Paisley St. James Station
Paisley St. James station is the nearest station to Glasgow Airport and any rail-based service to the Airport will probably effect services through the station.
It is not the best equipped of stations.
- The bridge is not step-free.
- It appeared not to have any ticket office or staff.
- There was a rudimentary shelter.
- Services are about one train every thirty minutes.
I suspect, it could be a really nice station on a blustery wet day!
A First Ride In A Class 385 Train
Yesterday, I finally got a ride in a Class 385 train between Linlithgow and Glasgow Queen Street stations.
These are my observations.
Ride, Seats And Tables
I have written in many commuter trains all over Europe and these trains are very much towards the top in these important three areas.
Ride seemed to my innocent and not-so-well-padded posterior to be fine and very similar to the closely-related Class 800 trains.
It certainly didn’t pose any problems to this well-balanced stroke survivor, when I walked around.
Seats were certainly better than some other trains.
It was also pleasing to see lots of tables, which is very much a British tradition, that seems to have really kicked-off in the InterCity 125s.
In some ways sitting there, it reminded me of Great Western Railway’s Class 387 trains.
Both are certainly a very good standard for a commuter train with a journey up to perhaps ninety minutes.
Large Windows
The trains seem to follow Bombardier’s Aventras, Stadler’s Flirts and some other new trains in having large windows.
It would be very difficult to prove, but I wonder, when trains have big windows aligned with the seats, it increases ridership amongst occasional travellers. Anything that improves the experience must increase the change of repeat journeys.
Quirky But Good Interior Design
Some of the design details are quite quirky.
- The priority seat covers are different and make a bold statement.
- There are labels everywhere, advertising the features.
And there are good features too.
- Plenty of bins for the rubbish, that commuters discard.
- Sensible sized luggage racks.
- Wide lobbies and doors.
- There might be space between and under the seats for medium-sized cases.
The design is not bland and boring like a Class 700 train.
Spacious Trains
Someone described the trains, as having more space. I think that’s down to generous lobbies and large windows.
I also don’t think, the trains have not been designed for a maximum number of people, but for a maximum return on investment.
These are different things.
I suspect that a maximum return on investment is obtained, with a comfortably-full train, operating like that all day.
Overcrowded trains do the following.
- Encourage passenger to use other modes of transport.
- Lengthen station dwell times, which make trains late.
- Make it difficult for less able passengers to use the trains.
But getting the balance right between train capacity and route is a complex problem.
Step-Free Access
Hitachi don’t seem to do good step-free access, where wheel-chairs, buggies and wheeled-cases can just roll in and out.
These trains are no exception Although, it could be that ScotRail has so many different types of trains, that the standard platform height hasn’t been defined yet!
Stadler have said, that all their trains used by Greater Anglia and Merseyrail will have this property, so I would have thought that other manufacturers would follow.
Passengers will demand it!
Train Formations
There is a document on the Hitachi web site, which is entitled Development of Class 385 Semi-customised/Standard Commuter Rolling Stock for Global Markets, which gives insights into Hitachi’s thinking.
This is the introduction.
The Class 385 is based on the AT-200, which was developed for global markets with the aim of providing flexibility of configuration while making maximum use of standardisation. It is a semi-customised model of a type common in global markets, with fewer components and greater standardisation of components achieved by adopting the “mother design” developed for the AT-300 (a typical example of which is the Class 800) and competitive lead times achieved by shortening the specification-setting process.
Note the close relationship between the Class 385 and Class 800 trains.
The document gives a detailed graphic and states that the four-car units have the following formation.
- DMCLw – Driver Motor Composite Lavatory with 20 First Class seats, 15 Standard Class seats, a Universal Access Toilet and Wheelchair Space
- TPS – Trailer Pantograoh Standard with 80 Standard Class seats
- TS – Trailer Standard with 80 Standard Class seats
- DMSL – Driver Motor Standard Lavatory with 62 Standard Class seats and a space-saving toilet.
Note.
- The coach designations on the delivered trains has been taken from this page on scot-rail.co.uk.
- This gives a total of 257 seats as against 273 seats in Wikipedia.
- The difference of 16 seats is twice the number of doors, so it could be that Hitachi have squeezed in a few more seats, between the provisional and final design.
The three-car trains would appear to have the following formation.
- DMSLw – Driver Motor Standard Lavatory with about 50 Standard Class seats, a Universal Access Toilet and Wheelchair Space
- TPS – Trailer Pantograoh Standard with 80 Standard Class seats
- DMSL – Driver Motor Standard Lavatory with 62 Standard Class seats and a space-saving toilet.
Note.
- This article in Rail Magazine, says that all trains have Universal Access Toilets and two wheelchair spaces.
- This gives a total of 192 seats as against 206 seats in Wikipedia.
- Add in two seats for each of the six doors and the difference is two seats.
I should have read the numbers from the side of the train on my visit to Scotland.
If you type “Class 800 regenerative braking” into Google, you will find this document on the Hitachi Rail web site, which is entitled Development of Class 800/801 High-speed Rolling Stock for UK Intercity Express Programme.
This is a paragraph.
Trains have a unit configuration of up to 12 cars,
including the ability to add or remove standardized
intermediate cars and the generator units (GUs)
(generators with diesel engines) needed to operate
commercial services on non-electrified lines. Along
with the A-train concept, developed in Japan, the
new rolling stock is also based on technology from the
Class 395 rolling stock developed by Hitachi for the
UK High Speed 1 that entered commercial operation
in 2009, providing compatibility with UK railway
systems together with high reliability.
This is also said about the Automatic Train Identification Function.
To simplify the rearrangement and management
of train configurations, functions are provided for
identifying the train (Class 800/801), for automatically
determining the cars in the trainset and its total length,
and for coupling and uncoupling up to 12 cars in
normal and 24 cars in rescue or emergency mode.
It’s all very Plug-and-Play.
Although, these two extracts come from a document describing the Class 800 trains, both these trains and the Class 385 trains are members of the Hitachi A-Train family.
If you look at the train formations of Class 800 trains, Wikipedia gives them as.
5-car: DPTS-MS-MS-MC-DPTF
9-car: DPTS-MS-MS-TS-MS-TS-MC-MF-DPTF
Note.
- DPTS and DPTF are Driver Pantograph Trailer cars, with Standard and First Class seats respectively
- MS, MF and MC are Motored cars with Standard, First and Composite(mixed Standard and First Class), seats respectively.
- TS is a Trailer car with Standard Class seats.
Trains use two standard Driver cars and then add a number number of Motored and Trailer cars in between, to get the required train length and capacity.
I would be very surprised, if the formations of the Class 385 train were to be very different.
There appear to be the following Driver cars.
- DMCLw – Driver Motor Composite Lavatory with 20 First Class seats, 15 Standard Class seats, a Universal Access Toilet and Wheelchair Space – Used in four-car trains
- DMSLw – Driver Motor Standard Lavatory with about 50 Standard Class seats, a Universal Access Toilet and Wheelchair Space – Used in three-car trains
- DMSL – Driver Motor Standard Lavatory with 62 Standard Class seats and a space-saving toilet – Used in both three- and four-car trains.
As with the Class 800 trains, I suspect you can create a train of the required length and capacity by adding the appropriate number of trailer cars between the two driver cars.
According to this page on the Hitachi web site, the AT200 trains have an operating speed of up to 125 mph. So perhaps for the greaster power, that might be needed for higher speeds, motored cars can be added as well.
I am puzzled about the length of the current trains.
At the present time, the Glasgow Queen Street to Edinburgh Waverley route can accept seven-car trains, which are formed from a three-car and a four-car working together.
But when platform extensions are complete at Glasgow, eight-car trains will be possible, which will be formed of two-four-car trains.
So why didn’t Abellio ScotRail use a Crossrail-like solution, where seven-car trains were ordered and these were then lengthened by an extra car, after the extension of the platforms?
- The current train formations waste space with two unused drivers cabs in every train.
- Do trains running on the half-hour journey across Scotland need two Universal Access and two space-saving toilets?
By comparison Abellio Greater Anglia‘s ten-car Class 720 trains have one Universal Access and two space-saving toilets for 1,145 seats. The seats/toilet for the three trains are as follows.
- 10-car Class 720 train – 382
- 3-car Class 385 train – 103
- 4-car Class 385 train – 137
ScotRail obviously need both three- and four-car Class 385 trains to replace some of the older trains on other routes.
I do find it strange, that two divisions of Abellio have gone for such different solutions.
Gangways
The pictures show that the train has end gangways.
I intended to walk through between the two trains, but the train was full and I couldn’t get near the door.
If the trains were the correct length for the route, then you have to wonder, if the complication of gangways between trains is worth the extra weight, expense and driver’s visibility problems.
But the gangway does aid staff access between different trains.
But I do wonder, if the ability to add and remove cars that seems to be a feature of Class 385 trains, means that gangways between trains may be an unnecessary feature.
Consider these other train orders.
- Most Aventra orders do not have gangways.
- All Siemens Desiro City orders do not have fixed gangways, although the Class 717 train has a rather ingenious emergency end gangway.
- CAF Civity Class 397 trains and Class 331 trains do not have end gangways.
Gangways seem to be going out of fashion, unless they are needed fpr emergency use.
If some of ScotRail’s services need trains with gangways, these could always be run by the current Class 380 trains.
Conclusions
The Class 385 trains appear to be a well-designed train, that should do an excellent job.
But I do question the need for the gangways between trains.
It should also be born in mind, that Scotland is planning more electrification, which will need more trains.
By perhaps converting pairs of four-car sets into eight-car trains, by replacing two Driver cars with appropriate Trailer or Motored cars, two more complicated Driver cars would be liberated, which could form the basis of the extra trains.
There are probably endless combinations, one of which will give ScotRail, the optimal fleet, that will deliver the required services for the best price.
Thoughts On The Lateness Of Crossrail
This article on the BBC is entitled Crossrail Delay: New London Line Will Open In Autumn 2019.
This is the first paragraph.
London’s £15bn Crossrail project is to open nine months after its scheduled launch to allow more time for testing.
I spent most of my working life, writing software for the planning and costing of large projects and despite never having done any serious project management in anger, I have talked to many who have, both in the UK and around the world.
So what are my thoughts?
Crossrail Is A Highly-Complex Project
The project involves the following.
- A 21 km double-track tunnel under London.
- New Class 345 trains
- Four different signalling systems.
- Rebuilt stations at West Drayton, Hayes & Harlington, Southall, West Ealing, Ealing Broadway. Acton Main Line, Forest Gate, Manor Park, Ilford
- Refurbished stations at Hanwell, Maryland, Seven Kings, Goodmayes, Chadwell Heath, Romford, Gidea Park, Harold Wood, Brentford and Shenfield.
- Major interchanges with existing stations at Paddington, Bond Street, Tottenham Court Road, Farrington, Liverpool Street, Whitechapel and Stratford.
- New stations at Custom House, Canary Wharf, Woolwich and Abbey Wood.
Some parts are easy, but a lot are very difficult.
A Shortage Of Specialist Workers
I believe that certain factors could be reducing the pool of workers available to Crossrail.
Less workers than needed would obviously slow the project.
Having to pay more than budgeted to attract or keep workers will also raise costs.
My thoughts on what is causing a possible shortage of specialist workers follow.
Crossrail-Related Development
If you own a site or a building, near to one of Crossrail’s stations, then your property will substantially increase in value, when the line opens.
Walk past any of the Crossrail stations in Central London and some further out and you will see towers sprouting around the station entrance like crows around a road-kill.
Developers know how to cash-in on the best thing that has happened to them since the Nazis flattened acres of Central London.
New sites are also being created over several Crossrail stations including Moorgate, Farringdon (2 sites), Tottenham Court Road (2 sites), Bond Street (2 sites) and Paddington.
But do all these extensive developments, mean that there are not enough sub-contractors, specialist suppliers, electricians, chippies, air-conditioning engineers, plumbers and other trades to do all the work available in London?
I also suspect a developer, building an office block to the world’s highest standard could pay better and faster, than a Crossrail supplier under pressure.
Underground Working
Working underground or in mining is dangerous.
In the 1960s, women were totally banned from working below the surface.
It must have been around 1970, when I met one of ICI’s archivists; Janet Gornall, who a few years previously had organised storage of their masses of historical documents, in the company’s salt mine at Winsford. The mine is still used for document storage, by a company called Deepstore.
Health & Safety found out that Janet would be supervising and indexing the storage underground, so that if any document was required, they could be easily retrieved. This caused them to give the scheme a big thumbs down.
Questions were even asked in the House of Commons, but nothing would change Health & Safety’s view
In the end a simple solution was found..
- As the boxes came up from London they were piled up in a large building on the surface, in the position Janet wanted them underground.
- The pile of boxes was then moved underground and stacked in exactly the same way.
- Nowadays, anybody can work underground, but they must have training and be certified for such work.
Crossrail thought the number of certified underground workers might not be enough, so they set up the Tunnelling and Underground Construction Academy (TUCA) at Ilford. This article on the Crossrail web site is entitled A Legacy To The Construction Industry.
Some points about TUCA.
- It is now part of Transport for London.
- It was funded by Crossrail and the Skills Funding Agency.
- TUCA is Europe’s only specialist soft-ground tunnelling training facility.
I wrote about TUCA in Open House – TUCA, after a visit in 2012.
I was told on my visit, that the Swiss have a similar facility for rock tunnelling and that there were plans for both academies to work together.
Trainees from all over the world would get training in an exotic Swiss mountain and then go on to enjoy the wonders of Ilford.
But at least they’ll be safe workers for all types of tunnelling.
I do wonder if some of the Crossrail delays has been caused by a lack of properly trained underground workers, as now the tunnelling is completed, many have moved on to the next project.
Thames Tideway Scheme
The Thames Tideway Scheme is a £4billion scheme to build a massive sewer under the Thames to clean up the river.
Many Crossrail engineers, tunnellers and workers are now working on the new scheme.
Brexit
Stuttgart 21 is one of numerous mega-projects in Europe.
Many of the workers on Crossrail were originally from Europe and now with the uncertainties of Brexit, some must be moving nearer home, to work on these large European projects.
Well-Paid Jobs In Sunnier Climes
Don’t underestimate, the effect of the Beast From The East last winter.
Skilled personnel have always gone to places like the Middle East to earn a good crust.
With Crossrail under pressure, how many of these key workers have gone to these places for the money?
Conclusion
I wouldn’t be surprised to find that a shortage of specialist workers is blamed for the delays.
In the BBC article, there is this quote
We are working around the clock with our supply chain and Transport for London to complete and commission the Elizabeth line.
Fairly bland, but does the supply chain include specialist suppliers and workers, which are under severe pressure from other projects to perform various works?
It’s probably true that there is only a finite pool of these companies, tradesmen and workers and at least some of the best will have been lured away.
Station Problems
In this article in the Architects Journal, which is entitled Crossrail Delayed Until Autumn 2019, this is said.
Crossrail then revealed in February that it had overspent its budget for the year to 30 March 2018 by £190 million.
At the time TfL said works at Whitechapel station, designed by BDP, and Farringdon station, designed by AHR, were completed later than expected, and there were delays to work at Weston Williamson’s Woolwich station and John McAslan + Partners’ Bond Street station.
I’ll look at Whitechapel station as an example.
You don’t need to be an expert to figure out that Whitechapel station is running late.
Look at all the blue hoardings.
- I know this only shows what is visible to the public.
- The Crossrail platforms deep underground could be ready.
- The main entrance to the station is still shrouded in plastic.
- The escalators to get down to Crossrail, will be between the two District/Metropolitan Line platforms.
This Google Map shows the area of Whitechapel station.
Note how the site is hemmed in, by important buildings including a Sainsburys supermarket and Swanlea School.
See An Innovative Use Of The School Holidays, for an insight about how the builders of the station coped with the lack of space.
I also feel that Whitechapel is an incredibly complex station to build.
- It is crossed by two important railways; the District/Metropolitan Line and the East London Line.
- Innovative techniques from the coal mining industry had to be used to dig the escalator tunnel.
- Whitechapel will be the station, where passengers change between the two Eastern branches.
I do wonder, whether a different design would have been easier to build.
For instance, could Sainsburys have been paid to shut their superstore and that site used to build the station?
But Crossrail has chosen a design and now they must build it.
The New Class 345 Trains
The new Class 345 trains for Crossrail are an almost totally new design called Aventra by Bombardier, that I believe has been specifically created to make the operation of Crossrail as efficient as possible.
The trains must have something about them, as since launch they have attracted five more substantial orders, from five different operators.
The introduction into service of the Class 345 trains, has been reasonably straightforward, but not without some issues.
But I do question, the launching of Aventra trains solely on a line as complex as Crossrail.
Would it have been easier to have built the Class 710 trains first and thoroughly debugged them on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line.
But then that electrification was late.
Four Types Of Signalling
Crossrail needs trains to have four different types of signalling.
- CBTC – Communications-Based Train Control
- ETCS – European Train Control System
- AWS – Automatic Warning System
- TPWS – Train Protection & Warning System
I know that as Crossrail runs on other lines with these signalling and going to a single system like ETCS would need to the changing of signalling systems on much of the railways in the South-East and the trains that use them.
It appears that there are problems for the trains running into Heathrow and one of the reasons for the Crossrail delayed opening, is to allow more time to test the trains and the signalling.
From my experience of writing complex software systems, where my software needed to interface with two operating systems, I know that you can never put too much time into testing complex systems.
So where is the dedicated test track, where trains can simulate the signalling of Crossrail routes, day in and day out?
I believe that not enough time and money was allocated to test this complex system.
Crossrail has found out the hard way.
Europe Has A Lack Of Train Test Tracks
A lot of European nations are ordering new trains and the UK is probably ordering more than most.
Reading the railway stories on the Internet, there are lots of stories about trains being brought into service late. And not just in the UK, but in Germany and Italy for example.
Crossrail identified that there was a need for a training academy for underground workers.
Did anybody do the calculations to make sure, there was enough test tracks for all the trains being built in Europe?
However, it does look as though Wales is coming to rescue Europe’s train makers, as I describe in £100m Rail Test Complex Plans For Neath Valley.
I suspect Crossrail wish this test complex had been completed a couple of years ago.
A Shortage Of Resources
For successful completion of projects on time and on budget, there must be enough resources.
I believe that, when the lateness and overspend on Crossrail is analysed, shortage of resources will be blamed.
- Shortage of people and suppliers, that has not been helped by other projects taking advantage of new opportunities offered by Crossrail.
- Shortage of space for work-sites at stations.
- Shortage of places to fully test trains and signalling.
I suspect that the last will be the most serious.
Hugo Rifkind On A Late Crossrail
In an excellent article in today’s copy of The Times entitled Leavers Have A Cheek Trying To Block HS2, Hugo Rifkind says this about Crossrail.
You think we’ll remember, 50 years from now. that Crossrail took six months longer than expected?
Rubbish. London will rest on it like a spine and boggle that we ever managed without.
I think Rifkind is right.
Will Hutton
Will Hutton has written this article in the Guardian, which is entitled Don’t Moan About Crossrail. Once Complete, It Will Be A Rare Triumph In Our Public Realm.
He says this.
Let’s sing a different tune. The railway line, more than 60 miles long, linking Reading and Heathrow in the west to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east – adding 10% to London’s commuter rail capacity – and set to carry around 200 million passengers a year, will be a fantastic achievement. Its 13-mile-long tunnels run more than 100ft under the capital’s streets, navigating everything from underground sewers to the deep foundations of skyscrapers with superb engineering aplomb. The longstanding reproach is that Britain can’t do grand projects. Crossrail, now christened the Elizabeth line, is proof that we can.
He then goes on to criticise the structure of the construction project, the salaries paid and the current Government.
But I suspect that in a few yeas time, Hutton, Rifkind and myself could have a quiet pint and say Crossrail got it right.
Current Developments That Will Help Bridge The Delay
It’s not as if, no new transport developments won’t happen in the time before Crossrail eventually opens in Autumn 2019.
Trains Providing More Capacity
These trains will be providing extra capacity.
- New Class 717 trains will be running on the services to and from Moorgate station.
- New Class 710 trains will be running on the Gospel Oak to Barking Line.
- New Class 710 trains will be running on the Lea Valley Lines to Cheshunt, Chingford and Enfield Town stations.
- New Class 710 trains will be running on the Watford DC Line.
- Cascaded Class 378 trains and new Class 710 trains will be running extra services on the original circular service of the London Overground.
- More Class 345 trains will be providing all of Crossrail’s services to Heathrow and Shenfield.
- New Class 720 trains or something similar or older, will be providing four trains per hour (tph) between Stratford and Meridian Water stations.
Note that before the end of 2019, nearly a hundred new trains will be delivered.
New And Rebuilt Stations
There will be some new or rebuilt stations.
- Acton Main Line
- Forest Gate
- Gidea Park
- Hayes & Harlington
- Manor Park
- Maryland
- Meridian Water
- Northumberland Park
- Tottenham Hale
- West Drayton
- West Ealing
- West Hampstead
This list may contain other stations.
Underground Improvements
There will also be Underground improvements.
- The Central Line Improvements Programme will increase capacity and reliability on the Central Line.
- The Metropolitan Line is being upgraded with new signalling.
- Up to ten Underground stations may be made step-free before the end of 2019.
The improvements to the Central and Metropolitan Lines, through Central London will compensate for the delaying of Crossrail’s core tunnel.
A Few Questions
I have to ask questions.
Will The High Meads Loop Be Used?
This would provide an excellent interchange between the following services.
- Local services to Hertford East and Bishops Stortford stations, including the new STAR service, along the West Anglia Main Line.
- Stansted Express and Cambridge services to and from Stratford.
- Fast Greater Anglia services to Chelmsford, Colchester, Southend and further, along the Great Eastern Main Line.
- Crossrail services between Liverpool Street and Shenfield.
- Central Line services.
There is also only a short, but tortuous walk to the Jubilee Line for London Bridge and Waterloo stations and Central London.
Based on the experience of the Wirral Loop under Liverpool, which handles sixteen tph, I believe that the High Meads Loop could handle a substantial number of trains, that instead of using the crowded lines to Liverpool Street station, would use the new uncrowded route from Tottenham Hale to Stratford via Lea Bridge station.
Moving services to Stratford from Liverpool Street would also free up platforms at the major terminus, which could be used to provide extra services on the Great Eastern Main Line.
The extra capacity might also enable the lengthening of the Crossrail platforms at Liverpool Street to be extended, so they could take full-length Class 345 trains.
No new extra infrastructure would be required at Stratford, although in future, a platform to connect the loop to Stratford International station would be nice.
I will be very surprised if the High Meads Loop is not used creatively in the future.
Will Some New Pedestrian Tunnels At Stations Like Liverpool Street And Paddington Be Opened?
I use Moorgate and Liverpool Street stations regularly.
There are blue walls everywhere, behind which the Crossrail infrastructure is hiding.
I do hope Crossrail and Transport for London are looking at the possibilities of using completed infrastructure to create new walking routes in stations to ease congestion.
Conclusion
Crossrail was designed to be opened in four phases over two years.
I am drawn to the position, that because of various resource shortages and the testing of trains, perhaps the project could have been arranged as perhaps a series of smaller projects delivered over a longer period of time.
A Walk Through London’s First Pedestrian And Cycle Zone
I took these pictures as I walked through London’s first Pedestrian and Cycle Zone, wher only electric vehicles and some hybrids are allowed.
I like the idea, although quite a few diesel and petrol cars and vans seem to have been ignoring the signs.
I was even interviewed by television. But it was Sistema Brasileiro de Televisão, so I doubt I’ll find it on the iPlayer.
Will subtitles make me look better?
An MG Y-Type
On Bank Holiday Monday, in my travels along the Crouch Valley Line, I ended up at Quay Day at Burnham-on-Crouch.
I took these pictures of an MG Y-Type.
It is an example of the earliest car owned by my father that I can remember
I can still remember the number, which was BNH 368.
Incidentally, my father had owned several MGs, both before and after the Second World War. The last two MGs were both ZA Magnettes; TNK 663 and 676 RME.
RSC Urges GWR To Provide Stratford Improvements
The title of this post is the same as that of an article in Issue 860 of Rail Magazine.
This is the first paragraph.
The Royal Shakespeare Company and the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust have written a joint letter to Great Western Railway Managing Director Mark Hopwood, urging him to improve services between London and Stratford-upon-Avon should GWR retain the Great Western franchise.
Stratford-upon-Avon station may have step-free access, but the services are not of a level for such an important tourist destination.
- 2 trains per hour (tph) to Birmingham Snow Hill and Stourbridge Junction.
- 1 train every two hours to Leamington Spa with some continuing to London Marylebone.
It really isn’t enough trains.
Coventry And Stratford-upon-Avon
In 2021 Coventry will be the UK City Of Culture, so surely there should be a direct rail link between one of the most important cities of the West Midlands and one of its biggest cultural attractions.
But no there isn’t a direct link, despite the rail lines being in place.
You have to change at Leamington Spa. But the journey only takes a reasonable 70 minutes.
I have read somewhere, that West Midlands Trains are going to link up these two services.
- Nuneaton and Coventry
- Coventry and Leamington Spa
This would create a single service between Nuneaton and Leamington Spa stations..
Could this service be extended to Stratford-upon-Avon?
- They are acquiring eight Class 172 trains from London Overground, to run services in Warwickshire.
- All the tracks are in place.
- The service would connect the West Coast Main Line and the Chiltern Main Line to Stratford-upon-Avon.
How long would it take?
These are current average times for the three legs
- Nuneaton to Coventry – 22 minutes
- Coventry to Leamington Spa – 12 minutes
- Leamington Spa to Stratford – 35 minutes
This totals to 69 minutes.
- There are thirteen stations stops, one of which is a reverse at Leamington Spa station.
- There will be a need to add a few minutes for turnround at Nuneaton and Stratford-upon-Avon stations.
- The Class 172 trains are 100 mph trains, whereas the current Class 153 trains are only 75 mph trains.
- Much of the track has an operating speed of 100 mph.
If a round trip can be done in under three hours, the following number of trains would be needed.
- One tph would need three trains.
- Two tph would need six trains.
The number of trains are actually the same that would be needed, if the routes were run as three separate sections. But by joining them together passengers don’t need to change trains.
With the faster trains, I do wonder if a round trip of two hours is possible, which would mean that just four trains would be needed for a two tph service.
Hopefully, a better service will be in place before Coventry is UK City of Culture.
An Improved Chiltern Service
Chiltern Railways don’t have the capacity on the Chiltern Main Line to run more direct services to Stratford, but I feel they could improve the current service.
If you are going to Stratford from Marylebone, most of Chiltern’s Birmingham services offer a one-change route to Stratford. But it is not always the same interchange station and I have found routes with changes at Birmingham Moor Street, Dorridge and Leamington Spa.
The Chiltern service to Stratford could be improved by just ensuring that to go between Marylebone and Stratford, you always changed at the same station and waited just a few minutes.
This map from Wikipedia, shows the rail connections around Leamington Spa.
Note the lines to Stratford and Coventry.
The direct service to Stratford is one train every two hours, whereas the service to Coventry is two trains per hour running fifteen minutes apart.
As I said earlier, perhaps what is needed is a unified Nuneaton to Stratford service, which ideally should do the following.
- Run every thirty minutes.
- Be timed to connect with Chiltern’s London trains at Leamington Spa.
- Run a bit quicker than the current Class 153 trains.
The problem would be that a Chiltern service would be replaced with one run by West Midlands Trains.
Avon Rail Link
Under Possible Future Development in the Wikipedia entry for Stratford-upon-Avon station, this is said.
The Shakespeare Line Promotion Group is promoting a scheme to reopen the 9 miles (14 km) of line south of Stratford to Honeybourne where it would link to the Cotswold Line. Called the “Avon Rail Link”, the scheme (supported as a freight diversionary route by DB Schenker) would make Stratford-upon-Avon station a through station once again with improved connections to the South, and would open up the possibility of direct services to Oxford and Worcester via Evesham. The scheme faces local opposition. There is, however, a good business case for Stratford-Cotswolds link.
This is the scheme, that has prompted, the letter from the RSC and SBT to GWR.
The link would connect Stratford to Oxford, Reading and Paddington.
I suspect that you could argue that it would create a useful railway in an arc connecting the Thames Valley to the West Midlands.
A lot of things said about the East West Rail Link, would probably apply to this railway.
Honeybourne station on the Cotswold Line between Worcester and Oxford, would be the Southern end of the Avon Rail Link, where a connection to the privately-owned herotage raily; the Gloucestershire Warwickshire Railway, has been allowed for by Network Rail.
This section entitled North From Honeybourne on the Wikipedia entry for the Gloucestershire Warwickshire Railway, says this about building the extension.
The section between Stratford and Stratford Racecourse has been utilised to improve road access around the town, especially the A4390, making reinstatement of rail to the main station at Stratford extremely difficult.
Given the local opposition, it looks like it will be a struggle to get this line built.
Conclusion
There are three ways to improve rail access to Stratford-upon-Avon.
- The relatively easy and quick, enhancement of the rail services in Warwickshire.
- Provide better one-change routes using Chiltern Railways.
- The more difficult re-connection of Stratford to the Cotswold Line at Honeybourne.
As the last project will take years to implement, I feel, it is important that services to Stratford from Birmingham, Coventry, Leamington Spa and the West Midlands are substantially increased.
I also believe that the responsibility of providing a local service between Leamigton Spa and Stratford should be given to West Midlands Trains.
What Are Greater Anglia Going To Do With A Problem Like The Crouch Valley Line?
This post is effectively a series of sub-posts describing the problems of the Crouch Valley Line.
Platform 1 At Wickford Station
These pictures show Platform 1 at Wickford station, where services on the Crouch Valley Line terminate.
The train in the platform is a four-car Class 321 train, which is almost exactly eighty metres long.
After Greater Anglia has renewed the fleet, the shortest electric train they will have will be a five-car Class 720 train, which is over one hundred and twenty metres long.
I don’t think one of these shiny new trains will fit into the current platform.
Electrification
These pictures show the electrification at Burnham-on-Crouch station.
And these show Southminster station.
The overhead electrification on the Shenfield to Southend Line is being renewed and this section is supposedly finished. But it does look very similar to pictures I took in 2016, that are posted in Wickford Station. As the 25 KVAC overhead electrification was installed in 1979, when the line was converted from 6.25 KVAC, I do wonder about the age of some of the gantries.
On the trip, where I took these pictures staff were still complaining about the unreliability of the wires, as they have done before.
There doesn’t appear to have been any work done on the Crouch Valley Line, although the conductor did say that the route was being closed at times for work in the near future.
I do question, whether the overhead wires on the Crouch Valley Line are of a sufficient high and modern standard to be both reliable and easy and affordable to maintain.
Can the electrification handle regenerative braking?
The Timetable
The timetable East of Shenfield is as follows.
- Three trains per hour (tph) between Liverpool Street and Southend Victoria stations.
- A train every forty minutes between Wickford and Southminster stations.
- There are also some direct services between Southminster and Liverpool Street in the Peak.
Every time, I go use the line it seems, I always have a long wait at Wickford station.
Current services take thirty minutes between the two end stations with generous turnround times of about ten minutes at each end of the route.
Two trains are needed for the service, which are single-manned with a conductor checking and selling tickets appearing to float between the trains.
A New Nuclear Power Station At Bradwell
There is a possibility of building.of a new nuclear power station at Bradwell.
This Google Map shows the area.
Note.
- Burnham-on-Crouch is the large village on the North Bank of the River Crouch.
- Southminster is a couple of miles to the North of Burnham on Crouch.
- Bradwell is in the North-East corner of the map alongside the River Blackwater.
- You can just see the World War 2 airfield, which was the site of the original Bradwell nuclear power station.
If a new power station is built at Bradwell, I doubt that it will require rail freight access at Southminster, as did the original station.
Transport technology has moved on and heavy goods will surely be taken in and out by barge from the River Blackwater.
But a new station or more likely ; a cluster of small modular reactors will require transport for staff, contractors and visitors.
Although, on balance, with the growth of renewable energy, I don’t think that many more nuclear power stations will be built.
A Battery Storage Power Station At Bradwell
I also wouldn’t rule out the use of Bradwell for a battery storage power station for the electricity generated by wind farms like Gunfleet in the Northern section of the Thames Estuary.
The number and size of these wind farms will certainly increase in the coming years.
Battery storage power stations are ideal partners for wind farms, as they help turn the intermittent wind power into a constant flow of electricity.
Currently, the largest battery storage power station is a 300 MWh facility that was built in 2016, at Buzen in Japan.
Energy storage technology is moving on fast and I would not be surprised to see 2000 MWh units by the mid-2020s.
Bradwell could be an ideal place to put a battery storage power station.
Passenger Numbers
Passenger numbers on the line over the last few years seem to have been fairly level although there appears to have been a drop in the last year or so. But this drop has happened in lots of places!
Various factors will effect the passenger numbers on the Crouch Valley Line in the future.
- New housing along the route.
- A large energy-based development at Bradwell will atract passengers.
- New trains will attract passengers.
- Will the Internet and new working practices affect passenger numbers?
- A two tph clock-face service will attract passengers.
- Faster and more frequent services between Liverpool Street and Wickford will make the line easier to access.
There is also the possibility of more visitors and tourists to the area. The RSPB have spent a lot of money developing Wallasea Wetlands, which is opposite Burnham-on-Crouch.
In future years, how many people will reach Wallasea, by ferry from Burnham-on-Crouch?
Adding up all these factors, I come to two conclusions.
Predicting the number of passengers will be difficult..
There will always be passengers who need this rail service.
It looks to me that Greater Anglia will have to plan for all eventualities from very low numbers of passengers to a substantial increase.
New Trains
Shenfield-Southend services and those on the Crouch Valley Line will be run using new Class 720 trains.
Bettween Liverpool Street And Southend Victoria
Currently, this service on the route is as follows.
Trains have a frequency of three tph.
- Each train takes an hour for the journey.
- All trains stop at the seven stations between Shenfield and Southend Victotria, Shenfield and Stratford.
- One train in three has an extra stop at Romford.
The new trains have a faster acceleration of 1 metre per second², as opposed to the current trains which can only manage 0.55 metre per second².
This property and their modern design, probably means that the new trains, can do a complete round trip between Liverpool Street and Southend Victoria stations in under two hours.
- The journey time between the two stations will be around fifty minutes.
- A three tph frequency will need a fleet of six trains.
- A four tph frequency will need a fleet of eight trains.
This service will be faster than the fastest services between Fenchurch Street and Southend Central stations.
I can certainly see a time, when the frequency between Liverpool Street and Southend Victoria stations is increased to four tph.
Passenger numbers are rising strongly at Southend Victoria station.
Southend Airport have big expansion plans and would welcome a better rail service, to and from their very convenient station.
At present times to their London termini from various airports are as follows.
- Gatwick Airport – 31 minutes (Express)
- Luton Airport – 28 minutes
- Southend Airport – 53 minutes
- Stansted Airport – 46 minutes
I think that Southend Airport times with the new trains could be about 43 minutes or less, which because of the closeness of the station to the terminal building could allow Southend Airport to claim faster times to Liverpool Street than Stansted Airport.
If the service does go to four tph, there will be a massive increase in capacity.
There will be 1145 seats in the new trains, as opposed to 927 in the current Class 321 trains.
With four tph. this would mean an increase in capacity of 40%.
I don’t think anybody in Southend will be complaining.
Between Wickford And Southminster
As I said earlier, the new longer Class 720 trains will have difficulty running the current service, as they don’t fit into Platform 1 at Wickford station.
Working the same timetable the new trains with their 544 seats will offer a 76% increase in train capacity.
Trains take thirty minutes with five intermediate stations.
Given the better acceleration and modern nature of the new trains, I wonder, if they will be able to do a round trip in an hour.
If they can do this, then it would be possible to run a two tph service on the route.
But it will be a tough ask!
That still leaves the problem of turning back the trains at Wickford.
Currently, trains between Liverpool Street and Southend Victoria going in opposite directions, pass at Wickford station.
If this could be arranged with four tph, then there would be up to fifteen minute windows, where no train was passing through Wickford station.
Suppose the Liverpool Street and Southend services passes through at XX:00, XX:15. XX:30 and XX:45.
Would it be possible for the Southminster trains to leave Wickford at XX:10 and XX:40 and arrive back at XX:05 and XX:35, thus giving five minutes for the driver to get to the other end.
As I said, it would be a tough ask!
But I suspect there is a plan to get two tph between Wickford and Southminster.
- The track could be improved.
- Some level crossings could be closed.
- Operating speed could be faster.
- Better step-free access could probably be arranged at the intermediate stations.
- A step-free bridge could be built at Wickford.
If two tph can be achieved, then this would increase capacity on the route by 134 %.
The Passing Loop At North Fambridge Station
This Google Map shows the station and passing loop at North Fambridge station.
Measuring from the map, I estimate the following.
- The length of the platforms are 160 metres.
- The length of the passing loop is in around 400 metres.
I also suspect that to save money was the line was singled in the 1960s, British Rail made the passing loop as short as possible to cut costs.
The current loop can handle eight-car Class 321 trains, so it can certainly handle a five-car Class 720 trains.
I do wonder if the passing loop were to be lengthened, this would ease operation on the line.
There might even be a length, that enable a two tph service with the current four-car Class 321 trains.
Thoughts On Speed Limits
The speed limit on the line is 60 mph between Battlesbridge and North Fambridge stations and 50 mph at both ends of the line.
Summarising sections of the line, their length and speed limits give.
- Wickford and Battlesbridge – 2 miles 38 chains = 4356 yards = 3983 metres – 50 mph
- Battlesbridge and North Fambridge – – 5 miles 67 chains = 10274 yards = 9395 metres – 60 mph
- North Fambridge and Southminster – 8 miles 15 chains = 14410 yards = 13177 metres – 50 mph
This gives totals of 17160 metres with a 50 mph limit and 9395 metres with a 60 mph limit.
- At 50 mph, the train would cover the 17160 metres in 12.8 minutes
- At 60 mph, the train would cover the 17160 metres in 10.7 minutes
- At 75 mph, the train would cover the 17160 metres in 8.5 minutes
Increasing the speed limit to 60 mph would save two minutes.
Network Rail must have all the figures and costs, but this could be a cost-effective way to save a couple of minutes.
But it does seem if the operating speed of the line were to be increased, time saving could be achieved, that would make a two tph timetable a reality.,
Could Electrification Be Removed From The Crouch Valley Line?
If the track is going to be improved with respect to line speed, level crossings and passing loops, then there will have to be changes to the layout of the overhead electrification.
Most of the serious changes that could be carried out, would be to the East of North Fambridge station.
Would it be sensible if the Class 720 trains have a battery capability, to remove the electrification to the East of North Fambridge station?
- 13.2 km. of single-track would have the electrification removed.
- Some of this electrification will need replacing soon.
- Trains could swap between power sources in North Fambridge station.
- The batteries would be charged between Wickford and North Fambridge stations.
- Only 16 miles in each round trip would be on batteries.
Removing some electrification would cut the cost of any works.
Conclusion
I’m sure Greater Anglia have a solution and it’s probably better than my rambling.
Bombardier’s 125 Mph Electric Train With Batteries
In Bombardier Bi-Mode Aventra To Feature Battery Power, I said this.
The title of this post is the same as this article in Rail Magazine.
A few points from the article.
- Development has already started.
- Battery power could be used for Last-Mile applications.
- The bi-mode would have a maximum speed of 125 mph under both electric and diesel power.
- The trains will be built at Derby.
- Bombardier’s spokesman said that the ambience will be better, than other bi-modes.
- Export of trains is a possibility.
Bombardier’s spokesman also said, that they have offered the train to three new franchises. East Midlands, West Coast Partnership and CrossCountry.
It has struck me, that for some applications, that the diesel engines are superfluous.
In the July 2018 Edition of Modern Railways, in an article entitled Bi-Mode Aventra Details Revealed.
In a report of an interview with Bombardier’s Des McKeon, this is said.
Conversion to pure electric operation is also a key design feature, with the ability to remove the diesel engines and fuel tanks at a later date.
So why not swap the diesel engines and add an equal weight of extra batteries?
Batteries would have the following uses.
Handling Energy Generated By Regenerative Braking
Batteries would certainly be handling the regenerative braking.
This would give efficiency savings in the use of electricity.
The total battery power of the train, would have to be large enough to handle all the electricity generated by the regenerative braking.
In the Mathematics Of A Bi-Mode Aventra With Batteries, I calculated the kinetic energy of the train.
I’ll repeat the calculation and assume the following for a pure electric train.
- The train is five cars, with say four motored cars.
- The empty train weighs close to 180 tonnes.
- There are 430 passengers, with an average weight of 90 Kg each, with baggage, bikes and buggies.
- This gives a total train weight of 218.7 tonnes.
- The train is travelling at 200 kph or 125 mph.
These figures mean that the kinetic energy of the train is 94.8 kWh. This was calculated using Omni’s Kinetic Energy Calculator.
My preferred battery arrangement would be to put a battery in each motored car of the train, to reduce electrical loses and distribute the weight. Let’s assume four of the five cars have a New Routemaster-sized battery of 55 kWh.
So the total onboard storage of the train could easily be around 200 kWh, which should be more than enough to accommodate the energy generated , when braking from full speed..
Traction And Hotel Power
Battery power would also be available to move the train and provide hotel power, when there is no electrification.
In an article in the October 2017 Edition of Modern Railways, which is entitled Celling England By The Pound, Ian Walmsley says this in relation to trains running on the Uckfield Branch, which is not very challenging.
A modern EMU needs between 3 and 5 kWh per vehicle mile for this sort of service.
As the Aventra is probably one of the most modern of electric multiple units, I suspect that an Aventra will be at the lower end of this range.
An Intelligent Computer
The train’s well-programmed computer would do the following.
- Choose whether to use electrification or battery power to power the train.
- Decide when the battery could be charged, when electrification power was being used.
- Arrange, that when a train stopped at a station without electrification, the batteries were as full as possible.
- Manage power load, by shutting off or switching equipment to a low energy mode, when the train was running on batteries.
- Raise and lower the pantograph as required.
The computer could take account of factors such as.
- Passenger load and total weight.
- Route and train’s position.
- Weather.
- Future signals.
The computer would only be doing a similar job that is done by those in the flight control systems of aircraft.
Although, trains run in less dimensions and don’t need to be steered.
How Far Would This Train Go On Batteries?
This is question of the same nature as how long is a piece of string?
It depends on the following.
- The severity of the route.
- The size of the batteries.
- The load on the train.
- The number of stops.
- Any delays from slow-moving trains.
- The timetable to be used.
I would expect that train manufacturers and operating companies will have a sophisticated mathematical model of the train and the route, that can be run through various scenarios.
With modern computers you could do a Monte-Carlo simulation, trying out millions of combinations, which would give a very accurate value for the battery size to have a near hundred percent chance of being able to run the route to the timetable.
After all if you ran out of power with a battery train, you stop and the train has to be rescued.
Suppose you were going to run your 125 mph Electric Train With Batteries from Kings Cross to Middlesbrough.
- You would need a battery range of about fifty miles, to go between Northallerton and Middlesbrough stations and come back.
- You would also need to have enough power to provide hotel power in Middlesbrough station, whilst the train was turning back.
Certain things could be arranged so that the service runs smoothly.
- The train must leave the East Coast Main Line with a fully-charged battery.
- The train must leave the East Coast Main Line as fast as possible.
- The train should have a minimum dwell time at all the intermediate stops.
- The train could be driven very precisely to minimise energy use.
Some form of charging system could also be provided at Middlesbrough. Although it could be difficult as there are only two platforms and trains seem to turn round in a very short time of six minutes
Electrification could also be extended for two hundred metres or so, at Northallerton junction to ensure points 1 and 2 were met.
Effectively, trains would be catapulted at maximum energy towards Middlesbrough.
Points 3 and 4 require good signalling, a good Driver Advisory System and above all good driving and operation.
What Other Routes Could Use 125 mph Electric Trains With Batteries?
Use your imagination!








































































































