The Anonymous Widower

Cardiff To Reading In A Class 387 Train

Returning from my trip to Cardiff yesterday, it wasn’t the normal Class 80x train, but a pair of Class 387 trains.

The timings from real time trains, weren’t as bad as some would have expected.

  • Cardiff Central – 16.54 – 16:56
  • Newport – 17:07 – 17:11
  • Bristol Parkway – 17:29 – 17:32
  • Swindon – 17:53 – 17:58
  • Reading – 18:20 – 18:26

Note.

  1. The first time is the scheduled time and the second time is the actual time of the Class 387 trains.
  2. The schedule covers the 109.2 miles in 84 minutes, which is an average speed of 78 mph.
  3. The Class 387 trains covered the 109.2 miles in 90 minutes, which is an average speed of 72.8 mph.

I also arrived in Reading with three or so minutes to catch the Elizabeth Line train.

Are More Elizabeth Line Services Needed To Reading?

In a couple of instances, I’ve waited at Reading for nearly half-an-hour for an Elizabeth Line train.

Currently.

  • The two Elizabeth Line trains take 53 minutes between Reading and Paddington.
  • The two Great Western Main Line trains, that serve Didcot Parkway take 37 minutes between Reading and Paddington.
  • The Great Western Main Line train, that serve Newbury take 25 minutes between Reading and Paddington.

Perhaps four trains per hour (tph) on the Elizabeth Line would be more convenient?

But services wouldn’t be as fast.

November 23, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Electrification Between Newbury And East Somerset Junction

In the August 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article, which is entitled GWR Seeks Opportunities To Grow.

This is the sub-heading.

Managing Director Mark Hopwood tells Philip Sherratt there is plenty of potential to increase rail’s economic contribution.

This is two paragraphs.

The desire to provide electrification to support aggregates traffic from the Mendip quarries could also benefit GWR , says Mr. Hopwood. ‘Having an electric loco would massively help with pathing heavy freight trains through the Thames Valley. If you could electrify from Newbury to East Somerset Junction, a big chunk of the Berks and Hants route would be wired.

Then you can ask how much further you could get on battery power on an IET without running out of juice.’

I have some thoughts.

Where Is East Somerset Junction?

This OpenRailwayMap shows East Somerset junction.

Note.

  1. The East Somerset junction is marked with the blue arrow.
  2. East Somerset junction is 5.2 miles North of Bruton station and 5.4 miles South of Frome station on the Reading and Taunton Line.

As the map shows there is a branch to Merehead Rail Sidings, which is shown in yellow.

This Google Map shows Merehead Rail Sidings.

Note.

  1. It looks like there is a massive quarry to the North of the A361 road, which curves across the map.
  2. It is labelled Torr Works – Aggregate Industries.
  3. Torr Works has a Wikipedia entry.
  4. The rail sidings are South of the A361.
  5. Zooming in on the map, shows that the railway between East Somerset junction and Merehead is single-track and only a few miles long.

Distances from East Somerset junction are as follows.

  • Dorchester junction – 41.2 miles
  • Newbury – 53.4 miles
  • Taunton – 37.2 miles
  • Weymouth – 47.8 miles

Note that it is electrified with 750 VDC third-rail between Weymouth and Dorchester junction.

Range of Battery-Electric Trains

Consider.

  • A Bombardier engineer told me eight years ago, that the battery-electric Class 379 train had a range of sixty miles.
  • Stadler’s FLIRT Akku has a Guinness world record of 139 miles on one battery charge. See this page on the Stadler web site.
  • Even Stadler’s Class 777 trains for Merseyrail have a range of 84 miles on battery power. See New Merseyrail Train Runs 135 km On Battery.

It does appear that five-car battery-electric trains will have ranges in excess of a hundred miles.

I believe that because Hitachi’s battery makers have a good record, they will probably be very ambitious and will want that Guinness record, that Hitachi’s Class 802 trains will have a battery range not far short of the 139 miles of the Stadler FLIRT Akku.

I will be very surprised if Hitachi’s battery-electric version of a Class 802 train, doesn’t have range of at least 125 miles.

But say if they could do say 140 miles, the battery-electric Class 802 train could cover every long-distance route in the UK, which would attract orders for trains to run on the following routes.

  • Cardiff and Swansea
  • Crewe and Holyhead
  • Edinburgh and Aberdeen
  • Edinburgh and Inverness
  • Crewe and Holyhead
  • London Waterloo and Exeter St. Davids

A substantial reward to the battery makers, would probably not be out of order.

Aggregate Trains From The Mendips

Consider.

  • Mining and quarrying companies are under pressure from governments, shareholders and environmentalists to reduce their carbon footprints.
  • Many are replacing diesel-powered mining excavators and trucks, with electric or hydrogen versions.
  • In addition, those companies delivering building products to the construction industry are under pressure to provide low-carbon products.
  • Using rail with electric traction to deliver products to market would cut carbon emissions and might even help sales.

These Mendip quarries appear to be connected to the Reading and Taunton Line.

  • Torr Works – Connects 5.4 miles to the South of Frome.
  • Whatley Quarry – Connects close to Frome.

There may be others.

But these rail-connected quarries, connect at or North of East Somerset junction, to where Mark Hopwood is proposing electrification.

Zero-carbon rail traction could even be possible, by electrifying the short single-track branch lines. or by using hydrogen-electric hybrid locomotives.

GWR’s London And South-West Services

These services use the Reading and Taunton Line to join the Bristol and Exeter Line at Taunton, before going on to Exeter, Plymouth and other destinations in the South-West of England.

These are distances from East Somerset Junction.

  • Exeter – 67 miles
  • Paignton 95.2 miles
  • Penzance – 198.5 miles
  • Plymouth – 119.0 miles
  • Taunton – 37.2 miles

Note.

  1. Exeter, Paignton, Penzance and Plymouth stations would need short lengths of electrification to charge terminating trains or top-up passing trains.
  2. In Thoughts About Electrification Through Devon And Cornwall, I showed that the average stop time at Plymouth station was eight minutes, which could be enough for the rail equivalent of a Formula One splash and dash.
  3. A 125 mile battery range, not only enables London and Penzance, but also Cardiff and Swansea, and Edinburgh and Aberdeen, when the extra electrification is completed.

Could my estimate of a 125 mile battery range, be Hitachi’s objective for their battery-electric trains?

The Ultimate Battery-Electric Class 802 Train

Hitachi have been totally silent on how the fitting of batteries to Class 802 trains is going.

But Mark Hopwood is more forthcoming in the GWR Seeks Opportunities To Grow article. where this is said.

Meanwhile, GWR had announced plans with Eversholt Rail to trial the replacement of a diesel generator unit with batteries on a Class 802 IET. However, Mr. Hopwood says this would not be useful for GWR and so the trial is not proceeding; instead, a TransPennine Express Class 802 will be the subject of a battery trial.

It sounds to me that another solution is being developed to get trains to run on electric power between London and the South-West.

  • I think we can rule out full electrification on the grounds of cost, disruption, time and the Nimbys and objectors will have a field day.
  • Newbury and Penzance is a distance of 251.9 miles, which would surely need a lot of batteries.

Mark Hopwood’s idea to electrify the 53.4 miles between Newbury And East Somerset junction, is starting to look like a good compromise.

GWR’s Bristol/Gloucester And Weymouth Services

These stopping trains are run by diesel trains and take the following route between Bristol Temple Meads and Weymouth stations.

  • Keynsham
  • Oldfield Park
  • Bath Spa
  • Freshford
  • Avoncliff
  • Bradford-on-Avon
  • Trowbridge
  • Westbury
  • Frome
  • East Somerset junction
  • Bruton
  • Castle Cary
  • Yeovil Pen Mill
  • Thornford
  • Yetminster
  • Chetnole
  • Maiden Newton
  • Dorchester West
  • Dorchester junction
  • Upwey

Note.

  1. I would assume that there is enough electrification at Bristol Temple Meads and towards Gloucester to charge the trains.
  2. Trains would leave Bristol Temple Meads with a full battery.
  3. The eighteen stops mean that an electric train with regenerative braking will be more efficient.
  4. Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury is not electrified.
  5. Westbury and East Somerset junction will be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead electrification under Mark Hopwood’s proposal.
  6. Trains take sixteen minutes between Westbury and East Somerset junction.
  7. East Somerset junction and Dorchester junction is not electrified.
  8. Dorchester junction and Weymouth is electrified with 750 VDC third-rail electrification.
  9. Trains take ten minutes between Dorchester junction and Weymouth.

Distances of the various legs are as follows.

  • Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28.3 miles – Not Electrified
  • Westbury and East Somerset junction – 11.4 miles – Electrified
  • East Somerset junction and Dorchester junction – 41.4 miles – Not Electrified
  • Dorchester junction and Weymouth – 6.6 miles – Electrified

The two sections without electrification, should be well within range of a dual-voltage battery-electric train, that has been designed for the route.

GWR’s Cardiff Central And Portsmouth Harbour Service

These stopping trains are run by diesel trains and take the following route between Bristol Temple Meads and Portsmouth Harbour stations.

  • Keynsham
  • Oldfield Park
  • Bath Spa
  • Freshford
  • Avoncliff
  • Bradford-on-Avon
  • Trowbridge
  • Westbury
  • Warminster
  • Salisbury
  • Romsey
  • Redbridge
  • Southampton Central
  • Fareham
  • Cosham
  • Fratton
  • Portsmouth & Southsea

Note.

  1. I would assume that there is enough electrification at Bristol Temple Meads and towards Cardiff Central to charge the trains.
  2. Trains would leave Bristol Temple Meads with a full battery.
  3. The seventeen stops mean that an electric train with regenerative braking will be more efficient.
  4. Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury is not electrified.
  5. Westbury station will be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead electrification under Mark Hopwood’s proposal.
  6. Trains would leave Westbury with a full battery.
  7. Westbury and Redbridge is not electrified.
  8. Redbridge and Portsmouth Harbour is electrified with 750 VDC third-rail electrification.

Distances of the various legs are as follows.

  • Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28.3 miles – Not Electrified
  • Westbury and Redbridge – 46.4 miles – Not Electrified
  • Redbridge and Portsmouth Harbour – 28.5 miles – Electrified

The two sections without electrification, should be well within range of a dual-voltage battery-electric train, that has been designed for the route.

GWR’s Bristol Temple Meads And Salisbury Services

These stopping trains are run by diesel trains and take the following route between Bristol Temple Meads And Salisbury stations.

  • Keynsham
  • Oldfield Park
  • Bath Spa
  • Freshford
  • Avoncliff
  • Bradford-on-Avon
  • Trowbridge
  • Dilton Marsh
  • Warminster

Note.

  1. I would assume that there is enough electrification at Bristol Temple Meads to charge the trains.
  2. Trains would leave Bristol Temple Meads with a full battery.
  3. An electric train with regenerative braking will be more efficient.
  4. Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury is not electrified.
  5. Westbury station will be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead electrification under Mark Hopwood’s proposal.
  6. Trains would leave Westbury with a full battery.
  7. Westbury and Salisbury is not electrified.

Distances of the various legs are as follows.

  • Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28.3 miles – Not Electrified
  • Westbury and Salisbury – 24.4 miles – Not Electrified

The two sections without electrification, should be well within range of a battery-electric train, that has been designed for the route.

GWR’s Swindon And Westbury Services

These stopping trains are run by diesel trains and take the following route between Swindon and Westbury stations.

  • Chippenham
  • Melksham
  • Trowbridge

Note.

  1. This is the Transwilts service.
  2. I would assume that there is enough electrification at Swindon to charge the trains.
  3. Trains would leave Swindon with a full battery.
  4. An electric train with regenerative braking will be more efficient.
  5. Chippenham and Westbury is not electrified.
  6. Westbury station will be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead electrification under Mark Hopwood’s proposal.
  7. Trains would leave Westbury with a full battery.

Distances of the various legs are as follows.

  • Swindon and Chippenham – 16.9 miles – Electrified
  • Chippenham and Westbury – 15.8 miles – Not Electrified

The section without electrification, should be well within range of a battery-electric train, that has been designed for the route.

What Can Be Done If The Electrification Is Not Long Enough?

Some of these routes battery-electric routes may need more electrification to work efficiently.

Despite some routes having both 25 KVAC  overhead and 750 VDC third-rail electrification, any extension of the electrification would be overhead, as new third-rail electrification is effectively banned.

Conclusion

It looks like Mark Hopgood proposal is an excellent idea to enable the decarbonisation of GWR services in Wiltshire and Somerset.

  • Express services would be run by battery-electric Class 802 trains.
  • Local services would be run by battery-electric trains with perhaps three cars.

Some of the local trains would need to be dual-voltage to use both forms of electrification.

 

July 27, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A Very Busy Paddington – 4th July 2023

On my trip to Marsh Barton station, Paddington was very busy, as these pictures show.

Note.

  1. Trains were leaving to Cheltenham Spa, Great Malvern. Newquay and Paignton, in addition to the more expected destinations of Bristol Temple Meads, Cardiff and Swansea.
  2. I took the Elizabeth Line to the station and it was very busy.

I feel, that action needs to be taken to increase the capacity of the station for both passengers and trains.

These are my thoughts.

Catching Trains From Reading

Recently, if I want to go somewhere, that is within an hour West of Reading station, I’ve started taking the Elizabeth Line to Reading using my Freedom Pass and then buying an Off Peak Day Return ticket from Reading.

  • It saves a few pounds.
  • I can catch the Elizabeth Line train at Moorgate direct to Reading, after having breakfast on Moorgate.
  • Moorgate is an easy bus ride from outside my house.

I suspect some other Freedom Pass holders will start to use Reading station to go West.

The only disadvantages are that you miss the Reading train and have to wait half-an-hour for another and that buying tickets at Reading means leaving the station.

Improvements, I would make would include.

  • Four trains per hour (tph) between Whitechapel and Reading.
  • A ticket machine on the bridge at Reading station, so that those needing a ticket can buy one without leaving the station.

I suspect other improvements could also improve this option.

A Second Concourse At The Western End Of Paddington Station

If you go to Paddington station on the Hammersmith and City Line of the Underground, you can walk across the top of the main station and take stairs down to the platform for your departing train.

There has been talk of improving this area of the station, so that passengers using that route from the Underground have an easier route with more facilities like cafes, shops and toilets.

I’m all for this improvement.

What Is The Point Of Heathrow Express?

On my trip, I watched a Heathrow Express arrive in Paddington and just a few people got off.

I am utterly certain, that the Elizabeth Line is giving Heathrow Express a good kicking, as it is so much better connected to the important destinations within London, like Bond Street, Canary Wharf, Farringdon for Thameslink, Liverpool Street for The City, Stratford for events and Whitechapel for the East London Line.

Discussions of the future of Heathrow Express, must also include the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, which is currently being planned by Network Rail.

This page on the Network Rail web site gives more details, including these benefits for the link.

  • Reduce rail journey times between Reading and Heathrow by delivering a new, faster, frequent, more reliable direct train service to Heathrow with four trains per hour in each direction. All trains would call at Reading and Slough and alternate trains at Twyford and Maidenhead. Journey times could be as short as 26 minutes from Reading and 6 to 7 minutes from Slough.
  • Significantly improve rail connectivity to Heathrow from the Thames Valley, South Coast, South West, South Wales and West Midlands.
  • Provide an alternative form of transport for passengers and the large number of people who work at the airport who are currently travelling by road.
  • Ease congestion on some of the UK’s busiest roads, the M4, M3 and M25 resulting in lower CO2 emissions equivalent to approximately 30 million road miles per year, helping to deliver the UK’s climate change and carbon reduction targets.
  • Generate economic growth and new jobs across the Thames Valley and surrounding areas.
  • Reduce passenger congestion at London Paddington.

There is then the question of who should run the service; Heathrow Express, the Elizabeth Line or both.

At the present time, trains from London to Heathrow are.

  • Elizabeth Line – 2 tph – Shenfield and Terminal 5
  • Elizabeth Line – 4 tph – Abbey Wood and Terminal 4
  • Heathrow Express – 4 tph  – Paddington and Terminal 5

Note.

  1. All trains also serve Heathrow Terminals 2 and 3.
  2. The Piccadilly Line also serves all Heathrow Terminals.
  3. It appears that Terminal 4 is only served by the Elizabeth Line.
  4. Terminal 5 has 6 tph, but the Western Rail Link will be at a frequency of four tph.

Because of the mismatch at Terminal 5 and that two tph will stop at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford, I suspect we might see the following services on the Western Rail Link

  • Elizabeth Line – 2 tph – Terminal 5 and Reading via Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford
  • Heathrow Express – 2 tph – Terminal 5 and Reading via Slough.

Note.

  1. This would give Reading and Central London, a much-needed four tph on the Elizabeth Line. Two tph would be direct and two tph would be via Heathrow.
  2. It would not require any more paths in the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel, as the 2 tph between Shenfield and Terminal 5 will just be extended to Reading.
  3. Heathrow Express has Western access with a connection to Reading.

It looks like this service pattern could be a good compromise.

I also suspect that this would improve passenger numbers for Heathrow Express.

Could Heathrow Express Run Its Service Using One Platform At Paddington?

I am fairly certain that this would be possible, if passenger access to the platforms at Paddington station were to be improved, by the building of a second concourse at the Western end of the station.

It is also likely, that full digital signalling will be applied between Paddington and Reading and this will surely improve the ease of running four tph into one platform at London Paddington for Heathrow Express.

I can see, that a reorganisation of Heathrow Express after the building of a second Western concourse at Paddington and the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, that Heathrow Express could be able to release a platform.

Could Great Western Railway Reorganise Suburban Services?

These are Great Western Railway’s suburban services, that terminate at Paddington.

  • 1 tph – London Paddington and Oxford via Reading and Didcot Parkway
  • 2 tph – London Paddington and Didcot Parkway via Slough, Maidenhead, Twyford, Reading, Tilehurst, Pangbourne, Goring & Streatley and Cholsey
  • 1 tph – London Paddington and Newbury via Reading, Theale and Thatcham

Note.

  1. The Oxford services, are run by Class 800 trains, running as either five-car, nine-car or ten-car trains.
  2. Oxford is also served by the hourly Paddington and Great Malvern service.
  3. All of the other services, are run by Class 387 trains, running as either four-car or eight-car trains.
  4. There doesn’t seem to be any pattern to the platforms used by these services.

I find the last point very surprising, as my extensive scheduling experience says that it is easier to schedule several similar processes, rather than a number of different ones.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the platforms at Paddington station.

Note.

  1. The platforms are numbered 1 to 14 from South-West to North-East.
  2. Platforms 1 to 12 all appear to long platforms about the same length.
  3. As some platforms can take ten-car Class 800 trains, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out all platforms 1-12 can.
  4. The only short platform is platform 14, which can accommodate an eight-car Class 387 train, which is 163 metres long.

It looks to me, with twelve long similar platforms, they can schedule the platforms on the fly, so perhaps this explains, the randomness of platform allocations.

I think in an ideal world, I would try and organise these services as follows.

  • The Oxford and Great Malvern services could share a platform at Paddington, which would help passengers to find the next Oxford train.
  • The Didcot Parkway and Newbury services could also share a platform at Paddington, for the same reason.
  • Unless Didcot Parkway and Newbury services are occasionally run by a twelve-car train, they could even use the short platform 14.

This would surely be a more efficient use of the platforms at Paddington station.

Could Didcot Parkway Services Become Another Elizabeth Line Destination?

Consider.

  • Didcot Parkway to London Paddington services appear to use the same tracks as Elizabeth Line services between Reading and Southall West Junction, where they change to the main line for Paddington.
  • London Paddington to Didcot Parkway services appear to use the main line from Paddington to Dolphin Junction, which is just to the East of Slough station, where it joins the same tracks as Elizabeth Line services to Reading.
  • Nine-car Class 345 trains are forty metres longer than an eight-car Class 387 train.
  • Class 345 trains are 90 mph trains.
  • Class 387 trains are 110 mph trains.
  • Class 387 trains wouldn’t fit the platform edge doors in the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel.

It would appear that the Didcot Parkway and London Paddington services could be moved to the Elizabeth Line, by doing the following.

  • The Class 387 trains would be replaced by Class 345 trains.
  • Trains to London would go straight on at Southall West Junction and through the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel.
  • Trains from London would emerge from the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel on the right track for Reading.
  • There might be a need to lengthen a few platforms.

Note.

  1. The Didcot Parkway to London Paddington services would not need to use the main line.
  2. 2 tph would be removed from Paddington station.

As one electric train is being replaced by another, there would probably be no need for more electrification.

Could Newbury Services Become Another Elizabeth Line Destination?

Consider.

Freight trains appear to be able to go from Theale station to Platform 5 at Slough station, through Platform 15 at Reading station, which is a possible route that a Newbury to the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel train would take.

Freight trains appear to be able to go from Platform 4 at Slough station to Theale station, through Platform 15 at Reading station, which is a possible route that an Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel to Newbury train would take.

It would appear that the Newbury and London Paddington services could be moved to the Elizabeth Line, by doing the following.

  • The Class 387 trains would be replaced by Class 345 trains.
  • Trains through Reading would follow the freight route.
  • There might be a need to lengthen a few platforms.

Note.

  1. The Newbury to London Paddington services would not need to use the main line.
  2. 1 tph would be removed from Paddington station.

As one electric train is being replaced by another, there would probably be no need for more electrification.

Conclusion

It looks like the capacity of Paddington station can be increased by the following.

  • Building a new second concourse at the Western end of the station.
  • Heathrow Express releasing a platform.
  • Oxford and Great Malvern services could share a platform at Paddington
  • Moving Didcot Parkway and Newbury services to the Elizabeth Line.

No new electrification would be required.

July 8, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Marsh Barton Station – 4th July 2023

The main purpose of my trip to Devon was to visit the new Marsh Barton station, on the Riviera Line.

These are my thoughts about the station.

The Overall Design

This Google map shows Marsh Barton station under construction.

The station is built on a narrow lane by an industrial estate, which features a large waste-to-energy facility, which is in the South-West corner of the map.

The station is a basic two platform design with everything you need on the platforms and a gently sloping bridge over the top to give full step-free access.

I’ve never been to a station, which uses this form of step-free access, either in the UK or Europe.

I think it works because of the unusual site.

Car Parking

The station’s page on the GWR web site, says this about parking.

The station only has disabled parking bays for blue badge holders in order to encourage more sustainable transport use to and from the station.

Staff

The station is unstaffed.

Refreshments

When I arrived, I was hungry and needed a drink, so I asked a guy with a dog, if there was a cafe or pub nearby.

He said, the cafe shut the day before, but there was a pub called Double Locks about three or four minutes away on the canal.

These pictures show the walk.

And this map shows the location of the pub and the station.

Are country minutes like country miles and a lot longer than those everybody else uses?

In the end, as I was getting soaked, I made a retreat back to the station.

Service Frequency

Currently, the trains are only hourly. Is that enough?

 

 

July 5, 2023 Posted by | Food, Transport/Travel | , , , , , | Leave a comment

What Will Be The Range Of A Hitachi Class 800 Battery Train?

I feel now, I have enough information to make an educated, at what the distance a five-car Class 800 or Class 802 train will travel on batteries.

Previous Battery-Electric Trains

These are examples of previous distances.

  1. A Bombardier engineer told me eight years ago, that the battery-electric Class 379 had a range of sixty miles.
  2. Stadler’s FLIRT Akku has a Guinness world record of 139 miles on one battery charge. See this page on the Stadler web site.
  3. Even Stadler’s Class 777 trains for Merseyrail have a range of 84 miles on battery power. See New Merseyrail Train Runs 135 km On Battery.

It does appear that five-car battery-electric trains will have ranges in excess of a hundred miles.

Engineering Ambition

Several times in my life, I’ve got fired up about engineering or software projects and I like to think, I’ve produced the best and fastest solution.

For this reason, I believe that Hyperdrive Innovation, who are now part of Turntide Technologies, and Hitachi will set themselves three objectives with the design of the the battery packs for the Class 800 or Class 802 train.

  • The battery-electric Class 802 will outperform the Stadler FLIRT Akku in terms of speed and distance.
  • The battery packs will be plug-compatible with the diesel engines, so there will only be minor software modification to the trains.
  • The train will be able to be handle all Great Western Railway’s routes without using diesel.
  • I wouldn’t be surprised that on many routes the train will cruise at over 110 mph on batteries.

I also suspect they want the Akku’s Guinness world record, which will mean the range will be in excess of 139 miles.

More On LNER’s Ten New Bi-Modes

I wrote about these trains in LNER Seeks 10 More Bi-Modes.

This was my conclusion.

There is a lot of scope to develop LNER’s services.

I think it is likely that the order will go to Hitachi.

But as I indicated, I do believe that there is scope for a manufacturer to design a zero-carbon train, that was able to serve Aberdeen and Inverness.

  • I suspect a fleet of ten trains would be sufficient.
  • Trains would use the 25 KVAC overhead electrification, where it exists and hydrogen or battery power North of the wires.

The trains would also be capable of being upgraded to higher speeds, should the East Coast Main Line be turned into a High Speed Line.

I also think, that whatever trains are bought, there will be a large upgrading of the existing Hitachi fleet, which will add batteries to a lot of trains.

In the July 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article, which is entitled LNER Embraces Pioneering Spirit, which takes the form of an interview with LNER’s Managing Director; David Horne.

In a section, which is entitled ‘225’ Replacement, this is said.

Meanwhile, Mr Horne is looking to what might replace the InterCity 225 fleet, now smartly repainted in a scheme which pays homage to the original ‘Swallow’ livery. While there were fears this fleet may be withdrawn as an economy measure, the ‘225s’ are now on lease until at least next summer.

But Mr Horne says obsolescence issues are a real challenge and LNER will struggle to maintain the fleet beyond 2025, and from the May 2023 timetable change the number of daily diagrams was reduced from five to four to conserve the fleet’s mileage. Much of the heavy maintenance work had previously been carried out at Wabtec’s Doncaster site, but this facility is no longer available, and while a recent reliability improvement programme is bearing fruit, the challenges remain. The crunch point comes with the transition to ETCS at the southern end of the ECML as part of the East Coast Digital Programme – Mr Horne says LNER does not want to fit cab signalling on the ‘225s’.

The solution to this  issue is to procure additional trains to run alongside the 65 Azumas, and LNER went out to tender in October 2020 for a fleet of 10 trains with self-power capability.

While a preferred bidder has been identified, the business case to proceed with the procurement is awaiting approval, but Mr Horne is still hopeful this project can be progressed.

The current plan envisages the new trains broadly replacing the ‘225s’ on Leeds and York diagrams, but a major benefit with the new fleet would be during engineering work – at present LNER has to withdraw services to places such as Harrogate and Hull to concentrate its bi-mode Azumas on services using non-electrified diversionary routes, and having more stock with self-power capability would ease the issue.

Currently, LNER has these Azumas and InterCity 225s in its fleet.

  • Five-car bi-mode Class 800 trains – 10
  • Nine-car bi-mode Class 800 trains – 13
  • Five-car electric Class 801 trains – 12
  • Nine-car electric Class 801 trains – 30
  • Nine-car electric ImterCity 225 trains – 8

Note.

  1. There are 23 bi-mode trains and 50 electric trains.
  2. There are 167 bi-mode carriages and 302 electric carriages.
  3. Currently 31.5 % of the trains are bi-mode.
  4. With ten new bi-mode trains and no InterCity 225 trains, 44 % of the fleet will be bi-mode.

Is this increase in the percentage of the fleet, that are bi-mode acceptable?

LNER’s Two Needs

Let’s look at LNER’s needs, which are actually two separate sub-needs.

  • There is a need for ten new trains to replace the InterCity 225 trains.
  • There is a need to increase the size of the bi-mode fleet to be able to use the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line and other non-electrified routes to by-pass engineering works.

Note.

  1. I suspect that as Mr Horne explained, there are only five or possibly four InterCity 225s diagrammed on a particular day, then perhaps ten five-car bi-mode Class 800 trains, might be able to cover for the retirement of the InterCity 225s.
  2. These trains would work as pairs to Leeds and York to replace the InterCity 225 capacity.
  3. If required they could split and join at Leeds and York to serve other destinations.
  4. The diversion route of the Great Eastern Joint Line has an unelectrified distance of 93.7 miles and the route is electrified at both ends.
  5. Would a battery-electric Class 800 train handle this distance? I suspect if Stadler can do it, then Hitachi and Turntide Technology will be able to do it too!

LNER will have replaced the InterCity 225s and acquired ten new five-car blockade runners.

As an order for ten new five-car battery-electric trains, is not to be sneezed at, I suspect Hitachi will make sure that their new battery-electric variants have enough range.

So this would mean that the range of a five car battery-electric Class 800 train, should be in excess of 93.7 miles.

Advantages Of Converting Class 800 and Class 802 Trains To Battery-Electric Operation

It should be noted that the five-car and nine-car Class 800 and Class 802 trains have specific advantages when it comes to converting them to battery-electric operation.

  • They are modern trains, that are still in production, so every bit of information about the train is known down to the last nut, bolt and plastic clip.
  • Like most modern trains, hey have a sophisticated computer system controlling the train.
  • They have spaces for three, four or maybe even five diesel engines under the floor, which could be used for a battery-pack in every car designed to hold a diesel engine.
  • The train has an electric bus between nose and tail.
  • As is shown, when the trains change between diesel and electric, the pantograph can go up and down with all the alacrity of a whore’s drawers.
  • The trains can be converted between bi-mode and electric, by adding or removing diesel packs. I doubt this feature will be removed, as batteries replace diesels.

With my Electrical and Control Engineer’s hard hat on, I doubt there is anything to stop a Class 800 or Class 802 train being fitted with three or more batteries to create a 125 mph train, with a range approaching two hundred miles on battery power.

The initial name of these Hitachi trains was the Hitachi Super Express. Is this train the Hitachi Super Battery Express?

But it would appear, that for their initial needs, LNER, just need a range to handle the near hundred miles of the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line.

Inverness and Aberdeen will come later.

Conclusion

The first version of the battery-electric train will have a range of around a hundred miles, so that they can handle the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line diversion, which is 93.7 miles on battery power.

But fairly soon after introduction into service, I will be very surprised if they don’t claim the Guinness world record by running farther than the Stadler FLIRT Akku’s 139 miles.

No-one likes being second!

June 27, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

New Wellington Railway Station Worth £15m Could Open By 2025

The title of this post is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Efforts to build a new railway station could soon move a step closer – if plans for 220 new homes are approved.

These are the first two paragraphs.

Somerset West and Taunton Council and Mid Devon District Council put together plans to reopen Wellington and Cullompton railway stations

Both closed during the infamous Beeching cuts of the mid-1960s.

Reading the article, it looks like the Department for Transport are going to pay for the station.

Four weeks ago, I went to the opening of Reading Green Park station, which I wrote about in Reading Green Park Station – 27th May 2023.

When I was there, I met the guy, who works for Great Western Railway, who is responsible for new stations in the area, who when I asked him about Wellington and Cullompton, indicated that they might be treated together.

In Thoughts About Electrification Through Devon And Cornwall, I speculated that there might be some electrification in the area to charge battery-electric trains on their way to and from the Devon and Cornwall Peninsular. As the M5 motorway goes through the area close to the railway, who would complain about some well-designed overhead electrification.

Network Rail could even use a design like this.

The structural rhomboid shape on top is made from laminated wood.

I describe it in detail in Prototype Overhead Line Structure Revealed.

According to Real Time Trains, Taunton and Exeter St. David’s are 30.7 miles apart and a typical train takes twenty-seven minutes, so I’m fairly sure that a long enough electrified section can be created to fully charge trains, even if they speed through at nearly 70 mph.

Services

The BBC article says this about services.

David Northey, a retired strategic planner with Network Rail, said at a public meeting held in May, that the station would initially be served by trains every two hours as part of the Great Western Railway service between Exeter St. David’s and Cardiff Central.

However, he said this likely increase to once per hour as demand grows.

There are currently four services that go through the site of the proposed stations at Wellington and Cullompton.

  • London Paddington and Exeter St. David’s
  • London Paddington and Plumouth
  • London Paddington and Penzance
  • Cardiff Central and Penzance

Note.

  1. All trains have a frequency of one train per two hours (tp2h).
  2. There is a train every thirty minutes.
  3. All trains stop at Taunton, Tiverton Parkway and Exeter St. Davids.

If at some time in the future all services are run by battery-electric Class 802 trains, I suspect GWR will have fun working out an efficient charging and stopping schedule, which increases the number of stops at Wellington and Cullompton stations.

 

 

June 25, 2023 Posted by | Design, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Thoughts About Electrification Through Devon And Cornwall

Distances

I’ll start by looking at a few distances.

  • Penzance and Taunton – 162.3 miles
  • Penzance and Exeter St. David’s – 131.5 miles
  • Penzance and Plymouth – 79.5 miles
  • Taunton and Exeter St. David’s – 30.7 miles
  • Plymouth and Exeter St. David’s – 52 miles
  • Taunton and Newbury – 89.6 miles
  • Plymouth and Taunton – 82.8 miles
  • Taunton and Paignton – 59 miles
  • Taunton and Patchway – 51.7 miles

Note.

  1. Patchway and Newbury are already electrified to Cardiff Central and London Paddington respectively.
  2. Bombardier’s engineer told me eight years ago, that the battery-electric Class 379 had a range of sixty miles.
  3. Stadler’s FLIRT Akku has a Guinness world record of 139 miles on one battery charge. See this page on the Stadler web site.
  4. Even Stadler’s Class 777 trains for Merseyrail have a range of 84 miles on battery power. See New Merseyrail Train Runs 135km On Battery.

The rail distances in Devon and Cornwall are getting closer to being within the capability of trains fitted with batteries.

Station Stop Times

These are typical times that trains stop in the more important stations between Taunton and Penzance.

  • Taunton – < 2 mins
  • Tiverton Parkway – < 2 mins
  • Exeter St. Davids – 2 mins
  • Newton Abbot – < 2 mins
  • Totnes – < 2 mins
  • Plymouth – 11 minutes
  • Devonport – < 2 mins
  • Saltash – < 2 mins
  • Menheniot – < 2 mins
  • Liskeard – < 3 mins
  • Bodmin Parkway – 2 mins
  • Lostwithiel – 2 mins
  • Par – 2 mins
  • St. Austell – 2 mins.
  • Truro – 2 mins
  • Redruth – 2 mins
  • Camborne – 2 mins

Note.

  1. The timings were for today.
  2. The Cardiff and Penzance services were being run by five-car Class 802 trains.
  3. Most station stops are around two minutes or less, but Plymouth on this train was eleven minutes.

I find it interesting that the Plymouth stop takes so much longer.

Train Stops At Plymouth

I looked at about twenty trains stopping at Plymouth, that included these services.

  • London Paddington and Penzance
  • Penzance and London Paddington
  • Cardiff Central and Penzance
  • Penzance and Cardiff Central

Note.

  1. I found an average time of eight minutes.
  2. Eleven minutes was a common stop.
  3. Eight minutes could be enough time for the rail equivalent of a Formula One splash and dash.
  4. CrossCountry services were going through the station in three minutes.

I am led to believe that the timetable used by the GWR trains would allow a quick battery charge at Plymouth station.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the platforms at Plymouth station.

Note.

  1. London is to the East and Penzance is to the West.
  2. Platform numbers increase from South to North.
  3. The two East-facing bay platforms are Platforms 1 and 2.
  4. The West-facing bay platform in the South-West corner is Platform 3.
  5. Platform 4 shares the island with the bay platforms 1, 2 and 3.
  6. Most trains going to Penzance use Platform 4.
  7. Platforms 5 and 6 share the centre island platform.
  8. Platforms 7 and 8 share the Northernmost island platform.
  9. Most trains going towards London use Platform 7.
  10. Wikipedia indicates that the track layout is comprehensive and allows a lot of operational flexibility.

Although the station was completed around forty years ago, it could have been designed for handling modern battery-electric trains.

  • There are three bay platforms numbered 1 to 3, to charge local services and send them on their way.
  • Trains can arrive and depart in the five through platforms, numbered 4 to 8, from either direction.
  • Two days ago, a nine-car London Paddington to Plymouth train terminated in Platform 7. After waiting an hour it returned to London. An hour would be enough time to fully-charge a train.
  • As many platforms as needed could be electrified.

I am fairly sure, that most battery-electric trains could be timetabled to leave Plymouth station with full batteries.

Turnround At Penzance

I have found these turnrounds.

  • 802113 arrived from Paddington at 1142 and left for London at 1215
  • 802022 arrived from Paddington at 1307 and left for London at 1415
  • 802103 arrived from Paddington at 1500 and left for London at 1615

This OpenRailwayMap shows the platforms at Penzance station.

Note.

  1. The three example trains used Platform 1.
  2. Platform 1 is the long platform on the landward side of the station.
  3. Platforms are numbered 1 to 4 from left to right.
  4. An appropriate number of platforms would be electrified to charge trains terminating at Penzance.

Trains would appear to have plenty enough time to recharge, so they would start their return journey with full batteries.

Engineering Ambition

Several times in my life, I’ve got fired up about engineering or software projects and I like to think, I’ve produced the best and fastest solution.

For this reason, I believe that Hyperdrive Innovation, who are now part of Turntide Technologies, and Hitachi will set themselves three objectives with the design of the the battery packs for the Class 802 train.

  • The battery-electric Class 802 will outperform the Stadler FLIRT Akku in terms of speed and distance.
  • The battery packs will be plug-compatible with the diesel engines, so there will only be minor software modification to the trains.
  • The train will be able to be handle all Great Western Railway’s routes without using diesel.
  • I wouldn’t be surprised that on many routes the train will cruise at over 110 mph on batteries.

I also suspect they want the Akku’s Guinness world record, which will mean the range will be in excess of 139 miles.

Battery Range Needed For Routes

These are routes that need to be covered by battery-electric Class 802 trains or similar.

  • Avanti West Coast – Crewe and Chester – 22.2 miles
  • Avanti West Coast – Crewe and Holyhead – 105.5 miles
  • Avanti West Coast – Crewe and Llandudno Junction – 65.5 miles
  • Avanti West Coast – Crewe and Wrexham – 34.4 miles
  • Avanti West Coast – Shrewsbury and Wolverhampton – 29.7 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Penzance and Plymouth – 79.5 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Plymouth and Taunton – 82.8 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Taunton and Patchway – 51.7 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Newbury and Taunton – 89.6 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Taunton and Paignton – 59.0 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Weston-super-Mare and Chippenham – 43.5 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Oxford and Great Malvern – 65.6 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Oxford and Hereford – 86.3 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Oxford and Worcester Foregate Street – 57.6 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Oxford and Worcester Shrub Hill – 57.2 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Cheltenham Spa and Swindon – 43.2 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Cardiff Central and Carmarthen – 77.4 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Cardiff Central and Pembroke Dock – 118.9 miles
  • Great Western Railway – Cardiff Central and Swansea – 45.7 miles
  • Hull Trains – Beverley and Temple Hirst Junction – 44.3 miles
  • Hull Trains – Hull and Temple Hirst Junction – 36.1 miles
  • LNER – Hull and Temple Hirst Junction – 36.1 miles
  • LNER – Middlesbrough and Longlands Junction – 22.2 miles
  • LNER – Sunderland and Longlands Junction – 48.5 miles
  • LNER – Lincoln Central and Newark Northgate – 16.6 miles
  • LNER – Leeds and Bradford – 13 miles
  • LNER – Leeds and Harrogate – 18 miles
  • LNER – Leeds and Huddersfield – 17 miles
  • LNER – Stirling and Inverness – 146 miles
  • LNER – Edinburgh Haymarket and Aberdeen – 130 miles
  • LNER – Peterborough and Doncaster via Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line – 93.7 miles
  • South Western Railway – Basingstoke and Exeter St. David’s – 124.5 miles
  • TransPennine – Hull and Micklefield – 42 miles
  • TransPennine – Longlands Junction and Saltburn – 34.7 miles
  • TransPennine – York and Scarborough – 42 miles
  • TransPennine – Doncaster and Cleethorpes – 52.1 miles
  • TransPennine – Stockport and Doncaster – 55.4 miles
  • TransPennine – Stockport and Cleethorpes – 107.5 miles

Note.

  1. Stirling and Inverness and Edinburgh Haymarket and Aberdeen could be shortened by up to thirty miles, by planned electrification in Scotland.
  2. I have assumed that the TransPennine Upgrade has been completed.
  3. It looks like a battery-electric Class 802 train could use the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line diversion via Lincoln.
  4. I am slightly surprised, that the longest stretch of line without electrification and with a passenger service is Basingstoke and Exeter St. David’s.

Charging will be needed at some places to charge the battery-electric trains. Stations fitted with chargers could include Aberdeen, Carmarthen, Cleethorpes, Exeter St. David’s, Hereford, Holyhead, Hull, Inverness, Paignton, Penzance, Pembroke Dock, Plymouth, Swansea, Taunton, Weston-super-Mare, Worcester.

Most chargers would be a length of electrification in the platform, where the battery-electric trains terminated or passed through.

More On LNER’s Ten New Bi-Modes

I wrote about these trains in LNER Seeks 10 More Bi-Modes.

This was my conclusion.

There is a lot of scope to develop LNER’s services.

I think it is likely that the order will go to Hitachi.

But as I indicated, I do believe that there is scope for a manufacturer to design a zero-carbon train, that was able to serve Aberdeen and Inverness.

    • I suspect a fleet of ten trains would be sufficient.
    • Trains would use the 25 KVAC overhead electrification, where it exists and hydrogen or battery power North of the wires.

The trains would also be capable of being upgraded to higher speeds, should the East Coast Main Line be turned into a High Speed Line.

I also think, that whatever trains are bought, there will be a large upgrading of the existing Hitachi fleet, which will add batteries to a lot of trains.

In the July 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article, which is entitled LNER Embraces Pioneering Spirit, which takes the form of an interview with LNER’s Managing Director; David Horne.

In a section, which is entitled ‘225’ Replacement, this is said.

Meanwhile, Mr Horne is looking to what might replace the InterCity 225 fleet, now smartly repainted in a scheme which pays homage to the original ‘Swallow’ livery. While there were fears this fleet may be withdrawn as an economy measure, the ‘225s’ are now on lease until at least next summer.

But Mr Horne says obsolescence issues are a real challenge and LNER will struggle to maintain the fleet beyond 2025, and from the May 2023 timetable change the number of daily diagrams was reduced from five to four to conserve the fleet’s mileage. Much of the heavy maintenance work had previously been carried out at Wabtec’s Doncaster site, but this facility is no longer available, and while a recent reliability improvement programme is bearing fruit, the challenges remain. The crunch point comes with the transition to ETCS at the southern end of the ECML as part of the East Coast Digital Programme – Mr Horne says LNER does not want to fit cab signalling on the ‘225s’.

The solution to this  issue is to procure additional trains to run alongside the 65 Azumas, and LNER went out to tender in October 2020 for a fleet of 10 trains with self-power capability.

While a preferred bidder has been identified, the business case to proceed with the procurement is awaiting approval, but Mr Horne is still hopeful this project can be progressed.

The current plan envisages the new trains broadly replacing the ‘225s’ on Leeds and York diagrams, but a major benefit with the new fleet would be during engineering work – at present LNER has to withdraw services to places such as Harrogate and Hull to concentrate its bi-mode Azumas on services using non-electrified diversionary routes, and having more stock with self-power capability would ease the issue.

Currently, LNER has these Azumas and InterCity 225s in its fleet.

  • Five-car bi-mode Class 800 trains – 10
  • Nine-car bi-mode Class 800 trains – 13
  • Five-car electric Class 801 trains – 12
  • Nine-car electric Class 801 trains – 30
  • Nine-car electric ImterCity 225 trains – 8

Note.

  1. There are 23 bi-mode trains and 50 electric trains.
  2. There are 167 bi-mode carriages and 302 electric carriages.
  3. Currently 31.5 % of the trains are bi-mode.
  4. With ten new bi-mode trains and no InterCity 225 trains, 44 % of the fleet will be bi-mode.

Is this increase in the percentage of the fleet, that are bi-mode acceptable?

I wonder, if there is a more affordable and flexible way to increase the fleet size.

In the Wikipedia entry for the Class 800 train, there is a section, which is entitled Traction And Generator Units, where this is said.

The Class 800 and Class 802 bi-mode are equipped with three GU per five-car set and five GU per nine-car set; a five-car set has a GU situated under vehicles 2/3/4 and a nine-car set has a GU situated under vehicles 2/3/5/7/8. In comparison, the electric-orientated Class 801 features a single GU for a five to nine-car set, which provides emergency power for limited traction and auxiliaries if the power supply from the overhead line fails. By adding or removing GUs, a Class 800 can be converted into a Class 801 and vice versa.

Let’s look at LNER’s needs, which are actually two separate sub-needs.

  • There is a need for ten new trains to replace the InterCity 225 trains.
  • There is a need to increase the size of the bi-mode fleet to be able to use the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line and other non-electrified routes to by-pass engineering works.

Note.

  1. I suspect that as Mr Horne explained, there are only five or possibly four InterCity 225s diagrammed on a particular day, then perhaps ten five-car bi-mode Class 800 trains, might be able to cover for the retirement of the InterCity 225s.
  2. These trains would work as pairs to Leeds and York to replace the InterCity 225 capacity.
  3. If required they could split and join at Leeds and York to serve other destinations.
  4. The diversion route of the Great Eastern Joint Line has an unelectrified distance of 93.7 miles and the route is electrified at both ends.
  5. Would a battery-electric Class 800 train handle this distance? I suspect if Stadler can do it, then Hitachi and Turntide Technology will be able to do it too!

LNER will have replaced the InterCity 225s and acquired ten new five-car blockade runners.

As an order for ten new five-car battery-electric trains, is not to be sneezed at, I suspect Hitachi will make sure that their new battery-electric variants have enough range.

So this would mean that the range of a five cat battery-electric Class 800 train, should be in excess of 93.7 miles.

It should be noted that the five-car Class 800 and Class 802 trains have specific advantages when it comes to converting them to battery-electric trains.

  • They are modern trains, that are still in production, every bit of information about the train is known down to the last nut, bolt and plastic clip.
  • Like most modern trains, hey have a sophisticated computer system controlling the train.
  • They have spaces for three, four or maybe even five diesel engines under the floor, which could be used for a battery-pack in every car designed to hold a diesel engine.
  • The train has an electric bus between nose and tail.
  • As is shown, when the trains change between diesel and electric, the pantograph can go up and down with all the alacrity of a whore’s drawers.
  • The trains can be converted between bi-mode and electric, by adding or removing diesel packs. I doubt this feature will be removed, as batteries replace diesels.

With my Electrical and Control Engineer’s hard hat on, I doubt there is anything to stop a Class 800 or Class 802 train being fitted with three or more batteries to create a 125 mph train, with a range approaching two hundred miles on battery power.

The initial name of these Hitachi trains was the Hitachi Super Express. Is this train the Hitachi Super Battery Express?

But it would appear, that for their initial needs, LNER, just need a range to handle the near hundred miles of the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line.

Inverness and Aberdeen will come later.

Hull Trains

This page on the Lumo web site is entitled Greener Travel Between Edinburgh And London.

These are the first three paragraphs.

A new, 100% electric rail service is to start running between London and Edinburgh with fares for as little as £14.90 in a bid to encourage greener and more affordable travel between the capitals.

Called Lumo, it will provide low-carbon, affordable long-distance travel for over 1 million passengers per year. Over 74,500 passengers currently fly between Edinburgh and London each month3.

And with single tickets between the capitals starting from just £14.90, Lumo will be a comfortable, convenient alternative to flying that is affordable for all. Some 60% of all single fares will be available at a cost of £30 or less.

I’m sure Hull Trains, who are owned by First Group like Lumo would like to position themselves in the 100 % electric low-carbon box too!

Currently, Hull Trains’s five-car Class 802 trains, run 88.6 and 72.2 miles using diesel on round-trips to Beverley and Hull respectively from London.

If batteries were fitted to their trains to give a battery range of around a hundred miles, Hull Trains could call themselves 100 % electric.

No new infrastructure would be required, but a short length of overhead electrification in a convenient platform at Hull station would ensure the train left for London and Beverley with a full battery.

The pictures show Hull Trains’s Class 802 train in Platform 7 at Hull station.

Penzance And Taunton

This to me is the key section as if you can run a battery-electric train between these two stations it allows so many of the services to be run using zero-carbon traction.

These are distances from Taunton.

  • Exeter St. David’s – 30.7 miles
  • Newbury – 89.6 miles
  • Okehampton – 55.3 miles
  • Paignton – 59.0 miles
  • Patchway – 51.7 miles
  • Plymouth – 82.8 miles

Note.

  1. I’ve added Okehampton, as I feel that if Dawlish had another encounter with Poseidon, Okehampton with its proposed Parkway station on the A30 could be the terminus for coaches to and from Cornwall.
  2. All would be possible with a battery-electric train, with a hundred-mile range, leaving Taunton with a full battery.
  3. Charging could be needed at Okehampton and Paignton.

What is needed is some form of charging in the Taunton area.

This OpenRailwayMap shows Taunton station.

Note.

  1. The station has four through platforms.
  2. All Great Western Railway services to and from Devon and Cornwall stop in the station.
  3. I feel it would be possible to electrify the station, so that all stopping trains could charge the batteries.

But the problem would be, that as typically trains only stop for a couple of minutes at Taunton, there may not be enough time to take enough charge on board.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the track between Wellington and Collumpton, between Taunton and Exeter.

Note.

  1. The black line is the railway between Taunton and Exeter.
  2. The blue arrow in the North-East corner of the map indicates the position of the proposed Wellington station.
  3. Collumpton is in the South-West corner of the map and has also been put forward for a new Collumpton station.
  4. I talked about the reopening of these two stations in Reopening Of Wellington and Cullompton Stations.
  5. The M5 to the North of Collumpton runs closely alongside the railway.
  6. According to Real Time Trains, it takes just under ten minutes to go the thirteen miles between Wellington and Collumpton.

This Google Map shows a section of the M5 North of Collumpton.

And this Google Map shows Tiverton Parkway station.

Note how the railway runs alongside the M5 to the West.

I feel that if the two new stations of Wellington and Collumpton are built between Taunton and Exeter St. David’s, then why not partially electrify the route, so that all trains would leave or pass through Taunton and Collumpton stations with full batteries.

  • Going West the trains would reach Exeter St. David’s, Okehampton or Plymouth.
  • Going East trains would reach Newbury for Reading and Paddington, and Patchway for Cardiff.

I believe that a battery-electric solution is possible, that would enable the decarbonisation of the Great Western Main Line all the way to Penzance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 25, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 8 Comments

An Aborted Trip To Cardiff

I got up early, this morning with the aim of spending a day in Cardiff looking at the progress on the Valley Lines and have a drink with a friend.

But the trip is off, as there are no trains to Heathrow and Reading on the Elizabeth Line, due to a shortage of staff.

There are also some gaps in the Great Western Railway service to Cardiff, for the same reason.

Is this to show sympathy with Putin?

June 25, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | 4 Comments

Marsh Barton Station Will Open On Tuesday, 4th July 2023

This is said on this page on the Great Western Railway web site.

The station is due to open on Tuesday 4 July 2023.

This Google map shows Marsh Barton station under construction.

Note.

  1. The two five-car platforms.
  2. The pedestrian and cycle bridge over the tracks at the Northern end of the station.
  3. I would assume, that the bridges have been made high enough over the tracks for electrification.

The page on the Great Western Railway web site also has a couple of videos showing construction of the station.

Services

The page on the Great Western Railway web site also says this about services at the station.

Marsh Barton will be served by our local services between Paignton and Exmouth which run through the heart of Exeter.

We aim to provide hourly off-peak services to the station with additional trains stopping at peak times.

Currently, there is an hourly train that stops at all stations between Exmouth and Paignton, which will probably be the main service.

In addition five long distance services will pass through Marsh Barton station.

  • Two trains per day (tpd) – London Paddington and Paignton via Reading, Newbury, Hungerford, Pewsey, Westbury, Castle Cary, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St. Davids, Dawlish, Teignmouth, Newton Abbot, Torre and Torquay
  • Three tpd – London Paddington and Plymouth via Reading, Newbury, Hungerford, Pewsey, Westbury, Castle Cary, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St. Davids, Dawlish, Teignmouth, Newton Abbot, Totnes and Ivybridge
  • One train per two hours (tp2h) – London Paddington and Plymouth via Reading, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids, Newton Abbot and Totnes.
  • One tp2h – London Paddington and Penzance via Reading, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids, Newton Abbot, Totnes, Plymouth, Liskeard, Bodmin Parkway, Par, St Austell, Truro, Redruth, Camborne and St Erth.
  • One tp2h – Cardiff Central and Penzance via Newport, Severn Tunnel Junction, Patchway, Filton Abbey Wood, Bristol Temple Meads, Nailsea & Backwell, Yatton, Worle, Weston-super-Mare, Highbridge & Burnham, Bridgwater, Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids, Dawlish, Teignmouth, Newton Abbot, Totnes, Ivybridge, Plymouth, Devonport, Dockyard, Keyham, St Budeaux Ferry Road, Saltash, St Germans, Menheniot, Liskeard, Bodmin Parkway, Lostwithiel, Par, St Austell, Truro, Redruth, Camborne, Hayle and St. Erth

Note.

  1. The fifth train is definitely what you would call a stopping train.
  2. All the through expresses stop at Taunton, Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids and Newton Abbot.
  3. The stopping service, the Paignton trains and some Plymouth trains stop at Dawlish and Teignmouth.
  4. All trains stopping at Plymouth, stop at Totnes.
  5. The Paignton and Plymouth services are run using Class 802 trains.
  6. The fifth stopping service is run by a GWR Castle.
  7. Marsh Barton station has been built for five-car Class 802 trains.

As the GWR Castles are being retired and will probably be replaced by more Class 802 trains, we are very likely to see more Hitachi trains working between Taunton and Penzance via Tiverton Parkway, Exeter St Davids, Dawlish, Teignmouth, Newton Abbot, Totnes, Plymouth, Liskeard, Bodmin Parkway, St Austell, Truro, Redruth, Camborne and Hayle.

 

June 23, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Reading And Oxford – 10th June 2023

Yesterday, after breakfast on Moorgate, I went for an explore at the Western end of the Elizabeth Line.

My aim was to change at Reading for Oxford and then have a bit of an explore in the University City.

These are my observations and thoughts.

Changing Trains At Reading

There are two trains per hour between Liverpool Street and Reading station, but at the Moorgate end of Liverpool Street station, there is no way of buying a ticket, that would get me between Reading and Oxford. To make things more complicated, I needed to be quick with my change at Reading, as I only had a few minutes before the next Oxford train left Reading.

In the end I had to leave Reading station and walk across the concourse in front of the station.

O then bought a ticket in a machine and then re-entered the station.

Great Western Railway can do better.

In Germany, there would be a ticket machine inside the barriers for those changing trains. But we never do that!

In the end, I missed my train and had to wait thirty minutes for a very crowded London Paddington to Oxford train.

Electrification At Oxford

This map from OpenRailwayMap shows the planned electrification at Oxford station.

Note.

  1. The four through lines are shown in dotted red-and-black, which indicates, that they will be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
  2. The proposed electrification continues all the way to Didcot Parkway station on the map.
  3. The two black tracks are the unelectrified platforms for Chiltern and East West Railway services.

But the proposed electrification stops just outside the station. Why?

Great Western Railway Services Beyond Oxford

Great Western Railway run an hourly service to Great Malvern, which according to Wikipedia terminates as follows.

  • 4 trains per day continue to Hereford calling at Colwall and Ledbury.
  • 1 train per day terminates at Worcester Shrub Hill.
  • 4 trains per day terminate at Worcester Foregate Street.

So what are the distances of these stations from Oxford?

  • Great Malvern – 65.6 miles
  • Hereford – 86.3 miles
  • Worcester Foregate Street – 57.6 miles
  • Worcester Shrub Hill – 57.2 miles

I suspect that one version of the Hitachi Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train, which is shown in the infographic below

could handle all these distances.

After the Oxford and Didcot Parkway electrification is complete, trains will arrive at Oxford station with a full battery.

But how would the batteries be recharged for the journey back to Oxford?

This map from OpenRailwayMap shows the tracks at Worcester.

Note.

  1. Trains to and from Oxford, use the tracks in the South-East corner of the map.
  2. Trains to and from Birmingham, use the tracks in the North -East corner of the map.
  3. Trains to and from Great Malvern and Hereford, use the tracks in the South-West corner of the map.

I suspect that some selective electrification would be able to charge the trains.

Trains take around twenty minutes to go between Great Malvern and Worcester Shrub Hill via Worcester Foregate Street.

Electrifying this 8.5 mile section would surely enable the following.

  • Trains to leave Worcester Shrub Hill for Oxford with a full battery.
  • Trains to leave Great Malvern for Hereford with a full battery.
  • As Hereford and Great Malvern are only 20.7 miles apart, I suspect a return trip without a recharge is possible.
  • Trains terminating at Worcester Shrub Hill and Worcester Foregate Street to be fully recharged before travelling back to Oxford.

Other services to and from the Worcester stations could also be run by battery-electric trains.

As Worcester Shrub Hill and Oxford stations are only 57.2 miles and well within the capabilities of most battery-electric trains, there would be no need to electrify the route.

I may of course, be wrong about the length and position of the electrification at Worcester, but this could be just one of many solutions using partial electrification.

Does this explain the stopping of the proposed electrification at Oxford?

In addition, there must be marketing opportunities in running a battery-electric service to Hereford and Worcester.

The Bay Platforms At Oxford Station

These pictures show the two North facing bay platforms 1 and 2 at Oxford station.

Note.

  1. The platforms are not electrified.
  2. They appear to be easily updated with electrification to be able to charge Chiltern and East West Railway trains.
  3. Marylebone is only 66.7 miles from Oxford.
  4. Milton Keynes Central is just over 40 miles from Oxford.
  5. Bedford is just under 60 miles from Oxford.

I suspect that services from Oxford to Bedford, Marylebone and Milton Keynes can all be run by battery-electric trains.

 

 

June 11, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 14 Comments