The Anonymous Widower

Shell Pulls Plug On Rotterdam Biofuels Plant

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on The Times.

This is the sub-heading.

Retreat from green energy continues as facility that was earmarked to produce sustainable aviation fuel and renewable diesel will not now be built

These first three paragraphs add some details.

Shell has scrapped construction of one of Europe’s biggest biofuels plants as it continues its retreat from green energy

The move by the FTSE 100 oil and gas group represents a further setback for efforts to cut aviation emissions.

Shell said it would not restart construction of the biofuels facility at its Rotterdam energy and chemicals plant, which was due to produce sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable diesel.

When I wrote Centrica Secures Investment Stake In Gasrec Helping Boost UK Bio-LNG Ambitions, I took a look at the use of liquified natural gas (LNG) in transport.

This paragraph from the Centrica press release about the stake, gives the thoughts of Chris O’Shea, who is Group Chief Executive, Centrica.

Chris O’Shea, Group Chief Executive, Centrica plc, said: “Demand for bio-LNG for transport is growing fast as more HGV operators make the switch – drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel*. This investment in Gasrec enhances our collaboration with the leading company in the sector, and puts us in a strong position to energise a vital sector of the industry on its journey to net zero.”

Chris O’Shea of Centrica appears to feel that bio-LNG is a good alternative to diesel, so have Shell come to a similar decision, about satisfying the demand for diesel?

I asked Google AI if LNG has advantages over diesel as a truck fuel and received this answer.

Yes, LNG offers advantages over diesel, including significantly lower emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PM), which improves local air quality. It can also be more economically efficient, with fuel costs potentially lower than diesel depending on market conditions. However, the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits are mixed; while LNG has a lower carbon content, it can result in higher lifecycle GHG emissions due to energy losses in its production and transport, as well as methane slip.

Note.

  1. If it drops emissions by up to 85 percent for bio-LNG, surely, it would do the same for LNG.
  2. I also think with tight regulations, the use of LNG could improve air quality in cities like London.
  3. LNG would probably be a more affordable fuel than hydrogen.

It should also be noted, that several major diesel engine makers, now make families of engines, which can handle, diesel, hydrogen and natural gas.

LNG would also be a convenient stepping stone between current fuels and hydrogen, that might give a few extra years for the transition.

Could LNG Be Used In Aircraft?

Consider.

  • LNG would certainly give some reduction in carbon emissions.
  • Handling LNG in aircraft could have similar problems to hydrogen, so companies like Airbus might have already solved them.
  • In addition, LNG doesn’t have the fearsome reputation, that hydrogen seems to have gained because of the Hindenburg.
  • It would be easier to provide LNG fuel at airports all round the world.
  • Airbus have said availability of hydrogen at airports, could be a problem.

Out of curiosity, I asked Google AI if LNG could be used to power an airliner and received this answer.

Yes, liquefied natural gas (LNG) can theoretically be used to power airliners, offering a potential reduction in CO2 emissions compared to conventional jet fuel, but significant challenges exist. These challenges include the need for entirely new, larger, and heavier cryogenic fuel tanks, modifications to aircraft engines and fuel systems, and the development of a new global infrastructure for LNG supply. While experimental tests have been conducted, such as on the Soviet Union’s Tupolev Tu-155 in 1989, LNG is not currently in normal service due to these practical and infrastructural hurdles.

I would prefer it was a purpose-designed Airbus, than a Soviet-era Tupolev.

 

 

 

September 3, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Environment, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Centrica Secures Investment Stake In Gasrec Helping Boost UK Bio-LNG Ambitions

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from Centrica.

This is the sub-heading.

Centrica has secured a minority stake in Gasrec, the UK’s largest dual provider of bio-LNG (bio-Liquified Natural Gas) and bio-CNG (bio-Compressed Natural Gas) to the road transport sector,

These first two paragraphs give more details.

Gasrec says the investment will drive the next phase of its infrastructure ambitions, with plans to open a UK wide network of open-access refuelling stations supplying renewable bio-LNG for the decarbonisation of heavy goods vehicles.

Centrica is taking a 16% stake and becomes one of three major shareholders in Gasrec, alongside global integrated energy company bp and private family office 44 North.

I have some thoughts.

Does Running A Truck On bio-LNG or bio-CNG. Reduce Carbon Emissions?

This paragraph from the press release, gives the thoughts of Chris O’Shea, who is Group Chief Executive, Centrica.

Chris O’Shea, Group Chief Executive, Centrica plc, said: “Demand for bio-LNG for transport is growing fast as more HGV operators make the switch – drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel*. This investment in Gasrec enhances our collaboration with the leading company in the sector, and puts us in a strong position to energise a vital sector of the industry on its journey to net zero.”

As Centrica is a public company, with shareholders, who would take a dim view of Mr. O’Shea telling porkies, I suspect we can assume that the following is true.

Drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel.

The asterisk in the full quote, refers to this note.

Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership, Innovate UK and Office for Low Emission Vehicles, Low Emission Freight & Logistics Trial (LEFT), Key Findings, November 2020. Using specific feedstocks CO2 reductions of 200% are achievable.

Centrica could be being conservative with their claims.

Decarbonising Buses, Locomotives And Trucks

Despite what Elon Musk, would have us believe, electric trucks will not dominate the future of freight transport.

An electric truck would be the vehicle equivalent of asking Usain Bolt to run a hundred metres with a large refrigerator on his back.

Trucks are going to need a fuel without a weight penalty and with a long range.

I asked Google for information about Cummins diesel, natural gas and hydrogen engines and received this AI Overview.

Cummins offers engines powered by diesel, natural gas, and hydrogen. While diesel engines are well-established, Cummins is also developing both natural gas and hydrogen engines, particularly focusing on hydrogen as a pathway to zero-carbon solutions for various applications. Cummins utilizes a fuel-agnostic platform, meaning a common base engine can be adapted for different fuel types, including diesel, natural gas, and hydrogen.

Recently, GB Railfreight purchased thirty Class 99 locomotives from Stadler.

  • They can use electrification, where it exists.
  • Where electrification doesn’t exist, they can use an onboard Cummins diesel engine, which is built in Darlington.
  • In electric-mode, they have 6.2 MW of power, and are the most powerful locomotives ever to run on UK railways.
  • In diesel-mode, they have 1.8 MW of power, which is more than enough to haul a large container train in and out of Felixstowe.

I had thought that at some future date, Cummins would convert these locomotives to electro-hydrogen.

But now that Gasrec is providing bio-LNG and bio-CNG, GB Railfreight, have the option of converting both hydrogen and biomethane.

Similar logic can be applied to Wrightbus’s Streetdeck Ultroliner, one version of which is fitted with a Cummins engine, that can be converted to electric, hydrogen or natural gas, which of course includes biomethane. This page on the Wrightbus web site describes the bus.

Wrightbus are also going back into coach manufacture, as I wrote about in Wrightbus Goes Back To The Future As It Relaunches The Contour Coach. As with the Streetdeck Ultroliner, Cummins seem to be providing one of the power units.

It seems to me, that the zero- and low-carbon revolution in transport will generate a need for the availability of biomethane, hydrogen and natural gas fuel for transport all over the country.

Gasrec with around twenty biomethane fuelling points around the country, seem well-placed to supply the biomethane in bio-LNG or bio-CNG  form.

Could Gasrec Deliver Hydrogen?

Various bus companies in the UK, have had difficulty getting the fuel for their hydrogen buses.

I believe that delivering hydrogen would be very similar to delivering LNG and if Gasrec can deliver LNG successfully and safely, they probably have the technology to do the same for hydrogen.

Centrica Seem To Be Assembling An Interesting Consortium

These are some deals, that I have reported on this blog, that involve Centrica.

Note.

  1. A lot of these deals are are about hydrogen production.
  2. Some of these deals are about biomethane production.
  3. None of these deals talk about getting hydrogen and biomethane to customers.

It appears to me, that Gasrec have a model that works to get hydrogen, methane and biomethane from production and storage to the end customers.

Developing A Rural Hydrogen Network

In Developing A Rural Hydrogen Network, I talked about supplying all those millions of off-gas grid properties with hydrogen for heating, agricultural and industrial purposes, in the countryside of the UK.

Gasrec have the technology to decarbonise the countryside.

Conclusion

Gasrec would appear to be a very useful partner for Centrica.

 

September 3, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Energy Storage, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment