The Anonymous Widower

US Interior Secretary: ‘No Future For Offshore Wind Under This Administration’

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

US Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said at a press conference on 10 September that offshore wind has no future in the US under the Trump administration and that the government was reviewing five offshore wind projects that are now under construction.

There is also this quote from Burgum.

Offshore wind was too expensive and not reliable enough.

Many of those projects weren’t really about electricity, they were about tax subsidies

I think the fact that the subsidies have been either cut back or limited means that it is likely that there will not be future offshore wind built in America.

He also added that there were concerns that wind turbines interfered with whales and radar systems.

I asked Google AI a few questions.

Is Offshore Wind Extremely Expensive?

Google AI replied.

No, offshore wind is not considered extremely expensive when compared to other energy sources, particularly gas-fired power stations, and its costs are projected to fall further. While initially more expensive to construct than onshore wind due to the marine environment, the higher and more consistent wind speeds offshore generate more power, leading to a competitive or lower overall levelised cost of energy (LCOE) in many regions. Recent economic challenges like inflation and supply chain disruptions have increased costs temporarily, but the sector’s financial position is recovering, and cost reductions are expected to continue.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Is Offshore Wind Reliable?

Google AI replied.

Yes, offshore wind is a reliable energy source because it generates power more consistently than onshore wind due to higher, more dependable wind speeds at sea, and can be integrated with other renewables and energy storage to provide continuous power. Offshore wind turbines operate almost all the time, and the power can be backed up by grid-level storage to ensure a steady electricity supply, even when the wind isn’t blowing.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Are Subsididies And Tax Breaks Important For Offshore Wind?

Google AI replied.

Yes, subsidies and tax breaks are important for the offshore wind industry, which faces high upfront costs and inflationary pressures, to make it more cost-competitive with fossil fuels and secure financing for projects. These incentives help reduce costs for developers, de-risk investments, and ensure the technology can meet climate targets by fostering investment and ensuring long-term viability.

That looks pretty fair to me, but if you were in the oil and gas industry you might think differently.

On the other hand some countries like Norway and the UK, are encouraging the linking of offshore wind farms to offshore oil and gas production to decarbonise offshore operations.

Does Offshore Wind Kill Whales?

This article on the BBC is entitled Fact-Checking Donald Trump’s Claim That Wind Turbines Kill Whales.

It goes into detail about Trump’s claims about wind turbines and marine life.

These are four paragraphs.

“We know what the main threats are to humpback whales: it’s very much the impact from things like fishing and ship strikes,” says Rob Deaville from the Zoological Society of London’s Cetacean Strandings Investigation Programme.

“To talk about wind farms being a problem takes away discussion around the very real threats that are a problem for those species.”

Many other areas with high numbers of wind farms have not seen an increase in whale mortality.

For example, the UK is home to the world’s four largest wind farms, but no humpback whale strandings there have been conclusively linked to the impact of those farms.

That looks pretty fair to me.

But because of our massive portfolio of offshore wind farms and top universities, who research the marine environment, the UK is in a unique position to expose fake science, that was made up on the back of a used envelope.

Does Offshore Interfere With Radar?

Google AI replied.

Yes, offshore wind farms can interfere with radar by reflecting radar signals, causing “radar clutter” or false echoes that can obscure real targets, like aircraft or ships, or create phantom images on a radar display. This interference, also known as a “blade flash,” can negatively impact air defense, air traffic control, and maritime navigation, leading to reduced accuracy and potential safety risks.

That looks pretty fair to me.

Have Wind Turbines Caused Any Air Accidents?

Google AI replied.

Yes, wind farms have caused air accidents, though they are rare. These incidents primarily involve light aircraft colliding with wind turbines or experiencing loss of control due to turbulence from turbine wakes. Examples include a pilot crashing near a wind farm due to turbulence and another fatal crash involving an aircraft hitting a turbine blade.

That looks pretty fair to me.

I learned to fly light aircraft in the 1970s and I remember being told about wake turbulence from airliners, which has been strong enough in some cases to flip an aircraft like a Cessna 150 upside down or into a spin.

What Are The CAA’s Rules For Flying Near Wind Turbines?

Google AI replied.

The primary CAA rule for flying near wind turbines is related to their visibility and safety, focusing on lighting requirements and potential hazards like turbulence. Structures 150 meters or higher require medium-intensity red lights. Pilots must avoid dazzling lights with their own, and wind turbine developers must assess and mitigate risks such as turbulence, radar interference, and impact on Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs).

That looks like what I would have expected.

Conclusion

I have tried not to be selective with my evidence, but if you are there are reasons that could be used to ban wind turbines.

I am also happy to add any other questions.

 

September 13, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Environment | , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Cerulean Winds Submits 1 GW Aspen Offshore Wind Project In Scotland (UK)

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on enerdata.

These first two paragraphs add more details.

Floating wind developer Cerulean Winds has submitted an offshore consent application for its 1 GW Aspen floating wind project to the local authorities in Scotland (UK). The application was submitted to the Scottish Marine Directorate Licensing Operations Team and is supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project. The Aspen project is comprised of 72 wind turbines to be installed 100 km off the coast in the Central North Sea to deliver 1 GW of renewable energy, expecting to start operations before 2030. The development is expected to attract a total investment of GBP11bn (€12.6bn) across a 50-year lifespan.

Cerulean Winds is partnering on the project’s delivery with NOV, Siemens Energy, Bilfinger and Ocean Installer. The company plans to develop three floating offshore wind projects in the Central North Sea (Aspen, Beech and Cedar), which are expected to be comprised of over 300 wind turbines in total.

This wind farm along with its sisters ; Beech and Cedar doesn’t appear to have been added to Wikipedia’s master list of offshore wind farms.

From a Cerulean infographic on this page, it appears that Aspen, Beech and Cedar are all 1008 MW wind farms, that are planned to be operational in 2028, starting in 2028 and starting in 2028. It would be good for the ambitions of Ed Miliband, if these three wind farms were fully operational by the end of 2030.

September 12, 2025 Posted by | Energy | , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

I’ve Signed Up For A Heata

I’ve now got the new boiler, I said I was getting in I’m Getting A New Hydrogen-Ready Boiler.

But unfortunately, during the fitting, we found that my hot water system had a leak problem and the immersion heater wasn’t working.

So I decided to sign up for a heata, which I wrote about in British Gas Partners With heata On Trial To Reuse Waste Heat From Data Processing.

It was a painless process, but unfortunately, I can’t have one yet, as they told me this.

Thank you for registering interest in being part of the heata network, very much appreciated.

We’ll be in touch when there is an opportunity to be part of a pilot, eg testing our unvented heata unit, or to join the network as it expands.

The heata team.

That is very fair.

They didn’t request anything more than name, e-mail address, broadband speed and my hot water tank type.

They didn’t ask for full address, credit card or even, who was my energy supplier.

In the meantime, I can use the new boiler for hot water.

How Heata Works

This page on the heata web site, describes how the system works.

September 10, 2025 Posted by | Computing, Energy | , , | Leave a comment

The Monster That Is AquaVentus Is Waking Up

I have written about AquaVentus for some time, but inh the last couple of days, ten references have been found to the project by my Google Alert.

What Is AquaVentus?

AquaVentus has a web page on the RWE web site, from where I clipped this image.

Note.

  1. The spine of AquaVentus is a pipeline called AquaDuctus to bring hydrogen to Germany.
  2. This image shows 10.3 GW of hydrogen will be generated and brought to near Wilhelmshaven in North-West Germany.

These two paragraphs introduce AquaVentus.

Hydrogen is considered the great hope of decarbonisation in all sectors that cannot be electrified, e.g. industrial manufacturing, aviation and shipping. Massive investments in the expansion of renewable energy are needed to enable carbon-neutral hydrogen production. After all, wind, solar and hydroelectric power form the basis of climate-friendly hydrogen.

In its quest for climate-friendly hydrogen production, the AquaVentus initiative has set its sights on one renewable energy generation technology: offshore wind. The initiative aims to use electricity from offshore wind farms to operate electrolysers also installed at sea on an industrial scale. Plans envisage setting up electrolysis units in the North Sea with a total capacity of 10 gigawatts, enough to produce 1 million metric tons of green hydrogen.

It is not an unambitious project.

North Sea Hydrogen Co-operation: AquaVentus And Hydrogen Scotland

The title of this section is the same as that of this page on the Hydrogen Scotland web site.

This is the introduction.

Hydrogen Scotland signed a comprehensive Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with AquaVentus at Offshore Europe in Aberdeen. The partnership aims to unlock the North Sea’s vast potential for hydrogen production and establish Scotland as a key supplier to European markets through the development of shared infrastructure.

Both partners are committed to intensifying research activities and advocating for the rapid scale-up of a European hydrogen economy.

By joining forces, members of AquaVentus and Hydrogen Scotland can help advance the development and deployment of technologies along the entire value chain – from production through transport and storage to the use of hydrogen for decarbonising the energy system. In addition, both organisations intend to intensify their supporting activities and jointly advocate for the accelerated ramp-up of a European hydrogen economy.

This map of the North Sea, which I downloaded from the Hydrogen Scotland web site, shows the co-operation.

Note.

  1. The yellow AquaDuctus pipeline connected to the German coast near Wilhelmshaven.
  2. There appear to be two AquaDuctus sections ; AQD 1  and AQD 2.
  3. There are appear to be three proposed pipelines, which are shown in a dotted red, that connect the UK to AquaDuctus.
  4. The Northern proposed pipeline appears to connect to the St. Fergus gas terminal on the North-East tip of Scotland.
  5. The two Southern proposed pipelines appear to connect to the Easington gas terminal in East Yorkshire.
  6. Easington gas terminal is within easy reach of the massive gas stores, which are being converted to hold hydrogen at Aldbrough and Rough.
  7. The blue areas are offshore wind farms.
  8. The blue area straddling the Southernmost proposed pipe line is the Dogger Bank wind farm, is the world’s largest offshore wind farm and could evebtually total over 6 GW.
  9. RWE are developing 7.2 GW of wind farms between Dogger Bank and Norfolk in UK waters, which could generate hydrogen for AquaDuctus.

This cooperation seems to be getting the hydrogen Germany needs to its industry.

These five paragraphs outline a position paper by AquaVentus.

This opportunity for German-British cooperation on hydrogen is highlighted in a position paper presented by AquaVentus alongside the signing of the MoU. This paper addresses how the requirements of German-British cooperation – as outlined, for example, in the July 2025 Kensington Treaty between the UK and Germany and the European Commission’s Common Understanding published in May 2025 – can be met.

The position paper highlights the significant potential of hydrogen production in Scotland, the necessity of imports for Germany, and references transport infrastructure already under planning. It thus lays the foundation for cross-border hydrogen trade between Germany and the United Kingdom, and for deeper European cooperation in the hydrogen sector, with three essential prerequisites:

Firstly, the networking of producers and consumers across national borders is critical for a successful market ramp-up

Secondly, beyond this synchronised production and transport infrastructure, regulatory frameworks must also be harmonised. Hybrid connection concepts (pipes & wires) that integrate both electricity and hydrogen networks provide the necessary flexibility for future energy needs, enable efficient use of renewable energy and ensure cost-effective grid expansion

Thirdly, the development from a national core network to a European Hydrogen Backbone is emphasised. Projects such as AquaDuctus can serve as a nucleus for building a pan-European hydrogen network that will shape Europe’s energy infrastructure in the long term. For the authors, strengthened cooperation with the United Kingdom is not only a sound energy policy and economic decision, but also a key contribution to European energy resilience.

Note.

September 9, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Energy Storage, Hydrogen | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

‘Targeted Attack’ | US DOI Plans To Revoke More Permits; White House Seeking To Engage Health And Human Services Department?

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

In a matter of months, the US offshore wind industry went from a growing investor and employer to an industry that is now undergoing what Oceantic Network called a “targeted attack” after reports emerged that the US Department of the Interior (DOI) plans to revoke federal permits for two more projects. The Trump administration has reportedly also asked multiple agencies, some of which are typically not involved in offshore energy permitting, to get involved in reviewing the impacts of offshore wind.

The whole article is very much a must-read.

The last two paragraphs are a quote from Sam Salustro, who is SVP Policy & Market Strategy at Oceantic Network.

“The Trump administration is singling out an American energy industry, undermining a 40-state, $25 billion domestic supply chain while holding American business investments hostage. This is from a political playbook that should make every industry worry whether they will be targeted by this administration or the next”

“We call on federal leaders to halt this targeted attack and restore certainty and predictability to our energy industry and the thousands ready to get back to work.”

Trump has no right to destroy an industry along with thousands of jobs, just because he doesn’t like it, when there is no commercial or environmental reason.

I will certainly not welcome Trump and his fellow travellers to the UK for his State Visit.

September 7, 2025 Posted by | Energy | , , , , | 2 Comments

Scotland And AquaVentus Partner On North Sea Hydrogen Pipeline Plans

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on H2-View.

These four paragraphs introduce the deal and add some detail.

Hydrogen Scotland has committed to working with the AquaDuctus consortium on cross-border infrastructure concepts to connect Scotland’s offshore wind power to hydrogen production in the North Sea.

Under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the two organisations plan to combine Scotland’s offshore wind with AquaVentus’ offshore electrolysis expertise, linking export and import goals across the North Sea.

The AquaDuctus pipeline is a planned offshore hydrogen link designed to carry green hydrogen through the North Sea, using a pipes and wires hybrid approach. The German consortium plans 10GW of offshore electrolysers in the North Sea, producing around one million tonnes of green hydrogen.

The pipeline design allows offshore wind farms to deliver electricity when the grid needs it, or convert power into hydrogen via electrolysis and transport it through pipelines.

Germany is embracing hydrogen in a big way.

  • I introduce AquaVentus in AquaVentus, which I suggest you read.
  • AquaVentus is being developed by RWE.
  • AquaVentus connects to a German hydrogen network called H2ercules to actually distribute the hydrogen.

This video shows the structure of AquaVentus.

I clipped this map from the video.

Note.

  1. The thick white line running North-West/South-East is the spine of AquaVentus, that will deliver hydrogen to Germany.
  2. There is a link to Esbjerg in Denmark, that is marked DK.
  3. There appears to be an undeveloped link to Norway, which goes North,
  4. There appears to be an undeveloped  link to Peterhead in Scotland, that is marked UK.
  5. There appears to be a link to just North of the Humber in England, that is marked UK.
  6. Just North of the Humber are the two massive gas storage sites of Aldbrough owned by SSE and Rough owned by Centrica.
  7. Aldbrough and Rough gas storage sites are being converted into two of the largest hydrogen storage sites in the world!
  8. There appear to be small ships sailing up and down the East Coast of the UK. Are these small coastal tankers, that are distributing the hydrogen to where it is needed?

When it is completed, AquaVentus will be a very comprehensive hydrogen network.

I believe that offshore electrolysers could be built in the area of the Hornsea 4, Dogger Bank South and other wind farms and the hydrogen generated would be taken by AquaVentus to either Germany or the UK.

  • Both countries get the hydrogen they need.
  • Excess hydrogen would be stored in Aldbrough and Rough.
  • British Steel at Scunthorpe gets decarbonised.
  • A 1.8 GW hydrogen-fired powerstation at Keadby gets the hydrogen it needs to backup the wind farms.

Germany and the UK get security in the supply of hydrogen.

Conclusion

This should be a massive deal for Germany and the UK.

September 6, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Energy Storage, Hydrogen | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Powering The Humber Energy Revolution

The title of this post is the same as this story on the Centrica web site.

This is the sub-heading.

From the UK’s largest industrial carbon emitter to a clean energy powerhouse, the Humber is ready to be transformed.

These are the first two paragraphs, which add more detail.

We’re prepared to invest £2 billion to keep Rough open and transform it into one of the world’s largest hydrogen storage facilities. This bold move is vital for the UK’s energy security, accelerating the energy transition and unlocking thousands of green jobs. But to make this vision a reality, we need strategic support from government.

We’ve spent time in the Humber, speaking with local communities and industry leaders to understand how this region’s infrastructure shapes lives and powers the nation.

It looks to me, that Centrica have got fed up with our useless, squabbling politicians and decided to act.

There is also a video to watch.

 

September 6, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Energy Storage, Hydrogen | , , , | 1 Comment

Shell Pulls Plug On Rotterdam Biofuels Plant

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on The Times.

This is the sub-heading.

Retreat from green energy continues as facility that was earmarked to produce sustainable aviation fuel and renewable diesel will not now be built

These first three paragraphs add some details.

Shell has scrapped construction of one of Europe’s biggest biofuels plants as it continues its retreat from green energy

The move by the FTSE 100 oil and gas group represents a further setback for efforts to cut aviation emissions.

Shell said it would not restart construction of the biofuels facility at its Rotterdam energy and chemicals plant, which was due to produce sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) and renewable diesel.

When I wrote Centrica Secures Investment Stake In Gasrec Helping Boost UK Bio-LNG Ambitions, I took a look at the use of liquified natural gas (LNG) in transport.

This paragraph from the Centrica press release about the stake, gives the thoughts of Chris O’Shea, who is Group Chief Executive, Centrica.

Chris O’Shea, Group Chief Executive, Centrica plc, said: “Demand for bio-LNG for transport is growing fast as more HGV operators make the switch – drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel*. This investment in Gasrec enhances our collaboration with the leading company in the sector, and puts us in a strong position to energise a vital sector of the industry on its journey to net zero.”

Chris O’Shea of Centrica appears to feel that bio-LNG is a good alternative to diesel, so have Shell come to a similar decision, about satisfying the demand for diesel?

I asked Google AI if LNG has advantages over diesel as a truck fuel and received this answer.

Yes, LNG offers advantages over diesel, including significantly lower emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and particulate matter (PM), which improves local air quality. It can also be more economically efficient, with fuel costs potentially lower than diesel depending on market conditions. However, the overall greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits are mixed; while LNG has a lower carbon content, it can result in higher lifecycle GHG emissions due to energy losses in its production and transport, as well as methane slip.

Note.

  1. If it drops emissions by up to 85 percent for bio-LNG, surely, it would do the same for LNG.
  2. I also think with tight regulations, the use of LNG could improve air quality in cities like London.
  3. LNG would probably be a more affordable fuel than hydrogen.

It should also be noted, that several major diesel engine makers, now make families of engines, which can handle, diesel, hydrogen and natural gas.

LNG would also be a convenient stepping stone between current fuels and hydrogen, that might give a few extra years for the transition.

Could LNG Be Used In Aircraft?

Consider.

  • LNG would certainly give some reduction in carbon emissions.
  • Handling LNG in aircraft could have similar problems to hydrogen, so companies like Airbus might have already solved them.
  • In addition, LNG doesn’t have the fearsome reputation, that hydrogen seems to have gained because of the Hindenburg.
  • It would be easier to provide LNG fuel at airports all round the world.
  • Airbus have said availability of hydrogen at airports, could be a problem.

Out of curiosity, I asked Google AI if LNG could be used to power an airliner and received this answer.

Yes, liquefied natural gas (LNG) can theoretically be used to power airliners, offering a potential reduction in CO2 emissions compared to conventional jet fuel, but significant challenges exist. These challenges include the need for entirely new, larger, and heavier cryogenic fuel tanks, modifications to aircraft engines and fuel systems, and the development of a new global infrastructure for LNG supply. While experimental tests have been conducted, such as on the Soviet Union’s Tupolev Tu-155 in 1989, LNG is not currently in normal service due to these practical and infrastructural hurdles.

I would prefer it was a purpose-designed Airbus, than a Soviet-era Tupolev.

 

 

 

September 3, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Environment, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Centrica Secures Investment Stake In Gasrec Helping Boost UK Bio-LNG Ambitions

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from Centrica.

This is the sub-heading.

Centrica has secured a minority stake in Gasrec, the UK’s largest dual provider of bio-LNG (bio-Liquified Natural Gas) and bio-CNG (bio-Compressed Natural Gas) to the road transport sector,

These first two paragraphs give more details.

Gasrec says the investment will drive the next phase of its infrastructure ambitions, with plans to open a UK wide network of open-access refuelling stations supplying renewable bio-LNG for the decarbonisation of heavy goods vehicles.

Centrica is taking a 16% stake and becomes one of three major shareholders in Gasrec, alongside global integrated energy company bp and private family office 44 North.

I have some thoughts.

Does Running A Truck On bio-LNG or bio-CNG. Reduce Carbon Emissions?

This paragraph from the press release, gives the thoughts of Chris O’Shea, who is Group Chief Executive, Centrica.

Chris O’Shea, Group Chief Executive, Centrica plc, said: “Demand for bio-LNG for transport is growing fast as more HGV operators make the switch – drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel*. This investment in Gasrec enhances our collaboration with the leading company in the sector, and puts us in a strong position to energise a vital sector of the industry on its journey to net zero.”

As Centrica is a public company, with shareholders, who would take a dim view of Mr. O’Shea telling porkies, I suspect we can assume that the following is true.

Drawn by a clean, ready-to-use fuel which slashes CO2 emissions by up to 85 per cent in comparison to diesel.

The asterisk in the full quote, refers to this note.

Low Carbon Vehicle Partnership, Innovate UK and Office for Low Emission Vehicles, Low Emission Freight & Logistics Trial (LEFT), Key Findings, November 2020. Using specific feedstocks CO2 reductions of 200% are achievable.

Centrica could be being conservative with their claims.

Decarbonising Buses, Locomotives And Trucks

Despite what Elon Musk, would have us believe, electric trucks will not dominate the future of freight transport.

An electric truck would be the vehicle equivalent of asking Usain Bolt to run a hundred metres with a large refrigerator on his back.

Trucks are going to need a fuel without a weight penalty and with a long range.

I asked Google for information about Cummins diesel, natural gas and hydrogen engines and received this AI Overview.

Cummins offers engines powered by diesel, natural gas, and hydrogen. While diesel engines are well-established, Cummins is also developing both natural gas and hydrogen engines, particularly focusing on hydrogen as a pathway to zero-carbon solutions for various applications. Cummins utilizes a fuel-agnostic platform, meaning a common base engine can be adapted for different fuel types, including diesel, natural gas, and hydrogen.

Recently, GB Railfreight purchased thirty Class 99 locomotives from Stadler.

  • They can use electrification, where it exists.
  • Where electrification doesn’t exist, they can use an onboard Cummins diesel engine, which is built in Darlington.
  • In electric-mode, they have 6.2 MW of power, and are the most powerful locomotives ever to run on UK railways.
  • In diesel-mode, they have 1.8 MW of power, which is more than enough to haul a large container train in and out of Felixstowe.

I had thought that at some future date, Cummins would convert these locomotives to electro-hydrogen.

But now that Gasrec is providing bio-LNG and bio-CNG, GB Railfreight, have the option of converting both hydrogen and biomethane.

Similar logic can be applied to Wrightbus’s Streetdeck Ultroliner, one version of which is fitted with a Cummins engine, that can be converted to electric, hydrogen or natural gas, which of course includes biomethane. This page on the Wrightbus web site describes the bus.

Wrightbus are also going back into coach manufacture, as I wrote about in Wrightbus Goes Back To The Future As It Relaunches The Contour Coach. As with the Streetdeck Ultroliner, Cummins seem to be providing one of the power units.

It seems to me, that the zero- and low-carbon revolution in transport will generate a need for the availability of biomethane, hydrogen and natural gas fuel for transport all over the country.

Gasrec with around twenty biomethane fuelling points around the country, seem well-placed to supply the biomethane in bio-LNG or bio-CNG  form.

Could Gasrec Deliver Hydrogen?

Various bus companies in the UK, have had difficulty getting the fuel for their hydrogen buses.

I believe that delivering hydrogen would be very similar to delivering LNG and if Gasrec can deliver LNG successfully and safely, they probably have the technology to do the same for hydrogen.

Centrica Seem To Be Assembling An Interesting Consortium

These are some deals, that I have reported on this blog, that involve Centrica.

Note.

  1. A lot of these deals are are about hydrogen production.
  2. Some of these deals are about biomethane production.
  3. None of these deals talk about getting hydrogen and biomethane to customers.

It appears to me, that Gasrec have a model that works to get hydrogen, methane and biomethane from production and storage to the end customers.

Developing A Rural Hydrogen Network

In Developing A Rural Hydrogen Network, I talked about supplying all those millions of off-gas grid properties with hydrogen for heating, agricultural and industrial purposes, in the countryside of the UK.

Gasrec have the technology to decarbonise the countryside.

Conclusion

Gasrec would appear to be a very useful partner for Centrica.

 

September 3, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Energy Storage, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Does Nuclear Power Not Sell Newspapers?

Five days ago, In Rolls-Royce SMR Advances To Final Stage In Swedish Nuclear Competition, I wrote about Rolls-Royce being one of two successful bids to advance to the ext stage to build Small Modular Reactors for Vatenfall in Sweden.

Since then, Rolls-Royce’s Swedish success has not featured in any newspaper in the UK, not even the Financial Times.

I can only assume, that good news stories about nuclear power, don’t sell newspapers.

September 2, 2025 Posted by | Energy | , , , , , , | Leave a comment