The Anonymous Widower

I Hope The American Army Doesn’t Navigate Using Google Maps

There is an article in The Times today, which is entitled As The World Watches Kharg Island, Iran Gets Oil Out Another Way.

This is the sub-heading.

Satellite imagery reveals millions of barrels have been shipped from the ‘forgotten’ port of Jask — used only once before

The only Jask, that Google Maps can find is a marketing agency in Solihull. At least Jask,Iran finds it.

Looks a bit deserty to me!

I just had to ask Google AI if the US Army has a Camel Corps and I received this answer.

Yes, the U.S. Army operated a “Camel Corps” experiment between 1856 and 1866, using camels for logistics and supply transport in the Southwest, particularly Texas and California. While considered hardy and effective, the corps was never an official unit and was abandoned due to the Civil War, soldier preference for mules, and lack of long-term support.

Key Facts about the U.S. Army Camel Experiment:

Origin: Proposed by Jefferson Davis (then Secretary of War) and approved by Congress with a $30,000 budget.

Acquisition: Around 70 camels were imported from the Mediterranean (Egypt, Turkey, Tunisia) in two shipments.

Operation: The camels were based primarily at Camp Verde, Texas, transporting cargo across desert terrains.

Key Leaders: Major Henry C. Wayne directed the experiment, and Lt. Edward F. Beale praised the camels’ endurance in reports.

End of Project: The program was abandoned during the Civil War. Confederate forces captured some camels, and the remaining herd was sold at auction in 1864-1866.

While the camels themselves were durable, they were often disliked by soldiers due to their difficult temperament compared to mules. Some camels were sold to miners or escaped, leading to reports of wild camels in the Southwest for decades following the experiment.

April 4, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, News, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can Low Atmospheric Pressure Suck Water Out Of Your Skin?

I asked Google AI, the title of this post and received this answer.

Yes, low atmospheric pressure can cause water to be removed from your skin, primarily by facilitating rapid evaporation and disrupting the body’s ability to hold moisture in its tissues.

While it does not “suck” water out with mechanical force like a vacuum cleaner in normal environments, low pressure triggers several physical processes that dehydrate the skin.

How Low Pressure Removes Skin Moisture

Increased Evaporation (Transepidermal Water Loss): Low pressure reduces the barrier function of the skin, leading to higher levels of transepidermal water loss (TEWL)—the process of water passing from inside the body through the epidermis and evaporating into the atmosphere.

Low Humidity Factor: Low pressure environments (like high altitude or airplane cabins) are often accompanied by low humidity, which works in tandem with the low pressure to draw moisture out of the upper layers of the skin, leading to dryness, tightness, and flakiness.

“Boiling” Moisture (Extreme Scenarios): In extreme low-pressure scenarios approaching a vacuum (such as high-altitude exposure, nearly 70,000 feet), the pressure becomes so low that the moisture in the skin, mouth, and eyes can actually vaporize (boil) at normal body temperature.

Scenarios Where This Occurs

Airplane Cabins: The air pressure inside an airplane is lower than sea level, and combined with low humidity, this causes significant dehydration of the skin and mucous membranes.

High Altitudes: Mountaineers often experience extremely dry, cracked, and damaged skin due to the low pressure and low humidity at high altitudes.

Vacuum Chambers: In experimental settings, placing an arm in a vacuum chamber results in moisture evaporation and the sensation of the skin being “sucked,” causing immediate surface drying and potential skin damage.

Visible Effects
Dryness and Flakiness: The skin becomes dry and rough.

Tightness and Itching: Decreased elasticity leads to a feeling of tightness.

Reduced Elasticity: In severe cases, the skin loses its ability to “bounce back” quickly, a sign of dehydration.

In addition to dry air, low pressure often causes swelling or puffiness because fluids shift out of cells and into the spaces between them, which, combined with the dryness, can make the skin feel irritated.

I certainly felt like that last night, as the UK waited for Storm Dave to arrive.

April 4, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Health | , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ocasio-Cortez, Markey Ask Trump Admin To Explain Paying TotalEnergies USD 1 Billion ‘In Taxpayer Money’ To Drop Offshore Wind Projects

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

US lawmakers Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Ed Markey have sent a letter to Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum on the plan by the Trump administration to pay nearly USD 1 billion to TotalEnergies to cancel offshore wind projects off the US East Coast, calling on the administration to stop the payment and explain the legal basis and funding source for the proposed transfer.

These four paragraphs add detail to the story.

As reported recently, the US government’s agreement with TotalEnergies concerns the company’s exit from offshore wind development in the country by relinquishing leases for projects off New York/New Jersey and North Carolina, for which the administration intends to pay approximately USD 928 million.

The agreement also stipulates that TotalEnergies would redirect that money to oil & gas projects in the US. The company, in a press release issued after signing the agreement with the government, indicated that it would invest proceeds from the payment into a liquefied natural gas export facility in Texas and other oil and gas activities in the US that will support both domestic supply and the demand in Europe.

As reported recently, the US government’s agreement with TotalEnergies concerns the company’s exit from offshore wind development in the country by relinquishing leases for projects off New York/New Jersey and North Carolina, for which the administration intends to pay approximately USD 928 million.

The agreement also stipulates that TotalEnergies would redirect that money to oil & gas projects in the US. The company, in a press release issued after signing the agreement with the government, indicated that it would invest proceeds from the payment into a liquefied natural gas export facility in Texas and other oil and gas activities in the US that will support both domestic supply and the demand in Europe.

Trump may have got what he wanted and stopped development of wind farms, but at what cost to US taxpayers?

Out of curiosity, I asked Google AI, “Which LNG Terminal In Texas Have TotalEnergies Agreed To Develop”, And Received This Answer.

TotalEnergies has agreed to develop and invest in the Rio Grande LNG (RGLNG) project located in South Texas.

Key details regarding TotalEnergies’ involvement include:

Partnership: In June 2023, TotalEnergies signed a framework agreement with NextDecade Corporation to participate in the development of the Rio Grande LNG project.

Ownership and Phase 1: TotalEnergies holds a 16.67% stake in the first phase of the project, which includes three liquefaction trains with an annual capacity of 17.5 million tons per annum (Mtpa).

Offtake Agreement: TotalEnergies has agreed to purchase 5.4 million tons per annum (Mtpa) of LNG from Phase 1 for 20 years.

Expansion (Train 4): As of September 2025, TotalEnergies has reached a Final Investment Decision (FID) for a 10% stake in the joint venture developing Train 4 of the Rio Grande LNG facility.

NextDecade Stake: TotalEnergies also acquired a 17.5% stake in NextDecade Corporation, the developer of the project.

The Rio Grande LNG project is located in Brownsville, Texas, and is expected to contribute to TotalEnergies’ goal of expanding its U.S. LNG export capacity to 15 million tons annually by 2030.

I shall be watching this project. Especially, as several new techniques have come forward in the last few months.

 

 

 

April 3, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Energy, Finance & Investment | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Easter Disruption For Europe’s Busiest Train Line

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Thousands of Easter train journeys will be disrupted by a six-day shutdown on the West Coast Main Line (WCML).

These two paragraphs add more details.

Engineering work means no intercity services will run between London Euston and Milton Keynes from Good Friday to Wednesday, 8 April, Network Rail said.

The Easter work is part of a £400m project to boost reliability, which WCML said was Europe’s busiest railway line used for passenger and freight trains.

This graphic from London Northwestern Railway, shows the Rail Replacement Bus routes around the blockade.

Note.

  1. There are no trains South of Milton Keynes Central
  2. There is a Rail Replacement Bus between Milton Keynes Central and Bedford.
  3. There is a Rail Replacement Bus between Milton Keynes Central and Watford Junction

This OpenRailwayMap , shows the Marston Vale Line between Milton Keynes Central and Bedford.

Note.

  1. The two Bedford stations ; Bedford and Bedford St. Johns are in the North East corner of the map.
  2. Milton Keynes Central station is on the Western edge of the map.
  3. The Marston Vale Line, which is shown in yellow, links Milton Keynes Central and the two Bedford stations.
  4. The track shown in red, going through Milton Keynes Central is the West Coast Main Line.
  5. The track shown in orange, going North South through Bedford is the Midland Main Line.
  6. The Midland Main Line appears to be running normally between Bedford and St. Pancras. This is according to Real Time Trains.
  7. The Marston Vale Line should be running new Class 196 trains, but it is not due to a door opening dispute with the trains.
  8. The Marston Vale Line appears to be running normally between Milton Keynes Central and Bedford. This is according to Real Time Trains.

This OpenRailwayMap shows Bletchley station and the flyover on the East side of the station.

Note.

  1. The West Coast Main Line is on the West side of the map.
  2. Bletchley station is indicated by the blue arrow at the bottom of the map.
  3. To the East of the station is Bletchley flyover, which is labelled “Summit of Bletchley Flyover.
  4. The flyover splits with one branch going North to Milton Keynes and the other East to Bedford.

It does appear, that no train can go between Milton Keynes Central and Bedford stations, without a reverse at Bletchley station.

But you can go between Milton Keynes Central and Oxford stations, without a reverse at Bletchley station, as you stop on the flyover.

To check, I read the tracks right, I asked Google AI, “Can Trains Go Between Bedford And Milton Keynes Central Without A Reverse At Bletchley and received this answer.

Currently, no. Trains running between Bedford and Milton Keynes Central cannot bypass a reversal (reversing direction) at Bletchley because the Marston Vale line terminates at Bletchley station. Trains must enter Bletchley and then change direction to join the West Coast Main Line to reach Milton Keynes Central.

Key Details:

Current Routing: The Marston Vale line connects Bedford and Bletchley. Services from Bletchley to Milton Keynes Central operate as a separate connection.

The Reversal: Passengers currently must change trains or experience a driver change/reversal at Bletchley to continue.

Future Changes: The East West Rail project aims to improve these connections, but as of early 2026, the direct link remains through Bletchley.

Conclusion

Does this explain, why there is a Rail Replacement Bus rather than a shuttle train between  Bedford And Milton Keynes Central stations?

 

April 3, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Has Donald Trump Made Any Reasoned Comments About Lord Sugar?

This was an obvious question to ask Google AI and I received this answer.

Donald Trump has not made any significantly “reasoned” or analytical comments regarding Lord Alan Sugar. Instead, his public comments have been focused on a 2012 Twitter spat and personal attacks aimed at undermining Sugar’s business reputation.

Twitter Spats (2012): The feud escalated when Trump used Twitter to criticize Sugar’s support for wind turbines in Scotland. Trump attacked Sugar’s business acumen, stating, “If you think ugly windmills are good for Scotland you are an even worse businessman than I thought and, in my opinion, should not be doing The Apprentice”.

“Small Timer” Accusations: Trump has accused Sugar of being “not successful enough” to host The Apprentice and claimed that the show’s success in the UK was solely due to his own American format.

Personal Claims: Trump asserted that he “approved” Sugar for the British version of the show and instructed him to “drop to your knees and thank me”.

Earlier Admiration (2010): Before the feud, Trump reportedly made a positive comment to the BBC in 2010, expressing admiration for his counterpart and stating Sugar had “done great” on the show.

Lord Sugar has responded by calling Trump “useless,” “not in his class,” and a “blatant liar”.

April 1, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Business, World | , , , , | Leave a comment

Has Lord Sugar Made Any Reasoned Comments About Donald Trump?

This was an obvious question to ask Google AI and I received this answer.

Yes, Lord Alan Sugar has made several reasoned and critical comments regarding Donald Trump over the years, primarily focusing on Trump’s business acumen, his performance on The Apprentice, and his political actions.

Based on his public comments, primarily around 2016–2020 and later, Sugar’s views can be summarized as follows:

Apprentice Performance: Sugar has frequently argued that he is superior to Trump in the context of hosting The Apprentice, calling Trump “useless” in comparison and asserting that Trump was “not in his class”.

Business Acumen: Sugar has challenged the notion of Trump’s extreme wealth, at one point suggesting he would challenge Trump to show whose check for £100 million would clear, referring to Trump’s claims of wealth as “nonsense”.

Political Style and Media Handling: Sugar has criticized Trump’s handling of the media, describing him as “childish” for blaming media outlets and labelling him a “blatant liar”. In 2020, he referred to Trump as a “comedian” who talked “rubbish” regarding his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that his advice was erratic and contradictory.

Trade and Policy: Sugar has criticized Trump’s economic policies, such as tariffs, describing them as “a disaster” that do not take into account the “ramifications of his actions”.

Despite these criticisms, Sugar acknowledged in 2020 that Trump possessed a “fighting spirit” that resonated with his followers.

 

April 1, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Business, World | , , , , , | Leave a comment

EU, France Grant EUR 126 Million For BW Ideol’s Floating Foundation Factory

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

BW Ideol has signed the final grant agreement for up to EUR 74 million from the EU Innovation Fund for a factory in Fos-sur-Mer, France, that will produce concrete floating wind foundations. The factory, dubbed Fos3F, has also secured up to EUR 52 million from the French State.

These three paragraphs add more detail.

The final agreement for the EU Innovation Fund grant was signed on 19 March, after BW Ideol revealed in November 2025 that the Fos3F was selected for up to EUR 74 million in funding by the European Commission.

The French government awarded support for the project at the end of 2025 through the C3IV tax credit scheme, dedicated to supporting leading French companies in the Green Industry. The funding from the French State will cover up to EUR 52 million to partially fund development and capital expenditures.

According to BW Ideol, if built, the Fos3F will be a first-of-its-kind factory dedicated to the serial production of concrete floating wind foundations based on the company’s patented Damping Pool.

The factory is stated to have a capacity of thirty foundations per year.

This Google Map shows the location of Fos-sur-Mer.

Note.

  1. Arles is in the North-West corner.
  2. Marseille is in the South-East corner.
  3. The mouth of the Rhône River is in between.
  4. Fos-sur-Mer is outlined by the red-and-white border.

Google AI says there is significant steel making at the mouth of the Rhône River.

I also asked Google AI, “What turbines will BW Ideol floating foundations support?  and received this reply.

BW Ideol’s floating foundations are designed to be universal, supporting all major 15 MW+ offshore wind turbines currently on the market, with scalability to future 20 MW+ platforms. Their concrete barge-type technology—using the Damping Pool® design—is compatible with both existing and next-generation turbine manufacturers.

Key Compatibility Details:

15 MW+ and 20 MW+ Turbines: The foundations are engineered for current large-scale turbines (15 MW+) and are ready to accommodate upcoming 20 MW+ turbines, with designs already certified by DNV.

Proven Technology: The technology has been in operation since 2018 at the Floatgen site in France (using a Vestas V80 2 MW turbine) and in Japan, covering both shallow and deep-water applications.

Universal Application: The design is tailored for diverse metocean conditions and is designed to support the commercial deployment of large turbines in projects like the Buchan Offshore Wind project in Scotland.

Production Scalability: The concrete floating platforms are designed for mass production, capable of being manufactured quickly in a factory setting, such as the proposed Fos-sur-Mer site, to meet the schedules of major developers.

These foundations have received Design Certification from DNV, confirming their suitability for large-scale, commercial floating wind farms.

My Thoughts:

Concrete v. Steel: I used to work with someone, who was a big advocate of concrete yachts. Also check out the Wikipedia entry for the Troll A platform, which is a concrete Norwegian gas platform.

Zero-Carbon: I wouldn’t be surprised if concrete manufacture emits less carbon, than steel.

Port Talbot: Will BW Ideol build a similar factory at Port Talbot? I wrote about the Port Talbot factory in Port Talbot To Become Offshore Wind Hub For Celtic Sea. Both sites are next to a large bay, which would be ideal for parking completed floats and a world-class steelworks.

Buchan: Buchan’s web site says it will use seventy BW Ideol floats and generate I GW, 75 km. to the North-East of Fraserburgh. Google AI said the floats will be built at the Port of Ardersier.

Will A Mini-Steel Mill Be Built At The Port Of Ardersier?

I asked Google AI, the question in the title of this section and received this reply.

Yes, a £300 million green steel mill is planned for the Ardersier Port redevelopment as part of its transformation into a circular Energy Transition Facility. This facility aims to process scrap steel from decommissioned oil rigs into new materials to support offshore wind developments, alongside creating a concrete production plant.

Key details regarding the development:
Purpose: The mill is intended to process scrap from offshore decommissioning.

Technology: It is planned as a green steel plant.

Integration: It is aimed to be integrated into a new, fully circular “Energy Transition Facility”.

Context: While the facility aims for circular steel production, the port is primarily focused on becoming a hub for offshore wind and manufacturing.

Recent developments as of March 2026 suggest a focus on a “scaled back,” more achievable vision by new owners/managers, focusing on floating concrete wind turbine bases. Additionally, recent UK government intervention restricted a large Chinese-backed manufacturing plan at the site due to security concerns.

 

 

March 31, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Energy, Finance & Investment, Manufacturing | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Much Vitamin B12 Is There In A Leon Full English Breakfast Egg Pot?

I asked Google AI, the title of this post and received this answer.

Based on the ingredients of a LEON Full English Breakfast Egg Pot—which includes a poached egg, Cumberland sausage, bacon, and baked beans—this breakfast provides a substantial amount of Vitamin B12.

Estimated B12 Content: A single large egg contains roughly 0.6 micrograms (mcg) of vitamin B12. When combined with the pork sausage and bacon in the Full English pot, the total content likely provides a significant portion of the UK adult daily requirement of 1.5 mcg.

Key B12 Sources in the Pot: The primary sources of B12 in the pot are the free-range egg (specifically the yolk) and the meat (bacon and sausage).

Other Nutritional Highlights: The Full English Pot contains 25-28g of protein and 371-398 calories.

It certainly looks that this Leon egg pot gives a significant portion of the UK adult daily requirement of vitamin B12.

 

March 31, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Food, Health | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

UK To Launch Next CfD Allocation Round In July

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

The UK government has announced that the next Contracts for Difference (CfD) allocation round will open in July 2026.

Contracts for Difference Allocation Round 7 did well and according to Google AI raised these contracts.

Contracts for Difference (CfD) Allocation Round 7 (AR7) results, announced in January 2026, secured a record 8.4 GW of offshore wind capacity, enough to power 12 million homes. The auction awarded contracts to 6.865 GW of fixed-bottom offshore wind and 192.5 MW of floating wind, with strike prices around £91/MWh (2024 prices).

Key Results of AR7:

Capacity Secured: Over 8.4 GW (8,437.5 MW) of offshore wind, with 6,090 MW in England, 1,380 MW in Scotland, and 775 MW in Wales.

Key Winners: RWE secured nearly 6.9 GW across four projects, including Dogger Bank South and Norfolk Vanguard; SSE Renewables secured 1,380 MW for Berwick Bank Phase B; and floating wind projects included Pentland and Erebus.

Strike Prices: Fixed-bottom offshore wind cleared at £91.20/MWh (£89.49/MWh in Scotland), while floating offshore wind cleared at £216.49/MWh.

Investment & Jobs: The projects represent over £22 billion in private investment and support approximately 7,000 jobs.

Timeline: The projects are expected to start delivering power from 2028 onwards.

Out of curiosity, I asked Google AI, “How Many GWs Are Expected To Be Signed Up In The UK’s CfD Round 8” and received this answer.

Allocation Round 8 (AR8) of the UK’s Contracts for Difference (CfD) scheme is expected to launch in July 2026. While specific, finalized GW targets for the winning bids have not yet been announced, the government is adapting the auction to support increasingly large projects, including potential floating offshore wind farms of 1GW+.

Following the record-breaking AR7, which secured 8.4 GW of offshore wind capacity in January 2026, AR8 is expected to focus on continuing this momentum to meet the UK’s “Clean Power 2030” objectives.

Key context regarding expected AR8 capacity includes:

Growing Project Scale: The AR8 consultation indicates that upcoming floating offshore wind projects are likely to be much larger (potentially 1GW+) than previously expected, prompting changes to the scheme to support this scale.

Targeted Procurement: Industry sources previously indicated that the combination of AR7 and AR8 was expected to secure significant capacity to meet 2030 goals, with over 20 GW of offshore wind previously identified as eligible for upcoming rounds.

Supply Chain Focus: The government has issued, or is planning, Supply Chain Plan requirements for solar projects of 300 megawatts or more and for onshore wind, indicating high volumes are anticipated in these sectors.

The application window for AR8’s Clean Industry Bonus is currently planned for May 2026, with the main auction following in July 2026.

Conclusion

It doesn’t really indicate a figure for AR8, but does indicate that AR7 and AR8 together have a joint target of over 20 GW.

  1. I can do a small calculation.
  2. AR7 secured 8.4 GW of offshore wind capacity in January 2026.
  3. As AR7+AR8 are expected to secure 20 GW before 2030, that means AR8 will secure  11.6 GW.

So this means that AR8 could be 38 % bigger than AR7.

 

 

 

 

March 29, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Energy | , , , , , | 1 Comment

Port Talbot To Become Offshore Wind Hub For Celtic Sea

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Port Talbot will become the first dedicated hub for floating offshore wind in the Celtic Sea.

These four introductory paragraphs add some detail.

Associated British Ports (ABP) will begin detailed design and engineering work on new port infrastructure after securing grant funding of up to £64m from the UK government.

The project will support the assembly and deployment of floating turbines that will operate in deeper waters off the Welsh coast. ABP said the development could support thousands of jobs and attract hundreds of millions of pounds in further investment.

The UK government said the new port would help deliver clean, homegrown electricity, protect households from volatile fossil fuel markets and create up to 5,000 new jobs.

Redeveloping the port to handle the assembly of wind turbines could position Port Talbot at the centre of a fast-growing clean energy sector.

I have some thoughts.

How Much Wind Power Is Planned For The Western Approaches?

In Ocean Winds Enters Lease Agreement With Crown Estate For 1.5 GW Celtic Sea Floating Wind Project, I published this Google AI estimate of the wind power, that could be developed in the Western Approaches.

How Much Wind Power Is Planned For The Western Approaches?

I asked Google AI, the title of this section and received this answer.

The UK has a target of 50 GW of offshore wind by 2030, with significant projects planned for the Celtic Sea (part of the Western Approaches), which is a key area for 5 GW of floating wind. Total UK offshore wind pipeline capacity exceeds 93 GW, with major developments in this region focusing on floating technology.

Key details regarding wind power in the Western Approaches (specifically the Celtic Sea) include:

Celtic Sea Developments: The area is a primary focus for floating wind projects, designed to capitalize on deep-water potential, with 5 GW of floating wind expected to be deployed across the UK by 2030.

Pipeline and Capacity: The total UK pipeline for offshore wind, which includes the Western Approaches, is 93 GW, and the government is aiming for 43-50 GW of installed offshore capacity by 2030.

Project Status: The region is expected to benefit from the Crown Estate’s leasing rounds aimed at accelerating floating wind, with 15.4 GW of new projects submitted across the UK in 2024.

Wales/South West England Context: Wales has 1.4 GW of projects in the pre-application stage, with some potential for developments off the South West coast.

For more detailed information on specific projects and their development status, you can visit the RenewableUK website and RenewableUK website.

It looks like about 20 GW of offshore wind could be installed in the Western Approaches.

I would expect, a lot of work will be generated in the Port Talbot area.

A Lot Of Steel Will Be Needed

Earlier in the weeek, the UK Government backed the steel industry in Port Talbot, with a press release entitled UK Steel Industry Backed By Major New Trade Measure And Strategy.

Port Talbot Is A Comprehensive, Well-Connected Site

This Google Map shows the site.

Note.

  1. The M4 running along the site.
  2. The South Wales Main Line running along the site, with Port Talbot Parkway serving the site.
  3. The harbour by the station.
  4. The Tata steelworks marked by the red arrow.

I hope the up to £64 million grant from the government is sufficient for Associated British Ports (ABP) to turn the harbour into a world-class floating wind facility and that the Treasury haven’t been too mean.

BW Ideol, ABP To Explore Serial Production Of Floating Wind Foundations At Port Talbot

I wrote a post with this name in December 2023, before the leases for the Celtic Sea windfarms had been awarded. As one has been awarded to EDf Renewables, BW Ideol seem to have made a good move.

BW Ideol have a web page, which describes their concrete floating wind foundations manufacturing line.

I hope South Wales has got enough concrete?

 

March 27, 2026 Posted by | Artificial Intelligence, Energy, Finance & Investment, Manufacturing | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment