The Anonymous Widower

Eurostar Orders First Double-Decker Trains

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Eurostar has revealed plans to run double-decker trains through the Channel Tunnel for the first time.

These three paragraphs add more details.

The cross-channel rail operator has confirmed it will order up to 50 trains from manufacturer Alstom, eventually increasing the size of its fleet by nearly a third.

The expansion plans would include investing heavily in a crucial London depot, it said.

But questions remain over whether the facility has enough space for both Eurostar and potential rival operators to use it.

This my solution to the problem outlined in the last paragraph.

Note, that I wrote the software that planned the building of the Channel Tunnel and the rail links to London and was also friends with the project manager of the 1960s attempt to build a Channel Tunnel.

We need more terminal platforms and depot space in the UK to handle Eurostar’s extra trains and the other companies who want to run to London.

We should split services into two groups.

Group 1 would terminate as now in an updated St. Pancras with more passenger handling capacity, which could probably be built over the tracks at the Northern end of the station. Trains would still be stabled at Temple Mills.

Group 2 would terminate at Ebbsfleet International, which would have extra platforms, a new depot, masses of car parking and a coach terminal.

Some trains from both groups could also stop at Ashford International.

To access Ebbsfleet from Central London and also create a Heathrow link to the Channel Tunnel, the Lizzie Line would be extended to Northfleet, where there is space to handle up to eight trains per hour in new platforms built in two disused sidings.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the location of Northfleet and Ebbsfleet stations.

Note.

  1. Ebbsfleet International station at the bottom of the map.
  2. The red tracks are High Speed One.
  3. The orange tracks are third-rail electrified lines.
  4. The orange tracks going across the map is the North Kent Line.
  5. Northfleet station is at the right edge of the map on the North Kent Line.
  6. Northfleet and Ebbsfleet stations are less than a kilometer apart.
  7. Ebbsfleet has a lot of car parking spaces.

I believe a spectacular cable-car or other link would connect Northfleet and Ebbsfleet stations.

These are some other thoughts.

Ebbsfleet International Station Has Good Motorway Access

This Google Map shows the location of Ebbsfleet International station in relation to the motorways.

Note.

  1. The A2/M2 road runs across the bottom half of the map.
  2. The red arrow marks the position of Ebbsfleet International station.
  3. The Dartford Crossing is a few miles West of the station.

In my last few years, as an Ipswich season ticket holder, I regularly had a lift to Ebbsfleet International from a friend and the route to the station from the M25 and the A2/M2 wasn’t bad.

But it will be getting better.

This map from the Government’s consultation on the Lower Thames Crossing, shows the road layout in a few years.

Note.

  1. The Lower Thames Crossing is shown in red.
  2. Ebbsfleet International station is about a mile South of Northfleet
  3. The new crossing will connect to the A2, a few miles East of the link road to the station.

Travellers from much of the East of  and Middle England could use the new crossing to get to Ebbsfleet International station.

These are current times from Google.

  • Birmingham – 2 hours and 41 minutes
  • Cambridge – 1 hour and 17 minutes
  • Edinburgh – 7 hours and 44 minutes
  • Fishguard – 5 hours and 29 minutes
  • Glasgow – 7 hours and 6 minutes
  • Holyhead – 5 hours and 29 minutes
  • Hull – 4 hours and 1 minute
  • Ipswich – 1 hour and 29 minutes
  • Leeds – 3 hours and 55 minutes
  • Liverpool – 4 hours and 40 minutes
  • Manchester – 4 hours and 28 minutes
  • Milton Keynes – 1 hour and 37 minutes
  • Newcastle 5 hours and 25 minutes
  • Norwich – 2 hours 23 minutes
  • Nottingham – 2 hours and 55 minutes
  • Peterborough – 1 hour and 54 minutes
  • Sheffield – 3 hours and 35 minutes
  • Stoke-on-Trent – 3 hours and 25 minutes
  • York – 4 hours and 16 minutes

Note.

  1. I would suspect that the opening of the Lower Thames Crossing will knock 10-15 minutes off these times.
  2. Edinburgh, Glasgow, Hull, Leeds, Newcastle, Nottingham, Peterborough, Sheffield and York would probably be quicker to Europe with a change to Continental train services at St. Pancras, rather than Ebbsfleet International.
  3. With improvements to rail services, more of these journeys will be quicker by train.
  4. High Speed Two should connect Birmingham, Liverpool, Manchester and Stoke-on-Trent to London, by the mid 2030s.

But there are some, who always feel their car is safer in a car park!

Ebbsfleet International Station Has A Large Amount Of Car Parking

This map shows the car parks at Ebbsfleet International station.

Note.

  1. Some of the parking areas are marked with a P.
  2. It is easy to pick-up and drop passengers.
  3. The car parks could be double-decked to add more spaces if needed.
  4. According to the Ebbsfleet International web site, the station currently has 5225 parking spaces, 68 accessible car parking spaces.

For those that have a lot of luggage or a large family, taking the car to Ebbsfleet International may be the best option.

Ebbsfleet International Station Should Have A Coach Station

Consider.

  • In the next few years, hydrogen-powered coaches with a thousand kilometre range will come to dominate the long distance coach market.
  • Mercedes and Wrightbus are know to be developing long-distance hydrogen-powered coaches.
  • Hydrogen-powered coaches will be able to reach all of England and Wales and a large part of Scotland from Ebbsfleet International.
  • Ebbsfleet International is closely connected to the UK motorway network.
  • Continental coaches using the Channel Tunnel, could use Ebbsfleet as a coach interchange with the UK.
  • Ebbsfleet International could also handle customs services for Continental coach services, which would take the pressure off the Channel Tunnel and the ferries.
  • Ebbsfleet International could also have a coach link to Gatwick Airport.

These and other reasons make me feel, that a coach terminal at Ebbsfleet International is essential.

A Green Connection Between The Two Halves Of The European Union For the Gretas Of This World

Consider.

  • There is no zero-carbon route between the island of Ireland and Continental Europe.
  • Eurostar is all-electric between London and Continental Europe, but only serves a limited number of destinations.
  • Low- or zero-carbon ferries are being designed, that run on hydrogen.
  • Trains between London and the Irish ferries are diesel-powered.
  • The simplest solution would surely be to run hydrogen-powered coaches between Ebbsfleet International and Fishguard and/or Holyhead. Both journeys would take three and a half hours.

Hydrogen-powered coaches are under development by Wrightbus.

I also asked Google AI if anybody is planning zero-carbon ferries between the UK and ireland and received this answer.

Yes, there are plans for zero-carbon ferries between the UK and Ireland, with a specific “Green Corridor” feasibility study underway for the Holyhead to Dublin route, and a separate, separate commuter service project planned between Belfast and Bangor. The Belfast Maritime Consortium is developing the zero-carbon commuter service, and a separate “Green Corridor” feasibility study is assessing potential low-carbon pathways between Holyhead and Dublin

I believe the green connection is feasible, provided the following happens.

  • Ebbsfleet International is reopened and developed as a station for Continental Europe.
  • The zero-carbon ferries are developed.
  • The busmasters from Ballymena deliver the ultimate hydrogen-powered coach.
  • Hydrogen and other fuels are made available, where they is needed.

This could do wonders for the economy of the island of Ireland.

Out of curiosity, I did ask Google AI, what is the longest coach route in the UK and received this answer.

The longest scheduled coach journey in the UK is the Scottish Citylink route from Glasgow to Uig on the Isle of Skye (route 915 or 916), which is about 230 miles and takes around 7 hours and 50 minutes. Historically, there have been much longer international bus routes, such as the Penn Overland tour from London to Ceylon, but these were not regular, scheduled services.

So my proposal at five hours and 29 minutes is only a short hop.

 

I also believe that with good project management that the additional infrastructure could be built by 2030, with little or no disruption to existing services.

 

October 22, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Gatwick Second Runway Plan Approved By Transport Secretary

The title of this post is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander has approved plans for a second runway at London Gatwick Airport, as the government looks for economic growth opportunities.

These four introductory paragraphs add some detail.

The £2.2bn privately-financed project involves in effect moving the current Northern Runway 12 metres to bring it into regular use, as well as other developments, including extending the size of terminals.

The airport says its plans will bring jobs and boost the local economy. But there has long been opposition from campaigners and groups worried about the impact on the surrounding area.

Gatwick currently handles about 280,000 flights a year. It says the plan would enable that number to rise to around 389,000 by the late 2030s.

A government source has described the plans as a “no-brainer for growth,” adding that “it is possible that planes could be taking off from a new full runway at Gatwick before the next general election.”

Over the last fifty years, I’ve been involved in many large projects, as I used to write project management software and at one period in the 1980s, half of all the world’s major projects, were being managed by the Artemis software, that I wrote in a Suffolk attic.

I am starting this post by asking Google AI, when Gatwick’s Northern Runway was built. This was the answer I received.

Gatwick’s Northern Runway was built in 1979 by widening an existing taxiway to serve as an emergency runway. While the main runway is known as 08R/26L, the standby or emergency runway is designated as 08L/26R and is located just to the north of the main runway.

Note.

  1. 08 means that the runway is aligned at 080 degrees, which is almost due East.
  2. 26 means that the runway is aligned at 260 degrees, which is almost due West.
  3. Normally, when landing and taking off at Gatwick, your aircraft will use the Southern runway, which points to the West or Runway 26L.

This Google Map shows the layout of the airport.

Note.

  1. The longer Southern 08R/26L runway.
  2. The shorter Northern 08L/26R runway.
  3. The station in the North-East corner of the map is Horley.
  4. The station to the East of the runways is Gatwick Airport station.
  5. Both stations are on the Brighton Main Line, which runs North-South past the Airport.
  6. As when it was built, the Airport envisaged that the Northern runway would be turned into a runway that would meet all standards, I doubt there will be any problems rebuilding the Northern Runway, the required twelve metres to the North.

It was a cunning plan, when it was executed in the late 1970s and worthy of Baldrick at his best.

I do wonder, if it had been developed using Artemis!

September 22, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel, World | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Council Invests £16m In Hydrogen Buses

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

There are now 34 hydrogen buses on the streets of Surrey, the council has announced.

These two paragraphs add more details.

Surrey County Council (SCC) said it has invested £16m and partnered with Metrobus to provide greener commuting options.

The fleet is now made up of 23 single-deck buses and 11 double-deckers, the council said.

I wrote about a ride on one of these buses to Gatwick Airport in Sutton Station To Gatwick Airport By Hydrogen-Powered Bus.

From the comments in the article, by a Surrey County Council councillor, the council seems very pleased with their hydrogen buses.

July 30, 2025 Posted by | Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , | 2 Comments

Was The Price Of Fuel A Factor In The Ahmedabad Plane Crash?

I am asking this question, as I know that a prudent airline, is careful where it buys the fuel for its aircraft.

I asked Google, if jet fuel is more expensive at Gatwick or in India and got this reply.

Jet fuel (Jet A-1/AVTUR) is more expensive at Gatwick Airport compared to India. At Gatwick, the price is 906.8 GBP/1000L. While in India, the price varies by location, for example, ₹97,975.72/kl in Delhi. This indicates that Jet A-1/AVTUR costs more at Gatwick than in India.

I suspect, if they can that Air India would prefer to fill up their planes in India.

Consider.

  • The flight that crashed was AI 171.
  • The aircraft was a Boeing 787-8.
  • The Air India flight that crashed was flying direct to Gatwick Airport, which is a great circle distance of 4254.3 miles.
  • Afterwards, it would fly from Gatwick Airport to Goa, which is a great circle distance of 4703.7 miles.
  • Wikipedia gives the range of a Boeing 787-8 as 8410 miles.

As a former private pilot, who did many long flights, if I were Air India, I might use a strategy like this.

  • Fill the plane with as much fuel, as it can carry at Ahmedabad.
  • Fly to Gatwick on an efficient great circle route.
  • Top up the plane, with enough fuel to fly safely to Goa, at Gatwick.

The cost of fuel would be minimised, but it would mean a heavy take-off at Ahmedabad.

The temperature at Ahmedabad yesterday was around the low thirties and as the altitude is only 53 metres, I don’t think it would have been a hot-and-high take-off.

 

June 13, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Gatwick To Accept ‘Stricter Limits’ On Plane Noise

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub heading.

Gatwick Airport has said it will accept stricter limits on aircraft noise and has put forward what it called improved plans in response to the government’s approval for a second runway.

These two introductory paragraphs give a bit of detail about the deal that seems possible.

Last month Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said that she was “minded” to give consent for the airport to bring its second runway into use.

Gatwick has now responded to the Secretary of State’s letter with what it called an “improved noise scheme for local residents.”

This certainly appears to be a fruitful start to negotiations.

The airport also seems to have put forward a package of proposals.

  • The airport said it accepts a requirement to have 54% of passengers using public transport before it brings the Northern Runway into operation. – but it needs support.
  • Gatwick said it needs help from others, including the Department for Transport, to meet the target.
  • The full Gatwick Express train service should be reinstated.
  • If the 54% public transport target is not achieved then an alternative cars-on-the-road limit should be met instead.
  • If neither the public transport mode share or the cars-on-the-road limit are met, then the second runway would be delayed until £350m of road improvements have been completed.
  • The airport also responded on sustainable design and reducing emissions.

I also think, we should note, that Heidi Alexander was seen at Newton Aycliffe, at the launch of Grand Central’s new trains, which I wrote about in Arriva Group Invests In New Battery Hybrid Train Fleet In Boost To UK Rail Industry.

It does seem, that after one trip to Hitachi’s factory in the North-East and she has softened her attitude on open access operators.

Perhaps, the sushi was excellent?

Since that trip to the North-East, Arriva Group have put in another application for an open access service, which I wrote about in Arriva Group Submits Open Access Rail Application To Connect Newcastle And Brighton, Via London Gatwick.

This proposal could mean the following.

  • Lots of neglected places between Newcastle and Brighton get an improved and better connected rail service.
  • Gatwick gets extra trains, which will increase the proportion of passengers going to Gatwick by train.
  • Arriva Group’s owner ; I_Squared meet one of their corporate objectives of improving transport links.
  • This could help the airport meet the conditions for a new runway.
  • Hitachi get an order for a few more trains.
  • An optimist, might even think, that this deal could result in some exports of Hitachi trains.

Being a politician, Heidi will claim the credit, if it all works out well.

 

April 26, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , | Leave a comment

Arriva Group Submits Open Access Rail Application To Connect Newcastle And Brighton, Via London Gatwick

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from Arriva Group.

These three bullet points act as sub-headings.

  • New services operated by Arriva’s Grand Central would introduce a direct rail connection between the Northeast and Midlands to London Gatwick and the South Coast.
  • Making better use of available network capacity, the proposed route would connect underserved communities in the UK and enhance long-distance connectivity without the need to interchange through London.  
  • The application reflects Arriva’s wider European strategy to connect people and places through sustainable transport solutions, strengthening regional economies and supporting modal shift.

This introductory paragraph provides more details.

Arriva Group has today announced it is submitting an open access application to the Office of Rail and Road (ORR) to introduce a new direct rail service between Newcastle and Brighton, via London Gatwick, providing vital connectivity for underserved communities along the route.

Other points to note include.

  1. There will be five trains per day in each direction.
  2. The proposed service would call at Durham, Darlington, Northallerton, York, Doncaster, Sheffield, Derby, Burton-on-Trent, Birmingham New Street, Warwick Parkway, Banbury, Oxford, Reading, Wokingham, Guildford, Redhill, London Gatwick and Haywards Heath.
  3. The service would be operated by Grand Central.
  4. The service could be introduced from December 2026.

It will be the be the first direct service between Newcastle and Brighton.

This final paragraph outlines where the service fits in Arriva’s wider philosophy.

The plans are part of Arriva Group’s broader commitment to strengthening regional connectivity and making better use of available rail capacity. By opening up new travel corridors, Arriva is helping to connect more people to jobs, education and leisure opportunities – and to encourage a greater shift from private cars to public transport.

There are certainly plenty of places in Europe, that could use a service like this one between Brighton and Newcastle.

In The Ultimate Open Access Service, I describe a possible open access service between Amsterdam and Hamburg, which is about the same distance as Brighton and Newcastle, which is 372.8 miles by Arriva’s proposed route.

These are some of my thoughts in no particular order.

A High-Class Service Between Oxford And Brighton Could Be An Interesting Development In Its Own Right

Governments, rail operators and passenger groups of all persuasions and flavours have warmly welcomed the planned reopening of the rail route between Oxford and Cambridge.

I suspect an Oxford and Brighton service would be equally welcomed.

Brighton may not be an academic powerhouse yet, but it does have one thing that Oxford and Cambridge lack ; the sea.

Gatwick Airport Will Surely Welcome The Extra Connectivity

Gatwick Airport will expand and extra rail services will do the following for the airport.

  • Make it easier to get the planning permission for the second runway.
  • Make it easier for passengers and airport and airline staff to get to the airport.
  • Surely, the more direct rail connections the airport has, will increase the likelihood, that families and other groups, will choose to fly from Gatwick.
  • More train services could cut the amount of car parking per flight needed at the airport.

Gatwick Airport station has recently rebuilt and added extra capacity, so I doubt there will be trouble accommodating another ten trains per day.

Would The Army Welcome The New Service?

Two of the British Army’s main training areas are in North Yorkshire and in Surrey.

Would they find a train service between the two areas useful?

What Trains Will Grand Central Trains Use For The New Service?

In Arriva Group Invests In New Battery Hybrid Train Fleet In Boost To UK Rail Industry, I talked about how Grand Central will be acquiring Hitachi trains for their routes between London and Bradford and Sunderland.

  • These will be Hitachi tri-mode trains.
  • The trains will have a range of over forty miles on batteries.
  • They will probably be serviced in Yorkshire or the North-East.
  • The trains will be built by Hitachi at Newton Aycliffe, with batteries from Turntide Technologies in Sunderland.
  • The first trains will be delivered in 2028.

As Arriva intend to start services from December 2026, they would probably use diesel trains to start with.

I would expect that Grand Central would go for a unified fleet, which would mean more Hitachi tri-mode trains.

For convenience, they could all be serviced at Doncaster, which all Grand Central services will pass through.

What Sections Will Not Be Electrified Between Brighton and Newcastle?

As far as I can see from OpenRailwayMap, the following sections of the route are not electrified.

  • Two sections of the North Downs Line – 29 miles.
  • Didcot and Birmingham New Street – 80.9 miles
  • Birmingham New Street and Derby – 41.3 miles
  • Derby and Sheffield – 36.4 miles
  • Sheffield and Doncaster – 18.4 miles

Note.

  1. Electrification South of Reading will be third rail, so some trains will need to have third-rail shoes.
  2. The length without electrification is a total of 206 miles.
  3. As Newcastle and Doncaster, Redhill and Brighton, Reading and Didcot, and Birmingham New Street station are all electrified, the longest sections the trains would run without electrification would be between Didcot and Birmingham New Street and between Birmingham New Street and Doncaster.
  4. The planned electrification between Derby and Sheffield would make life easier.

It appears that trains capable of handling a hundred miles of unelectrified railway are needed.

Hitachi have shown that a five-car train with one battery will travel 70 km (43.5 miles) on a full battery, so one with three batteries should be able to manage the hundred miles needed in a few years.

Will Any Extra Electrification Be Needed?

I think Birmingham New Street station will be the critical point.

  • The next electrification on the route to the South of Birmingham New Street is at Didcot, which is 80.9 miles away.
  • The next electrification on the route to the North of Birmingham New Street is at Doncaster, which is 96.1 miles away.

These battery ranges should be possible, but an alternative would be to provide an electrified platform at one or more intermediate stations to be safe.

Stations that could be equipped to the South would include Oxford and Banbury and to the North would include Burton-on-Trent, Derby and Sheffield.

Perhaps electrifying a single platform at these stations, should be the first thing to be done, so that battery-electric trains can run on some useful routes as soon as they are delivered and approved.

Electric Trains, Even Battery-Electric Ones, Will Be Quick Off The Mark

Electric trains have good acceleration and I wonder, if this acceleration will enable stops, that are not feasible with diesel trains to be fitted in with electric trains, without having to take the same time penalty.

This might allow useful stops to be added to the service.

  • Chesterfield is not mentioned, but most trains passing through stop.
  • As I said, Farnborough North could be a useful stop for the Army.
  • There might be a case for selective stopping patterns.

Battery-electric trains stop without any noise or pollution.

Connection To The Ivanhoe Line At Burton-on-Trent

The proposed Ivanhoe Line is intended to link Burton-on-Trent and Leicester.

As it is intended that the Newcastle and Brighton service will call ten times per day at Burton-on-Trent station, this must surely improve the economics of the Ivanhoe Line.

Are there any other new or reopened rail schemes, that will be helped by the proposed Brighton and Newcastle service?

Updated Frequencies At Sheffield

Currently, trains at Sheffield have these daily frequencies to the towns and cities on the proposed Newcastle and Brighton route.

  • Newcastle – 18
  • Durham – 16
  • Darlington – 15
  • Northallerton – 0
  • York – 19
  • Doncaster – 64
  • Derby – 58
  • Burton-on-Trent – 9
  • Birmingham New Street – 21
  • Warwick Parkway – 0
  • Banbury – 0
  • Oxford – 3
  • Reading – 4
  • Wokingham – 0
  • Guildford – 0
  • Redhill – 0
  • London Gatwick – 0
  • Haywards Heath – 0
  • Brighton – 0

Note.

  1. Sheffield gets five trains per day  (tpd) direct connections to nine new destinations.
  2. Other useful destinations will get five more tpd.
  3. Reading is a useful interchange for Wales and the West.
  4. Guildford is a useful interchange for Portsmouth, Southampton and West Surrey.
  5. Reading and Guildford have coach services to Heathrow.

There are also a large number of universities along the route.

Hitachi Can Offer A One-Supplier Battery-Electric Train Solution

It should be noted that Hitachi can offer a complete package including battery-electric trains and all the electrification, transformers and other electrical gubbins needed.

So perhaps for the Chiltern Main Line, which is used for part of the route between Didcot and Birmingham, Hitachi could deliver a one-supplier solution, that would also electrify Chiltern’s services between Marylebone and Birmingham Moor Street.

Remember, Chiltern are another Arriva Group company.

If Hitachi get this right, I can see other lines being electrified in this way.

Could This One-Supplier Battery-Electric Solution Be Exported?

I discussed this in Arriva Group Invests In New Battery Hybrid Train Fleet In Boost To UK Rail Industry, where I suggested that the United States could be a market.

  1. Arriva Group are ultimately American-owned.
  2. Hitachi’s battery technology is also American-owned.

In these days of Trump’s tariffs, these could prove useful facts.

As Arriva Group used to be owned by Deutsche Bahn, they may be another interested party, especially as they have a lot of lines, where I believe Hitachi’s solution would work.

Conclusion

A battery-electric railway service of nearly four hundred miles would certainly attract the passengers.

 

April 25, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The UK’s Worst Airport For Flight Delays Revealed

The title of this post, is the same as that, as this article in The Times.

This is the sub-heading.

The shortage of air traffic controllers is a European problem but some in the industry have blamed early retirement during the pandemic

These are the first two paragraphs.

Gatwick was the country’s worst airport for delays last year as it struggled with air traffic issues and capacity.

Departures were an average of more than 23 minutes late, according to analysis of Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) data. It is the second year in a row it has topped the late league table.

It does look that the first paragraph is saying they need more air traffic controllers and that second runway.

Ironically, one of the adverts in my copy of the article was for Avanti West Coast.

 

April 21, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Checking The Traffic In The Blackwall Tunnel

In A Return Journey Through The Silvertown Tunnel On A 129 Bus, I observed that there wasn’t much traffic in the Silvertown Tunnel, but that it might be in the Blackwall Tunnel.

So this morning, I went through the Blackwall tunnel to check and took these pictures.

Note.

  1. I caught the 108 bus from bus stop F, which is opposite the taxi rank at Stratford station.
  2. The bus went round parts of the Olympic Park to pick up passengers.
  3. There was quite a bit of traffic slowing my journey before the Blackwall Tunnel.
  4. I went Southbound first in the modern tunnel buiult in the 1960s.
  5. I turned round at North Greenwich station, as the bus was crowded and I wanted a good seat from on return, from which to take pictures.
  6. I came back in the Northbound tunnel, which dates from the 1890s.

But I achieved my objective and found that the Blackwall Tunnel was taking more vehicles than the Silvertown Tunnel. Even the buses were taking more passengers!

I have further thoughts.

I Don’t Like The Blackwall Tunnel

Consider.

  • We were going to my Uncle Bert’s house in Broadstairs one day, when I was about eight.
  • In those days of the 1950s, there was only one bore of the tunnel and we got stuck in it, for a couple of hours.
  • I don’t remember using the tunnel again and I suspect we probably used Tower or London Bridge.

The last time I used it in a car, was coming back from Gatwick to when we lived just North of Ipswich and the Dartford Crossing was blocked. So I cut through South-East London, drove through the Blackwall Tunnel and up the A12.

If I Was A Driver I’d Probably Take The Silvertown Tunnel

Unless of course there was a problem!

April 10, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 2 Comments

Gatwick Airport South Terminal Bus Station

These pictures show the bus station at Gatwick Airport’s South Terminal

Note.

  1. It is in two separate sections (Northbound and Southbound) on either side of a fairly busy dual carriageway.
  2. This is the bus station in the South Terminal for Metrobus local services.
  3. Most of these pictures were taken on the Southbound side, with the last four looking down from the terminal.
  4. The information displays were clear and easy to understand.
  5. Access to the terminal and the train station was via lifts and a pair of travelators.
  6. About 80 % of the buses I saw were hydrogen-powered.

It did look as if it had been designed by an architect, who was more used to designing rudimentory rural tram stops or train stations.

This page on the London Gatwick web site gives more details of Coaches and Buses at Gatwick Airport.

March 3, 2025 Posted by | Design, Transport/Travel | , , , , , | Leave a comment

From Reading To Gatwick Airport Along The North Downs Line

After writing Connecting Reading And The West To Gatwick Airport And Eurostar, I decided to go and look at the reality of the North Downs Line between Reading and Gatwick Airport stations.

I took my usual route to Reading, which is to go to Moorgate and get the Elizabeth Line direct to Reading using my Freedom Pass, after having breakfast in the Leon on Moorgate.

  • I then had to leave the station at Reading, so that I could buy my ticket to Gatwick Airport.
  • It would be so much easier, if there ere a couple of ticket machines on the bridge or platform at Reading station, so that passengers, who were changing trains could buy tickets quickly and easily.

In the end, I caught the 11:24 train to Gatwick with only a few minutes to spare.

From Reading To Gatwick Airport Along The North Downs Line

Along the North Downs Line, the train was a well-refreshed Great Western Railway Class 165 train.

These are some of the pictures, that I took on the route.

Note.

  1. The route goes through a lot of typical Surrey heathland.
  2. I noticed several pubs along the way.
  3. I suspect that there are some good walks from the stations.
  4. Reading and Guildford are university cities.
  5. Sandhurst is home to the Royal Military Academy.
  6. Farnborough Airport used to be home to the Royal Aircraft Establishment.
  7. Most of the seats on the train were taken.

I would expect that for a mainly rural route it is fairly busy.

Hitachi’s Intercity Battery Trains

Hitachi have developed an Intercity battery train and it is described on this page on their web site, where this is said about converting the trains to battery-electric operation.

A quick and easy application of battery technology is to install it on existing or future Hitachi intercity trains. Hitachi Rail’s modular design means this can be done without the need to re-engineer or rebuild the train and return them to service as quickly as possible for passengers.

Replacing one diesel engine with just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%. Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance.

That performance is certainly enough for Reading and Ashford via Gatwick, as only 37.7 miles in total, is not electrified.

Does The North Downs Line Mirror The East-West Rail?

Consider.

  • The East West Rail will encircle London to the North, between Oxford and Cambridge.
  • The North Downs Line encircles London to the South, between Reading and Ashford.

They could be considered two complimentary rail lines.

A Milton Keynes And Ashford International Service

Looking at the track layout on OpenRailwayMap, it would appear that one of Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains fitted with dual voltage could pick its way elegantly along the East West Rail and the North Downs Line between Milton Keynes and Ashford International via Oxford, Reading and Gatwick Airport.

An Occasional Sheffield And Ashford International Service

If you could run a service between Milton Keynes and Ashford International, why not extend it to Bedford or even Sheffield in the North?

I believe if you put these Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains on a cross-country route, that they will quickly suffer from London Overground Syndrome. This is my definition of the syndrome.

This benign disease, which is probably a modern version of the Victorian railway mania, was first identified in East London in 2011, when it was found that the newly-refurbished East London Line and North London Line were inadequate due to high passenger satisfaction and much increased usage. It has now spread across other parts of the capital, despite various eradication programs.

Put simply, it can probably be summed up as Quality Attracts Passengers.

Serving Heathrow

There have been various plans to get rail access into Heathrow from the West, but none have so far got off the starting blocks.

It is my view, that in the interim period, after my trip last weekend in the superb Wrightbus hydrogen double deck bus from Sutton to Gatwick, that I wrote about in Sutton Station To Gatwick Airport By Hydrogen-Powered Bus, that we should ask Wrightbus, who are designing a hydrogen-powered coach, to design the ultimate coach to connect rail hubs to major airports.

I would then run these coaches every ten minutes between Reading station and Heathrow Airport.

Serving Attractions

I believe that pairing Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains with Wrightbus’s hydrogen coach could be a winner for passengers and operators.

As an example, Lumo are hoping to run an open access service between Paddington and Carmarthen, if Heidi the Spoilsport permits. Would it not be sensible, if one of Wrightbus’s hydrogen coaches did the last mile duties to the ferry for Ireland at Fishguard harbour.

 

March 1, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments