Boris Johnson Backs Station Opening Which Could See Metro Link To County Durham
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the Sunderland Echo.
The article has this sub-title.
The Prime Minister has backed calls for a new railway station in County Durham which could also be linked to the Tyne and Wear Metro.
This all came out in Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, where Boris said it was his ambition to see a line opened to the former Ferryhill station, which is nine miles South of Durham.
There has been talk of reopening the Leamside Line, as both a route for the Tyne and Wear Metro and as a diversion for the East Coast Main Line (ECML).
New Rolling Stock For The Tyne And Wear Metro
Stadler are building new rolling stock for the Tyne and Wear Metro, which will be dual-voltage.
- Able to work on the Metro’s 1500 VDC.
- Able to work on the national 25 KVAC.
- In addition like Merseyrail’s closely-related Class 777 trains, they could have a battery capability.
Pelaw And The Leamside Line
The Leamside Line leaves the Durham Coast Line near to Pelaw station on the Metro.
This Google Map shows Pelaw station and the rail lines in the area.
Note.
- Pelaw station on the Western edge of the map marked by a blue M.
- The Durham Coast Line running East-West across the map.
- The tracks going North from the junction in the middle of the map are the Tyne and Wear Metro to South Shields station and a freight line to Jarrow.
- At the Eastern edge of the map, Pelaw Metro Junction can be seen, where the Metro and the Durham Coast Line join to continue through Sunderland to their respective terminals.
- The Leamside Line can be picked out running from the major junction in the middle to the South East corner of the map.
This second Google Map shows an enlarged view of the Pelaw Metro Junction.
It appears to be a flying junction of the highest class, despite being built in the days of cash-strapped British Rail. Note the two outside Metro lines with their electrification merging with the central Durham Coast Lines, that have no electrification.
- The route is electrified using the Metro’s 1500 VDC overhead system from here until the Metro branches off to South Hylton station.
- The Metro and the other trains through the area, use a version of the Karlsruhe model for the signalling, so effectively, the Metro is running as a tram-train.
When the Metro has received the new Stadler trains, it will be possible to electrify the Durham Coast Line at 25 KVAC, which would allow the following.
- Metro trains could run all the way to Middlesbrough, using their dual-voltage capability.
- Metro trains could also run directly into Newcastle station, using the Durham Coast Line.
Voltage changeover would take place in Pelaw station.
Pelaw And Washington
The route of the Leamside Line South from Pelaw to Washington is more or less intact, although it does look in need of tender loving case.
This Google Map shows the section through Follingsby, where there used to be a Freightliner terminal.
Note.
- The whole area, including a former opencast coal time, is being developed.
- Amazon are building a fulfilment centre on the site of the Freightliner terminal.
- The Leamside Line runs North-South through the complex road junction at the top of the map.
This second Google Map shows the area South of the previous one and shows the Leamside Line as it passes to the West of the Nissan plant at Sunderland.
Note.
- The Leamside Line runs down the Western side of the map.
- The Nissan plant to the East, with a sausage =shaped feature in the South-West corner of the site.
- North of the Nissan plant an area has been earmarked for the International Advanced Manufacturing Park, which is currently the site of the NHS Nightingale Hospital NE.
It would appear discussions are underway to connect the Advanced Manufacturing Park to the Metro. But surely, with all the development alongside the line, there must be a need for perhaps three stations between Nissan and Prlaw.
This third Google Map shows Washington and its position with respect to the Nissan plant.
Note.
- The Nissan plant is to the North-East of this map and the sausage-shaped feature can just be seen.
- The Leamside Line goes North-South through the area and crosses the A1231 road, midway between the two complex junctions.
- The housing of the town of Washington in the South-West corner of the map.
There will surely be scope to put more than one station in the town of Washington, if the Leamside Line were to be reopened to passenger trains.
South From Washington
I will now continue South from Washington
The Victoria Viaduct
Going South from Washington, the Leamside Line has to cross the River Wear and it does that in spectacular fashion over the Grade II* Listed Victoria Viaduct.
This Google Map shows the crossing.
Note.
- Network Rail have maintained the viaduct since it was mothballed in 1991.
- It used to carry a double-track railway.
- The viaduct must have handled an occasional InterCity125.
I would be very surprised if a restored Victoria Viaduct couldn’t handle a five-car Class 800 train or similar.
Penshaw Station
The first station on the Leamside Line to the South of the viaduct, used to be Penshaw station.
This Google Map shows the village of Penshaw.
Note.
- Station Road curving around the South-West corner of the map.
- The Leamside Line crossing this road and running North-South.
I would expect a station could be built there, without too much difficulty.
Fencehouses Station
The next station to the South was Fencehouses station.
This Google Map shows the location of the station.
Note.
- The A1052 Road named Station Avenue North passing through the village.
- The former track of the railway passing North-South.
- According to Wikipedia, there used to be a level crossing at the station.
As with Penshaw station, I suspect a station could be built here fairly easily.
Leamside Station
The next station was Leamside station, which served the villages of Leamside and West Rainton.
This Google Map shows the station.
Note.
- The Leamside Line runs North-South in the middle of the map.
- Station Road can be picked out crossing the railway.
- Leamside is to the West of the Leamside Line.
- West Rainton is to the East of the Leamside Line.
It looks to be another station, that can be rebuilt without difficulty.
A Choice Of Routes At Belmont
The next station coming South on the Leamside Line used to be Belmont station.
This Google Map shows the site of the original station.
Note.
- The area is dominated by the two major roads; the A1(M) and the A690.
- In the vee of the roads, the Belmont Park-and-Ride site for Durham City is situated.
- The Leamside Line passes to the East of the Park-and-Ride.
- It appears that there is already a bridge to carry the Leamside Line over the A690.
There used to be a direct line between Belmont and Durham Gilesgate stations and the remains of the track-bed can be picked out, as it passes to the North of the Park-and-Ride.
There must surely be possibilities for some innovative thinking to connect Belmont, Durham, Newcastle and Washington.
But a simple station at the Park-And-Ride could be the best!
- Travellers living along the Leamside Line could use the buses at the Park-and-Ride to get to Durham City.
- The station would become a Parkway station for travellers going to Gateshead, Newcastle, Sunderland, Washington and anywhere on the Tyne and Wear Metro.
There would appear to be space for more parking, if that were to be needed.
An Alternative Direct Route Between the Leamside Line and the East Coast Main Line.
This Google Map shows the Leamside Line to the North of Belmont and the area to the West of the Line.
Note.
- The A1 (M) running North-South.
- The Leamside Line running North-South to the East of the motorway.
- The Grade II Listed Belmont Railway Viaduct marked by a blue arrow crossing the River Wear.
The remains of the trackbed of a railway can be picked out between the Leamside Line and the Belmont Railway Viaduct.
This second Google Map shows the area between the Belmont Railway Viaduct and the ECML.
Note.
- HM Prison Frankland at the top of the map.
- The ECML running down the West side of the map.
- The Belmont Railway Viaduct in the South-East corner of the map.
The trackbed between the ECML and the railway viaduct can be picked out.
Could The Line Over The Belmont Railway Viaduct Be Rebuilt To Create A Route Between Durham And Newcastle?
- Looking, where the railway would need to cross the A1 (M), if appears that no provision was made for a underpass or bridge, when the motorway was built, so building one would be expensive and very disruptive.
- Creating a flying junction to connect the new line to the ECML would be another expensive and disruptive project.
- What is the condition of the Belmont Railway Viaduct?
- Would it be better to build an interchange station at the Belmont Park-And-Ride?
I feel that it would be unlikely that this route will be rebuilt.
South From Belmont
I will now continue South from Belmont station.
Shincliffe Station
The next station going South was Shincliffe station.
This Google Map shows the village of Shincliffe.
Note.
- The A177 road running NW-SE across the map.
- The Leamside Line running SW-NE across the map.
- The original station was where was road and railway crossed.
The Leamside Line continues South to Tursdale Junction, where it joins the ECML.
This Google Map shows Tursdale Junction.
Note.
- Ferryhll is to the South.
- The ECML runs North to Durham and Newcastle in a slightly North-Westerly direction.
- The Leamside Line goes to Washington in a Northerly direction.
This second Google Map shows the ECML through Ferryhill.
Note.
- The sand quarries opposite the village, that are planned to be used for landfill.
- The ECML runs North-South between the village and the quarries.
- There are two railways going South from Ferryhill.
- The ECML goes South to Darlington, York and beyond.
- The Stillington Railway goes South-East to Stockton and Hartlepool.
The Campaign for Better Transport have given a high priority for reopening passenger services between Ferryhill and Stockton.
Thoughts On The Reopening Of Ferryhill Station
The closing of routes linking to Ferryhill station seems to have been almost a continuous process.
- Coxhoe – 1902
- Byers Green Branch beyond Spennymoor – 1939
- Leamside Line – 1941
- Spennymoor – 1952
- Stockton – 1952
- Harlepool – 1952
Beeching finally put the station out of its misery in 1963
But things are different now!
- We need to build lots of new houses all over the country. And they need transport connections!
- We need to cut our carbon emissions.
- Roads are getting more crowded and we need to provide alternative reliable public transport.
- We need to load our weapons against COVID-19.
I feel with detailed planning, a well-designed station at Ferryhill could be an asset to the North East.
These are a few thoughts.
The Leamside Line Will Be An Important Route
The route between Pelaw and Ferryhill stations will be just over twenty miles long.
- It could be easily be run with the new Metro trains.
- Trains could stop at perhaps seven or eight intermediate stations.
- I estimate a journey could take about an hour.
- South Hylton station supports at least four trains per hour (tph)
- Four tph would need eight trains.
- Trains could stop at Belmont Park-and-Ride for a frequent bus service to Durham City.
- Washington might be able to support two stations.
It would certainly be a service that would fit in with the philosophy of the Metro.
Would The Leamside Line Be Electrified?
Unless the Metro trains were to be fitted with batteries, it would need to be electrified.
Either 1500 VDC or 25 KVAC could be used!
If the Durham Coast Line and the Leamside Line were to both be electrified with 25 KVAC, the following would be possible.
- Metro trains could go to Newcastle station.
- Other electric trains could use the Leamside Line as a diversion.
- Electric freight trains could use the Leamside Line.
On the other hand, the Leamside Line would be ideal for partial electrification.
- Merseyrail’s Class 777 trains are to be fitted with batteries and these trains are closely-related to the Tyne and Wear Metro’s new trains.
- Relaying new track on the existing track bed, is not going to be the expensive part of the project.
- Electrification between Pelaw and Washington would be easy, using the 1500 VDC overhead system of the Metro.
- There may be problems from the Heritage lobby, about electrification on the Victoria Viaduct.
- Ferryhill station would be electrified as it is on the ECML.
Trains could run the sixteen or so miles between Washington and Ferryhill stations on battery power.
The Ferryhill And Hartlepool Line Could Be A Useful Passenger Route
The route between Ferryhill and Hartlepool stations will be around twenty miles long.
- There could be new stations at Sedgefield, Stillington and Stockton.
- The route is double-track throughout.
- The route joins the Durham Coast Line at Billingham.
- It must open up possibilities for business and leisure travel.
The Government and local politicians must see a future for the railways in the area, as Horden station, which is next to Hartlepool station, is reopening.
Perhaps, there are plans for a train to leave Newcastle and take this route.
- Newcastle to Ferryhill via the Leamside Line.
- Ferryhill to Hartlepool.
- Hartlepool to Newcastle via the Durham Coast Line.
Running hourly, it would connect a lot of towns with unemployment to those, where jobs are being created.
Would The Ferryhill and Hartlepool Line Be Electrified?
This route would surely only be electrified, when other lines in the area were similarly enhanced.
Electrification would not be a bad idea.
- It would allow the new Tyne and Wear Metro trains to invade Teesside.
- A Teesside Metro could be developed, that was electric-hauled, which would use the same trains as the Tyne and Wear Metro.
- Some of the many freight trains starting or finishing in the area could be electric-hauled.
- LNER and TransPennine Express could use their bi-mode trains in electric mode to Teesside.
There could be a zero-carbon alternative, as plans for hydrogen trains on Teesside seem well advanced, as I wrote about in Fuelling The Change On Teesside Rails.
Also in Northern’s Hydrogen Plans, I published this extract from an article in the March 2020 Edition of Modern Railways.
Northern has submitted planning documents, with the preferred site for a maintenance and fuelling facility understood to be at Lackenby. As hydrogen units would have a more limited operating range than DMUs (around 600 miles), they would likely need to return to the depot every night. Northern believes the routes radiating from Middlesbrough to Nunthorpe, Bishop Auckland and Saltburn are ideal candidates for the operation, as they are unlikely to be electrified and can be operated as a self contained network using hydrogen trains. A fleet of around a dozen Breeze units is planned, with the possibility they could also operate services to Whitby and on the Durham Coast Line to Newcastle. Planning documentation suggested the first hydrogen train would be ready for testing in June 2021, but this was based on construction of the depot facility beginning in January this year.
If they were to use these trains to Ferryhill, some extra stations would be needed.
Will Trains On The East Coast Main Line Stop At Ferryhill Station?
I can’t see why not!
Services between York and Newcastle call at the following stations.
- CrossCountry – Plymouth and Edinburgh calls at York, Darlington, Durham and Newcastle
- CrossCountry – Reading and Newcastle calls at York, Darlington, Durham and Newcastle
- LNER – London and Edinburgh calls at York, Darlington and Newcastle
- LNER – London and Edinburgh calls at York, Northallerton, Darlington, Durham and Newcastle
- TransPennine Express – Liverpool and Edinburgh calls at York, Darlington, Durham and Newcastle
- TransPennine Express – Manchester Airport and Newcastle calls at York, Northallerton, Darlington, Durham, Chester-le-Street and Newcastle
I suspect that with a small amount of adjustment two tph could call at Ferryhill
- If train 3 stopped, this would give a connection to London and Edinburgh
- If train 6 stopped, this would give a connection to Manchester Airport
For many stations, which could connect to Ferryhill station in the future, the station might offer the quickest and most convenient route for travellers.
Could Some Of The Old Branches From Ferryhill Be Reopened?
There were a lot of branches from the Ferryhill area to neighbouring villages, because of all the coal mines in the area.
So could some of these branches be reopened, if say there were housing or commercial developments.
This Google Map shows the ECL about a mile North of the site of Ferryhill station.
Note.
- The ECML going North-South just to the East of the centre of the map.
- Ferryhill station is to the South.
- On the Western side of the map, there is the remains of a triangular junction, which used to connect Byers Green and Spennymoor stations on the Byers Green Branch to Ferryhill.
- On the Eastern side of the map, there is a scar, which was the trackbed to Cuxhoe station.
Both branches can be picked out on Google Maps. As can roads like Railway Terrace and Station Road!
Whether any of these branches are worth reopening, is one for the planners armed with future knowledge of developments and various statistics.
Did Boris Know More Than He Said?
I have listened to Prime Ministers Questions off and on, since the time of Mrs. Thatcher.
Not often, does any Prime Minister make a substantial statement in PMQs, as they rarely have all the facts at their fingertips and don’t want to be called to account later.
In response to a direct question from a local MP, about the opening of Ferryhill station, Boris after usual PMQ waffle, said this.
I will make sure that I add to that an ambition to come and see Ferryhill station launched with him.
As decisions on the Leamside Line and hydrogen trains for Teesside have been delayed for months or possibly years, I wondered, if the decision has recently been made.
- If the plan had been discussed in Cabinet, Boris would surely have known more.
- A government minister was also seen on the BBC News at Horden station having a look, last week.
- The tone of the Sunderland Echo article is also very positive.
All that prompted me to write this post.
Conclusion
After looking at the Leamside Line and other railways in the North East, I think there is a lot that can be done to create a world-class local railway in the area.
Universities Study Options For Battery Traction To Replace Diesel
The title of this post, is the same as that as this article on Railway Gazette.
This is the introductory paragraph.
A three-month study of the extent to which battery-powered trains could replace diesel traction in Germany is being undertaken through a collaboration between rolling stock financing company Rock Rail, Technische Universität Dresden and the UK’s University of Birmingham.
In some ways, two Universities and one rolling stock leasing company are strange bedfellows for a study of trains in Germany.
But then Rock Rail are a very successful and surprisingly innovative company, who appear to know their trains. This sentence, is taken from the home page of their web site.
Rock Rail works closely with the franchise train operators and manufacturers to ensure a collaborative approach to design, manufacture and acceptance of the new state of the art trains on time and to budget.
They have certainly been involved in several large fleet orders in the last few years.
I have a feeling that this study will lead to sensible and workable conclusions, that may well have lessons for the UK.
Understanding Floatovoltaics
Floatovoltaics is mounting panels on floats, on an appropriate stretch of water.
This video, which I think from some of the words in the commentary, is shown to visitors who visit the floating solar farm at Yamakura Dam.
It describes all the advantages of floating solar and shows how this 13.7 MW solar farm was constructed.
We’ve even got a couple of these floating solar farms in the UK.
This Google Map shows the farm in the Queen Elizabeth II Reservoir, near Walton-on-Thames.
There is also this article in the Guardian, which is entitled World’s Biggest Floating Solar Farm Powers Up Outside London. It gives a good description of the project.
The article also states that unlike large solar arrays on land, no planning permission is required.
United Utilities have also installed a system at Godley Reservoir in Hyde, near Manchester, as this Google Map shows.
They must like the first installation, as this Press Release from United Utilities indicates that they are now building a second floating solar farm at Langthwaite Reservoir near Lancaster.
Some points from the Press Release.
- The floats are made locally.
- Godley is three times the size of Langthwaite.
- Godley can generate up to 3 GWh per year.
- It is thought that the panels help to stop the growth of algae in the water.
- United Utilities already has 45 MW of installed solar and intends to add 22 more sites in the next two years.
In some ways, this embracing of solar is a bit surprising, as the North West, is England’s wettest region.
Conclusion
If my excellent physics teacher in the 1960s had said that it will be commonplace by 2020 to generate electricity using solar panels floating on water, I would not have believed him!
UK’s Largest Solar Park Cleve Hill Granted Development Consent
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Solar Power Portal.
These are the two introductory paragraphs.
Cleve Hill Solar Park, set to be the largest in the UK, has been granted development consent by the energy secretary.
The colossal 350MW project will include 880,000 panels along with battery storage, and sit just one mile northeast of Faversham, in Kent, situated close to the village of Graveney.
Other points from the article.
- Cleeve Hill Solar Park is a £450million project.
- It is the first solar project to be considered a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project.
- It is being developed as a joint venture between Hive Energy and Wirsol.
- It is due to be operational by 2022.
- To complete the project 700 MWh of energy storage will be added later.
The article also contains this quote from Solar Trade Associations chief executive Chris Hewett.
Solar has a significant role to play in boosting the economy in the wake of the coronavirus crisis. With the right policies we can expect to see an 8GW pipeline of solar projects unlocked and rapidly deployed, swiftly creating a wealth of skilled jobs and setting us on the path towards a green recovery.
8 GW of intermittent energy will need a lot of storage.
As Cleeve Hill’s developers are planning to provide 700 MWh of storage for 700 MW of solar panels, it would appear that 8 GW of solar panels could need up to 16 GWh of energy storage.
As our largest energy storage system is the pumped storage Electric Mountain in Snowdonia with a capacity of 9.1 GWh and most of the large solar developments are towards the South of England, the UK needs to develop a lot more energy storage, where the solar is generated and much of the energy is used.
I can see the following environmentally-friendly developments prospering.
- Highview Power‘s CRYOBattery, which uses liquid air to store energy. Systems have a small footprint and up to a GWh could be possible.
- Electrothermal energy storage like this system from Siemens.
- Using electrolysers from companies like ITM Power to convert excess energy into hydrogen for transport, steelmaking and injecting into the gas main.
- Zinc8‘s zinc-air battery could be the outsider, that comes from nowhere.
Developers could opt for conservative decision of lithium-ion batteries, but I don’t like the environmental profile and these batteries should be reserved for portable and mobile applications.
Floatovoltaics
One concept, I came across whilst writing was floatovoltaics.
The best article about the subject was this one on Renewable Energy World, which is entitled Running Out of Precious Land? Floating Solar PV Systems May Be a Solution.
A French company call Ciel et Terre International seem to be leading the development.
Their web site has this video.
Perhaps, some floatovoltaics, should be installed on the large reservoirs in the South of England.
- The Renewable Energy World article says that panels over water can be more efficient due to the cooling effect of the water.
- Would they cut evaporative losses by acting as sunshades?
- As the French are great pecheurs, I suspect that they have the answers if anglers should object.
This Google Map shows the reservoirs to the West of Heathrow.
Note.
- Wraysbury Reservoir has an area of two square kilometres.
- King George VI Reservoir has an area of one-and-a-half square kilometres.
- Using the size and capacity of Owl’s Hatch Solar Farm, it appears that around 65 MW of solar panels can be assembled in a square kilometre.
- All these reservoirs are Sites of Special Scientific Interest because of all the bird life.
- Heathrow is not an airport, that is immune to bird-strikes.
Could floatovoltaics be used to guide birds away from the flightpaths?
Incidentally, I remember a report from Tomorrow’s World, probably from the 1960s, about a porous concrete that had been invented.
- One of the uses would have been to fill reservoirs.
- The capacity of the reservoir would only have been marginally reduced, as the water would be in the voids in the concrete like water in a sponge.
- Soil would be placed at the surface and the land used for growing crops.
I wonder what happened to that idea from fifty years ago!
Alstom And Snam To Develop Hydrogen Trains In Italy
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on H2 View.
This paragraph sums up the agreement.
As part of the agreement, Alstom will manufacture and maintain newly built or converted hydrogen trains, while Snam will develop the infrastructures for production, transport and refuelling.
It does appear that Alstom is setting up similar deals across Europe, with now Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and Austria being prepared for hydrogen trains, manufactured or converted by Alstom.
The only recent reference, that I can find to the Alstom Breeze for the UK, is this article in Electric And Hybrid Vehicle Technology International, which is entitled Is Post-Covid The Perfect Time To Start A Hydrogen Transportation Revolution?
There is just a new visualisation pf the train to illustrate an article.
A Timeline Of Hitachi’s Statements And News About Battery Trains
These are posts on this blog, that reference articles about Hitachi and battery trains.
21st November 2018 – Hitachi’s Thoughts On Battery Trains – Modern Railways Modern Railways January 2018 – Candid interview with Nick Hughes of Hitachi.
21st March 2019 – Trains Ordered For 2021 Launch Of ‘High-Quality, Low Fare’ London – Edinburgh Service – Railway Gazette – Announcement of service, but no mention of batteries, diesel or bi-mode.
26th March 2019 – Hitachi Plans To Run ScotRail Class 385 EMUs Beyond The Wires – Rail Engineer – Batteries for Class 385 trains.
1st January 2020 – Hitachi Trains For Avanti – Modern Railway January 2020 – The Hitachi trains for Avanti West Coast can be fitted with batteries, if required.
16th February 2020 – Sparking A Revolution – Rail Magazine Issue 898 – Informative interview with Andrew Barr of Hitachi.
16th April 2020 – First of Five FirstGroup Class 803s Arrives In UK – Rail Magazine Issue 903 – Disclosure that the Class 803 trains will use a battery instead of diesel power for on-board services, but not traction power.
Hitachi seem to have opened up gradually with more information.
‘Chernobyl’ Fears Dismissed As Herne Bay Hydrogen Plant Bid Approved
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Kent Online.
it would appear that Kent Online got their prediction right. that I wrote about in Hydrogen Power Plant Bid In Herne Bay Set For Green Light From Canterbury City Council.
UK Energy Storage ‘Nears 4GW’
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on ReNews.biz.
This is the introductory paragraph.
Almost 4GW of energy storage capacity is now connected to the UK network with a further 9GW in the planning process, according to a new report released today by the Electricity Storage Network (ESN).
It is a small article, where GW is mentioned nine times.
Thoughts On East Coast Trains
According to an article and a picture, the second new Class 803 train for Open Access Operator; East Coast Trains, has arrived in the UK to be fitted out at Newton Aycliffe.
These are my thoughts on the service.
The Trains
The Class 803 trains are similar to the other Hitachi A-trains running in the UK, but with two big differences.
- They will have a one class interior and they will be fitted with a battery, instead of a diesel engine.
- The battery is not for traction and is to provide hotel power in stations and in the event of a dewiring. The latter has been surprisingly common on the East Coast Main Line in recent years.
Normally, these five-car trains are fitted with a single MTU 12V 1600 R80L diesel engine, which is described in this datasheet on the MTU web site.
The mass of the engine is given as 6750 Kg, when it is ready to run.
It would seem logical to replace the diesel engine with a battery of the same weight. I’ll use seven tonnes, as the fuel tank won’t be needed either.
This page on the Clean Energy institute at the University of Washington is entitled Lithium-Ion Battery.
This is a sentence from the page.
Compared to the other high-quality rechargeable battery technologies (nickel-cadmium or nickel-metal-hydride), Li-ion batteries have a number of advantages. They have one of the highest energy densities of any battery technology today (100-265 Wh/kg or 250-670 Wh/L).
Using these figures, a seven-tonne battery would be between 700 and 1855 kWh in capacity.
Incidentally, the power output of an MTU 12V 1600 R80L is 700 kW.
In Sparking A Revolution I gave Hitachi’s possible specification of a battery-electric train.
- Range – 55-65 miles
- Performance – 90-100 mph
- Recharge – 10 minutes when static
- Routes – Suburban near electrified lines
- Battery Life – 8-10 years
These figures are credited to Hitachi.
Doing a quick calculation, it would appear that.
- A 700 kWh battery could supply the same power as the diesel engine for an hour.
- A 1855 kWh battery could supply the same power as the diesel engine for two hours and thirty-nine minutes.
I am drawn to the conclusion, that although Hitachi say the battery is not for traction purposes in a Class 803 train, that a battery the same weight as the current diesel engine, would be a very adequate replacement.
If say, you put a 300-500 kWh battery in a Class 803 train, it would probable give enough hotel power until the train was able to move again. but it would also reduce the weight of the train and thus improve the acceleration in normal running.
A Battery Module
I wouldn’t be surprised if Hitachi are developing a battery module, that can replace the MTU 12V 1600 R80L diesel engine.
- The module would be used for both traction and hotel services on the train.
- It would be charged from the electrification or by regenerative braking.
- It would act as emergency power.
- To the driver and the train’s computer, it would have similar performance to the diesel engine.
The diesel engine and the battery module would be plug-compatible and could be exchanged as required.
I can do a quick calculation for a 1000 kWh battery, which would weigh under four tonnes.
- A 1000 kWh battery would provide 700 kW for 86 minutes.
- At 90 mph, the train would travel for 129 miles.
- At 100 mph, the train would travel for 143 miles.
That would be a very handy extended range.
As East Coast Trains will only run on a fully-electrified route, they have no need for the traction capability.
- But it would fit well with the routes of Avanti West Coast, East Midlands Railway, Great Western Railway, Hull Trains, LNER and TransPennine Express.
- All except East Midlands Railway and LNER, share part or full ownership with East Coast Trains.
It does look to me, that Hitachi is using East Coast Trains and their fully electrified route to give the battery module for the trains, a thorough work-out, on a route, where it will not normally be needed.
The Proposed Service
From various sources we know the following.
- There will be five trains per day in both directions between London Kings Cross and Edinburgh. – See Wikipedia
- East Coast Trains have ordered five trains. – See Wikipedia.
- There will be stops at Stevenage, Durham, Newcastle and Morpeth. – See Wikipedia
- The first Northbound service will arrive in Edinburgh before 10:00. – See Rail Advent.
- Fares will be low-cost at around £25 – See Wikipedia.
It is also likely that East Coast Trains will want a journey time of under four hours, which is being planned for the route anyway under the L2E4 project.
As the record time between London and Edinburgh was set in 1991 by an InterCity 225 train at a minute under three-and-a-half hours, could a time of around three hours and forty-five minutes be possible, including the turnaround of the train?
10:00 Arrival In Edinburgh
This is obviously a good idea, but with a four hour journey time, it would mean leaving London before six.
- Perhaps to make the most of clear tracks in the morning the train would leave early.
- Currently, the first two trains from Kings Cross are the 06:15 to Edinburgh, which arrives at 11:08 and the 06:33 to Leeds.
- How early could the train leave?
I suspect that the first train to Edinburgh would leave Kings Cross around 05:30 and arrive in Edinburgh and be ready to return before 10:00.
10:00 Arrival In London
If arriving in Edinburgh before ten is a good idea, then surely arriving in London by the same time is worthwhile.
- Currently, the first train from Edinburgh to London is the 05:48, which arrives at 10:40.
As with the Northbound service, I suspect the first train to Kings Cross would leave Edinburgh around 05:30 and arrive in Kings Cross and be ready to return before 10:00.
Five Services Per Day
If the first Edinburgh and Kings Cross services left at 05:30 and after unloading and loading, were ready to return before 10:00, that would be the first service.
The simplest way to handle the rest of the day would be to split the time into four and run the trains continuously.
Suppose, the last train got to its destination at one in the morning, that would mean that fifteen hours were available for four trains or three hours and forty-five minutes for each trip between London and Edinburgh and the turnaround.
The train starting from Kings Cross would run the following services.
- Kings Cross to Edinburgh – Leaves 05:30 – Arrives before 10:00
- Edinburgh to Kings Cross – Leaves 10:00
- Kings Cross to Edinburgh – Leaves 13:45
- Edinburgh to Kings Cross- Leaves 17:30
- Kings Cross to Edinburgh – Leaves 21:15 – Arrives 01:00 on the next day.
The train starting from Edinburgh would run the following services.
- Edinburgh to Kings Cross – Leaves 05:30 – Arrives before 10:00
- Kings Cross to Edinburgh – Leaves 10:00
- Edinburgh to Kings Cross – Leaves 13:45
- Kings Cross to Edinburgh – Leaves 17:30
- Edinburgh to Kings Cross – Leaves 21:15 – Arrives 01:00 on the next day.
There would be two very tired trains at the end of every day, that would be looking forward to some well-deserved tender loving care.
This has been my best guess at what the timetable will be! But!
- Travellers can catch an early train, do a full days work in the other capital and return at the end of the day.
- There are three services during the day; one each in the morning, the afternoon and the early evening, for those who want affordable, slightly less frenetic travelling.
- I suspect the intermediate stops have been chosen with care.
- Improvements at Stevenage station could make the station, the preferred interchange for many between East Coast, LNER and local services for Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and North London. Car parking is probably easier than Kings Cross!
- Is Durham station an alternative station on the other side of the Tyne from Newcastle, with better parking?
- Could Durham City Centre be the terminal of a Leamside Line extension of the Tyne and Wear Metro?
- Newcastle station is very well-connected to all over the North East.
- Morpeth station could attract a large number of travellers from over the Border. It also looks to have space to expand the parking!
It looks a well-designed route and timetable.
How Many Trains Would Be Needed?
Consider.
- Each train could be two five-car trains working together as a ten-car train.
- This would maximise the use of paths on the East Coast Main Line.
- Four trains would be needed for the full five trains per day ten-car service.
As there is going to be a fleet of five trains, the fifth train would either be in maintenance or waiting to enter the action as a substitute.
Improving Efficiency
It looks to me, that the efficiency of this service could be improved by good old-fashioned time and motion study.
- Will drivers use stepping-up to speed the reverse of trains?
- Would cleaning teams board at Morpeth and Stevenage stations and clean the train on the last leg?
- Will the buffet be designed for fast replenishment?
- Will drivers be given all possible aids to go faster?
Every little will help!
Conclusion
I like this system and the competition will keep LNER on its toes!
Would a similar system work on the West Coast Main Line?
- Grand Union have proposed a service between Euston and Stirling stations.
- There will be stops at Milton Keynes Central, Nuneaton, Crewe, Preston, Carlisle, Lockerbie, Motherwell, Whifflet, Greenfaulds and Larbert.
- Trains will be InterCity 225s.
The service could start in 2021.


















