The Anonymous Widower

Taking Pictures In Doncaster And Cleethorpes Today

My faith was restored a bit in UK railways today.

I had to go to Cleethorpes at the last minute to take some pictures for this blog.

I went with a change at Doncaster each way.

 

  • I bought the single ticket to Doncaster from a person in King’s Cross for £28.55 on LNER.
  • I bought the return ticket to Cleethorpes from a person in Doncaster for £20.55 on TransPennine Express.
  • I bought the single ticket to King’s Cross from a person in Doncaster for £15.30 on Hull Trains.

I bought all tickets with my railcard on a walk up basis.

All four trains were on time.

The only problem was the weather in Cleethorpes and the pictures could have been better.

March 25, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Cut-Price Sheffield to London King’s Cross Train Service A Step Closer After Breakthrough

The title of this post, is the same as that of a story on The Star.

This is the sub-heading.

A new cut-price Sheffield to London train service has moved a step closer after a significant breakthrough.

These two paragraphs add detail to the story.

Hull Trains, which is part of FirstGroup, wants to launch a twice-daily return service between Sheffield and London King’s Cross, via Woodhouse, Worksop and Retford.

It says fares would be up to 30 per cent cheaper and the new route would provide more choice for passengers, especially for students and other people on a tighter budget.

I would assume the breakthrough is that the new East Coast Main Line timetable has been agreed.

The article confirms this.

The new East Coast Mainline timetable coming into operation later this year has been confirmed by Network Rail, making it easier to see how the new Sheffield-London trains would fit in around existing services.

Ever since I saw this proposed service, I wondered if by judicious splitting and joining at Retford, the Hull Trains services would effectively be only one ten car train on the East Coast Main Line.

February 15, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Extending The Sheffield Tram-Train To Adwick

I must admit, I very much like the Class 399 tram-trains in Sheffield and their German cousins in Karlsruhe.

I am not alone, as talking to an experienced Sheffield tram driver, he said that the extra power of the Class 399 tram-trains have over the Supertrams, mean they handle Sheffield’s hills with ease, when the tram-trains are full.

They have a top speed of 62 mph compared to a British Rail Class 150 train being able to manage 75 mph.

Passenger capacity of the two trains is probably about the same.

The Current Tram-Train Service

The service has the following characteristics.

  • This runs between Sheffield Cathedral and Rotherham Parkgate via Meadowhall South and Rotherham Central stations.
  • Services run every thirty minutes.
  • I have heard rumours that an extra stop is going to be be added at Magna Science Adventure Centre.

London Overground and local rail services in Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester and other cities in the UK, seem to run at a frequency of four trains per hour (tph).

The Current Northern Rail Service Between Sheffield And Adwick Via Doncaster

The service has the following characteristics.

  • This runs between Sheffield and Aswick stations via Meadowhall, Rotherham Central, Swinton, Mexborough, Conisbrough, Doncaster and Bentley stations.
  • Services run every hour.
  • The service passes Rotherham Parkway Shopping Centre, but doesn’t stop.

Is there a need for this Northern Rail service to stop at Rotherham Parkway Shopping Centre?

The Current Electrification Between Sheffield And Rotherham

This OpenRailwayMap shows the electrified lines between Sheffield and Rotherham Parkway.

Note.

  1. Mauve tracks are electrified with 750 VDC overhead wires, so they can power Sheffield’s trams and tram-trains directly.
  2. Black tracks are not electrified.
  3. Meadowhall and its rail and tram interchange is in the South-West corner of the map.
  4. Note how mauve lines indicate the electrified tram tracks, that curve round the Meadowhall Shopping Centre.
  5. The blue arrow in the North-East corner indicates Rotherham Parkgate tram stop.
  6. The mauve line diagonally across the map, indicates the current electrification between Meadowhall South and Rotherham Parkgate tram stops.
  7. Magna Science Adventure Centre, is just to the South of the electrified Sheffield-Rotherham tram-line.

This second OpenRailwayMap shows the rail and tram lines between Sheffield and Rotherham in more detail.

Note.

  1. Track colours are as in the first map.
  2. The blue arrow in the North-East corner of the map indicates Holmes junction and is the route that Northern Rail’s current Sheffield and Adwick service takes.
  3. Sheffield and Rotherham Central stations are 6.1 miles apart.
  4. Sheffield and Adwick stations are 22.7 miles apart, but the Northern four miles between Doncaster and Adwick are electrified with 25 KVAC overhead wires.

This would indicate that a tram-train with a range of about twenty miles on battery power would be able to handle the route, if it could charge its batteries on the electrified lines.

Terminating a Sheffield And Adwick Service In Sheffield

This OpenRailwayMap shows the rail and tram lines in and through Sheffield station.

Note.

  1. Rail lines are in orange.
  2. Tram lines are in mauve.
  3. Platform numbers in Sheffield station are shown as blue dots. Click on the map to show it on a larger scale.
  4. Sheffield Cathedral tram stop is in the North-West corner of the map.
  5. The triangular junction in the North-East corner of the map, allows trams to use all the main tram lines that go in three directions. A touch of genius as it gives a lot of flexibility, when adding extra services.

Currently, termination of the services from Rotherham and Doncaster is as follows.

  • The tram-train terminates at the Sheffield Cathedral tram stop with a frequency of two tph.
  • The train terminates in Platform 3 in Sheffield station with an hourly frequency.
  • As typically a terminal platform can handle 4 tph, I don’t see why a second Sheffield and Adwick service can’t be running every hour into Sheffield station.

A short length of overhead electrification would need to be added on Platform 3 to recharge any tram-trains terminating in the platform.

It could also become a tram and run to any of the other destinations served from the triangular junction; Halfway, Herdings Park or Malin Bridge. This would allow batteries to be charged as the tram-trains ran across the city.

Remember,  Sheffield station is likely to be electrified with 25 KVAC  overhead wires in connection with running electric trains between London St. Pancras and Sheffield.

If the four bay platforms at Sheffield station, were to be electrified, then these would be ideal for recharging any battery-electric trains or tram-trains, that terminated in the station.

Battery-Electric Trains Between Manchester And Sheffield

Consider.

  • Manchester Piccadilly station is already fully electrified.
  • Currently, all Manchester Piccadilly and Sheffield, terminate in Platform 8 at Sheffield station.
  • The distance between the electrification at Manchester Piccadilly and Platform 8 at Sheffield station is 40.2 miles.
  • CAF are promising battery-electric versions of their Class 331 trains.

With a battery range of fifty miles, which is not outrageous, Manchester and Sheffield could be an electric service for the first time since January 1970, when the Woodhead route was closed.

FirstGroup’s Proposed  London King’s Cross And Sheffield Service

This open access service might happen, although with this Government of all the Lawyers we have, who can predict anything.

  • If it does happen, it is likely that the trains will be battery-electric Class 802 trains.
  • These will be the same as those that will be run by Hull Trains.
  • Battery range will be sufficient to handle Retford and Sheffield, which is 23.3 miles and much shorter than Temple Hirst junction and Beverley.

These trains will also need charging at Sheffield.

 

 

 

 

 

The current Sheffield and Adwick service terminates in platform 3 at Sheffield station, so this platform would probably need to have tramway electrification, so that it could charge the trams.

Updating Rotherham Parkgate Tram Stop

My preference would be for four tph passing through Rotherham Parkgate tram stop in both directions, so this would be a tram-train every seven minutes and thirty seconds, if there was only one platform as now.

I’m fairly sure, that Rotherham Parkgate tram stop needs to have a platform in both directions.

This Google Map shows the tram stop.

Note.

  1. The double-track rail line between Meadowhall and Doncaster curving to the South of the Rotherham Parkgate Shopping Centre.
  2. The Rotherham Parkgate tram stop on a spur from the rail line.

I am pretty certain, that a two-platform station could be squeezed in.

February 15, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hull Trains Eyes Worksop And Sheffield Launch

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.

These are the two introductory paragraphs of the article.

Hull Trains’ proposed London King’s Cross – Worksop – Sheffield open access service would ‘give people more choice’, offer more flexibility in train fares and make the area better known, according to Labour Member of Parliament for Bassetlaw Jo White.

Speaking at the launch of FirstGroup’s Moving forward together: Why open access is essential for a better railway report on January 21, White said the service would increase opportunities for the growing population of Worksop, where new housing being built. Looking back at the history of open access, she said East Hull MP John Prescott had been a supporter of the original launch of Hull Trains.

I suspect that the ebullient John Prescott would have given full backing to Hull Trains proposed Sheffield service.

I have some thoughts about Hull Trains proposed service.

London Overground Syndrome

I am fairly certain, that this service will suffer from from London Overground Syndrome, which is defined like this.

This benign disease, which is probably a modern version of the Victorian railway mania, was first identified in East London in 2011, when it was found that the newly-refurbished East London Line and North London Line were inadequate due to high passenger satisfaction and much increased usage. It has now spread across other parts of the capital, despite various eradication programs.

It may be for slightly different reasons, but as Workshop station has good car parking and could have fast trains to London, it could attract passengers.

But I don’t think two trains per day will be enough.

Tram-Trains Between Sheffield And Retford Via Worksop

Consider.

  • It’s under twenty-five miles between Sheffield and Retford, so this route would be possible using battery-electric tram trains, similar to those in South Wales.
  • These tram-trains would also be suitable for the Robin Hood Line between Nottingham and Worksop via Mansfield.
  • The speed limits are not fast and the distances are not great and I suspect battery-electric versions of Sheffield’s tram trains could handle all routes.
  • By using temporal separation, Hull Trains services could be sneaked in early and late in the day.

As both cities of Nottingham and Sheffield have used or thought about using tram-trains, I’m sure Stadler could provide a suitable tram-train, that could work in the two cities and all the branch lines that used to serve the numerous coal mines.

It would be levelling up on a big way.

It could grow into a very comprehensive East Midlands Metro, that also served Derby, Doncaster and possibly Lincoln.

Stadler’s products can certainly be configured in many unusual ways.

 

 

 

January 28, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Is FirstGroup’s Order For Fourteen Trains For Lumo And Hull Trains More Identical Than Is Generally Assumed?

Currently, Hull Trains operate Class 802 trains and Lumo operate Class 803 trains.

Both trains are five-car Hitachi A-Trains and appear to be similar in size, although there are other differences.

  • Hull Trains have a two-class layout, whereas on Lumo everybody sits in the same class.
  • Hull Trains are a true bi-mode with the 700 kW Rolls-Royce mtu diesel generators.
  • Lumo only have a battery for emergency hotel power.
  • Hull Trains currently operate a route, where up to a hundred miles in each round trip can be on diesel.
  • Lumo’s current route is all electric.

However, the differences in train specification doesn’t stop the two operators using each other’s trains.

This is from an article in the November 2023 Edition of Modern Railways, that is entitled Extra Luggage Racks For Lumo.

The co-operation between sister East Coast mail line open access operators Lumo and Hull Trains continues, with one recent move,  being the use of a Hull Trains ‘802’ on Lumo services to cover  for a shortage of the dedicated ‘803s’ while one unit was out of action for repairs following a fatality. Although the two types are similar, there are notable differences, most obviously that the Hull Trains units are bi-modes while the Lumo sets are straight EMUs and a training conversion course is required for Lumo drivers on the ‘802s’. There are also challenges from a passenger-facing perspective – The Hull Trains units have around 20 % fewer seats and a First Class area.

A future Chief Executive of FirstGroup  might at some future date decide to convert all trains to the same specification.

Drive Systems Of The Five-Car Class 80x Trains

I’m writing them down for all the five-car Class 80x trains to make it easier to understand.

  • Class 800 train – DPTSMS-MS-MCDPTF – (LNER) 3 x 560 kW or (GWR) 3 x 700 kW diesel generators.
  • Class 801 train – DPTSMS-MS-MCDPTF –  1 x 560 kW diesel generators
  • Class 802 train – DPTSMS-MS-MCDPTF – (LNER) 3 x 700 kW diesel generators.
  • Class 803 train – DPTSMS-MS-MSDPTF
  • Class 805 train – DPTSMS-MS-MCDPTF –  3 x 700 kW diesel generators.
  • Class 810 train – DPTSMS-MS-MCDPTF –  4 x 735 kW diesel generators.

Note.

  1. All these five-car trains have the same drive configuration.
  2. Traction motors are on cars 2 and 4.
  3. Trains with one diesel generators have them under car 3.
  4. Trains with three diesel generators have them under cars 2/3/4.
  5. Trains with four diesel generators have them under cars 1/2/4/5.
  6. The traction battery in the Class 802 battery-electric test train was 750 kW, according to The Data Sheet For Hitachi Battery Electric Trains.

It is all a very balanced design.

A Standard Basic Train For Hull Trains And Lumo

This may be possible and could be the following.

  • A Class 802 or Class 803 train to the latest specification.
  • Five cars.
  • Interior to the customers specification.
  • Ability to work in pairs.
  • A standard size traction battery in car 3.

The battery could be changed according to route.

I can see a battery range of 100 miles covering most routes.

There could be two or three batteries close together in cars 2, 3 and 4, driving the traction motors in cars 2 and 4 and being charged by them.

These are my thoughts on individual Hull Trains and Lumo routes.

Beverley And Hull

In Could Hull Station Be Electrified?, I put forward my view that if Hull station were to be electrified, it opens up various possibilities of running battery-electric trains to Hull and Beverley.

Hull Trains services would charge the battery, every time they went through Hull station.

Distances needed on battery power to electrification would be.

  • Beverley – 16.7 miles for return trip.
  • Bridlington – 31.1 miles
  • Doncaster – 40.8 miles
  • Scarborough – 53.8 miles
  • Temple Hirst – 36.1 miles

Except for Scarborough, a single battery would probably suffice.

Beverley and Hull are handled without a battery at present, but Hull Trains might like to carry sufficient power in batteries to be able to handle the Lincoln Diversion.

Carmarthen

Cardiff and Carmarthen via Gowerton is 75.3 miles, which probably means two batteries would be needed.

See Thoughts On Lumo’s Proposed Paddington And Carmarthen Service, for more details.

Edinburgh

Edinburgh is handled without a battery at present, but Lumo might like to carry sufficient power in batteries to be able to handle the Lincoln Diversion.

Paignton

Paignton is the longest route at 128.2 miles and I doubt, it would be talked about if it wasn’t technically possibly.

See Thoughts On Lumo’s Proposed Paddington And Paignton Service, for more details.

Rochdale

Sheffield

Stirling

Stirling could be handled without a battery, but Lumo might like to carry sufficient power in batteries to be able to handle a small diversion.

 

January 11, 2025 Posted by | Design, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Could An Open Access Operator Develop A Train Service Along The South Coast of The UK Between Kent and Fishguard?

Before I go into detail, I will answer a question that explains the terminology and the why’s and wherefores’ of the title of this post.

What Is An Open Access Operator?

This is the first paragraph of the Wikipedia entry of an Open Access Operator.

In rail transport, an open-access operator is an operator that takes full commercial risk, running on infrastructure owned by a third party and buying paths on a chosen route and, in countries where rail services run under franchises, are not subject to franchising.

In the UK, these are all open access operators, that are running services.

Note.

  1. Other groups are developing services.
  2. Regional, High Speed, International, Local and Sleeper services seem to be offered by various open access operators.
  3. Grand Central is a subsidiary of Deutsche Bahn,
  4. Hull Trains and Lumo are both subsidiaries of FirstGroup.

Open Access operators seem to operate in most European Union countries.

Why Run Between Kent and Fishguard?

  • The main purpose of the train service would be to provide a low-cost  rail connection between the island  of Ireland and particularly the Republic of Ireland, with the Southern part of England and the European Union.
  • At both ends of the route the train service would connect to ferries.
  • At the Eastern end, the train service would also connect to Eurostar services through the Channel Tunnel.
  • The Port of Dover could be efficiently connected to Dover Priory Station.
  • Dover Priory Station could be the Eastern terminus.
  • The service could stop at Folkestone Central station, if ferries call at the Port of Folkestone in the future.
  • The service could stop at Ashford International station for Eurostar services.
  • Fishguard Harbour station has been built as a train terminus for the Port of Fishguard.
  • Fishguard Harbour station could be the Western terminus.

This could be a busy service.

Where Would The Trains Call?

Intermediate stations would depend on passenger umbers, but could start as Folkestone Central, Ashford International, Hastings, Eastbourne, Brighton, Portsmouth & Southsea, Southampton Central, Romsey, Salisbury, Warminster, Westbury, Trowbridge, Bradford-on-Avon, Bath Spa, Bristol Temple Meads, Bristol Parkway, Newport, Cardiff Central, Gowerton, Llanelli and Carmarthen.

How Long Would The Journey Be?

The journey would be around 377 miles and I suspect could take about three and a half hours with modern digital signalling.

Surprisingly, the route is fully-electrified except for the following.

  • Ashford International and Ore – 27.9 miles
  • Southampton Central  and Bristol Parkway – 82 miles
  • Cardiff Central and Fishguard Harbour – 115.6 miles

All gaps should be able to be bridged using battery power.

I suspect trains would be Hitachi high speed battery-electric trains.

Would Any European Funding Be Available?

This is an interesting question, as the service does join up two separate sections of the European Union.

 

December 10, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Fourteen New Trains To Drive First Rail Open Access Growth

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from First Group.

These four bullet points are sub-headings.

  • The Group has signed an agreement with Angel Trains and Hitachi to lease 14 new five-car class 80X Hitachi electric, battery electric or bi-mode trains (70 cars in total) at a cost of c.£500m including maintenance, over a ten year lease period
  • The trains will be manufactured by Hitachi in County Durham, securing the skills base and jobs in the local area
  • The new trains will enable FirstGroup to significantly expand its open access portfolio and will be used on the newly announced London-Carmarthen route and to increase the number of cars on the existing Lumo and Hull Trains services
  • The agreement also contains an option for FirstGroup to lease up to an additional 13 trains on the same terms if the Group’s open access applications are granted by the Office of Rail and Road (‘ORR’)

These first three paragraphs add a bit more detail.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is visiting Newton Aycliffe, County Durham, today to celebrate a significant agreement for the Hitachi factory which has secured an order to manufacture 70 new rail cars for FirstGroup’s growing open access business, creating certainty for the manufacturing skills base, and the factory’s future.

The Lease Agreement will deliver 14 new trains, which will not only give the Group a homogenous fleet across its open access operations, ensuring flexibility and reliability for customers, but also facilitates the Group’s strategic objective of materially increasing its open access capacity. Delivery of the new trains is expected to commence in late 2027. The lease will be financed by Angel Trains, adding to their portfolio of Hitachi assets. The trains will be maintained by Hitachi at their facilities around the country.

The trains will be used on the Group’s open access rail services, including the Carmarthen-London route announced on 5 December, and the existing Hull Trains and Lumo services on the East Coast Mainline.

Note.

  1. Does the presence of Keir Starmer indicate any approval for open access?
  2. Trains could be electric, battery electric or bi-mode.
  3. Bi-mode trains should only be purchased these days, if they are convertible to battery-electric trains. Hitachi’s can.
  4. Delivery is expected to commence in late 2027.
  5. The first fourteen trains will be deployed on the London to Carmarthen, Edinburgh and Hull routes.

This table shows the trains needed initially  for each route.

  • Carmarthen – Class 802 trains – 5 tpd – 5 trains – 75.3 miles unelectrified
  • Edinburgh – Class 803 trains – 5 tpd – 5 trains – electrified
  • Hull – Class 802 trains – 5 tpd – 5 trains – 44.3 miles unelectrified

Note.

  1. tpd is trains per day.
  2. I’m assuming that as unelectrified distances to Carmarthen and Hull are not that far apart, the number of trains needed is the same.
  3. Class 802 trains are bi-mode.
  4. Class 803 trains are electric.

After the fourteen new trains are delivered, there will be a combined fleet of 29 trains.

Consider.

  • Hull Trains have started running some services as pairs of trains. I wrote about this in Ten-Car Hull Trains.
  • Lumo has been a success and perhaps needs more capacity.

The Wikipedia entry for Grand Union says this.

Grand Union proposed to operate with ex-LNER Class 91s and Rail Operations Group Class 93s hauling nine-car Mark 4s and a Driving Van Trailer.

So perhaps the Carmarthen service needs ten-car trains.

That would mean that the number of routes needed for the three routes would be as follows.

  • Carmarthen – Class 802 trains – 5 tpd -10 trains
  • Edinburgh – Class 803 trains – 5 tpd -10 trains
  • Hull – Class 802 trains – 7 tpd – 10 trains

It would appear that we’re a train short with 29 in the combined fleet against a need of 30 trains.

But then it would also appear that Hull Trains can provide the required five/ten car service with only four trains.

I would assume that the extra train, goes to make up the numbers for  Lumo’s Carmarthen service.

 

December 6, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Where Will Lumo Strike Next?

Yesterday, First Group reported that they had added more possible services to their network of open-access services.

I gave my view in FirstGroup Acquires London – South Wales Open Access Business And Plans Lumo To Devon.

Their list of possible services and destinations include.

  • Hull Trains – London King’s Cross and Beverley via Stevenage, Grantham, Retford, Doncaster, Selby, Howden, Brough, Hull Paragon and Cottingham
  • Hull Trains – London King’s Cross and Hull Paragon via Stevenage, Grantham, Retford, Doncaster, Selby, Howden and Brough
  • Hull Trains – London King’s Cross and Sheffield via Worksop and Woodhouse
  • Lumo – London Euston and Rochdale via Warrington Bank Quay, Newton-le-Willows, Eccles and Manchester Victoria
  • Lumo – London King’s Cross and Edinburgh/Glasgow via Stevenage, Newcastle and Morpeth
  • Lumo – London Paddington and Carmarthen via Bristol Parkway, Newport, Severn Tunnel Junction, Cardiff Central, Gowerton and Llanell
  • Lumo – London Paddington and Paignton via Bath Spa, Bristol Temple Meads, Taunton, Exeter St David’s and Torquay

I believe that all services could be run by identical versions of Hitachi’s high speed Intercity Battery Electric Train, which are described in this page on the Hitachi web site.

The London Paddington and Paignton service would require the longest running without electrification at 210 km. and I don’t believe First Group would have put in a bid, unless they were certain zero-carbon trains with sufficient performance would be available.

Other possible open access services  could be.

Hull And Blackpool Airport

Note.

  1. This could be the first half of a Green Route between the North of England and the island of Ireland, if zero-carbon aircraft can fly from Blackpool Airport.
  2. Trains would call at Selby, Leeds, Bradford, Huddersfield, Manchester Victoria, Blackburn and Preston.
  3. Blackpool Airport has good access from Squires Gate station and tram stop, which could be improved.
  4. Blackpool Airport could be well supplied with green electricity and hydrogen from wind power.

These are distances to possible airports.

  • Belfast City – 111 nm.
  • Belfast International – 114 nm.
  • Cardiff – 143 nm.
  • Cork – 229 nm.
  • Donegal – 200 nm.
  • Derry/Londonderry – 163 nm.
  • Dublin – 116 nm.
  • Inverness – 228 nm
  • Ireland West Knock – 204 nm.
  • Kerry – 253 nm.
  • Ronaldsway, IOM – 59 nm.
  • Shannon – 220 nm.

Note.

  1. The Wikipedia entry for the all-electric Eviation Alice, gives the range with reserves as 250 nm.
  2. The Belfast and Dublin airports could be within range of a round trip from Blackpool without refuelling.
  3. ,Cork, Kerry and Shannon airports may need to go by another airport, where a small battery charge is performed.
  4. The Isle of Man is surprisingly close.

Blackpool has reasonably good coverage for the island of Ireland.

London Euston And Holyhead

This could be the first half of a Green Route to Dublin, if the trains met a high speed hydrogen-powered catamaran to speed passengers across to Dun Laoghaire.

London King’s Cross And Aberdeen Or Inverness

Why not? But these routes would probably be best left to LNER.

London King’s Cross And Grimsby Or Cleethorpes

In Azuma Test Train Takes To The Tracks As LNER Trials Possible New Route, I talked about how LNER  had run a test train to Grimsby and Cleethorpes.

The Government might prefer that an open access operator took the risk and got all the blame if the route wasn’t worth running.

Humberside is very much involved in the energy industry, with several gas-fried power-stations at Keadby.

It might be more efficient in terms of trains and infrastructure, if this service was an extension of the Lincoln service.

London King’s Cross And Scarborough Via Beverley

This would probably be one for Hull Trains, but it would also serve Bridlington and Butlin’s at Filey.

The BBC was running a story today about how holiday camps are making a comeback. Surely, one on a direct train from London wouldn’t be a bad thing. for operators, train companies or holidaymakers.

London King’s Cross And Middlesbrough, Redcar Or Saltburn

As with the Grimsby and Cleethorpes service, the government might think, that this might be a better service for an open access operator.

Teesside is heavily involved in the offshore wind industry and may add involvement in the nuclear industry.

London Paddington And Fishguard, Haverfordwest, Milford Haven Or Pembroke Dock

Note.

  1. This could be the first half of a Green Route to Southern Ireland, if the trains met a high speed hydrogen-powered catamaran to speed passengers across to Rosslare or an electric or hydrogen-powered aircraft from Haverfordwest Airport.
  2. These three ports and one airport will feature heavily in the development of offshore wind power in the Celtic Sea.
  3. RWE are already planning a hydrogen electrolyser in Pembrokeshire, as I wrote about  in RWE Underlines Commitment To Floating Offshore Wind In The Celtic Sea Through New ‘Vision’ Document.
  4. According to the Wikipedia entry for Fishguard Harbour station, it was built as a station to handle ship passengers and is now owned by Stena Line, who run the ferries to Rosslare in Ireland.
  5. I can see a tie-up between FirstGroup and Stena Line to efficiently transfer passengers between Lumo’s planned service to Carmarthen and Stena Line’s ships to Ireland.

All four secondary destinations would be a short extension from Carmarthen.

Summing Up

Note how energy, a Green Route to Ireland and other themes keep appearing.

I do wonder if running a budget train service to an area, is an easy way of levelling up, by attracting people, commuters and industry.

Have the budget airlines improved the areas they serve?

They’ve certainly created employment in the transport, construction and hospitality industries.

Zero-Carbon Ferries And Short-Haul Aircraft

These will be essential for Anglo-Irish routes and many other routes around the world.

I will deal with the ferries first, as to create a zero-carbon ferry, only needs an appropriate power unit to be installed in a ship design that works.

But with aircraft, you have to lift the craft off the ground, which needs a lot of energy.

This article on Transport and Environment is entitled World’s First ‘Carbon Neutral’ ship Will Rely On Dead-End Fuel, with this sentence as a sub-heading.

The Danish shipping giant Maersk announced it will operate the world’s first carbon-neutral cargo vessel by 2023. The company had promised a carbon-neutral container ship by 2030 but now says it will introduce the ship seven years ahead of schedule following pressure from its customers. While welcoming Maersk’s ambition, T&E says the company is betting on the wrong horse by using methanol which may not be sustainable and available in sufficient amounts.

Note.

  1. I’d not heard of this ship.
  2. Pressure from customers brought the date forward by seven years.
  3. As always, it appears that the availability of enough green hydrogen and methanol is blamed.

Perhaps, Governments of the world should put more teeth in green legislation to ensure that companies and governments do what they say they are gong to do?

But worthwhile developments in the field of shipping are underway.

For instance, I estimate that this Artemis Technologies hydrofoil ferry could take passengers across the 54 nautical miles between Dun Laoghaire and Holyhead in around 90 minutes.

This ferry is being designed and built in Northern Ireland and I can’t believe, it is the only development of its type.

A Fast Green Route To Ireland

I have talked about this before in High-Speed Low-Carbon Transport Between Great Britain And Ireland and I am certain that it will happen.

  • Air and sea routes between the UK and the island of Ireland carry a lot of traffic.
  • Some travellers don’t like flying. Especially in Boeings, which are Ryanair’s standard issue.
  • It is the sort of trip, that will appeal to a lot of travellers and most probably a lot with Irish connections.
  • An electric or hydrogen-powered aircraft or a fast surface craft will be able to cross the Irish Sea in a quick time.
  • High speed trains and then High Speed Two will consistently reduce the travel times on the UK side of the water.

Cross-water travel routes, be they by aircraft, ferries, bridges or tunnels are generally popular and successful.

Conclusion

Given the opportunity at Fishguard, I can see that FirstGroup next move would be to extend the Carmarthen service to Fishguard Harbour.

 

 

 

December 6, 2024 Posted by | Energy, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

FirstGroup Acquires London – South Wales Open Access Business And Plans Lumo To Devon

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.

This is the sub-heading.

‘Growing our open access rail portfolio is a key priority’, FirstGroup CEO Graham Sutherland said on December 5 when the company announced that it had acquired Grand Union Trains GWML Holdings Ltd. GUT holds track access rights to launch an open access passenger service between London and Carmarthen. FirstGroup has also applied for paths to launch a London to Paignton service.

FirstGroup seem to have acted quickly to replace the business that they have lost to the Government.

This is said about the London Paddington  and Carmarthen route.

The London Paddington to Carmarthen service is now expected to launch in December 2027, with GUT having secured track access rights to the end of 2037.

There will be five services each way per day, calling at stations including Bristol Parkway, Newport, Severn Tunnel Junction, Cardiff Central, Gowerton and Llanelli. FirstGroup said it would provide low fares, ‘more customer choice and much-needed additional capacity’.

It is still considering rolling stock options, and ’updates will be provided in due course’. The trains would have one class, free wi-fi and onboard catering.

After the successful trial of battery-powered high speed trains that I wrote about in ‘UK-First’ Intercity Battery Trial Exceeds Expectations, I would suspect that the train would run between London Paddington and Carmarthen like this.

  • Run between London Paddington and Cardiff Central using the 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
  • Whilst running between Paddington and Cardiff Central, the train’s batteries will be fully charged using the overhead electrification.
  • Run between Cardiff Central and Carmarthen using the onboard battery power.
  • Charge the train as required at Carmarthen.

Note.

  1. London Paddington and Cardiff Central is 145.2 miles or 233.7 km.
  2. Cardiff Central and Carmarthen via Gowerton is 75.3 miles or 121.2 km.
  3. In case of disruption, trains could wait at Cardiff Central, until the batteries had enough charge.

A battery capability of 121.2 km will be needed.

This is said about the London Paddington and Paignton route.

An application has been submitted to the Office of Rail & Road for the service to incorporate five return trips per day between London Paddington and Paignton via stations including Bath Spa, Bristol Temple Meads, Taunton, Exeter St David’s and Torquay from May 2028, as well as a sixth path between Highbridge & Burnham and London.

I suspect that the Paignton route will use a similar profile to the Carmarthen route.

  • Run between London Paddington and Chippenham using the 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
  • Whilst running between Paddington and Chippenham, the train’s batteries will be fully charged using the overhead electrification.
  • Run between Chippenham and Paignton using the onboard battery power.
  • Charge the train as required at Paignton .

Note.

  1. London Paddington and Chippenham is 93.5 miles or 233.7 km.
  2. Chippenham and Paignton is 128.6 miles or 207 km.
  3. In case of disruption, trains could wait at Chippenham , until the batteries had enough charge.

A battery capability of 207 km will be needed.

This page on the Hitachi Rail web site is entitled Intercity Battery Trains, where this is a paragraph.

Replacing one diesel engine with just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%. Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance.

I am a Graduate Control and Electrical Engineer and I believe that, if you have a train with two batteries, then by sequencing and managing the power, a range of 140 km. should be possible. As a typical Class 802 train, as used by Hull Trains has three diesel engines, would the train have a range of 210 km., if all three were swapped for batteries?

One fact, that has been disclosed by Hitachi, is that diesel engines and battery packs are identical in weight and power, so train performance and handling is unaffected, by the number of batteries.

If we look at the routes of First Group present and future subsidiaries and how much is on unelectrified track, we can create the following table.

  • Beverley – Hull Trains – 71.3 km.
  • Carmarthen – Lumo – 121.2 km.
  • Hull – Hull Trains – 58,1 km.
  • Paignton – Lumo – 207 km.
  • Rochdale – Lumo – 16.7 km.
  • Sheffield – Hull Trains – 37.5 km.
  • Worksop – Hull Trains – 12.2 km.

Note,

  1. One two or three batteries could be fitted.
  2. Some destinations could be served without any charging at the destination.
  3. Hitachi have proposed short lengths of 25 KVAC overhead line to charge trains.
  4. For some destinations, it may be a more affordable to add another battery than add a charger.

It’s all very modular.

December 5, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Rochdale Station – 12th November, 2024

Yesterday, I went to Rochdale station, to ascertain, the suitability of running a Lumo service between Euston and Rochdale stations.

Note.

  1. The building in the style of a mosque, is actually a Catholic church.
  2. The island tram platform is at right angles to the railway lines through the station.
  3. The tram takes you a short distance to the North to the town centre.

This map shows the station and the tram stop.

Note.

  1. The station has four platforms and two tram platforms.
  2. The two outer train platforms are quite long.
  3. The West-facing bay platform could probably take a five-car Lumo train.
  4. The tram platform runs North from the station.
  5. There is a co-working space by the tram-stop.
  6. There is a cafe in the station.
  7. There is a manned ticket office.
  8. Car parking is free.
  9. There are sixteen bicycle spaces.

With some tidying up, this could be a neat interchange.

These are my thoughts.

Will Rochdale Station Accommodate One Of Lumo’s Five-Car Trains?

The Wikipedia entry for Rochdale station, says this about the Bay Platform 4, that was used for the Cltheroe train.

In 2015, construction on a fourth railway platform began. The 135m-long bay platform was completed in 2016 and is used to relieve congestion at Manchester Victoria, where terminating trains would otherwise occupy the through platforms; numerous services now continue on to Rochdale as opposed to terminating at Victoria. It is located at the south end of the main island platform, with the southbound through line having been re-aligned slightly further east to accommodate the new terminating line and is used by the half-hourly stopping service from Blackburn/Clitheroe via Bolton and Victoria.

A 135 metre platform should be able to accommodate a five-car train with 27 metre carriages, so it looks like a 5-carriage Lumo train with 26-metre cars would fit in the bay platform 4.

Will Rochdale Station Accommodate A Pair Of Lumo’s Five-Car Trains?

Consider.

  • Lumo’s Hitachi trains, like all their siblings can run in pairs. As I reported in Ten-Car Hull Trains, Hull Trains do it regularly.
  • Rochdale station may or may not be able to accommodate a pair of five-car trains, but say if one of Manchester’s Premier League clubs was playing in the FA Cup Final, I’m sure they would find a way to run a ten-car train to London.
  • It looks like Warrington Bank Quay, Newton-le-Willows, Eccles and Manchester Victoria could all take 10-car trains.
  • Euston probably can as well, as 9-car and 11-car Class 390 trains are 217.5 and 265.3 metres respectively long respectively and a 10-car Lumo train would only be 260 metres.

Perhaps, one train can start at Rochdale and the other at Manchester Victoria, before they join at Victoria and go to London as a pair.

Could The Lumo Service Be Extended Across The Pennines?

Distances Along the Calder Valley Line to Leeds are as follows.

  • Rochdale 10.4 miles – 
  • Hebden Bridge – 23.6 miles
  • Halifax – 32.7 miles
  • Low Moor – 37.5 miles
  • Bradford Interchange – 40.4 miles
  • Leeds – 49.8 miles

Note.

  1. The 70 km. rang of a Lumo train will be 43.5 miles.
  2. The train can be charged at both end stations and will be fully charged, when it leaves Manchester Victoria and Leeds.
  3. There are short lengths of electrification at Manchester Victoria and Leeds.
  4. There may be extra electrification between Bradford Interchange and Leeds, in the next few years.

I am fairly certain, that a battery-electric Lumo Class 803 train will be able to provide a London Euston and Leeds service.

How Long Will Services Take?

Timings on the extended route from London Euston to Manchester Victoria, Rochdale, Bradford and Leeds would take.

  • London-Euston – Warrington Bank Quay – One hour and forty-four minutes – Current Avanti timings.
  • Warrington Bank Quay – Newton-le-Willows -Eleven minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Newton-le-Willows – Eccles -Ten minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Eccles – Manchester Victoria – Ten minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Manchester Victoria – Rochdale – Fourteen minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Rochdale – Hebden Bridge – Sixteen minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Hebden Bridge – Halifax – Fifteen minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Halifax – Low Moor – Six minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Low Moor – Bradford Interchange -Ten minutes – Current Northern timings.
  • Bradford Interchange – Leeds – Nineteen minutes – Current Northern timings.

Totals.

  • London and Manchester Victoria – Two hours and fifteen minutes.
  • London and Rochdale – Two hours and twenty-nine minutes.
  • London and Bradford – Three hours and six minutes.
  • London and Leeds – Three hours and twenty-five minutes.

I suspect times could be speeded up a bit.

Proposed Developments Of Manchester Metrolink

This sub-title has its own Wikipedia entry.

Developments that would be beneficial to a Lumo service might include.

A station at Cop Road on the Oldham and Rochdale Line, that would support new housing.

Tram-trains between Oldham and Heywood On the Calder Valley Line.

These two developments will directly bring more passengers to the Lumo service, but because the Lumo service has links with the Metrolink at Eccles, Manchester Victoria and Rochdale any Metrolink improvements should benefit the Lumo service.

 

November 13, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments