Railway’s senior program manager, Sonya Johns, speaks to Electric & Hybrid Rail Technology about the firm’s progress on developing ex-Vivarail Fast Charge technology for battery-powered trains, ahead of operational trials due to commence in 2024.

The article is a must-read as it describes the progress since First Group, acquired the assets and intellectual property of Vivarail and its Fast Charge battery train technology.

This paragraph describes the components of the Fast Charge technology.

The Fast Charge system consists of three key components: retractable charging shoe gear, which is mounted to the underframe of the train; short (4m) charging rails mounted between the underframe of the train; and the Fast Charge Battery Bank (FCBB) installed beside the track, acting as an energy buffer between the train and the grid.

This paragraph outlines the benefits of the system.

The Fast Charge system has several benefits, according to Johns, including high charging power, enabling the train to be recharged in around 10 minutes; a standard DNO connection, avoiding costly power supply upgrades; full automation, with no driver interaction required; low safety risk (the charging rails are never live unless fully covered by the train); and minimal disruption during installation, as the FCBB is manufactured offsite and the charging rails are attached to existing sleepers.

This sounds like a system, that has been designed by someone fed up with regulators saying no to innovative ideas.

Other points from the article include.

  1. The shoe gear has been designed to be easily installed on any rolling stock.
  2. The one-year trial of the Fast Charge technology and the Class 230 battery train on the West Ealing and Greenford line will commence in spring 2024.
  3. GWR will capture and analyze data during the trial to understand how the technology performs in different conditions.

The article finishes with this paragraph.

The work, according to GWR, is part of its commitment to reduce the carbon emissions of its train fleet with a view to removing all diesel-only traction from the network by 2040, in line with the Government’s Transport Decarbonisation Plan.

Adrian Shooter would have been pleased if he was here to see it.

 

December 20, 2023 Posted by | Energy, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Crafty Electrification On The Rhymney Line

I was puzzled on Wednesday, when I took the Class 231 train to Caerphilly on the Rhymney Line, when I saw no signs of electrification.

These are pictures I took at Caerphilly station.

These two OpenRailwayMaps show the tracks through Caerphilly.

Note.

  1. The map on the left shows infrastructure, with the Rhymney Line shown in yellow.
  2. Caerphilly station is in the top third of the map.
  3. The white section of the Rhymney Line is the Caerphilly tunnel.
  4. The map on the right shows electrification, with the sections of the Rhymney Line that will be electrified are shown in red.
  5. Black sections will not be electrified.
  6. North of Caerphilly, the Rhymney Line is electrified, but through the station and the Caerphilly tunnel, there will be no electrification.

Trains will use battery power, where there is no electrification.

This article on Modern Railways gives more information.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the electrification around Cardiff Central and Queen Street stations.

Note.

  1. Electrified lines are shown in red.
  2. Unelectrified lines are shown in black.
  3. The four-platform Cardiff Queen Street station is marked by the blue arrow in the North-East corner of the map.
  4. There appears to be no plans for electrification in Cardiff Queen Street station.
  5. The electrified line across the map is the South Wales Main Line.
  6. The nine-platform Cardiff Central station sits on the South Wales Main Line.
  7. The main line platforms at Cardiff Central station are electrified, but it appears that Platforms 6.7 and 8. that will serve the South Wales Metro, will not be electrified.
  8. The line going to the South-East is the branch to Cardiff Bay station.
  9. The Southern part of this branch appears to be planned to be electrified. so that it can charge the tram-trains before they return North.

This article on Modern Railways says this about catenary-free sections (CFS) in the electrification of the South Wales Metro.

Catenary-free sections are concentrated on areas where it is disproportionately expensive to erect overhead wires. These include the area around Cardiff Queen Street station and the adjacent junction, which has complicated switches and crossings. North of Queen Street, the Cathays area adjacent to Cardiff University and the hospital would present a significant electromagnetic compatibility challenge, so a CFS avoids this complication. Other catenary-free areas will include Pontypridd, where the station features listed canopies and the track is curved, and around the new depot at Taff’s Well, where there will be a significant number of new switches and crossings as well as challenges around highway bridges.

I am in touch with two major electrification companies and I am sure we’ll be seeing a lot more crafty electrification and the use of battery-electric trains.

 

November 24, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Data Sheet For Hitachi Battery Electric Trains

Was I just slow to spot this data sheet or has it only just been released?

You can download a copy from this page on the Hitachi web site.

In a section on the page, which is entitled Intercity Battery Trains, this is said.

A quick and easy application of battery technology is to install it on existing or future Hitachi intercity trains. Adding just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%.

Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance. Hitachi Rail’s modular design means this can be done without the need to re-engineer or rebuild the train and return them to service as quickly as possible for passengers.

These are my initial thoughts.

Plug-and-Play

It looks like the train is plug-and-play.

A diesel engine will be swapped for a battery-pack and the train’s computer controls the power sources accordingly.

Hitachi’s Battery Philosophy Explained

This is said on the data sheet.

Battery technology has the potential to play a significant role in the future of sustainable rail mobility, setting
the rail industry on the path to full intercity decarbonisation by 2050.
Installing batteries on intercity trains can complement electrification and provide a low emission alternative
to domestic air travel.

Our retrofit solution for intercity trains offers phased replacement of diesel engines at the time that they would
have been due for their regular heavy maintenance overhaul, replacing each engine in turn until trains are fully battery electric. The solution delivers fuel cost savings and lowers CO2 emissions by at least 20% for every engine replaced, and a 20% reduction in whole life maintenance costs – well within the battery’s life span of 8-10 years.

Performance On Battery Power

The data sheet gives these bullet points.

  • 750kW peak power
  • Weight neutral.
  • At least 20% lower CO2 emissions
  • 70km on non-electrified routes
  • 20% reduction in whole life maintenance costs
  • Up to 30% fuel cost savings
  • Zero emissions in and out of stations
  • Charge on the move
  • 10 year life span

Note.

  1. 750 kW peak power, is around the power of the diesel-engine, that will be replaced.
  2. I wouldn’t be surprised that powerwise, the battery pack looks like a diesel engine.
  3. Weight neutral means that acceleration, performance and handling will be unchanged.
  4. Batteries are easier to maintain than diesels.
  5. It is stated that a train can be fully-decarbonised.

I have a feeling these trains are no ordinary battery-electric trains.

Seventy Kilometre Range On Battery

Seventy kilometres is 43.5 miles.

This may not seem much, but the data sheet says this.

Our battery hybrid trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same
or increased performance. By identifying the routes with short non-electrified sections of 70km or less, we could
see the replacement of existing diesel trains with fully battery-operated trains on those routes within a year.
And, using battery power to avoid electrifying the hardest and most expensive areas, such as tunnels and bridges,
enables flexibility on electrification, minimising passenger disruption during upgrades.

Note.

  1. It looks like the trains can operate at 125 mph on battery power, where the track allows it. But then the rolling restistance of steel wheel on steel rail, is much lower, than that of rubber tyres on tarmac.
  2. Hitachi seem to have developed a philosophy on how the trains will be used.
  3. Hitachi’s pantographs, go up and down with all the alacrity of a whore’s drawers. They will be ideal for a short length of electrification.

I think these LNER routes could be immediately decarbonised.

  • LNER – London and Harrogate , where only 18.3 miles is unelectrified. Trains may not need charging, as a full battery could handle both ways.
  • LNER – London and Hull, where 36.1 miles is unelectrified. A short length of electrification to charge trains would be needed at Hull.
  • LNER – London and Lincoln, where only 16.7 miles is unelectrified. Trains would not need charging, as a full battery could handle both ways.
  • LNER – London and Middlesbrough, where only 20.3 miles is unelectrified. Trains would not need charging, as a full battery could handle both ways.

Note.

  1. It looks like some services could start fairly soon, once batteries are available.
  2. Hull Trains could use the 70 km batteries and charging at Hull, as it passed through. This would decarbonise Hull Trains passenger operations.
  3. Services to Aberdeen, Cleethorpes and Inverness would be out of range of the initial Hitachi trains.

Could the last point, partially explain the purchase of the CAF tri-mode trains, which I wrote about in First Tri-Mode Long Distance Trains For The East Coast Main Line?

We shall see what we shall see.

But having a choice of battery-electric or tri-mode trains will enable route development and decarbonisation.

What Is The Size Of The Battery Pack?

In How Much Power Is Needed To Run A Train At 125 Or 100 mph?, I estimated that to maintain 125 mph, a Class 801 train has a usage figure of 3.42 kWh per vehicle mile.

If a five-car Class 800 can run 70 km or 43.5 miles at 125 mph, as indicated by Hitachi, then the battery size can be calculated.

3.42 * 5 * 43.5 = 743.85 kWh

As the battery pack can supply 750 kW according to the data sheet, this looks like this will run the train for an hour.

Is that coincidence or a design criteria?

What Battery Capacity Would Be Needed For A Hundred Miles?

For a five-car train, this is the energy needed for a hundred miles.

3.42 *5 * 100 = 1710 kWh or three batteries.

For a nine-car train, this is the energy needed for a hundred miles.

3.42 *9 * 100 = 3078 kWh or five batteries.

It looks like all diesel engines will be replaced by batteries.

Will Class 801 Trains Swap Their Single Diesel Engine For a Battery Power Pack?

Consider.

  • Class 801 trains have a single diesel engine for emergency power.
  • Lumo’s Class 803 trains, are all-electric with a battery-pack for emergency hotel power only.
  • Hitachi must have full details on the performance of Lumo’s trains.
  • The East Coast Main Line is notorious for the wires to come tumbling down.
  • The diesel engine and the battery pack appear to weigh the same.
  • Batteries cost less to maintain than diesels.

I can’t see why the single diesel engine can’t be replaced by a standard battery pack, without loosing any functionality.

What Would Be The Range Of A Fully Battery-Electric Train?

This is a paragraph from a data sheet.

Our retrofit solution for intercity trains offers phased replacement of diesel engines at the time that they would
have been due for their regular heavy maintenance overhaul, replacing each engine in turn until trains are fully battery electric. The solution delivers fuel cost savings and lowers CO2 emissions by at least 20% for every engine replaced, and a 20% reduction in whole life maintenance costs – well within the battery’s life span of 8-10 years.

Note.

  1. It looks like Hitachi are expecting operators to replace engines in turn.
  2. Replacing engines with batteries saves the operators money.

As a five-car Class 800 train has three diesel engines and a nine-car train has five engines, does this mean that the range of fully-batteried Class 800 train is 70 km or 210 km?

  • A fully-batteried Class 800 train will weigh the same as the current diesel.
  • One battery can drive the train for 70 km at 125 mph according to Hitachi.
  • There are no branches of electrified lines that are 125 mph lines without electrification.
  • I would assume that the train can use regenerative braking to recharge the batteries.
  • 210 kilometres is 130 miles.

I don’t know much about the electrical systems of Hitachi’s trains, but it is likely that there will be an electrical bus to distribute power from one end of the train to the other.

So a five-car Class 800 train with three fully-charged battery packs could have over 2 MWh of electricity on board, that could be used for traction.

  • Applying the usage figure of 3.42 kWh per vehicle mile, gives a range for the five-car train of at least 117 miles.
  • The equivalent figure for a nine-car train will be at least 121 miles.

These distances would open up routes like these on the East Coast Main Line.

  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Aberdeen – 91.4 miles – Charge before return.
  • LNER/Hull Trains – London King’s Cross and Beverley via Temple Hirst junction – 44.3 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • Grand Central – London King’s Cross and Bradford Interchange via Shaftholme junction – 47.8 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Cleethorpes via Newark and Lincoln – 63.9 miles – Charge before return.
  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Harrogate via Leeds – 18.3 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Inverness– 146.2 miles – Charge before return.
  • LNER/Hull Trains – London King’s Cross and Hull via Temple Hirst junction – 36.1 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Middlesbrough via Northallerton – 20.3 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • LNER – London King’s Cross and Scarborough via York – 42.1 miles – No Charging needed before return.
  • LNER/Grand Central – London King’s Cross and Sunderland via Northallerton – 47.4 miles – No Charging needed before return.

Note.

  1. The miles are the longest continuous distance without electrification.
  2. Only Aberdeen, Cleethorpes and Inverness would need to charge trains before return.
  3. Inverness may be too far. But is it in range of LNER’s new CAF tri-mode trains?

The battery range  would also allow LNER to use the Lincoln diversion on the Joint Line.

Why Didn’t LNER Buy More Azumas?

This puzzles me and I suspect it puzzles other people too.

Surely, an all Azuma fleet will be easier to manage.

But in this article on Modern Railways, which is entitled LNER Orders CAF Tri-mode Sets, this is said.

Modern Railways understands the new fleet will be maintained at Neville Hill depot in Leeds and, like the ‘225’ sets, will be used predominantly on services between London and Yorkshire, although unlike the ‘225s’ the tri-modes, with their self-power capability, will be able to serve destinations away from the electrified network such as Harrogate and Hull.

Note.

  1. Hull would possibly need work to provide some form of charging for battery-electric Azumas, but Harrogate is close enough to be served by a one-battery Azuma.
  2. The CAF Tri-mode sets would certainly handle routes like Cleethorpes, Middlesbrough and Sunderland, but would they really need a ten-car train.
  3. Ten-car trains would also be busy on the Leeds route.
  4. The UK is going to need more 125 mph trains for Cross Country, Grand Central, Grand Union, TransPennine Express and possibly other train companies.
  5. Has Hitachi got the capacity to build the trains in the UK?

So has the Government given the order to CAF to create a level of competition?

Conclusions

These are my conclusions about Hitachi’s battery packs for Class 80x trains, which were written in November 2023.

  • The battery pack has a capacity of 750 kWh.
  • A five-car train needs three battery-packs to travel 100 miles.
  • A nine-car train needs five battery-packs to travel 100 miles.
  • The maximum range of a five-car train with three batteries is 117 miles.
  • The maximum range of a nine-car train with five batteries is 121 miles.

As battery technology gets better, these distances will increase.

Hitachi have seen my figures.

They also told me, that they were in line with their figures, but new and better batteries would increase range.

In July 2025, I wrote Batteries Ordered For Grand Central Inter-City Trains, which mentions the following.

  • Grand Central’s trains will be electric-diesel-battery hybrid inter-city trainsets.
  • The trains will have lithium ion phosphate batteries.
  • The trains will be delivered in 2028.
  • The batteries will be smaller and more powerful, than current batteries.

This is also said about safety, hazards and cybersecurity.

The Safety Integrity Level 2 and IEC 61508 compliant battery management system will detect and mitigate hazards and meet the IEC 62243 cybersecurity standard.

These batteries would appear to give Hitachi and Grand Central Trains everything they want and need.

It looks like the new battery chemistry, will give Hitachi extra range.

November 14, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments

Grand Central Trains And CAF’s Tri-Mode Trains

In First Tri-Mode Long Distance Trains For The East Coast Main Line, I wrote about LNER’s purchase of a new fleet of ten CAF tri-mode trains to work services between London and Yorkshire.

In this press release from LNER, which is entitled First Tri-Mode Long Distance Trains For The East Coast Main Line, this is a paragraph.

This new fleet of trains will keep LNER on track to reduce its emissions by 67 per cent by 2035 and be net zero by 2045. LNER has already reduced carbon emissions by 50 per cent compared with 2018/19. Per mile, LNER trains produce 15 times less carbon emissions than a domestic flight.

I believe that as they compete over similar routes with LNER, that Grand Central Trains will have to implement a similar decarbonisation strategy or their business will suffer.

The new trains for Grand Central Trains, will need to have the following conditions.

Train Length

Consider.

  • The train must be able to fit all the platforms it will use.
  • Ten-cars may be too long for some of the platforms.
  • Train length should also be long enough to capture as much of the market as possible.

But as adjusting the length of trains is an easy process, I suspect all manufacturers will be happy to supply extra carriages.

Distances Without Electrification

These are the distances on Grand Central Trains’s services without electrification.

  • Doncaster and Bradford Interchange – 52.1 miles
  • Northallerton and Sunderland – 47.4 miles

A battery-electric train with a battery range of 110 miles would probably be able to reach Sunderland and return, after charging on the main line.

But a CAF tri-mode train, which ran on diesel or a suitable sustainable fuel like biodiesel or HVO wouldn’t give the driver, operator or passengers any worries.

Possible Time Savings To Bradford

Digital signalling is being installed on the East Coast Main Line between Woolmer Green and Dalton-on-Tees, which will allow running on the line up to 140 mph.

  • Woolmer Green is 132.1 miles South of Doncaster.
  • A typical train time by Grand Central Trains is 75 minutes.
  • This is an average speed of 110 mph.
  • Trains take typically three hours and eight minutes between London and Bradford Interchange.

I can build a table of timings and savings at various average speeds.

  • 120 mph – 66 minutes – 9 minutes
  • 125 mph – 63 minutes – 12 minutes
  • 130 mph – 61 minutes – 14 minutes
  • 140 mph – 57 minutes – 18 minutes

Several times, I have timed an Hitachi train running at 125 mph on routes like the East Coast Main Line, Great Western Main Line, Midland Main Line and West Coast Main Line, so I have no doubt, that London and Bradford Interchange services can be less than three hours.

These journey time savings will be available to any train able to use the digital electrified railway to the South of Doncaster.

Possible Time Savings To Sunderland

Dalton-on-Tees, where the first phase of the digitally signalling will end, is North of Northallerton, so once the Sunderland train is on the East Coast Main Line, it will be a digital electrified railway all the way to Woolmer Green.

  • Woolmer Green is 194.6 miles South of Northallerton.
  • A typical train time by Grand Central Trains is 151 minutes.
  • This is an average speed of 77.3 mph.
  • Trains take typically three hours and twenty-eight minutes between London and Sunderland.

I can build a table of timings and savings at various average speeds.

  • 120 mph – 97 minutes – 54 minutes
  • 125 mph – 93 minutes – 58 minutes
  • 130 mph – 89 minutes – 62 minutes
  • 140 mph – 83 minutes – 68 minutes

It looks like times of two hours and thirty minutes will be possible between between London and Sunderland.

Will The Trains Need A 140 mph Capability?

Trains will need to average 125 mph on the digital electrified East Coast Main Line to get under three hours for Bradford Interchange and 2½ hours for Sunderland, so I feel a 140 mph capability is required between Northallerton and London.

Could The Trains Split And Join At Doncaster?

High speed paths on the digitally signalled and electrified East Coast Main Line might be at a premium, so running pairs of five-car trains to two destinations could be commonplace working.

  • It could be a way of increasing frequency to Bradford Interchange and Sunderland, by perhaps running pairs of five-car trains that split at Doncaster.
  • Grand Union Trains have proposed in the past to use splitting and joining to run services to Cleethorpes.

As Hitachi trains can split and join, I suspect that the CAF tri-mode trains will be at least able to be retrofitted with the ability.

Conclusion

These are my conclusions.

  • The digital signalling certainly gives good time saving to Yorkshire and the North-East
  • New trains for Grand Union Trains would give them faster services on their existing routes.
  • Trains with a 140 mph capability would be needed.
  • CAF tri-mode trains wouldn’t need any new infrastructure, but battery-electric trains may need chargers at the destinations.
  • Because of the lower infrastructure requirements, I think the CAF trains will get the nod.

 

November 12, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | 6 Comments

First Tri-Mode Long Distance Trains For The East Coast Main Line

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from LNER.

This is the sub-heading.

London North Eastern Railway (LNER) is pleased to confirm that CAF has been named as the successful bidder to deliver a fleet of 10 new tri-mode trains for LNER. Porterbrook has been chosen as the financier of the new fleet. The trains will be able to operate in electric, battery or diesel mode.

These are the first two paragraphs.

Benefits of tri-mode trains range from a reduction in emissions, particulates, noise and vibration pollution, lower maintenance and operating costs and upgradeable technology, with an expected increase in range and performance as technology develops further. Battery power reduces the need to use diesel traction in areas where overhead powerlines are not available.

Complementing the modern Azuma fleet of 65 trains, the new ten-coach trains will help LNER achieve its vision of becoming the most loved, progressive and trusted train operator in the UK, delivering an exceptional service for the customers and communities served along its 956-mile network.

I have a few thoughts.

Will The Trains Have Rolls-Royce mtu Diesel Engines?

Consider.

  • CAF’s Class 195, 196 and 197 Civity trains for the UK all have Rolls-Royce mtu diesel engines.
  • Porterbrook are headquartered in Derby.
  • Rolls-Royce are headquartered in Derby.
  • In Rolls-Royce And Porterbrook Agreement Will Drive Rail Decarbonisation, I talked about how the two companies were planning to  decarbonise trains using techniques like mtu Hybrid PowerPacks and hydrogen fuel cells.

I would think it very likely that the new trains will have Rolls-Royce mtu engines.

Will The Trains Have Rolls-Royce mtu Hybrid PowerPacks?

It was in 2018, that I first wrote about mtu Hybrid PowerPacks in Rolls-Royce And Porterbrook Launch First Hybrid Rail Project In The UK With MTU Hybrid PowerPacks.

  • Examples of these power packs are now running in Germany, Ireland and the UK.
  • The mtu Hybrid PowerPack how has its own web site.
  • There is also this YouTube video.
  • If CAF use off-the-shelf mtu Hybrid PowerPacks in their Civity trains, there is one big massive plus – They don’t have to develop the complicated control software to get a combination of diesel engines and batteries to perform as immaculately as Busby Berkeley’s dancers or a Brigade of Guards.
  • The mtu Hybrid PowerPacks also have a big plus for operators – The batteries don’t need separate charging infrastructure.
  • In Rolls-Royce Releases mtu Rail Engines For Sustainable Fuels, I talk about how mtu engines can run on sustainable fuels, such as biodiesel or HVO.

I think it is extremely likely that CAF’s new trains for LNER will be powered by mtu Hybrid PowerPacks.

Class 800 And Class 397 Trains Compared

The Class 800 train is LNER’s workhorse to Scotland from London.

The Class 397 train used by TransPennine Express, is a 125 mph Civity train.

Differences include.

  • The Class 800 train can run at 140 mph, where the signalling allows, but is the Class 397 train only capable of 125 mph?
  • The Class 397 train accelerate at 0.92 m/s², whereas the Class 800 train can only manage 0.7 m/s².
  • The Hitachi train has 14 % more seats, 36 First and 290 Standard as opposed to 22 First and 264 Standard in five-car trains.

I will add to this list.

Will The New Trains Be Capable Of 140 mph Running?

As the East Coast Main Line is being fully digitally signalled to  allow 140 mph running of the numerous Hitachi expresses on the route, I wouldn’t be surprised to see, that the new CAF trains will be capable of 140 mph.

In this article on Modern Railways, which is entitled LNER Orders CAF Tri-mode Sets, this is said.

The new fleet will be equipped with CAF Signalling’s European Rail Traffic Management System digital signalling. This will align with the East Coast Digital Programme, which aims to introduce European Train Control System (ETCS) on the southern stretch of the East Coast main line from King’s Cross to Stoke Tunnel by 2029.

Later in the article this is said.

LNER has retained 12 ‘91s’ hauling eight rakes of Mk 4s, and the rollout of ETCS is another reason the operator has sought to order the replacement fleet. LNER’s passenger numbers have rebounded more quickly than other operators post-Covid, which has helped make the case for confirming the order.

This does seem sensible.

What Will Be The Range Of The CAF Trains Without Electrification?

The longest LNER route without electrification is the Northern section of the Inverness service between Inverness and Dunblane, which is 146.1 miles. There are also eight stops and some hills.

In Edinburgh to Inverness in the Cab of an HST, there’s a video of the route.

I’m sure that even, if they don’t normally run the new trains to Inverness, being able to do so, could be useful at some point.

It should be noted that the Guinness World Record for battery-electric trains is 139 miles, which is held by a Stadler Akku.

I am left with the conclusion that London and Inverness needs a tri-mode train or lots of electrification. Did this rule out Hitachi?

The Number Of Trains Ordered

The Modern Railways article says this about the number of trains.

The contract includes an eight-year maintenance services agreement with an option to extend; CAF says the order value, including maintenance, exceeds €500 million. When the tender was published the intention was to include an option for five additional sets; LNER confirmed to Modern Railways there is an option to purchase additional sets on top of the base order of 10.

Can we assume this means that other trains will be ordered, if the trains are a success?

Can These New CAF Trains Be Made Net Zero?

This is a paragraph, in the LNER press release.

This new fleet of trains will keep LNER on track to reduce its emissions by 67 per cent by 2035 and be net zero by 2045. LNER has already reduced carbon emissions by 50 per cent compared with 2018/19. Per mile, LNER trains produce 15 times less carbon emissions than a domestic flight.

As the new CAF trains will probably have a service life of at least forty years, there must be some way, that these new trains can be made net zero.

Consider.

  • I am absolutely certain, that the new CAF trains will have Rolls-Royce mtu diesel engines.
  • LNER’s existing Class 800 and 801 trains have Rolls-Royce mtu diesel engines.

Rolls-Royce mtu according to some of Rolls-Royce’s press releases appear to be developing net zero solutions based on hydrogen or net zero fuels.

This press release from Rolls-Royce is entitled Rolls-Royce Successfully Tests mtu Engines With Pure Hydrogen, suggests that Rolls-Royce mtu are working on a solution.

Routes They Will Serve

The Modern Railways article says this about the routes to be served.

Modern Railways understands the new fleet will be maintained at Neville Hill depot in Leeds and, like the ‘225’ sets, will be used predominantly on services between London and Yorkshire, although unlike the ‘225s’ the tri-modes, with their self-power capability, will be able to serve destinations away from the electrified network such as Harrogate and Hull.

Note.

  1. This surprised me, as I’d always expected the Yorkshire routes will be served by Hitachi battery-electric trains.
  2. But it does look that both Harrogate and Hull stations, have long enough platforms to hold a ten-car train.
  3. With their tri-mode technology, it also looks like the CAF trains won’t be needed to be charged before returning to London.

The last point would enable them to try out new routes.

These are distances from the electrification of the East Coast Main Line of the destinations that LNER served, where there is not full electrification.

  • Aberdeen via Ladybank – 91.4 miles
  • Carlisle via Skipton – 86.8 miles
  • Cleethorpes via Newark and Lincoln – 63.9 miles
  • Harrogate via Leeds – 18.3 miles
  • Huddersfield via Leeds – 17.2 miles
  • Hull via Temple Hirst junction – 36.1 miles
  • Inverness via Dunblane – 146.1 miles
  • Lincoln via Newark – 16.7 miles
  • Middlesbrough via Northallerton – 22.2 miles
  • Scarborough via York – 42.1 miles
  • Sunderland via Northallerton – 47.4 miles

Note.

  1. The first place after the ‘via’ is where the electrification ends.
  2. Carlisle could be a possibility during High Speed Two upgrading of the West Coast Main Line or for an enthusiasts’ special or tourist train.
  3. Cleethorpes is a possible new service for LNER. I wrote about this in LNER To Serve Cleethorpes.
  4. Scarborough must be a possible new service for LNER.
  5. All stations can take ten-car trains, with the possible exception of Middlesbrough, which is currently being upgraded.
  6. Huddersfield and Leeds is being electrified under the TransPennine Upgrade.

This would appear to show that LNER need enough bi-mode or tri-mode trains to run services to Aberdeen, Cleethorpes, Harrogate, Hull, Inverness, Lincoln, Middlesbrough and Sunderland.

But.

  • It would appear that the initial batch of trains, will not be serving the North of Scotland.
  • Aberdeen and Inverness could be served, when there is enough electrification at the Southern end.

I am also fairly sure, that no significant infrastructure is required.

Do Hitachi Have A Problem?

I am starting to wonder, if Hitachi are having trouble with the designing and building of their battery packs.

  • It’s not like Hitachi to allow someone to run off with a €500 million contract from under their nose.
  • Are they short of capacity to build the trains at Newton Aycliffe?

But then they’re probably up to their elbows in work on the High Speed Two Classic-Compatible trains.

Are There Any Other Routes, Where The New CAF  Trains Could Be Employed?

The trains would certainly be suitable for these routes.

  • Chiltern – InterCity services.
  • CrossCountry Trains – Fleet replacement
  • Grand Central Trains – Fleet replacement
  • Grand Union Trains – For Carmarthen and Stirling open access services.
  • Great Western Railway – Replacing Castles in the South West.
  • ScotRail – Replacing Inter7City trains.
  • South Western Railway – Basingstoke and Exeter St. Davids and other routes.

Note.

  1. CAF could sell a lot of trains.
  2. I estimate that fleet replacement for Grand Central Trans would cost around €350 million
  3. The specification would vary according to the route.

Could CAF  have got the LNER order, because they have the capacity in the Newport factory?

Conclusion

It looks like CAF have done a good job in designing the trains.

I’m also fairly sure that CAF are using Rolls-Royce mtu PowerPacks.

 

 

 

 

November 11, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 6 Comments

East Midlands Railway To Leeds

This news story from the Department of Transport is entitled Yorkshire And The Humber To Benefit From £19.8 billion Transport Investment.

This is said about Leeds and Sheffield services.

The line between Sheffield and Leeds will be electrified and upgraded, giving passengers a choice of 3 to 4 fast trains an hour, instead of 1, with journey times of 40 minutes. A new mainline station for Rotherham will also be added to the route, which could give the town its first direct service to London since the 1980s, boosting capacity by 300%.

These are my thoughts.

A New Mainline Station For Rotherham

This page on Rotherham Business News, says this about the location of the Rotherham mainline station.

South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority (SYMCA) and Rotherham Council have been developing a scheme to return mainline train services to the borough for the first time since the 1980s. A site at Parkgate is the frontrunner for a regeneration project described by experts as “a relatively straightforward scheme for delivery within three to four years.”

Various posts and comments on the Internet back the councils preference for a new station at Rotherham Parkgate.

  • It  would be at Rotherham Parkgate shopping centre.
  • It connects to the tram-trains, which run half-hourly to Cathedral in Sheffield city centre via Rotherham Central.
  • There appears to be plenty of space.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the tracks at the current Rotherham Parkgate tram stop.

Note.

  1. The orange lines are the main railway tracks.
  2. Rotherham Parkgate is indicated by the blue arrow in the North-East corner of the map.
  3. Trains would run between Sheffield and Rotherham Parkgate via Meadowhall Interchange and Rotherham Central.
  4. Trains and tram-trains would share tracks through Rotherham Central.

After passing Rotherham Parkgate trains would go to Swinton, and then on to Doncaster or Leeds.

Sheffield And Leeds Via Rotherham Parkgate

Currently, there is an hourly service between Leeds and Sheffield, that goes through the Rotherham Parkgate site.

  • It calls at Outwood, Wakefield Westgate, Sandal & Agbrigg, Fitzwilliam, Moorthorpe, Thurnscoe, Goldthorpe, Bolton-upon-Dearne, Swinton, Rotherham Central, Meadowhall.
  • The service takes one hour and thirteen minutes, but there are eleven stops.
  • As the distance is 38.9 miles, that works out at an average speed of 32 mph.

I suspect this schedule was written for Pacers.

The Department of Transport is aiming for a forty minute journey, which is an average speed of 58.4 mph.

Consider.

  • If you look at the maximum speeds of the route from Rotherham Parkgate to Wakefield Westgate, it is 21.8 miles of 100 mph track.
  • About twenty miles to the South of Wakefield Westgate is electrified.
  • Leeds and Wakefield Westgate is 10.1 miles of 75-85 mph track.
  • LNER’s expresses leave Wakefield Westgate, eleven minutes after leaving Leeds.
  • I can find a TransPennine Express that takes thirteen minutes to go between Sheffield  and Rotherham Parkgate late at night on the way to the depot.

The eleven and thirteen minutes mean that leaves 16 minutes for Rotherham Parkgate to Wakefield Westgate, if Sheffield and Leeds are to be timed at forty minutes, which would be an average speed of 82 mph between Rotherham Parkgate and Wakefield Westgate.

I feel that for a forty minute journey between Leeds and Sheffield, the following conditions would need to be met.

  • Very few stops. Perhaps only Meadowhall, Rotherham Parkgate and Wakefield Westgate.
  • 100 mph running where possible.
  • 100 mph trains
  • Electric trains would help, as acceleration is faster. Battery-electric trains would probably be sufficient.
  • Some track improvements might help.

But forty minutes would certainly be possible.

At present there are five trains per hour (tph) between Leeds and Sheffield.

  • Northern – 2 tph – via Wakefield Kirkgate, Barnsley and Meadowhall – 58 minutes
  • Northern – 1 tph – via Outwood, Wakefield Westgate, Sandal & Agbrigg, Fitzwilliam, Moorthorpe, Thurnscoe, Goldthorpe, Bolton-upon-Dearne, Swinton, Rotherham Central and Meadowhall – One hour and 13 minutes
  • Northern – 1 tph –  via Woodlesford, Castleford, Normanton, Wakefield Kirkgate, Darton, Barnsley, Wombwell, Elsecar, Chapeltown and Meadowhall – One hour and 19 minutes.
  • CrossCountry – 1 tph – via Wakefield Westgate – 44 minutes

Note.

  1. Only the second service will go through Rotherham Parkgate.
  2. The CrossCountry service takes the more direct route avoiding Rotherham Parkgate.
  3. All trains go via Meadowhall, although the CrossCountry service doesn’t stop.
  4. If the CrossCountry service was run by electric trains, it might be able to shave a few minutes as part of the route is electrified.

The CrossCountry service indicates to me, that 40 minutes between Leeds and Sheffield will be possible, but a stop at Meadowhall could be dropped to save time.

Extending East Midlands Railway’s Sheffield Service To Leeds

Consider

  • Sheffield station has two tph to London all day.
  • The CrossCountry service looks like it could be timed to run between Leeds and Sheffield in forty minutes.
  • An East Midlands Railway Class 810 train could probably be timed at 40 minutes between Leeds and Sheffield via Meadowhall, Rotherham Parkgate and Wakefield Westgate.
  • The current Northern services could continue to provide connectivity for stations between Leeds and Sheffield.

Extending one tph of East Midlands Railway’s trains to Leeds would probably be sufficient to give two fast trains per hour between Leeds and Sheffield.

  • The East Midlands Railway and CrossCountry services could provide a fast service between Leeds and Sheffield in forty minutes.
  • If they were electric or battery-electric trains, I suspect that they could call at Meadowhall, Rotherham Parkgate and Wakefield Westgate.
  • They could be backed up by the two tph through Barnsley, which could probably be speeded up to around fifty minutes by electrification or using battery-electric trains.

The East Midlands Railway service between London and Leeds would be under three hours.

  • Rotherham would get an hourly train to London.
  • ,London and Leeds in under three hours, would be slower than Leeds and King’s Cross.
  • But the electrification of the Midland Main Line would speed it up a bit.

A fast Leeds and Derby service might compensate for the loss of the Eastern leg of High Speed Two.

Sheffield And Doncaster Via Rotherham Parkgate

At present there are three tph between Sheffield and Doncaster.

  • Northern – 1 tph – via Meadowhall, Rotherham Central, Swinton, Mexborough and Conisbrough – 42 minutes
  • Northern – 1 tph – via Meadowhall – 28 minutes
  • TransPennine Express – 1 tph – via Meadowhall – 27 minutes

Note.

  1. The first Northern train continues calling at all stations to Adwick.
  2. The second Northern train continues calling at all stations to Scarborough.
  3. Both Northern services go through Rotherham Parkgate.
  4. The TransPennine Express service takes the more direct route avoiding Rotherham Parkgate.
  5. All trains go via Meadowhall.

These services would give good connectivity for a London train, with a change at Rotherham Parkgate.

Improving Tracks Between Doncaster, Leeds and Sheffield

Consider.

  • About 65 % of the main routes between Doncaster, Leeds and Sheffield have a maximum operating speed of 100 mph.
  • Doncaster and Leeds is electrified.
  • Only 35 miles is without electrification.
  • The Midland Main Line is in the process of being electrified to Sheffield.
  • There are plans to extend the Sheffield tram-trains to Doncaster Sheffield Airport, that I wrote about in Sheffield Region Transport Plan 2019 – Doncaster Sheffield Airport.

There is also heavyweight electrification infrastructure through Rotherham Central for the Sheffield tram-trains.

As it is only used by the tram-trains it may be only 750 VDC. But it can probably handle 25 KVAC.

  • Could these routes be improved to allow faster running?
  • Would it be cost-effective to electrify between Sheffield and the East Coast Main Line and the Doncaster and Leeds Line?
  • Alternatively battery-electric trains could be run on the routes between Doncaster, Leeds and Sheffield, charging at all three main stations.

Any form of electric train should be faster, as acceleration and deceleration is faster in any electric train, be it powered by electrification, batteries, hydrogen or a hybrid diesel-battery-electric powertrain.

Conclusion

 

 

November 2, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

May The Maths Be With You!

It was a bit of a surprise, when in the November 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, in an article, which was entitled Extra Luggage Racks For Lumo, I read this closing paragraph.

Lumo celebrated its second birthday in late October and was also set to mark the carriage of its two-millionth passenger. It is understood Lumo is interested in augmenting its fleet, such has been the success of the service; while many operators favour bi-mode units, Lumo is proud of its all-electric credentials so straight EMUs are still preferred, although the possibilities of including batteries which could power the trains may be pursued (the ‘803s’ have on-board batteries, but only to provide power to on-board systems if the electricity supply fails).

I find this development very interesting.

Surely the obvious way to increase capacity would be to acquire some  extra identical trains and run the busiest services as ten-car trains. I talked about Hull Trains running ten-car trains in Ten-Car Hull Trains. Both companies have five trains, so I suspect that this number would allow for occasional ten-car trains.

If not, then add a few identical trains to the fleet, so capacity can be matched to the demand.

  • Some services would be ten-car instead of five-car.
  • Platforms at Edinburgh, King’s Cross and Newcastle already handle nine and ten-car trains, so infrastructure costs would be minimal.
  • No extra paths would be needed, as a ten-car train can run in a path, that normally has five-car trains, as Hull Trains have shown.

A simple spreadsheet should probably predict, when and how many extra trains need to be added to the fleet.

Lumo And Traction Batteries

But why does the Modern Railways’s article talk about traction batteries?

In the two years since Lumo started their service, there have been days, when the East Coast Main Line has been closed for engineering works, bad weather or an incident. I wrote about an incident in Azumas Everywhere!.

Some of these engineering works have been able to be by-passed by using diversions. But not all of these diversion routes are fully-electrified, so are not available for Lumo.

There would appear to be three viable diversions for the East Coast Main Line.

  • Werrington Junction and Doncaster via Lincoln – Not Electrified – 85.4 miles
  • Doncaster and York via Leeds – Being Electrified – 55.5 miles
  • Northallerton and Newcastle – Not Electrified – 56.8 miles

If all or some of Lumo’s five-car trains had a battery-range of a hundred miles, they would be able to divert around some blockades.

Note.

  1. A traction battery could also provide power to on-board systems if the electricity supply fails.
  2. A traction battery would allow the train to skip past some catenary problems.
  3. I would be interested to know how much diversions, bad weather and incidents have cost Lumo in lost sales and refunds.

As an electrical engineer, I believe, that the emergency-only and the traction batteries could be the same design, but with different software and capacity.

The extra cost of the larger capacity traction battery, might deliver a better service and also pay for itself in the long term.

Extending Lumo’s Route

Lumo will want to maximise revenue and profits, so would it be possible to extend the route North of Edinburgh?

Consider.

  • Edinburgh and Aberdeen is 131.4 miles
  • Ladybank is a station to the North of the Forth Bridge, which is under 40 miles from Edinburgh.
  • The line between Edinburgh and Ladybank is being electrified.
  • Ladybank is just 91.4 miles South of Aberdeen.

At some point in the next few years, I believe that one of Lumo’s trains fitted with a hundred mile traction battery could reach Aberdeen on electric power.

The train would need to be charged at Aberdeen before returning South.

How would Aberdonians like that?

Unfortunately, Inverness is 146.1 miles from the nearest electrification at Dunblane, so it is probably too far for a hundred mile traction battery.

It does appear to me that if Lumo’s trains were fitted with a hundred mile traction battery, this would enable them to take some non-electrified diversions and provide a service to Aberdeen.

How Useful Would A Hundred Mile Range Battery-Electric Train Be To Other Operators?

I take each operator in turn.

Hull Trains

Consider.

  • It appears that Hull Trains change between diesel and electric power at Temple Hirst junction, which is between Doncaster and Selby, on their route between King’s Cross and Hull/Beverley.
  • The distance between Temple Hirst junction and Beverley is 44.3 miles.
  • It would appear that an out-and-return journey could be possible on a hundred mile traction battery.
  • The hundred mile traction battery would also allow Hull Trains to use the Lincoln diversion, either when necessary or by design.

To ensure enough range, a short length of overhead electrification could be erected at Hull station to combat range anxiety.

The Modern Railways article also says this.

The co-operation between sister East Coast Main Line open access operators Lumo and Hull Trains continues, with one recent move being the use of Hull Trains ‘802’ on Lumo services to cover for a shortage of the dedicated ‘803s’ while one was out of action for repairs following a fatality. although the two types are similar, there are notable differences, most obviously that the Hull Trains units are bi-modes while the Lumo sets are straight EMUs, and a training conversion course is required for Lumo drivers on the ‘802s’. There are also challenges from a passenger-facing perspective – the Hull trains units have around 20 % fewer seats and a First Class area.

If Hull Trains used traction batteries rather than diesel engines could the trains be identical to Lumo’s trains from the driver’s perspective?

This would surely appeal to First Group, who are the owner of both Hull Trains and Lumo.

TransPennine Express

These are TransPennine Express services.

  • Liverpool Lime Street and Newcastle – Fully Electrified
  • Liverpool Lime Street and Hull – Part Electrified – Hull and Micklefield – 42 miles
  • Manchester Airport and Saltburn – Part Electrified – Saltburn and Northallerton – 33.6 miles
  • Manchester Piccadilly and Newcastle – Fully Electrified
  • Manchester Piccadilly and Scarborough – Part Electrified – York and Scarborough – 42.1 miles
  • York and Scarborough – Not Electrified – 42.1 miles
  • Manchester Piccadilly and Huddersfield – Fully Electrified
  • Huddersfield and Leeds – Fully Electrified
  • Liverpool Lime Street and Cleethorpes – Part Electrified – Hazel Grove and Cleethorpes – 104.6 miles

Note.

  1. I am assuming that the TransPennine Upgrade has been completed and Manchester and Leeds is electrified.
  2. Liverpool Lime Street and Cleethorpes will need some form of charging at Cleethorpes and a slightly larger battery.

All of these TransPennine  Rxpress routes would be possible with a battery-electric train with a hundred mile traction battery.

LNER

These are distances from the electrification of the East Coast Main Line.

  • Aberdeen via Ladybank – 91.4 miles – Charge before return
  • Bradford Forster Square – Electrified
  • Carlisle via Skipton – 86.8 miles – Charge before return
  • Cleethorpes via Newark and Lincoln – 63.9 miles – Charge before return
  • Harrogate via Leeds – 18.3 miles
  • Huddersfield via Leeds – 17.2 miles
  • Hull via Temple Hirst junction – 36.1 miles
  • Lincoln via Newark – 16.7 miles
  • Middlesbrough via Northallerton – 22.2 miles
  • Scarborough via York – 42.1 miles
  • Skipton – Electrified
  • Sunderland via Northallerton – 47.4 miles

Note.

  1. The first place after the ‘via’ is where the electrification ends.
  2. Carlisle could be a possibility during High Speed Two upgrading of the West Coast Main Line or for an enthusiasts’ special or tourist train.
  3. Cleethorpes is a possible new service for LNER. I wrote about this in LNER To Serve Cleethorpes.
  4. Scarborough must be a possible new service for LNER.
  5. ‘Charge before return’ means the train must be charged before return. Carlisle is electrified, but Cleethorpes is not.
  6. The only new infrastructure would be the charging at Cleethorpes.

All of these LNER routes would be possible with a battery-electric train with a hundred mile traction battery.

The hundred mile traction battery would also allow LNER to use the Lincoln diversion.

Grand Central

These are distances from the electrification of the East Coast Main Line for Grand Central’s services.

  • Bradford Interchange via Shaftholme junction – 47.8 miles
  • Cleethorpes via Doncaster – 52.1 miles – Charge before return
  • Sunderland via Northallerton – 47.4 miles

Note.

  1. The first place after the ‘via’ is where the electrification ends.
  2. Cleethorpes is a possible new service for Grand Central.
  3. ‘Charge before return’ means the train must be charged before return.

All of these routes would be possible with a battery-electric train with a hundred mile traction battery.

The hundred mile traction battery would also allow Grand Central to use the Lincoln diversion.

Avanti West Coast

These are distances from the electrification of the West Coast Main Line for Avanti West Coast’s services.

  • Chester via Crewe – 21.1 miles
  • Gobowen via Wolverhampton – 47.7 miles
  • Holyhead via Crewe – 105.5 miles – Charge before return
  • Shrewsbury via Wolverhampton – 29.7 miles
  • Wrexham via Crewe – 33.3 miles

Note.

  1. The first place after the ‘via’ is where the electrification ends.
  2. Gobowen is a possible new service for Avanti West Coast.
  3. ‘Charge before return’ means the train must be charged before return.

All of these routes would be possible with a battery-electric train with a hundred mile traction battery.

Great Western Railway

These are distances from the electrification of the Great Western Main Line for Great Western Railway’s services.

  • Bristol Temple Meads via Chippenham – 24.4 miles
  • Carmarthen via Cardiff Central – 77.4 miles – Charge before return
  • Cheltenham Spa via Swindon – 43.2 miles
  • Exeter St. Davids via Newbury – 120.4 miles – Charge before return
  • Great Malvern via Didcot East junction – 76.1 miles – Charge before return
  • Hereford via Didcot East junction – 96.9 miles – Charge before return
  • Oxford via Didcot Parkway – 10.3 miles
  • Paignton via Newbury – 148.7 miles – Charge before return
  • Pembroke Dock via Cardiff Central – 121.6 miles – Charge before return
  • Penzance via Newbury – 172.6 miles – Charge before return
  • Plymouth via Newbury – 120.4 miles – Charge before return
  • Swansea via Cardiff Central – 53 miles – Charge before return
  • Weston-super-Mare via Chippenham – 43.8 miles
  • Worcester Foregate Street via Didcot East junction – 68.2 miles – Charge before return
  • Worcester Shrub Hill via Didcot East junction – 67.6 miles – Charge before return

Note.

  1. The first place after the ‘via’ is where the electrification ends.
  2. ‘Charge before return’ means the train must be charged before return.
  3. Partial electrification through Hereford, Great Malvern, Worcester Foregate Street and Worcester Shrub Hill, could possibly be used to charge services from Hereford and Worcester.
  4. Partial electrification through Penzance, Plymouth and Exeter St. Davids, could possibly be used to charge services from the South West.
  5. Partial electrification West of Swansea, could possibly be used to charge services from West Wales.

All routes, except for Hereford and Worcester, the South-West and West Wales, would be possible with a battery-electric train with a hundred mile traction battery.

I’ll now look at the three groups of services in more detail.

Services To Hereford And Worcester

These are distances from the electrification of the Great Western Main Line for Great Western Railway’s Hereford and Worcester services.

  • Great Malvern via Didcot East junction – 76.1 miles
  • Hereford via Didcot East junction – 96.9 miles
  • Worcester Foregate Street via Didcot East junction – 68.2 miles
  • Worcester Shrub Hill via Didcot East junction – 67.6 miles

Note.

  1. All services join the Great Western Main Line at Didcot East junction.
  2. Some services will be probably need to have, their batteries charged at the Hereford and Worcester end.

At the present time, the electrification finishes at Didcot East junction, but if it were to be extended to Charlbury station, these would be the distances without electrification.

  • Great Malvern via Charlbury – 52.3 miles
  • Hereford via Charlbury – 73.1 miles
  • Worcester Foregate Street via Charlbury – 44.4 miles
  • Worcester Shrub Hill via Charlbury – 43.8 miles

Note.

  1. Some of the track between Oxford and Charlbury is only single track, which may give advantages, when it is electrified.
  2. It might be possible with a hundred mile traction battery for all Worcester services to charge their batteries between Charlbury and London Paddington and not need a charge at Worcester to return.
  3. A larger traction battery or extending the electrification to perhaps Morton-in-Marsh could see Great Malvern in range of battery-electric trains from London Paddington without a charge.
  4. Hereford would probably be too far to get away without charging at Hereford.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the layout of Hereford station.

I’m certain that a platform can be found, where there is space for a charger, which could also be used for other trains serving the station.

Services To The South West

In the August 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article, which is entitled GWR Seeks Opportunities To Grow.

This is the sub-heading.

Managing Director Mark Hopwood tells Philip Sherratt there is plenty of potential to increase rail’s economic contribution.

This is two paragraphs.

The desire to provide electrification to support aggregates traffic from the Mendip quarries could also benefit GWR , says Mr. Hopwood. ‘Having an electric loco would massively help with pathing heavy freight trains through the Thames Valley. If you could electrify from Newbury to East Somerset Junction, a big chunk of the Berks and Hants route would be wired.

Then you can ask how much further you could get on battery power on an IET without running out of juice.’

Newbury to East Somerset Junction would be 53.5 miles of electrification, so I can build this table of services to the South-West

  • Exeter St. Davids via Newbury – 120.4 miles – 66.9 miles
  • Paignton via Newbury – 148.7 miles – 95.2 miles
  • Penzance via Newbury – 251.9 miles – 198.5 miles
  • Plymouth via Newbury – 172.6 miles – 119 miles

Note.

  1. The distance between Penzance and Plymouth is 79.5 miles.
  2. The first figure in the table is the distance to Newbury.
  3. The second figure in the table is the distance to East Somerset junction.

A possible way of running these four services to London on battery power is emerging.

  • Exeter St. Davids via Newbury – Charge before return – Run on battery for 66.9 miles to East Somerset junction.
  • Paignton via Newbury – Charge before return – Run on battery for 95.2 miles to East Somerset junction.
  • Penzance via Newbury- Charge before return – Run on battery for 79.5 miles to Plymouth – Charge at Plymouth – Run on battery for 119 miles to East Somerset junction.
  • Plymouth via Newbury – Charge before return – Run on battery for 119 miles to East Somerset junction.

Once at East Somerset junction, it’s electrification all the way to Paddington.

This is the corresponding way to run services from London.

  • Exeter St. Davids via Newbury – Run on electrification to East Somerset junction, charging the battery on the way – Run on battery for 66.9 miles to Exeter St. Davids.
  • Paignton via Newbury – Run on electrification to East Somerset junction, charging the battery on the way – Run on battery for 95.2 miles to Paignton.
  • Penzance via Newbury – Run on electrification to East Somerset junction, charging the battery on the way – Run on battery for 119 miles to Plymouth – Charge at Plymouth – Run on battery for 79.5 miles to Penzance.
  • Plymouth via Newbury – Run on electrification to East Somerset junction, charging the battery on the way – Run on battery for 119 miles to Plymouth.

More electrification or a larger  than a hundred mile traction battery would be needed, as Plymouth and East Somerset junction is 119 miles.

But if a Stadler Akku can do 139 miles on a charge, why shouldn’t a Hitachi battery-electric train?

Services To West Wales

It seems that the current timetable is already setup for battery-electric trains to run to and beyond Swansea.

  • Carmarthen and Swansea is almost exactly 32 miles.
  • Pembroke Dock and Swansea is 73.4 miles.
  • Swansea and Cardiff Central is 45.7 miles.

Note

  1. All these sections could be run by a battery-electric train, with a fully-charged hundred mile traction battery.
  2. All trains going to or from Carmarthen or Pembroke Dock reverse at Swansea, where a generous time of more than eleven minutes is allowed for the manoeuvre.
  3. During the reverse at Swansea, there is sufficient time to charge the batteries, if overhead wires were present.

Battery-electric services could serve Wales Wales with overhead electrification at Carmarthen, Pembroke Dock and Swansea.

Conclusion

We will go a long way, if we embrace battery-electric trains.

Most routes can be handled with a train with a traction battery range of 100 miles.

Exceptions are.

  • Hazel Grove and Cleethorpes – 104.6 miles
  • Plymouth and East Somerset junction – 119 miles

But if a Stadler Akku can do 139 miles on a charge, why shouldn’t a Hitachi battery-electric train?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

October 28, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment