From Groningen To Leer By Train
On my recent trip to the Netherlands and Germany, I didn’t get to do this trip by train and had to make do with a slow bus ride.
However I’ve just found this video on YouTube.
The Freisenbrücke is about an hour from the start of the video.
I should fast forward, as there is only so much travelling on a single-track rail line, that you can watch before falling asleep.
I got this impression of the route in the video, which was made in October 2014.
- The route is mainly single-track, with some passing loops at stations.
- the track is not electrified, except for short sections at either end.
- The track was almost straight.
- The track, stations and signalling appear to be in good condition.
- There were a large number of level crossings.
- The train took around one hour and twenty minutes between Groningen and Leer stations.
I can imagine that Deutsche Bahn and Arriva Netherlands were a good bit more and just annoyed, when the MV Emsmoon destroyed the bridge.
Wikipedia says this about the accident.
On 3 December 2015, Emsmoon collided with the Friesenbrücke [de], which carries the Ihrhove–Nieuweschans railway over the Ems. The cause of the accident was reported to be miscommunication between the bridge operator and pilot on board the ship. The bridge could not be raised as a train was due, but the ship failed to stop and collided with the bridge, blocking both railway and river. The bridge was so severely damaged that it will have to be demolished. Replacement is expected to take five years
I suspect, it’s not just an massive inconvenience for the railway, as a couple of miles South on the River Ems, is the Meyer Werft shipyard, where cruise ships up to 180,000 tonnes are built.
I found this document on the NDR.de web site and gleaned the following information.
- The cost of rebuilding could be up to eight million euros.
- The new bridge will be finished in 2024, if all goes well.
- Environmentalists are bringing lawsuits against the construction of the bridge.
It will be a challenge to rebuild this bridge.
This video shows the new bridge
Let’s hope that one of those large cruise ships doesn’t hit the bridge.
Conclusion
This surely has been a very costly accident.
Third Degree Murder
The title of this post is the same as that of an article by Ian Walmsley in the April 2019 Edition of Modern Railways.
In the article Ian has a heavyweight go at the Office of Road and Rail about their policy towards third rail electrification.
As a Control and Electrical Engineer, I agree with a lot he says, especially as I believe modern control systems and good design can improve safety of third rail systems to a high level.
I also believe the following.
- In some places third-rail electrification, which is only live when a train is protecting the rails from morons, is safer than any other electrification system.
- In some places, like on top of high viaducts third-rail electrification is safer for engineers installing and maintaining it, than overhead electrification.
- Some battery charging systems will be designed around third-rail electrification.
Ian’s article gives various reasons for using third-rail electrification.
He also proposes the radical innovation of using a voltage of 1500 VDC, which he calls 2XV.
I like it and agree with his reasoning..
It sounds radical, but it is not a new idea.
An article on Wikipedia is entitled Rail Transport In The Netherlands.
This is said.
Most of the network is electrified at 1.5 kV DC (which limits interoperability with neighbouring countries), although Belgian trains – built for 3 kV DC – can run on the Dutch network at reduced power. Both the HSL-Zuid and the Betuweroute have been electrified at 25 kV AC; although conversion of existing electrified lines to 25 kV AC was considered in 1997, 2005 and 2012 at a cost of over €10 billion, a 2015 proposal (revised in 2017) is to convert to 3 kV DC at a 2017 cost of €1 billion. The higher DC voltage would reduce power losses and have faster acceleration above 60 to 70 kilometres per hour (37 to 43 mph), so stopping trains would save seven to 20 seconds per stop.
Are the Dutch implementing their proposal?
Groningen Station
Groningen station sits at the centre of a rail network reaching to Delfzijl, Eemshaven, Harlingen,, Leer, Leeuwarden, Veendam and Zwolle.
These pictures show the station.
Note.
- The large numbers of Stadler GTW trains, which Arriva call Spurt.
- The decoration in the Booking Hall.
- The multiple bay platforms, some of which are electrified.
It is certainly a station worth a visit.
The Harlingen–Nieuweschans Railway
Groningen station is on the Harlingen–Nieuweschans Railway.
- It stretches from Harlingen. on the Ijsselmeer in the West to Leer in Germany in the East.
- The distance is around eighty miles.
The railway was originally built for trade between the port at Harlingen and Cerntral Europe.
Unfortunately, the Eastern section is cut-off as the freighter; MV Emsmoon, destroyed a bridge. Wikipedia says this about the accident.
On 3 December 2015, Emsmoon collided with the Friesenbrücke [de], which carries the Ihrhove–Nieuweschans railway over the Ems. The cause of the accident was reported to be miscommunication between the bridge operator and pilot on board the ship. The bridge could not be raised as a train was due, but the ship failed to stop and collided with the bridge, blocking both railway and river.[4] The bridge was so severely damaged that it will have to be demolished. Replacement is expected to take five years.
Was für ein Haufen Wichser!
And we think, we have problems with level crossings!
Conclusion
Groningen would make a base from where to tour the area. But it will be even better, when the bridge over the River Ems has been rebuilt!
The Train Station At The Northern End Of The Netherlands
Eemshaven station is the northernmost station in the Netherlands.
One of the reasons I went, was that the station is only a year old and I wanted to see how the Dutch build new stations.
Note this about the station.
- It is very basic, with few facilities.
- The single platform is very long.
- The station is surrounded by oil and gas installations on one side and the sea on the other.
It appears that for a lot of the day, the station gets two trains per hour.
This Google Map shows the station by the beach.
I would assume that most of the cars are those of workers at the oil and gas complex.
I returned on the train, I had arrived on, after a few minutes taking the pictures.
The Stadler GTW Train
Shown in the pictures is one of the Stadler GTW trains,which work the services in the North of the Netherlands.
- They are electric trains, with their own diesel power pack in the middle.
- This train had three passenger cars, but some only have two.
- Noise from the engine was noticeable and probably about the same in a Class 170 train.
- Ride quality wasn’t bad, considering the unusual configuration. But then the track looked very neat and tidy.
- Arriva call the trains Spurt.
Stadler have not stood still, since they built these trains and Greater Anglia’s new Class 755 trains are built by Stadler to similar principles.
At the turnround at Eemshaven with the driver. He indicated that there had been speculation about battery and hydrogen trains in the North of The Netherlands.
Level Crossing Accidents
An interesting aside is to look at the Wikipedia entry for Spurt.
Three of the trains have been involved in serious level crossing accidents.
The Dutch Plan For Hydrogen
This now a separate post at The Dutch Plan For Hydrogen.
Is This Stadler’s Plan For A Multi-Mode Future?
We have not seen any of Stadler’s bi-mode Flirts in service yet although Greater Anglia’a Class 755 trains have been rumoured to be speeding between London and Norwich in ninety minutes from this May!
Today, I rode on one of Stadler’s diesel GTWs between Groningen and Eemshaven in the Netherlands, which I wrote about in The Train Station At The Northern End Of The Netherlands.
GTWs are a diesel electric train with a power-pack car in the middle of the three car train. The diesel electric Flirts are a later train with a similar layout to the GTW.
So are the diesel GTWs and Flirts just a bi-mode without a pantograph? Or more likely the bi-mode is a diesel electric train with the addition of a pantograph and extra electrical gubbins.
Looking at the visualisations on Wikipedia of the bi-mode Class 755 train and the all-electric Class 745 train, it appears that the next-to-end car has the pantograph.
Are these cars with the pantograph identical on both the bi-mode and the all-electric versions? It would certainly be sensible from a engine erring point of view.
So could it be that all that is needed to convert a diesel electric Flirt into a bi-mode Flirt is to add the pantograph car and swap the power pack car for a bi-mode one? The old power pack car could then be converted into another bi-mode power pack car to convert another train.
But the power pack cars are not as simple as they look. They have four slots for diesel engines. Three-car and four-car Class 755 trains have two and four engines respectively.
I believe that one or more of the slots can be filled with a battery to create Flirts like the tri-mode ones proposed for South Wales.
So could we see some of the Greater Anglia Flirts converted in this way? Surely, Colchester Town to Sudbury could be a service that could benefit from battery power West of Marks Tey?
Today, I had a chat with a GTW driver, who said that the train he’d been driving was diesel-electric and that he had heard that batteries or hydrogen power could be used on the eoute.
The lines around Groningen seem to employ quite a few GTWs and distances are not overly long. So could some be converted to 1500 VDC electric/diesel/battery tri-modes? There is electrification at Groningen station and some of the bay platforms used by GTWs already have wires.
If the conversion is successful, then Stadler could be on a Swiss roll, as there are a lot of GTWs and Flirts out there, many of which are diesel-electric, like the one I rode today.
Would a train operator prefer to upgrade a diesel electric train that works well or buy a new bi-mode from another train manufacturer?
Could also an electric Flirt be converted into a bi-mode, by splitting the train and sticking a power pack car in the middle. Engineering common sense says that the passenger cars must be very similar to those of diesel Flirts to simplify manufacture of the trains.
We already know, that four-car Flirts are only three-car trains with an extra passenger car. Stadler could mix-and-match passenger, pantograph and power pack cars to give operators what they need.
Intelligent computer software would choose which power option to be used and the driver would just monitor, that the train was behaving as needed.
Looking at my route yesterday between Groningen and Eemshaven, it is a route of just under forty kilometres or twenty-five miles. Adrian Shooter is talking of ranges of sixty miles with battery versions of Class 230 trains. So I don’t find it impossible to create a tri-mode GTW or Flirt for this lonely route at the very North of the Netherlands.
Conclusion
Stadler seem to have created a very imitative modular train concept.
As some Flirts can travel at 125 mph, could they be serious bidders to provide the new trains for the Midland Main Line?
ProRail And Arriva Launch Automation Trials
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.
I have posted this article, because it lays out in a simple way, the benefits of digital signalling and Automatic Train Operation.
Engine Change At Bad Bentheim
I’m on a train frim Amsterdam to Osnabruck. The train, which goes all the way to Berlin, is not very fast, but they’ve now stopped for ten minutes, whilst the Dutch engine is changed for a German one! Can’t both railway companies use the dame Euro-blighter and just have a change of drivers, as we do on Anglo-Scottish services.
Surely, these are the problems that the EU should solve. Or do German and Dutch rail unions make the RMT look like pussy-cats?
Express London-Amsterdam Eurostar Service Being Explored
The title of this post is the same as the title of this article on Global Rail News.
This is the first paragraph.
Nederlandse Spoorwegen (NS) has said it is in discussions with Eurostar to boost the number of journeys from Amsterdam to London in 2019.
The aim is to do the following.
- Speed up the call at Brussels.
- Increase services from two to three per day.
- Reduce journey times from four to three and a half hours.
All very worthy, but I think Amsterdam even in three and a half hours may be a bit far, as the time by air is probably quicke.
Stadler Comes Up With A New Take And A Big Order For Hybrid And Battery Trains
This article on Global Rail News is entitled Vegetable Oil Fuel Trains To Run In The Netherlands Ahead Of Battery Conversion.
This is said.
- Arriva has ordered eighteen hybrid diesel trains from Stadler to operate its Northern Lines services in the Netherlands.
- The trains will initially be powered by Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO).
- The trains will have regenerative braking.
- Stadler have called the trains Flirtinos.
- The trains are capable of conversion to battery trains, when there is sufficient electrification.
- The first HVO trains will enter service in 2020.
- Arriva has committed to putting batteries into all of its fleet of fifty-one trains.
This a very strong environmental statement from Stadler and Arriva.
In July 2017, I wrote Battery EMUs For Merseyrail.
These trains are also being built by Stadler.
Conclusion
Have Stadler found the secret for better battery trains?
Certainly, the amount of money that Arriva is paying Stadler and the fact that Arriva are creating sixty-nine trains with batteries, indicates that they have confidence in the product!
You can’t fault Stadler’s marketing either!
Dutch Leave Passengers In The Cold
This article on Global Rail News is entitled Dutch Minister Resigns Over Fyra Failures.
The first paragraph sums up the article.
Dutch infrastructure minister Wilma Mansveld has resigned following the publication of a highly critical report on the failings of the Fyra high-speed rail fiasco.
The report, which was led by CDA parliamentarian Madeleine van Toorenburg, said that passengers had been “left out in the cold” by the HSL-Zuid project.
The second paragraph gave me the title for this post.
But as I effectively said in Back From The Hague, the Dutch, Belgians and Germans couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery!
So no wonder there’s frozen passengers all the way from Amsterdam to Brussels.
The Anonymous Widower 