The Anonymous Widower

Consultation On Offshore Wind Reform: Hydrogen Sector Calls For Hybrid Connection Concepts And Warns Of Compensation Risks

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the AquaVentus web site.

There is this statement on the home page.

Berlin, January 02 2026. In the context of the consultation launched by the Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWE) on the reform of the Wind Energy at Sea Act (WindSeeG), the hydrogen initiative AquaVentus is calling for clear legislative action to enable a cost-efficient and system-friendly development of offshore wind energy. At the heart of its position is the timely legal establishment of hybrid connection concepts, allowing offshore wind farms to be connected via both electricity cables and hydrogen pipelines.

Note.

  1. I’ve always felt that copying proven technologies from the offshore oil and gas industry is good practice.
  2. It may be easier to recycle infrastructure like pipelines, platforms and storage by creating the hydrogen offshore.
  3. In the UK, Centrica and SSE are already re-purposing natural gas storage for hydrogen.

It may feel safer to some for the hydrogen to be produced a distance offshore.

January 4, 2026 Posted by | Energy, Hydrogen | , , , | 1 Comment

If President Maduro Is Found Guilty Of The United States Charges Will He Face The Death Penalty?

I asked Google AI the question in the title of this post and received this answer.

Nicolás Maduro has been indicted on several charges in a U.S. federal court, primarily in the Southern District of New York. The potential penalties for these charges are:

 

  • Narco-terrorism conspiracy: This charge has a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 20 years and a maximum of life in prison.
  • Cocaine importation conspiracy: This charge carries a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years and a maximum of life in prison.
  • Weapons charges (using and possessing machine guns and destructive devices in furtherance of the conspiracies): These charges carry a mandatory minimum sentence of 30 years and a maximum of life in prison.

The maximum penalty for all charges combined is life imprisonment in a U.S. federal prison, a sentence that has been described as a “de facto life sentence” in the media. The U.S. Attorney General has stated that the goal is for him to face justice in a U.S. court and, if convicted, he could spend the rest of his life behind bars.

Will this be enough for Trump?

Who knows?

But The Lady On The Train may have a say.

Could Artificial Intelligent Judge Cases Without A Jury?

I just had to ask Google AI this question and received this answer.

Artificial intelligence is not currently used to judge cases or issue final verdicts without human oversight in any major legal system, and legal experts believe a full replacement is unlikely in the foreseeable future. The complex nature of law requires human qualities like empathy, moral judgment, and the ability to assess nuance and credibility, which AI currently lacks.

The current role of AI in the judiciary is primarily used as a tool to assist human judges and lawyers, not replace them.

Could Artificial Intelligent Perform Sentencing In Cases?

I just had to ask Google AI this second question and received this answer.

While artificial intelligence (AI) is already used in various legal processes, it cannot perform actual sentencing in legal cases in a legally binding capacity. Legal systems currently maintain that judicial discretion and the final decision-making authority must rest with a human judge to ensure accountability, due process, and fairness.

Does Artificial Intelligence Support A Reduced Role For Juries In Legal Cases?

I just had to ask Google AI this third question and received this answer.

Artificial intelligence  is currently being used to support, not replace, human decision-makers in the legal system, with experts highlighting the need for human judgment, empathy, and accountability in jury trials. The debate over AI’s potential to reduce the role of juries is ongoing, with arguments both for and against.

Conclusion

In all these questions, artificial intelligent didn’t appear to act above its station.

 

 

January 3, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Computing, World | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Could Doncaster Sheffield Airport Become A Hydrogen Airport?

I asked Google AI, what is the current status of Doncaster Sheffield Airport and received this reply.

Doncaster Sheffield Airport (DSA) is currently in a state of active, public-funded redevelopment after closing in late 2022 due to financial issues, with plans to reopen for passenger flights by late 2027 or 2028, following significant funding (around £160m) secured by the South Yorkshire Mayoral Combined Authority (SYMCA) for the City of Doncaster Council to take over operations and rebuild commercial viability, with freight and general aviation potentially returning sooner.

This Google Map shows the location of the airport.

Note.

  1. The distinctive mouth of the River Humber can be picked out towards the North-East corner of the map.
  2. Hull and Grimsby sit in the mouth of the Humber.
  3. The red arrow indicates Doncaster Sheffield Airport.
  4. Leeds is in the North-West corner of the map.
  5. The towns and city of Doncaster, Rotherham and Sheffield can be picked out to the West of the airport.

This second Google Map shows a close-up of the airport.

 

On my visit to NASA in the 1980s, where an Artemis system was used to project manage the turnround of the Space Shuttle, I was asked questions by one of NASA’s support people about RAF Finningley. Nothing too technical, but things like what is Doncaster like.

When I asked why, they said there’s a high chance that a Space Shuttle could land at RAF Finningley, as it has one of the best runways for a very heavy aircraft in Europe.

Looking at the runway, it is a long and wide runway that was built for heavy RAF nuclear bombers like Valiants, Victors and Vulcans.

I believe that we will eventually see hydrogen-  and/or nuclear-powered airliners flying very long routes across the globe, just as a nuclear-powered example, attempted to do in the first episode of the TV series Thunderbirds, which was called Trapped in the Sky and has this Wikipedia entry.

Just as the Space Shuttle did, these airliners and their air-cargo siblings will need a large runway.

Doncaster Sheffield Airport already has such a runway.

These hydrogen- and nuclear-powered aircraft will make Airbus A 380s look small and will need runways like the one at Finningley.

But I don’t think we’ll ever see nuclear-powered aircraft in the near future, so the aircraft will likely be hydrogen.

Other things in favour of making Doncaster Sheffield Airport, an airport for long range hydrogen aircraft include.

  • The airport is close to the massive hydrogen production and storage facilities being developed on Humberside at Aldbrough and Rough.
  • The airport could be connected to the Sheffield Supertram.
  • The airport could be connected to the trains at Doncaster station, which has 173 express trains per day to all over the country.
  • The airport would fit well with my thoughts on hydrogen-powered coaches, that I wrote about inFirstGroup Adds Leeds-based J&B Travel To Growing Coach Portfolio
  • The airport might even be able to accept the next generation of supersonic aircraft.
  • The airport  could certainly accept the largest hydrogen-powered cargo aircraft.
  • The Airport isn’t far from Doncaster iPort railfreight terminal.

Did I read too much science fiction?

I have some further thoughts.

 

Do Electric Aircraft Have A Future?

I asked Google AI this question and received this answer.

Yes, electric aircraft absolutely have a future, especially for short-haul, regional, and urban air mobility (UAM), promising quieter, zero-emission flights, but battery limitations mean long-haul flights will rely more on hydrogen-electric or Sustainable Aviation Fuels (SAF) for the foreseeable future. Expect to see battery-electric planes for shorter trips by the late 2020s, while hybrid or hydrogen solutions tackle longer distances, with a significant shift towards alternative propulsion by 2050.

That doesn’t seem very promising, so I asked Google AI what range can be elected from electric aircraft by 2035 and received this answer.

By 2035, fully electric aircraft ranges are expected to be around 200-400 km (125-250 miles) for small commuter planes, while hybrid-electric models could reach 800-1,000 km (500-620 miles), focusing on short-haul routes due to battery limitations; larger, long-range electric flight remains decades away, with hydrogen propulsion targeting 1,000-2,000 km ranges for that timeframe.

Note.

  1. I doubt that many prospective passengers would want to use small commuter planes for up to 250 miles from Doncaster Sheffield airport with hundreds of express trains per day going all over the UK mainland from Doncaster station.
  2. But Belfast City (212 miles), Dublin (215 miles) and Ostend (227 miles), Ronaldsway on the Isle of Man (154 miles) and Rotterdam(251 miles) and Schipol 340 miles) may be another matter, as there is water to cross.

It looks like it will be after 2035 before zero-carbon aircraft will be travelling further than 620 miles.

My bets would be on these aircraft being hydrogen hybrid aircraft.

What Will The Range Of Hydrogen-Powered Aircraft In 2040?

I asked Google AI this question and received this answer.

By 2040, hydrogen-powered commercial aircraft are projected to have a range that covers short- to medium-haul flights, likely up to 7,000 kilometers (approximately 3,780 nautical miles), with some models potentially achieving longer ranges as technology and infrastructure mature.
The range of these aircraft will vary depending on the specific technology used (hydrogen fuel cells versus hydrogen combustion in modified gas turbines) and aircraft size.

It looks like we’ll be getting there.

This Wikipedia entry is a list of large aircraft and there are some very large aircraft, like the Antonov An-225, which was destroyed in the Ukraine War.

A future long-range hydrogen-powered airline must be able to match the range of current aircraft that will need to be replaced.

I asked Google AI what airliner has the longest range and received this reply.

The longest-range airliner in service is the Airbus A350-900ULR (Ultra Long Range), specifically configured for airlines like Singapore Airlines to fly extremely long distances, reaching around 9,700 nautical miles (18,000 km) for routes like Singapore to New York. While the A350-900ULR holds records for current operations, the upcoming Boeing 777-8X aims to compete, and the Boeing 777-200LR was previously known for its exceptional range.

I believe that based on the technology of current successful aircraft, that an aircraft could be built, that would be able to have the required range and payload to be economic, with the first version probably being a high-capacity cargo version.

What Would An Ultra Long Range Hydrogen-Powered Airliner Look Like?

Whatever the aircraft looks like it will need to be powered. Rolls-Royce, appear to be destining a future turbofan for aircraft called the Ultrafan, which has this Wikipedia entry.

I asked Google AI, if Rolls-Royce will produce an Ultrafan for hydrogen and received this answer.

Rolls-Royce is actively developing the UltraFan architecture to be compatible with hydrogen fuel in the future, but the current UltraFan demonstrator runs on Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). The company has a research program dedicated to developing hydrogen-powered engines for future aircraft, aiming for entry into service in the mid-2030s.

I asked Google AI, if Rolls-Royce have had major difficulties converting engines to hydrogen and received this answer.

Rolls-Royce has not encountered insurmountable difficulties but faces significant engineering and logistical challenges in converting engines to run on hydrogen. The company has made substantial progress in testing both stationary and aero engines using pure hydrogen, confirming its technical feasibility.

Given the company’s success in developing engines in the past, like the R Type, Merlin, RB 211, Pegasus, Trent, mtu 4000 and others, I suspect there’s a high chance of a successful hydrogen-powered Ultrafan.

If you look at a history of large passenger and cargo aircraft over the last sixty years, there has been a lot of the following.

  1. Conversion of one type of aircraft to a totally different type.
  2. Fitting new engines to a particular type.
  3. Fitting new avionics to a particular type.

Examples include.

  • Fitting new CFM-56 engines to DC-8s.
  • The first two Nimrods were converted from unsold Comet 4Cs.
  • Converting Victor bombers to RAF tanker aircraft.
  • Converting BA Tristars to RAF tanker aircraft.
  • Converting DC-8s to cargo aircraft.
  • Airbus converted five Airbus A 300-600 into Belugas, which have this Wikipedia entry.
  • Airbus converted six Airbus A 330-200F into BelugaXLs, which have this Wikipedia entry.
  • Converting two Boeing-747s to carry Space Shuttles ; one from American Airlines and one from Japan Airlines, which have this Wikipedia entry.

Note.

  1. Most of these examples have been successful.
  2. The last three examples have been very successful.
  3. Most of these applications do not have a human cargo.

This picture shows an Emirates Air Lines’s Airbus A 380 on finals at Heathrow.

Note.

  1. The aircraft was landing on Runway 27 L.
  2. The four engines and the vertical oval cross-section of the fuselage are clearly visible.
  3. The Wikipedia entry for the Airbus A 380 shows two floors across the fuselage; the upper floor with eight seats in 2-4-2 and the lower floor with ten seats in 3-4-3, and a pair of LD3 cargo containers in the basement.

I’d be interested to know, how much hydrogen could be put in the basement and how far it could take the plane with a full load of passengers!

This link to the Wikipedia entry, shows the cross section in detail.

 

 

Note

 

I wouldn’t be surprised that the first application of large hydrogen aircraft will be for cargo and it could be an Airbus Beluga or perhaps an Airbus A 380 freighter?

 

January 2, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Rail Operator Crosses Line For First Time In Years

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

An operator’s first passenger train has crossed a historical and scenic route for the first time in more than a decade.

These three paragraphs give more details about the reason for the trip.

Avanti West Coast’s 07:54 GMT from Wigan was the first to run on the Settle to Carlisle route earlier.

The 73-mile line is renowned for its picturesque views across the Yorkshire Dales and the North Pennines via the Ribblehead viaduct.

The route is usually only used by Northern trains operating between Leeds and Carlisle, but Avanti is using it as a diversion while work to replace the Clifton Bridge take place over the M6 near Penrith.

I’ve only ridden the Route once and that was on a day in 2014, when the weather wasn’t at its best.

Afterwards I wrote Long Live The Settle And Carlisle, so the trip couldn’t have been that bad!

These paragraphs give the reason for and details of the diversion.

The Settle to Carlisle line does not have overhead power lines, meaning Avanti is using bi-mode Class 805 Evero trains which operate on diesel.

Several timetable changes have been made during the engineering works, with disruption expected until 15 January.

Until 5 January, the railway will also be blocked south of Preston, meaning on these days the diverted services are running between Wigan North Western and Carlisle.

But if Great British Railways could get their act together and convert a sufficient number of their Hitachi diesel bi-modes to battery-electric bi-modes and do some testing and a few calculations, the problem would be solved.

In 2021, I wrote Through Settle And Carlisle Service Under Consideration, after Modern Railways wrote an article of the same name.

Could Lumo Run A Lincoln And Glasgow Service Via Doncaster, Leeds And Settle?

In South Yorkshire Now Has Better North-South Connections, I calculated that Doncaster station now has 173 express trains per day, that stop at the station.

So why not add five or six express trains per day to Doncaster, Lincoln, Leeds, Settle, Carlisle and Glasgow?

And why not ask Lumo to run it, as they’d know how to run such a service?

 

January 1, 2026 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Offshore Wind Turbines In 2025: China Continues Leading In Single-Unit Capacity, Vestas’s 15 MW Turbine Installed At Offshore Wind Farms

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

In offshoreWIND.biz‘s 2024 annual wind turbine overview, you could have read about the first 16 MW floating wind platform installed offshore and a 26 MW prototype under construction, both in China, and a 21 MW prototype being assembled in Europe. Wind turbine generator (WTG) technology did not stop progressing in 2025, with Chinese OEMs still leading capacity-wise, while in Europe, first offshore wind farms are now featuring 15 MW turbines and a 21+ MW model was installed onshore for testing.

The article is very much a must-read and there is a lot of innovation going on.

As a comparison, between 2020 and 2026 we commissioned or are building these offshore wind farms in the UK.

  • East Anglia One – 2000 – 714 MW – 102 x 7 MW
  • Hornsea One – 2020 – 1218 MW – 174 x 7 MW
  • Kincardine – 2021 – 49.5 MW – 6 x floating
  • Hornsea Two – 2022 – 1386 MW – 165 x 8 MW
  • Moray East – 2022 – 950 MW – 100 x 9.5 MW
  • Triton Knoll – 2022 – 857 MW – 90 x 9.5 MW
  • Seagreen Phase 1 – 2023 – 1400 MW – 114 x 10 MW
  • Dogger Bank A – 2025 – 1235 MW – 95 x 13 MW
  • Moray West – 2025 – 882 MW – 60 x 14 MW
  • Neart Na Gaoithe – 2025 – 450 MW – 54 x 8 MW
  • Dogger Bank B – 2026 – 1235 MW – 95 x 13 MW
  • East Anglia 3 – 2026 – 1372 – 95 x 14 MW
  • Sofia – 2026 – 1400 MW – 100 x 14 MW

Average sizes for the various years are as follows.

  • 2020 – 7 MW
  • 2021 – floating
  • 2022 – 8-9.5 MW
  • 2023 – 10 MW
  • 2025 – 8-14 MW
  • 2026 – 13-14 MW

It can clearly be seen that in the last few years, turbines have been getting bigger.

I have some thoughts on the article.

2025 Saw Some Plans For And Installations Of Some Very Large Turbines

These four monsters were mentioned at the start of the article.

  • 26 MW – Prototype installed for testing (China)
  • 21.5 MW – Prototype installed for testing (Europe)
  • 15 MW Installed at offshore wind farms (Europe)
  • 50 MW Twin-turbine platform; Announced (China)
It would appear that much larger turbines are on the way.
This will not only mean some wind farms will be built with larger turbines, but also some older wind farms could be refitted with new larger turbines.
I Am Looking Forward To Seeing A Twin-Turbine Platform In Action
These posts talk about Swedish and Chinese designs.
Note.
  1. The Chinese seem to be providing turbines for both manufacturers.
  2. The TwinHub is the Swedish design, being built for trial in Cornwall.
  3. This new design is a 50 MW design, whereas these two are 32 MW.
It will be interesting to see how costs of single turbine designs compare with twin-turbine designs.

 

 

January 1, 2026 Posted by | Energy | , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments