Amber Train Links The Baltic States To Western Europe
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.
These paragraphs outline the freight link.
A trial Amber Train service between the Baltic States left the Estonian port of Muuga on September 13, arriving the following day at Kaunas in Lithuanian where its load of semi-trailers was transferred to 1 435 mm gauge wagons for onward transport to destinations including France and the Netherlands.
The 1 520 mm gauge wagons returned to Muuga with trailers for onward sea transport to Finland.
This Google Map shows the Estonian port of Muuga Harbour.
Note.
- Muuga Harbour is the largest cargo port in Estonia, located on the southern coast of the Gulf of Finland, 17 kilometres (11 mi) northeast of the capital Tallinn
- It is one of the few ice-free ports in northernmost Europe and one of the most modern ports in the Baltic Sea region.
- Enlarging the picture shows a lot of rail lines.
It looks like Muuga Harbour is an ideal Northern terminus for the Amber Train freight service.
This Google Map shows the area of the Kaunus Intermodal Terminal.
Note.
- The railway runs diagonally across the map.
- Estonia is to the North-East.
- Poland is to the South-West.
This map shows how the different gauges are used in the North-East of the previous map.
Note.
- Standard gauge tracks are shown in black.
- Russian gauge tracks are shown in red.
- The standard gauge track ends in the North-East corner of the map.
Trucks would probably moved between trains on parallel tracks in this freight terminal.
It appears to be a very simple way to run piggy-back trains of trucks between The Baltic States and Finland and Central and Western Europe.
Rail Baltica
According to Wikipedia, the location for the Kaunas Intermodal Terminal was chosen as it is compatible with the route of Rail Baltica, which will create a new standard gauge route between Kaunas and Tallinn in Estonia.
The Amber Train
The Amber Train has an impressive web site, where this is said on the home page.
Amber Train is a joint project of the national railways of Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. It is an excellent example of cooperation, that offers road and railway clients convenient and efficient freight logistics.
Amber Train is an intermodal train, which runs on the route Šeštokai / Kaunas – Riga – Talinn, thus connecting the three Baltic States by railways and opening new business opportunities for freight shippers.
Exclusivity of the project is the connection of Western and North Europe, using the unique Šeštokai and Kaunas intermodal terminals, which enable the transshipment of freight from the European gauge to the 1520 mm gauge and vice versa.
The train is planned to run 2 times per week (with a future perspective to run up to 4 times per week), delivery time is 24 hours. Train length – up to 43 container wagons.
It is planned, that already in 2021 customers will be offered the opportunity to transport semi-trailers by railways via all three Baltic States. For this purpose, special “pocket” wagons are already in production.
Operations are managed by AB LTG Cargo (Part of Lithuanian Railways group), Latvia’s LDZ Loģistika and Estonia’s Operail.
It appears to be a well-thought out service.
A few years ago, I was on the roads of North-East Poland, about a hundred miles South of Kaunas.
These roads were crowded with large trucks going between The Baltic States and Finland and Central and Western Europe.
I suspect that once the Amber Train is fully established, a proportion of these trucks will go by rail.
Plan To Build £150m Green Hydrogen Plant At Felixstowe Port
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article in The Times.
These two paragraphs introduce the project.
A £150 million green hydrogen plant is to be built at the UK’s busiest container port according to proposals by ScottishPower, it emerged yesterday.
The energy company has devised plans for a 100MW plant at the Port of Felixstowe which will provide fuel to power trains, trucks and ships.
There’s a lot more to this project than it would appear at first.
Where Will The Electrolyser Be Sited?
The Times article says this.
The site will be around the size of a football pitch, on brownfield land within the port.
I have flown my virtual helicopter over the port and there could be a couple of suitable football pitch-sized plots.
Where Will The Electricity Come From?
The East Anglia Array is a proposed massive series of offshore wind farms, which will be about thirty miles off the Suffolk coast.
Wikipedia says this about the size.
Up to six individual projects could be set up in the area with a maximum capacity of up to 7.2 GW.
But the main thing about the East Anglian Array is that it is being developed by a partnership of ScottishPower and Vattenfall.
Negotiations shouldn’t be difficult.
This Google Map shows the town of Felixstowe.
Note.
- The Ports of Felixstowe and Harwich are opposite each other on the two banks of the River Orwell.
- The power cable to the East Anglia Array comes ashore at Bawdsey in the North-East corner of the map.
- The Port of Felixstowe has two rail links, which are not electrified.
I suspect that the electric power to the electrolyser might well be routed underwater to the Port of Felixstowe either from Bawdsey or possibly direct from the wind farm.
A Meeting With A Crane Driver
I used to regularly go to Ipswich Town away matches and at one match, I met a senior crane operator from the Port of Felixstowe. We got talking about electrifying the rail link to the port and decarbonisation of the port in general.
He was adamant that electrification of the rail lines in the port, wouldn’t be a good idea as containers occasionally get dropped or crane drivers aren’t as accurate as they should be.
Hydrogen-Powered Freight Locomotives
When, I told him about the possibilities of hydrogen rail locomotives, he felt this was the way to go, as no rail electrification would be needed in the port.
Hydrogen-electric hybrid locomotives would also be able to take containers cross-country to the main electrified routes to the North and West, where they would raise their pantographs and use electric power.
How many trucks would be removed from the A14, A1 and M6?
Will Greater Anglia Convert Their Class 755 Trains to Hydrogen?
Class 755 trains have a short PowerPack in the middle and are designed for conversion to hydrogen-electric operation.
Note the PowerPack has four slots for diesel engines, batteries or hydrogen fuel-cells.
A Better Working Environment
But my fellow supporter felt the biggest gain in the port, would come with replacement or updating of all the vehicles and handling equipment, as if all these machines were hydrogen-powered, this would greatly improve the working conditions for the dock workers.
ScottishPower’s Vision
This press release on ScottishPower’s web site is entitled ScottishPower Vision For Green Hydrogen Fuels Hub At Port Of Felixstowe.
Conclusion
The Port of Felixstowe is doing the planning for this in the right way, as ensuring the hydrogen supply in the port first, is the logical way to transition to hydrogen power.
But then, I’ve watched the Port of Felixstowe grow since the 1960s and they usually get their decisions right.
The press release starts with these bullet points.
- ScottishPower explores green hydrogen at Port of Felixstowe to help decarbonise the UK’s busiest port.
- The project could help kick-start the low carbon transformation of the UK’s heavy transport sector.
- 100MW facility could deliver up to 40 tonnes of green hydrogen per day – enough to power 1300 hydrogen trucks.
- International export also being explored.
And these two paragraphs.
ScottishPower, with Hutchison Ports, is exploring the opportunity to develop, build and operate a multi-hundred MW green hydrogen production facility at the Port of Felixstowe – with the potential to decarbonise industry and transportation in the region.
Both companies have set out their vision to help create a greener port, which could provide clean fuel for customers at Britain’s busiest container port.Plans are being developed to use green hydrogen for onshore purposes, such as road, rail and industrial use, with the potential to create liquid forms, such as green ammonia or e-methanol. This could, in turn, provide clean fuels for shipping and aviation, and create opportunities for cost-effective export to international markets. The project aims to continue engineering and site development works to align with customer demand from 2025 onwards.
It is certainly a very extremely ambitious vision!
But then the county of my conception, has a tremendous determination to succeed. And often against all conventional logic!
The Channel Crossing Problem
My company provided the project management computer system; Artemis, that planned how both the tunnel and the rail link to London was built. So I heard numerous stories of inadequate infrastructure on both sides of the Channel.
I also for a time was a business partner of the man, who had been project manager on a previous attempt to build a Channel Tunnel, that was cancelled by Harold Wilson’s government in 1975, who had a lot of interesting input.
I have heard over the years of these inadequacies,
- The Dartford Crossing wouldn’t be able to handle the traffic generated at busy times.
- The Eurotunnel terminal in Folkestone wasn’t built large enough.
- The port of Dover is too small.
- The roads to the Port of Dover were inadequate.
- The rail terminal at St. Pancras doesn’t have the capacity to run services to the places that are better served by train.
The government only has one major improvement in place, which is a new Thames Crossing, but that will only make matters worse, as more traffic will be tempted to cross the Channel to get to Europe.
It is my belief, that we need more innovative services to provide more capacity.
- A German company called CargoBeamer, is developing a system, whereby unaccompanied freight trailers can be moved thousands of miles across Europe by rail. Their plans include services to Birmingham, Cardiff, Manchester and Scotland.
- I would also run a CargoBeamer service from Calais to Holyhead to create a direct freight service between Ireland and Europe.
- Ebbsfleet needs to be developed as a destination for the Elizabeth Line and an extra terminal for both daytime and sleeper trains to Europe.
- High speed freight trains, based on existing 160 mph EMUs could be used.
- Given the position of the new Thames Crossing on the Isle of Grain, perhaps a new ferry port could be built on the island to partially replace Dover.
- Could some Eurotunnel services start from Watford Gap?
We have to be bold.
Rolls-Royce Lists Sites For New Reactor
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on The Times.
The headline is a bit misleading, as the site is for a factory to build the reactors.
These paragraphs list the sites.
Rolls-Royce, the engineering company, has shortlisted six sites for a factory that will build its proposed small nuclear reactors.
The constituency of Rishi Sunak, the chancellor, in Richmond, North Yorkshire, is among the locations, which have been whittled down from more than 100 proposals.
The other sites are Sunderland, Deeside in Wales, Ferrybridge in West Yorkshire, Stallingborough in Lincolnshire, and Carlisle.
As Rishi Sunak resigned last night, does that rule out Richmond?
I feel that Rolls-Royce will choose this location with care, as any good company would.
I have a few thoughts.
Will Rolls-Royce Go For Zero-Carbon Manufacture?
If you intend to build large numbers of small modular nuclear reactors, it is not a good idea from a marketing or public relations point of view to release tonnes of carbon in their manufacture.
This page on the Rolls-Royce web site has a title of Destination Net Zero, where this is said.
We have already pledged to reduce emissions from our own operations to net zero by 2030, and to play a leading role in enabling the sectors in which we operate to reach net zero by 2050. Now, we are now laying out our technology pathway and setting clear short-term targets to show how we will achieve those goals.
I am sure Rolls-Royce will go for zero-carbon manufacture.
This will probably mean the site will need to have access to the following.
- Renewable electricity from wind, solar or hydro.
- Hydrogen
- Zero-carbon steel, copper and other raw materials
An external supply of hydrogen may well be the least important, as they recently purchased a German electrolyser developer and manufacturer, that I wrote about in Rolls-Royce To Develop mtu Hydrogen Electrolyser And Invest In Hoeller Electrolyser.
Will The Factory Have A Rail Connection?
A rail connection could have four main purposes.
- Bringing in raw materials like steel.
- Delivering manufactured components to site.
- If the factory is a major source of employment, rail is the greenest way to bring in staff from further away.
- If large shipments are brought in and delivered by zero-carbon rail, it generally doesn’t annoy the locals.
Note.
- The huge Britishvolt gigafactory at Blyth will have a rail connection for the transport of lithium and finished batteries.
- Transport of nuclear fuel and waste around the UK is generally done by train, with perhaps the last few miles by truck.
I think it will be very unlikely, that the new factory will not have a rail connection.
Will Power Station Modules Be Transportable By Rail?
Given that in the UK, there will need to be a railhead at or near the power station for fuel and waste, I believe that if modules were transportable by rail, this could give big advantages to the roll-out of the reactors.
If a former Magnox nuclear site like Bradwell is to be home to a fleet of small modular reactors, the electrified railhead is already in place at Southminster station.
The crane and the track probably need a bit of a refurbishment, but overall, it looks in reasonable condition.
If you sell nuclear as zero-carbon, rail is the easiest way to ensure zero-carbon delivery of modules.
The standard loading gauge in the UK is W10, which is 2.9 metres high and 2.5 metres wide.
- A standard twenty-foot container is six metres long, which must help.
- W10 gauge allows the transport of standard Hi-Cube shipping containers, which are 9 ft 6 in. high, on flat rail wagons.
- If the modules can fit into Hi-Cube shipping containers, this would make transport easier everywhere, as all ports and railways can handle these containers.
Would it be possible to fit all components into this relatively small space?
It could be difficult, but I suspect it is possible to achieve, as it would make the reactors easier to sell.
- Sites would only need to be able to receive Hi-Cube shipping containers.
- These could be trucked in from a nearby railhead.
- Containers on a railway are a very secure way of transporting goods.
- Rolls-Royce has masses of experience in shipping large turbofan engines in standard shipping containers. Some are shipped in very carefully controlled air conditions to minimise damage.
- Hi-Cube shipping containers can go through the Channel Tunnel.
I am fairly sure, that Rolls-Royce are designing the power station, so that it fits into a number of Hi-Cube shipping containers. It would give other advantages.
- Smaller components would probably speed up assembly.
- Smaller components may also mean that smaller cranes could be used for assembly.
There may need to be some gauge enhancement to be able to access some sites in the UK.
- This article on Rail Engineer, is entitled Showing Your Gauge, and it details how gauge is being enhanced to W10 and W12 in the UK.
- Network Rail have also published a map, which shows where W10 gauge is possible. Click here to view.
I am fairly certain, that most railways in the world can handle Hi-Cube shipping containers.
Availability Of Staff
Rolls-Royce will obviously opt for a place, where there is good availability of staff.
Conclusion
I feel that any of the sites mentioned could be the ideal place for the factory.
If I had to have a bet, I’d put it the factory at Stallingborough in Lincolnshire.
- It is close to the Zero Carbon Humber energy and hydrogen hub.
- There is plenty of space.
- There is a rail connection.
- It is close to the Port of Immingham.
- It is close to British Steel at Scunthorpe.
It is also not that far from Derby by road or rail.
Nestlé Unveils New Double-Stacking Rail Logistics Plan To Reduce Carbon Footprint
The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from Nestlé.
These paragraphs explain the concept.
Nestlé UK & Ireland has unveiled plans to increase freight capacity on trains to allow the double-stacking of products, an important step towards reducing its carbon footprint.
The new curtain-sided rail container with a raising roof, designed to transport double-stacked palletised products by rail, was displayed at the Multimodal Exhibition in Birmingham this week.
The design of the container overcomes an important barrier as the height of road trailers differs from rail containers due to the height constraints of the rail network, meaning transport by rail had not been a winning option for Nestlé until now.
Utilising a hydraulic raising roof mechanism, the unit allows the business to double-stack its food and drink products. The roof is then lowered to just above the height of the stock, making it compliant with the height requirements of rail transport, while being able to get more products on board.
It is currently under test between the Midlands and London.
The press release also mentions, that it could be used to deliver to Tesco, who are extensive users of rail freight and have been for some years.
Call For Rail Sector To Mobilise To Get Ukrainian Agricultural Exports Moving
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.
These are the first two paragraphs.
Rail has a central role in the European Commission’s plan to establish ‘Solidarity Lanes’ for the transport of Ukrainian agricultural exports which would normally use the Black Sea ports that are being blockaded by Russia.
Announcing its plan, the commission said the Russian blockade is threatening global food security, creating an urgent need for alternative transport routes. Ukraine is the largest exporter of sunflower oil (50% of world exports), the third largest of rapeseed (20%) and barley (18%), the fourth of maize (16%) and the fifth of wheat (12%).
It certainly is a big problem and not just for Ukraine, but for any country that habitually buys these agricultural products from Ukraine.
But it will probably require a lot of investment to solve.
These are points from the article.
- Trains handling 1,400 tonnes are possible.
- The average waiting time for wagons at the Ukrainian border is sixteen days.
- The capacity of existing freight corridors must be expanded and new ones must be created.
After reading the whole article, it does seem that an EU plan is being created.
I have my thoughts.
Gauge Change
Consider.
- There will be a gauge change between standard and Russian gauge.
- Spanish company; Talgo has developed the technology, so that trains can run on both gauges and even change between gauges at a slow speed.
- The technology is used on the Strizh train, which runs passenger services between Berlin and Moscow via Warsaw.
I feel it is likely, that Talgo could develop freight wagons to move the agricultural products between Ukraine and ports in Poland or Germany.
Talgo’s Plans
In A Spaniard In The Works!, I outlined Talgo’s plans, which included building a factory at Longannet in Scotland.
But their plans must have been disrupted, as the company did not secure the High Speed Two Classic-Compatible rolling stock contract.
On the other hand Longannet could be an ideal place to build trains for Eastern Europe. They could go on a ferry to Gdansk, Helsinki or other ports.
Carbon-Cutting Test Run Sees Welsh Timber Return To Railway
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on RailBusinessDaily.
These are the first two paragraphs.
For the first time since 2005, a freight train carrying Welsh timber left Aberystwyth as part of a trial that could see regular freight traffic return to the Cambrian line.
The successful trial, aimed at exploring the feasibility of transporting timber by rail to reduce carbon emissions, opens up the possibility of removing hundreds of large lorries from the rural roads of mid Wales.
These are a few details and points from the article.
- The terminal at Aberystwyth appears to have been just outside Aberystwyth station.
- The timber was taken to Kronospan at Chirk in North Wales.
- The 700 ton load of ten wagons was hauled by a pair of Class 37 locomotives.
- The pair was needed because of the route.
- Network Rail claim that upwards of sixteen trucks were taken off the roads of mid-Wales.
This Network Rail picture shows the loading of timber at Aberystwyth station.
And this Network Rail picture shows the two Class 37 locomotives.
It looks to me, that the locomotives pushed the empty train in and pulled the full train out. Once on its way, the train took the Cambrian Line to Shrewsbury and then it was about twenty miles to tyhe Kronospan factory at Chirk.
This video shows the train leaving.
I appears to have been filmed at a convenient level crossing.
Conclusion
It must have been a success, as they are going to repeat the exercise.
There would appear to be only one problem. The pair of Class 37 locomotives make a bit of a noise.
- The pair have a power of 2610 kW.
- I estimate that the journey between Aberystwyth and Chirk will take around two hours and thirty minutes.
- Aberystwyth and Chirk is a distance of about a hundred miles.
It looks to me that this journey could be handled by one of the new Class 99 locomotives, that I wrote about in Class 99 Electro-Diesel Locomotive Order Confirmed.
I also doubt whether a battery-electric Class 99 locomotive could handle the route, but a hydrogen-powered locomotive, that fuelled at Aberystwyth might be able to do it.
I do think though, that passenger trains between Aberystwyth and Shrewsbury could in the future be hydrogen-powered.
So if hydrogen were to be provided at Aberystwyth, hydrogen haulage of the timber trains would be a possibility.
Royal Mail Rolling Back The Years To Put More Post On Trains
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on The Daily Telegraph.
This is the sub-title.
Post transported by train will treble under plan to ditch planes and lorries.
These are some points from the article.
- They are in discussion with Network Rail.
- Roughly 4pc to 5pc of Britain’s mail is transported on the railways.
- Keith Williams is executive Chairman of Royal Mail and also was the independent chair of the recent Government-supported Rail Review.
- One of the aims of the strategy is to rescue the share price.
- Royal Mail are building some fully-automated parcel-hubs, with the first two at Warrington and Northampton.
I have some further thoughts.
The Warrington Parcel Hub
This appears to be at the Omega Business Park on the closed RAF Burtonwood airfield.
This Google Map shows Warrington.
Note.
- The M62 running across the map in an East-West direction.
- The two junctions on the M62 are 8 and 9, with junction 8 to the West and junction 9 to the East.
- The Omega Business Park is on both sides of the M62 to the West of Junction 8.
- Royal Mail appear to have three sheds to the South of the motorway.
- Amazon, Asda, Hermes, The Hut Group and others have sheds in the Omega Business Park.
- The red arrow indicates the location of Royal Mail’s Warrington Rail Terminal, where mail services between London and Scotland call.
This second Google Map shows Royal Mail’s Warrington Rail Terminal in more detail.
Note.
- The West Coast Main Line runs North-South to the West of the terminal.
- It looks to be a cramped site.
- I doubt that Royal Mail would want to transfer parcels between the rail terminal and the parcel hub, because of the number of trucks involved and the carbon they will generate.
- They could use Hydrogen or battery trucks, but that would be a considerable expense.
Perhaps the best thing to do, would be to bore a tunnel.
- It’s about six kilometres.
- Electric shuttles would be zero-carbon.
- Everything could be highly-automated.
- No drivers would be needed.
It would probably cost less to run.
Royal Mail At Northampton
Where the Northampton Loop Line meets the West Coast Main Line between Rugby and Northampton, there is a massive logistics park, which is shown in this Google Map.
Note.
- There are at least three Royal Mail sites here.
- One at the top of the map is labelled Royal Mail NDC NEW SITE.
- One at the bottom of the map is labelled Royal Mail National Distribution Centre.
- There is a rail connection.
This must be a very large investment for Royal Mail.
Further Parcel Hubs
No further hubs are mentioned in the article. But I’m sure, that the systems at Warrington and Northampton could be replicated.
The East Coast, Great Western And Midland Main Lines
I suspect, when these lines are fully electrified, they could be brought into the system.
A Hub At Calais
Why not?
Conclusion
It looks a good plan and one that can be realised.
GB Railfreight Names Locomotive For Ukraine
The title of this post is the same as that of this article on Railnews.
This is the first paragraph.
GB Railfreight has unveiled a Class 66 locomotive bearing the nameplates ‘Glory to Ukraine’, and painted in a special livery using the Ukrainan colours. GBRf said it ‘stands with Ukraine, and this newly painted locomotive honours the people affected by the conflict as they continue to courageously defend their homeland’.
Perhaps not in the same class as this article from the Guardian, which is entitled Lithuania Names Road Leading To Russian Embassy ‘Ukrainian Heroes’ Street’.
But every little bit helps!
The TruckTrain
Note that I first came across the TruckTrain, when I wrote Innovative Composite Masts Look To Reduce Cost And Increase Efficiency Of Rail Electrification.
I have now decided that the concept could be so revolutionary, that it needs its own post.
The TruckTrain
TruckTrain is a concept with roots in Coventry University that could be off-beam enough to become a new normal.
The TruckTrain Web Site
The TruckTrain web site is the main source of information for the TruckTrain.
A sales leaflet for the TruckTrain can be accessed from the Home page.
The About page on the web site, gives this description of the TruckTrain.
TruckTrains® are short, fast, bi-directional self-propelled fixed freight train formations able to operate at passenger train speeds. Train sets can work in multiple in response to operational and commercial imperatives. Each vehicle is powered and all axles are powered to deliver the acceleration and braking required to achieve and to sustain this demanding level of performance. The initial configuration will use diesel-electric power to ensure freedom of operation over the national network. A hybrid design able to operate on electrified lines has also been developed together with an all-electric variant capable of extremely high-speed performance.
The Specifications page on the web site gives a detailed specification of the TruckTrain.
These are my thoughts.
The Basic Design Concept
The leaflet on their web site describes the concept.
This visualisation at the bottom of the leaflet shows four TruckTrains forming a train carrying twelve intermodal containers, each of which I suspect are 20 feet long.
Note.
- Each of the four TruckTrains appears to be carrying three intermodal containers.
- A 20 foot container is 6.096 metres long, so three are 18.288 metres long.
- Each TruckTrain has two bogies and four axles.
- The cabs at the two ends of each TruckTrain are different sizes.
- The longest carriages in use on the UK rail network are the 26 metre carriages used by Hitachi in their Class 800 and other trains.
I can deduce that with a twenty metre load space, a TruckTrain would accommodate any of the following.
- Three twenty-foot containers.
- A forty foot container and a twenty foot container.
- Large numbers of pallets.
- Ability to handle roll-cages as regularly used by supermarkets.
- A curtain-sided load space.
Any of these would give six metres for the two cabs.
This should be enough space for two cabs, but there are other possibilities.
- The longer cab could have a pantograph on the roof to use 25 KVAC electrification.
- The space behind the driver cab in the longer cab could be used for power-train gubbins.
- There must also be space under the load space for more power-train gubbins.
I feel certain, that an electrically-powered TruckTrain is more than a possibility.
The Width And Height Of A TruckTrain
This sentence from the Wikipedia entry for intermodal container, says this about their size.
Intermodal containers exist in many types and a number of standardized sizes, but ninety percent of the global container fleet are so-called “dry freight” or “general purpose” containers – durable closed rectangular boxes, made of rust-retardant Corten steel; almost all 8 feet (2.44 m) wide, and of either 20 or 40 feet (6.10 or 12.19 m) standard length, as defined by International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 668:2020. The worldwide standard heights are 8 feet 6 inches (2.59 m) and 9 feet 6 inches (2.90 m) – the latter are known as High Cube or Hi-Cube (HC / HQ) containers.
The Specifications page for the TruckTrain says this.
2-7 car Freight multiple unit capable of carrying combinations of 6 to 21 TEU of ISO containers, Hi-cube containers or swap bodies or 175 cubic meters of palletised cargo per vehicle with refrigeration available for both variants.
And the sales leaflet for the TruckTrain says this.
Performance and train path profile similar to a Turbostar passenger DMU.
Does that also mean that the width and height of a TruckTrain are no greater than that of a Class 170 train, which are respectively 2.69 and 3.77 metres?
It appears that international standards allow for a wagon floor height of 0.94 metres, which gives the following train heights to the top of the container.
- Standard container – 3.53 metres
- High Cube container – 3.84 metres
It will be a tight fit, but companies like Stadler use smaller wheels on some of their UK trains, which also have a height of 3.95 metres
I suspect that with a bit of selective bridge-raising TruckTrains will be able to go anywhere a Turbostar can go.
Connecting TruckTrains Together
The pictures of the TruckTrain on the web-site and the leaflet appears to show a standard multiple unit coupler like a Dellner.
The Specifications page for the TruckTrain says this.
2-7 car Freight multiple unit capable of carrying combinations of 6 to 21 TEU of ISO containers.
Is seven the maximum or just a marketing limit?
The technology and software to connect the trains and run them as a formation has been well and truly tested in many multiple units.
Motive Power Of TruckTrains
The About page for the TruckTrain says this.
The initial configuration will use diesel-electric power to ensure freedom of operation over the national network. A hybrid design able to operate on electrified lines has also been developed together with an all-electric variant capable of extremely high-speed performance.
As I said earlier, the pantograph could go on the roof of the longer cab for electric operation and the diesel engine could go under the load, as it does on most diesel multiple units.
I would think though, that one of the best variants would mount batteries under the load space.
Hydrogen would probably be a no-no, as this would limit the availability of the train to serve certain routes.
Performance Of TruckTrains
The Specifications page for the TruckTrain says this.
Maximum speed 140 kph for the inter-modal version, 160 kph for the pallet carrier.
As some of the routes, where these trains would be used is out of Felixstowe, where there is a 100 mph operating speed on the Great Eastern Main Line, I suspect that TruckTrains will sell better with a 100 mph (160 kph) operating speed on electric power.
125 mph Truck Trains
If they were running on a fully electrified route, I suspect the technology is available to run TruckTrains at 125 mph, which would make them ideal for parcels and light freight.
Manufacture Of TruckTrains
I don’t see that there would be many problems in manufacturing TruckTrains.
- 100 mph (160 kph) bogies are readily available for freight trains.
- A wagon manufacturer would probably be happy to design and build the chassis.
- The cabs could possibly be a standard multiple unit design.
- There shouldn’t be any problems with the power-train.
- Multiple running and splitting/joining technology is very much proven.
Certified rail components would probably be available for other parts and uses.
Combi TruckTrains
Combi Aircraft is defined in Wikipedia like this.
Combi aircraft in commercial aviation are aircraft that can be used to carry either passengers as an airliner, or cargo as a freighter, and may have a partition in the aircraft cabin to allow both uses at the same time in a mixed passenger/freight combination.
Would a Combi TruckTrain have applications on some routes in the world, where a passenger route carries the occasional container up and down the route?
Several ideas might be possible.
- The simplest would probably to have a twenty or forty foot passenger module, which could be lifted in and out like a standard intermodal freight container.
- TruckTrains could also be built with the load space fitted out for passengers, so they became a Class 153 replacement, that could be coupled to a freight TruckTrain.
- Could a TruckTrain be fitted out as a specialised work train to take workers and equipment to a work site, which had difficult road access?
It could almost be like a rail equivalent of Thunderbird 2.
Point-To-Point TruckTrains
The classic point-to-point train, could be run by someone like Toyota, where the engines for their cars are made in North Wales and the cars are assembled at Burnaston near Derby. I know there is a doubt over the future of Toyota’s engine plant, due to the stopping of manufacture of cars running on fossil fuels, but surely, an appropriate number of TruckTrains shuttling on the route would give advantages over a fleet of trucks, like, speed and reliability.
In the leaflet, they mention that the TruckTrain has been designed to use single-track short-terminals. These would surely be ideal for a company that decides to use TruckTrain as a point-to-point train between an important supplier and their main factory or distribution centre.
TruckTrains Could Use Stations
There has been a lot of talk recently about using major stations as freight terminals at night.
I doubt that a TruckTrain would have any problems using stations.
International TruckTrains
Why not? In Kraft Heinz And Freight Innovation, I talked about an international freight movement, that would be ideal for TruckTrains.
TruckTrains And Ferries
Could we even see the revival of train ferries?
Imagine a terminal at a port in Ireland, which could load and unload containers between standard gauge TruckTrains and trucks.
- A short length of standard gauge track would lead from the terminal to the quay, so that the TruckTrains could be driven on and off the ferry, either using a shunter or the TruckTrains’ own battery or diesel power.
- On the other side of the water, the TruckTrain would use the UK railways to get to its destination.
This concept would allow freight to go between most of Western Europe and Ireland with only a transfer to and from trucks at both ends.
It could even be improved with dual-gauge TruckTrains, which might be able to run between Ireland and Spain, through the Channel Tunnel.
Conclusion
I like the concept and I can’t see why it would not be successful worldwide.
The Anonymous Widower 