TransPennine Express Explores Further Fleet And Capacity Expansion Options
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.
This is the first paragraph.
First TransPennine Express is hopeful that it will be able to issue a call for expressions of interest in the provision of additional bi-mode trains before the end of March. This follows ‘a healthy level of interest’ in its existing call for expressions of interest in the supply of bi-mode locomotives to replace the Class 68s which work with its MkVa coaches.
I wrote about the expressions of interest to replace the Class 68 locomotives with new bi-mode locomotives in Suppliers Sought For New Bi-Mode Locomotives For TransPennine Express And Great Western Railway.
This was my conclusion in the related post.
When I saw First Group’s proposals, I thought that they were over ambitious.
But after doing a few simple calculations, I think they can decarbonise some, but not all of the TransPennine Express services and the Night Riviera.
So do First Group want to complete the decarbonisation of TransPennine Express services?
These are my thoughts.
The Train Fleet Specification
The Railway Gazette article makes these points about the new bi-mode trains.
- The trains could be existing or new bi-modes.
- It would be desirable for the trains to have a long-term electric-only option.
- Options for this would include removing the diesel engines or converting the trains to battery-electric operation.
- Hydrogen is not mentioned.
- A fleet size of twenty-five trains is mentioned.
- The possibility of electric-only trains in the future is mentioned..
- Five-cars, with the ability to lengthen to six- or seven-cars.
- 200 km/h operation.
There is nothing unusual in the specification.
Will They Be Existing Or New Trains?
I doubt that there are any existing 200 km/h bi-modes in the UK, that are not wanted by their current operators.
I am very certain they will be new trains.
Could The Trains Be Hitachi Class 802 Trains?
The trains sound very much like Hitachi Class 802 trains, that are in service with TransPennine Express, Great Western Railway and Hull Trains, all of whom are First Group companies.
- Long-term, the diesel engines can be removed or replaced with batteries.
- The battery option is under development and should be on test this year.
- The trains can be lengthened to as long as twelve cars, so six- and seven-car trains would be possible.
Hitachi will obviously show interest in this possible order.
Will These Trains Replace the Class 185 Trains?
Consider.
- TransPennine Express have 51 three-car Class 185 trains.
- This is a total of 153 cars.
- On some routes they work singly and on others they work in pairs.
- A three-car Class 185 train has 167 Standard Class and 15 First Class seats or 60.7 seats per car.
- A pair of Class 185 trains have 334 Standard Class and 30 First Class seats.
- A five-car TransPennine Express Class 802 train has 318 Standard Class and 24 First Class seats or 68.4 seats per car.
- It would appear that a Class 802 train is not that far short of the capacity of a pair of Class 185 trains.
- Some of the TransPennine services are very crowded.
I suspect that twenty-five five-car trains be able to handle the the workload of the Class 185 trains.
If a small amount of extra capacity were needed, some of the new trains could be six-cars.
In this section, I have assumed the new trains will be Class 802 trains, but any train manufacturer pitching for this order would adjust the capacity to the needs of TransPennine Express.
The Railway Gazette article says this.
TPE continues to explore opportunities for new services in the north of England, and the move could also feed into government plans for the removal of older and more costly to operate diesel trains elsewhere on the network, should any rolling stock become surplus to requirements at TPE.
So where could the Class 185 trains be used in the future?
Recently, MTU Hybrid PowerPacks have replaced the transmission on a Class 168 train, which reduces carbon emissions and fuel consumption and makes the train quieter and more passenger-friendly, as it doesn’t use diesel in stations.
The Class 185 trains are only fifteen years old and I suspect that MTU have designed the Hybrid PowerPack, so that it can replace the Cummins engine in trains like these.
The conversion could be done as a rolling program, so that any future operator would start with diesel and go hybrid a train at a time.
There has been speculation, that the trains may end up on the East West Railway and I wrote about this in East West Railway Company To Start Second Phase Of Rolling Stock Procurement.
But the East West Railway may prefer to use zero-carbon trains on a route, where there is electrification in places on the route.
Alternatively, South Western Railway run 10 two-car Class 158 trains and 30 three-car Class 159 trains between London Waterloo and Exeter.
- South Western Railway is another First Group company.
- The Class 185 trains could provide a capacity increase.
- The Class 185 trains are 100 mph trains, whereas the Class 158/159 trains are only capable of 90 mph.
The London Waterloo and Exeter Route could be electrified in the future and I am pretty sure, that the Class 185 trains with a hybrid transmission could be a good stand-in until this happens.
Other Train Manufacturers
I believe that Hitachi are in pole position for this order, just because they are an established supplier to both TransPennine Express and First Group.
But twenty-five five-car trains would be a very worthwhile order, so I suspect that companies like Alstom, CAF, Siemens, Stadler and Talgo will also express interest.
Conclusion
Buying extra bi-mode trains will take TransPennine Express further along the route to full decarbonisation.
Arcola Showcases Scottish Hydrogen Conversion
The title of this post is the same as an article in the December 2021 Edition of Modern Railways.
The article has this sib-title.
Class 614 Demonstration Runs at Bo’ness Next Year
This is a key paragraph early in the article.
The aim is to build capability within the Scottish supply chain with a view to future conversion of hydrogen fleets within Scotland. The choice of a ‘314’ to provide the donor vehicles was based solely on availability, following the withdrawal of the EMU fleet by ScotRail at the end of 2019.
I don’t think they would have been my choice of donor train, as the Class 314 trains were built over forty years ago.
But, as Merseyrail have shown, British Rail trains of that era scrub up well.
The article is worth a full read and worth the cover price of the magazine, as it has details on the conversion and tips on how you might design a hydrogen train.
- All the hydrogen tanks , fuel cells and batteries are designed to be fitted in the vehicle underframes and don’t take up space in the passenger compartment.
- There is a fuel cell raft under both driving motor vehicles.
- Each raft contains a 70 kW fuel cell from Ballard and hydrogen cylinders.
- 40 kg. of hydrogen at a pressure of 350 bar can be carried in each raft.
- Waste heat from the fuel cell is used to heat the train.
- The DC traction motors have been replaced by modern three-phase AC motors.
- The hydrogen fillers come from the automotive industry, which is surely an obvious move.
- The interior looks good in the picture and has uses seats reclaimed from Pendolino refurbishment.
The article also reveals that Arcola are working with Arup on a study to convert a Class 158 DMU to hydrogen power.
Conclusion
I wish all the engineers and suppliers well, but I feel that these two projects are both driven by Scottish politics, rather than sound engineering principles.
What Happened To The Class 158/159 Bi-Mode Study?
In Class 158/159 Bi-Modes?, I discussed the possibility of turning South Western Railway‘s Class 158 and Class 159 trains into bi-modes.
I said this.
In the March 2018 Edition of Modern Railways, there is a short news item, which is entitled Bi-Mode Study For SWR DMUs.
The Class 158 and Class 159 diesel multiple units used by South Western Railway are diesel-hydraulic units.
Under their franchise agreement, South Western Railway, agreed to perform a study, to see if the multiple units could be converted from diesel-hydraulic to diesel-electric transmission.
If this is successful, then the plan would be to fit a third-rail capability to the trains, so they could use the electrification between Basingstoke and Waterloo on services to Salisbury and Exeter.
Could the conversion also raise the operating speed of the trains from their current 90 mph to a more timetable-friendly 100 mph?
It looks like it could be a feasible , especially as the article states they might re-use redundant modern traction equipment from Class 455 trains, which are due for replacement.
It sounded a sensible plan to do a study.
But we’ve heard nothing since.
- Has the late delivery of the Class 701 trains, pushed the availability of the Class 455 trains, that wioll donate the traction system, too far into the future?
- Has the Covids delayed another project?
- Would First Group prefer more Hitachi trains as five of their companies use them or have them on order?
- Is the 90 mph speed of the diesel trains, too slow for the busy London Waterloo and Basingstoke route?
Or could it be that Alstom, CAF, Hitachi, Stadler or another manufacturer have a much better zero-carbon plan?
Werrington Dive-Under – 8th September 2021
I had gone to Peterborough to take pictures of the Werrington Dive Under, from a train between Peterborough and Spalding.
I took these pictures going Peterborough and Spalding.
My train between Peterborough and Spalding stations took the following route.
- The Class 158 train was a great improvement on the Class 153 train, I took in From Peterborough To Lincoln in 2015.
- It started in Platform 1b at Peterborough station.
- It then crossed over to the Down Fast line to go North.
- Finally, it slowed to cross the Up Fast and Up Slow lines to go towards Spalding.
- It is surely not an efficient and the safest way to run a railway.
Think about turning right on a busy dual carriageway, by going through a gap in the central reservation.
This diagram shows the new track layout of Werrington Junction.
Note.
- My train was going North on Line 5, so it had to use the two crossovers to get to the lines to Spalding.
- The Up Stamford (Line 4) can be seen in the pictures after the two lines have disappeared into the dive-under.
It’s a pity the first of my pictures aren’t better, but the sun was in the wrong direction.
I took these pictures going Spalding and Peterborough.
Note.
- The train used the Up Slow (line 7) to go between Werrington Junction and Peterborough station.
- The last two pictures show the Class 158 train in Platform 1b at Peterborough station.
At least this time, the train didn’t cross the Fast lines.
Will Passenger Trains Use The Werrington Dive-Under?
I’m very sure they will!
- On the Western side of Peterborough station, there are four platforms 4 to 7 and an avoiding line for freight trains going North.
- It appears that all of these lines can access the Down Stamford (Line 1) and Up Stamford (Line 4) to go to Werrington Junction.
- At Werrington Junction, trains either take the route to Stamford or use the dive-under for Spalding.
It looks to me, that if the trains to and from Spalding terminated in one of the Western platforms, then they could use the Stamford Lines to access the dive-under and they wouldn’t cross the Fast Lines of the East Coast Main Line on the flat.
Greengauge 21’s Suggestion, That Thameslink Be Extended To Spalding
In the study by Greengauge 21, which is entitled Connecting East Lincolnshire, this is said.
As noted the Spalding-Peterborough line should be a strong candidate for electrification because of its freight potential, and if so it could also accommodate an extension of Thameslink services from London and the South East to Spalding where interchange would be made with a Spalding–Boston–Louth–Grimsby express bus using the A16.
This proposal may be possible, if instead of using the dive-under, the Thameslink trains were able to use the Up Slow (line 7) to go both ways between Werrington Junction and Peterborough station.
As in the near future, full digital signalling will apply through Peterborough, this shouldn’t be a problem.
Electrification Of The Werrington Dive-Under?
Consider.
- There is a gap of around ninety miles in the freight route between the comprehensive electrification at Peterborough and Doncaster stations on the Great Northern and Great Eastern Joint Line (GNGE).
- There are dozens of level crossings.
- The route goes through the centre of Lincoln, where there are two level crossings.
There are two ways of decarbonising the route.
- Full electrification
- Using hydrogen-powered freight locomotives.
Both solutions have their proposers and opponents.
I favour hydrogen-electric hybrid locomotives, that can use electrification where it exists, as it reduces the infrastructure cost on overbridges and in freight depots.
- Hydrogen-powered locomotives have a go-anywhere capability.
- There are also a lot of routes in the UK, where freight trains currently run and it would take a long time to electrify all of them.
- As rail freight companies would have to purchase a lot of new locomotives, I can see them opting for hydrogen-electric hybrid locomotives.
But there are others, who think the only way is full electrification.
London And Lincolnshire By Electric Train
Passenger trains are not a problem, as Alstom, CAF, Hitachi, Stadler and others have demonstrated battery ranges of over fifty miles.
LNER are currently serving Lincoln from London using Hitachi bi-mode Class 800 trains, which use diesel for the 16.5 miles between Newark and Lincoln.
Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train, is described in this Hitachi infographic.
I believe it would be possible to handle London and Lincoln via Newark without using diesel.
It also looks like it will be possible to convert the LNER’s current Class 800 trains into Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Trains.
But I doubt their range would sufficient to go between London and Lincoln via Peterborough, Spalding and Sleaford, unless there were to be a charging system at Lincoln.
But surely though, the ideal train for Lincolnshire would be a train that ran between London and Cleethorpes via Peterborough, Spalding, Sleaford, Lincoln, Market Rasen and Grimsby Town.
- Peterborough and Lincoln is 56.9 miles.
- Lincoln and Cleethorpes is 47.2 miles.
- The service could be timed for a convenient interchange with the other Lincolnshire train services.
- The service could run perhaps a few times per day.
With charging systems at Lincoln and Cleethorpes, similar to the Hitachi ABB Power Grids system that I described in Solving The Electrification Conundrum, this service could be run by an Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train.
Peterborough And Lincolnshire By Electric Train
If you could run between Peterborough and major places in Lincolnshire, as part of a London service, I also suspect that a well-designed Peterborough and Lincolnshire service could serve Lincolnshire almost equally well.
It might use Platform 5 to terminate at Peterborough.
- This is paired with Platform 4, which is the platform generally used by LNER trains from London, so there would be a cross-platform interchange going North.
- Going South, there would be a need to use the footbridge.
How many people would use an hourly cross-TransLincs service?
Service Provision On The Levenmouth Rail Link
The reinstated Levenmouth Rail Link, will have two stations; Leven and Cameron Bridge.
According to this section in Wikipedia, which is entitled Service Provision, this will be the service.
The expected level of services is two trains per hour between Leven railway station and Edinburgh Waverley. Both will call at Cameron Bridge. One train will travel via Kirkcaldy and along the coast, while the other train will travel via Dunfermline along the inner Fife Circle Line.
In the Wikipedia entry for Leven station, it says that the service will take just over an hour.
Consider.
- Services between Edinburgh and Glenrothes with Thornton take about an hour whether the go via Kirkcaldy or Dunfermline.
- The current timings are based on Class 158 or Class 170 diesel trains.
- If as I surmise in Trains On The Levenmouth Rail Link, the trains are battery-electric Class 385 trains, these trains with their electric power will at least match the schedules of the diesel trains.
- Network Rail will design the track layout at Thornton junction, so that trains will clear the junction efficiently.
- Glenrothes with Thornton station is only half a mile from Thornton Junction.
- Leven station is only 5.9 miles from Thornton Junction.
I can see battery-electric trains moving smoothly and quietly up and down the Levenmouth Rail Line and around Thornton junction to provide a very efficient service to Edinburgh.
Could we even see trains from Edinburgh take this route?
Edinburgh, Haymarket, Edinburgh Gateway, Dalmeny, North Queensferry, Inverkeithing, Dalgety Bay, Aberdour, Burntisland, Kinghorn, Kirkaldy, Cameron Bridge, Leven, Cameron Bridge, Glenrothes with Thornton, Cardenden, Lochgelly, Cowdenbeath, Queen Margaret, Dunfermline, Dunfermline Town, Rosyth, Inverkeithing, North Queensferry, Dalmeny, Edinburgh Gateway and Haymarket.
Note.
- A second service would run in the opposite direction.
- Trains would reverse and the drivers would change cabs at Leven station.
- Trains would charge batteries on the Levenmouth Rail Link and at Edinburgh.
- Every station on the route would get two trains per hour (tph) in both directions.
The hourly service between Edinburgh and Cowdenbeath could continue.
The Bridges Across The Firth Of Forth
There would be a battery-electric train every thirty minutes in both directions across the Forth Bridge.
This Google Map shows the three bridges across the Firth of Forth.
Note.
- The most Westerly bridge is the Queensferry Crossing, which carries the M90 and was opened in 2017.
- The bridge in the middle is Forth Road Bridge, which opened in 1964.
- The Forth Bridge is the most Easterly bridge and it opened in 1890.
- North Queensberry station is to the North of the bridge and Dalmeny is to the South.
After opening of the Levenmouth Rail Link, there could be a battery-electric train every thirty minutes in both directions across the Forth Bridge.
This sounds like an opportunity to develop the bridge with its battery trains as a tourist attraction.
Battery-electric trains could run from Edinburgh to the following places.
- Dundee
- Perth
- St. Andrews
And that’s just for starters.
Conclusion
There is a lot more to the Levenmouth Rail Link, than just a double-track railway to Leven, as it enables so much.
Related Posts
The New Leven Station On The Levenmouth Rail Link
The New Cameronbridge Station On The Levenmouth Rail Link
Trains On The Levenmouth Rail Link
Ashington Targets 2023 Opening
The title of this post, is the same as that of an article in the April 2021 Edition of Modern Railways.
This is the sub-title.
A half-hourly service to Newcastle is planned.
The two trains per hour (tph) service and the opening date sounds just what is needed. Not just on the Northumberland Line, but in many places in the UK.
I would suggest some of the following.
- Bodmin General And Bodmin Parkway
- Camp Hill Line
- Exeter and Okehampton
- Maid Marian Line
- South Fylde Line
- Wareham and Swanage
- Wymondham and Dereham
There are also some much-needed stations, that could be added.
If we can create and manufacture a vaccine in a year, we can surely do a lot on a rail project in two years. And a lot of them! How many construction firms and workers would it keep employed?
The Modern Railways article gives a few more details.
How, Not If
This is the title of the first sub-section and sounds good to me!
It looks like Network Rail and others intend to apply good project management to deliver the project, fast and at a good price.
They haven’t been the best in the past, is all I’ll say!
Six Stations
This is said.
In summary, six new stations are proposed, at Northumberland Park (interchange with the Tyne and Wear Metro), Seaton Delaval, Newsham, Blyth Bebside, Bedlington and Ashington. An extension at the Northern end to Woodhorn is possible at a later stage.
Other points made include.
- Ashington is envisaged as the terminus.
- There are level crossing issues between Ashington and Woodhorn
- There will be a cycleway connecting Blyth Bebside with the town centre. With all those B’s, they need an Geordie equivalent to Boris bikes!
It sounds well-thought out to me.
Butterwell Freight Line
This is said.
Also for consideration at a later stage is conversion of the currently freight-only Butterwell Line to passenger use, permitting a service from Berwick-on-Tweed and Morpeth to Newcastle via Bedlington.
This Google Map shows the railway lines North of Ashington.
Note.
- The big grey building at the bottom of the map is Asda’s Ashington superstore.
- There is a rail junction to the West of the superstore.
- The line going South leds to Bedlington and Newcastle.
- The line going North-East goes to Woodhorn, Lynemouth Power station and the Alcan Smelter.
- The Line going North West through the trees is the Butterwell Line, which goes to the Butterwell Opencast coal mine, Widdrington station and up the East Coast Main Line to Berwick-on-Tweed.
This second Google Map shows to the North of the first one.
Note the Butterwell Line runs from the South East corner of the map through the woods and to the East of the Ellington landfill site.
This third Google Map shows the route of the line to the East Coast Main Line.
Note.
- The electrified East Coast Main Line runs North-South down the Western site of the map.
- The large fields may indicate that coal has been removed and they have been restored.
- The Butterwell Line meanders its way across the map.
- Trains would appear to be able to enter and leave the Butterwell Line to or from the East Coast Main Line to and from the South only.
- The next station to the South is Pegswood and to the North is Widdrington.
- At the East of the map, the line connects to the line to Ashington through the woods.
- The Butterwell Line appears to be a mix of single and double track.
I wonder if Network Rail and train companies have a cunning plan for train services on this section of the East Coast Main Line.
Current services on the East Coast Main Line, that use the section of the line between Newcastle and Berwick-upon-Tweed include.
- CrossCountry – 1 tph – Newcastle and Edinburgh/Glasgow – Stops irregularly at Alnmouth and Berwick-upon-Tweed.
- East Coast Trains – 5 trains per day (tpd) – Stops at Morpeth
- LNER – 1 tph – Newcastle and Edinburgh – Stops at Berwick-on-Tweed
- Northern Trains – 1 tph – Newcastle and Morpeth – Stops at Manors and Cramlington
- Northern Trains – 2 tpd – Newcastle and Chathill – Stops at Manors, Cramlington, Morpeth, Pegswood, Widdrington, Acklington and Alnmouth
- TransPennine Express – 1 tph – Newcastle and Edinburgh – Stops at Morpeth
Note.
- Morpeth and Berwick-upon-Tweed get at least one fast tph to both Newcastle and Edinburgh.
- Stations between Morpeth and Berwick-upon-Tweed get only a two tpd service.
- Stations between Newcastle and Morpeth get a 1 tph service.
- The East Coast Main Line is only two tracks and I suspect that Northern’s slow diesel multiple units are not ideal trains for the route.
The obvious improvement would surely be to run an hourly train between Newcastle and Berwick-upon-Tweed, via Bedlington.
- It would stop at Northumberland Park, Seaton Delaval, Newsham, Blyth Bebside, Bedlington, Ashington, Pegswood, Morpeth, Pegswood, Widdrington, Acklington and Alnmouth.
- There would be a reverse at Morpeth.
- It would join the East Coast Main Line between Pegswood and Widdrington stations.
- Trains could be timed, so that passengers between Cramlington and Alnmouth only waited a couple of minutes during change at Morpeth.
- Faster trains would be used to ease train pathing on the East Coast Main Line.
Current fastest times between Newcastle, Morpeth and Berwick-upon-Tweed are as follows.
- Berwick-on-Tweed and Newcastle – LNER – 67 miles – 46 minutes – 87 mph
- Berwick-on-Tweed and Morpeth – LNER – 50.2 miles – 30 minutes – 100.4 mph
- Morpeth and Newcastle – TransPennine Express- 17.5 miles – 26 minutes – 40.4 mph
It looks to me that because of the times North of Morpeth, that a high performance train or some cunning signalling will be needed.
Britishvolt’s Gigaplant
BritishVolt are building a factory to produce lithium-ion batteries at Blyth.
The Modern Railways article says this.
Recent news concerning Blyth is that it has been selected as the site for Britain’s first ‘gigaplant’ for electric car battery production, with a planning application for the 95-hectare site on the north of the river Blyth (the location of the former Blyth power station) submitted by Britishvolt in February. The £2.6billion scheme is expected to generate about 3000 jobs; if all goes well, lithium-ion batteries could be produced on the site by the end of 2023. The new factory will be about 2.5 miles from Bebside station and there has been talk of linking to the site with a shuttle bus.
I looked at Britishvolt’s web site and if I was graduating soon, I don’t think it would fire me up, unlike others in similar sectors.
We live in exciting times, so don’t have a boring web site, as it will not attract exciting and enthusiastic people.
This Google Map shows the Port of Blyth.
Note.
- The red arrow at the top of the map labelled as a former power station, which must be Blyth power station.
- There is certainly a large cleared site to the South of the arrow.
- The Port of Blyth is to the East.
- Because of the power station and the port the site could be rail connected fairly easily.
Britishvolt seem to be planning to use rail freight to bring in raw materials and take out finished product.
The Modern Railways article says this.
The new factory will be about 2.5 miles from Bebside station and there has been talk of linking to the site with a shuttle bus.
As there is a rail connection, at some point in the future could a shuttle train be used? Or perhaps a few trains per day between the factory and Newcastle.
A Bridge For The A1061 At Newsham
The Modern Railways article says this.
A new road bridge will be built on the A1061 to replace Newsham level crossing.
This Google Map shows where the Northumberland Line crosses the A1061 at the level crossing at Newsham.
Note.
- The railway is double-track through the level crossing.
- It doesn’t appear to be a challenging project.
- A bridge could either be built along the existing route or a few metres to the South.
But as it looks like there could be more housing development in the area, would a bold design, that would allow a station to be added later be better?
Two Footbridges
The Modern Railways article says this.
In addition, there will be two new footbridges; Palmersville Dairy (replacing Palmersville foot crossing) and Chase Meadows (replacing Chase Meadows foot crossing).
This Google Map shows the Palmersville foot crossing to the West of Palmersville station on the Tyne and Wear Metro.
Note.
- The Northern pair of tracks are the Tyne and Wear Metro.
- The Southern pair of Tracks are the Northumberland Line.
- Palmersville and Northumberland Park stations are to the East.
- The current foot crossing is shown over the Northumberland Line.
It would appear that there is plenty of space for a footbridge.
Two Trains Per Hour
The Modern Railways article says this about infrastructure improvements to enable two trains per hour.
An extension of the double-track south from Newsham, for about 1 km in the direction of Seaton Delaval, along with a new 2.4 km passing loop between Holywell and Seghill, are in place in order to permit a half-hourly service in both directions.
From the maps, it looks like about half the route between Northumberland Park station and Seghill will be double-track.
It may even be possible to extend the double-track further South towards Northumberland Park station, if there became a need to run more trains on the Northumberland Line.
Operations
The Modern Railways article says this.
It is assumed that Class 158 DMUs will be the rolling stock for the first couple of years of service to Ashington, with three or four units required. Conversion of these trains (or replacement with new) to allow battery-electric operation is envisaged for the later years of this decade. There will be provision for two-car services at the outset with passive provision for extension to four-cars in the infrastructure works.
In Trains: £34m For Revival Of 50-Year-Old North-East Railway Line, I felt that the Hitachi Regional Battery Trains would be ideal for this route.
I said this.
I’m drawn inextricably to the conclusion, that the trains should be 100 mph battery-electric trains.
Hitachi, who have a factory in the North-East, have announced their Regional Battery Train in July 2020, which is described in this Hitachi infographic.
These trains can be based on Class 385 trains.
-
- They are 100 mph trains.
- They come in three- and four-cars lengths.
- The three-car trains have 206 seats.
- They can work in pairs.
- They can use 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
- They have a range of 90 kilometres or 56 miles on battery power.
- The batteries would be charged on the ECML between Benton North junction and Newcastle station.
- The battery packs will be designed and manufactured by Hyperdrive Innovation in Sunderland.
- They have big windows for the views.
I’m sure Hitachi, Hyperdrive and Britishvolt would like a fleet in service, just up the road from their factories.
Now that the extension to between Ashington and Berwick-upon-Tweed via Morpeth is being talked about, I suspect that battery-electric trains, will be ideal for this route.
Distances without electrification of the two routes are as follows.
- Benton North Junction and Ashington – 19 miles – 38 miles round trip
- Benton North Junction and Widdrington – 27 miles
These distances are well within the planned range of the Hitachi Regional Battery Trains and they would even be capable of working a round trip to Ashington without charging at the Northern end of the route.
Batteries can be charged on the East Coast Main Line on the following sections of the route.
- Between Benton North Junction and Newcastle.
- Between Morpeth and Berwick-upon-Tweed stations.
Their fast acceleration and 100 mph operating speed mean that it could keep out of the way of the 140 mph Hitachi trains North of Morpeth.
Calling At Manors Station
The Modern Railways article says that because the East Coast Main Line is so busy, some peak services may have to omit the call at Manors station in the suburbs of Newcastle that is envisaged for the off-peak services.
I wonder with their faster acceleration, if the Hitachi Regional Battery Trains would be able to handle the stop at Manors station for all services.
Development At Ashington
The Modern Railways article gives this quote from Network Rail’s manager for the reopening project.
For instance in the centre of Ashington there’s a rather grim 1960s tower block that is owned by the county council that could be replaced by something more appropriate to today’s needs. This is Wansbeck Square in the centre of the town; the square is in line to be remodelled to make it more attractive. The integrated station and development need to be delivered at the same time for maximum impact.
This Google Map shows the Northerland Line going through the centre of the town of Ashington.
Note.
- Station Road running East-West .across the top of the map.
- The 1960s block could be to the West of the railway, especially as the Southern part is labelled Northumberland County Council.
- The site to the West of the railway does appear to be quite large.
The new station and the Wansbeck Square site does look look to have strong development potential.
Teeside’s Refurbished Trains
On my trip around Teeside, I took four trains.
There was none of the usual rubbish, that I have endured in the North like this scrapyard special at Carlisle.
All trains were refurbished Class 158 trains.
They were a lot better, with tables and clean, working toilets.
But will they get replaced with hydrogen or updated to zero-carbon trains?
Hydrogen Trains
In Fuelling The Change On Teesside Rails, I talked about the local services on Teesside being run by a fleet of hydrogen trains, based on an article in RAIL Magazine.
But the order has not been placed and it must be getting tight if trains are going to run in a few years.
There was this report in the November 2020 Edition of Modern Railways, which is entitled Tees Valley Hydrogen Hub.
This is the first paragraph.
Mott MacDonald is to create a masterplan for the development of a hydrogen transport hub in the Tees Valley. Transport Secretary Grant Shapps made the announcement as he travelled on the HydroFLEX on the 29th of September.
It appears the masterplan could be published in January and would cover several modes of transport.
Battery Electric Trains
There have been developments in the battery electric train field over the past few months.
Hitachi at Newton Aycliffe and Hyperdrive Innovation at Sunderland have partnered up to produce Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train. Three-car trains based on Hitachi’s Class 385 trains would be ideal for trundling around the North East.
The trains would need charging and what better charging system is there than Vivarail’s Fast Charge system? And they could be produced at Vivarail’s factory at Seaham just up the coast towards Sunderland.
As I indicated in £100m Station Revamp Could Double Local Train Services, where I said this about the location of chargers to power battery electric trains in the Tees and the Tyne.
There will need to be strategically-placed battery chargers around the North-East of England. These could include.
-
- Hexham
- Nunthorpe
- Redcar or Saltburn – This would also be used by TransPennine Express’s Class 802 trains, if they were to be fitted with batteries.
- Whitby
If Grand Central did the right thing and ran battery electric between London and Sunderland, there would probably be a need for a battery charger at Sunderland.
It appears that Adrian Shooter of Vivarail has just announced a One-Size-Fits-All Fast Charge system, that has been given interim approval by Network Rail.
I discuss this charger in Vivarail’s Plans For Zero-Emission Trains, which is based on a video on the Modern Railways web site.
Vivarail might just have another card or should it be train to play.
In the video, Mr. Shooter discusses using Vivarail’s technology to convert British Rail era diesel multiple units to battery electric trains.
Northern have already refurbished the Class 158 trains, so it would surely be an economical route to convert them to battery electric operation.
Replacement Of South Western Railway’s Class 158/159 Trains
South Western Railway use Class 158 and Class 159 trains on the following routes.
- London Waterloo and Salisbury (and Yeovil Pen Mill)
- London Waterloo and Exeter St Davids
- Romsey and Salisbury
- Salisbury and Bristol Temple Meads
The two types of train are very similar, with the Class 159 trains being converted from Class 158 trains.
- There are ten two-car Class 158 trains in service with South Western Railway. which have a capacity of around 140 seats
- There are thirty three-car Class 159 trains in service with South Western Railway, which have a capacity of 196 seats
- Each car has a diesel engine driving two axles through a hydraulic transmission.
- Both trains have an operating speed of 90 mph.
- The trains are all around thirty years old.
I took these pictures on my trip to Basingstoke station on Friday, when I rode in nine-car formation of three Class 159 trains both ways.
Note.
- For much of the route between Clapham Junction and Basingstoke, the trains were doing just a few mph short of ninety on the 100 mph route.
- The interiors are fairly spacious and I got a table seat both ways.
As diesel multiple units go, there are worse ones in service in the UK. And I don’t mean Pacers.
Replacement Possibilities
Ideally, these trains should be replaced with zero-carbon trains.
As most of the routes, on which the trains run are not-electrified, there must either be a lot of new third-rail electrification or battery electric trains must be used.
These are my thoughts for the various trains.
Two-Car Class 158 Train
These trains have the following specification.
- Length – 46 metres
- Seats – 140
- Operating Speed – 90 mph
In Converting Class 456 Trains Into Two-Car Battery Electric Trains, I stated that these Class 456 battery electric trains would have the following specification.
- Seats – 113
- Range on Battery Power – 30-40 miles
- Operating Speed – 75 mph
I also felt that as the trains would receive a new AC traction system, that the operating speed could be increased to perhaps 90 mph.
I wouldn’t be surprised to find, that a professional conversion capitalising on Alstom’s work to create the Class 600 hydrogen train, could turn a Class 456 train into a battery electric replacement for a two-car Class 158 train.
Three-Car Class 159 Train
These trains have the following specification.
- Length – 69 metres
- Seats – 196
- Operating Speed – 90 mph
Could these be replaced with a three-car Class 456 battery electric train, lengthened by the addition of a Trailer Car from a Class 321 train, that has been converted to a Class 600 hydrogen train?
As most Class 159 trains probably work in longer formations, this could be a possibility, to replace units working alone.
Two Three-Car Class 159 Trains Working As A Six-Car Formation
These trains have the following specification.
- Length – 138 metres
- Seats – 392
- Operating Speed – 90 mph
This formation would be impossible for Class 456 battery electric trains, so it must be a case for calling up the heavy brigade, in the shape of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train, which is described in this Hitachi infographic.
A five-car version of this train could have the following specification.
- Length – 130 metres
- Seats – 326
- Range on battery power – 56 miles
- Operating Speed – 100 mph
- It would probably be able to work with both 25 KVAC overhead and 750 VDC third-rail electrification.
Note.
- More seats could probably be fitted if needed.
- Platforms where the trains would work can already accept nine-car Class 159 trains, which are 207 metres long.
- The trains would charge the batteries using the electrification between London Waterloo and Basingstoke.
- Fast Charge facilities would also be needed at some intermediate and terminal stations like Bristol Temple Meads, Exeter St. Davids, Salisbury, Westbury and Yeovil Junction.
- These trains would be ten mph faster than the Class 159 trains and this may enable the saving of a few minutes between London Waterloo and Basingstoke stations.
A six-car version would be possible, if more capacity is needed.
Three Three-Car Class 159 Trains Working As A Nine-Car Formation
These trains have the following specification.
- Length – 207 metres
- Seats – 588
- Operating Speed – 90 mph
An eight-car version of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train could have the following specification.
- Length – 208 metres
- Seats – 522
- Range on battery power – 56 miles
- Operating Speed – 100 mph
- It would probably be able to work with both 25 KVAC overhead and 750 VDC third-rail electrification.
Note.
- More seats could probably be fitted if needed.
- Platforms where the trains would work can already accept nine-car Class 159 trains, which are 207 metres long.
- The trains would charge the batteries using the electrification between London Waterloo and Basingstoke.
- Fast Charge facilities would also be needed at some intermediate and terminal stations like Bristol Temple Meads, Exeter St. Davids, Salisbury, Westbury and Yeovil Junction.
- These trains would be ten mph faster than the Class 159 trains and this may enable the saving of a few minutes between London Waterloo and Basingstoke stations.
A nine-car version would be possible, if more capacity is needed.
More Capacity Between London Waterloo And Basingstoke
London Waterloo and Basingstoke was very busy before COVID-19 and it needed more capacity.
- All the express passenger trains are capable of 100 mph, with the exception of the diesel Class 158 and Class 159 trains, which can only do 90 mph.
- If these diesel trains were to be replaced by Hitachi’s Regional Battery Trains, these trains will be able to do 100 mph on battery power.
This speed increase will enable faster journey times and increase capacity.
- But between London Waterloo and Basingstoke, they will be using the third-rail electrification.
- Class 800 and Class 801 trains, which are cousins of the Regional Battery Train are currently able to do 125 mph between London Paddington and Swindon and London Kings Cross and Doncaster.
- London and Doncaster is being upgraded to 140 mph running.
So will we see 125 mph running between London Waterloo and Basingstoke? I will be very surprised if we didn’t, before 2030.
Charging The Batteries
Much of the charging of batteries will be performed whilst running on electrified lines.
But as I indicated there will need to be Fast Charge facilities at intermediate and terminal stations.
The Need For A Universal Fast Charge Facility For All Battery Electric Trains
If you look at Salisbury for example, the facility would need to be able handle all types of battery electric trains. So the Government, Network Rail and the Office of Road and Rail must come up with a universal design of charging facility that can be used by all battery electric trains.
Standard UK electrification, which can be either 25 KVAC overhead or 750 VDC third-rail, can obviously be used, as all battery electric trains will be designed to be able to charge the batteries, whilst running on electrified lines.
But a Universal Fast Charge system is surely needed, that can charge every battery electric train running on the UK rail network.
Splash-and-Dash At Yeovil Junction Station
But I believe that trains like Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train, when working long routes like Salisbury and Exeter will need the equivalent of Formula One’s Splash-and-Dash, where a fast pit-stop enabled cars to complete the race in the most economic manner.
If you look at timings between Salisbury and Exeter on Real Time Trains, you find the following.
- Salisbury and Exeter is 88.5 miles
- Salisbury and Yeovil Junction is 39 miles
- Yeovil Junction and Exeter St. Davids is 50 miles
- Trains seem to be timed to wait between 8-14 minutes at Yeovil Junction station.
- At several times during the day the Westbound and Eastbound services pass at Yeovil Junction station.
I would assume the wait and the passing, are so that trains can safely navigate the sections of single-track line, that are a legacy of British Rail’s policy of saving money, that affectively ruined the efficiency of sections of the network.
It would appear that a well-designed Universal Fast Charge facility at Yeovil Junction station could enable battery electric trains to run between Salisbury and Exeter St Davids stations, without any adjustment to the existing timetable.
This Google Map shows Yeovil Junction station.
Note.
- Yeovil Junction station is in the South West corner of the map.
- The West of England Main Line passes East-West through the station.
- The station has two platforms.
- The two lines running North to Yeovil Pen Mill and Westbury stations.
- The line running between the North side and the South-East corner of the map is the Heart of Wessex Line, between Yeovil Pen Mill in the North and Weymouth in the South.
- Most links between the West of England Main Line and the Heart of Wessex Line have been removed.
The station doesn’t appear short of space.
Great Western Railway’s Gloucester And Weymouth Service
If a link between Yeovil Junction station and the Heart of Wessex Line towards Weymouth, this would enable Great Western Railway’s Gloucester and Weymouth service to call at both Yeovil stations, with a reverse at Yeovil Junction.
It would surely, improve the train service for the town of Yeovil.
If in the future, it was desired to run the Gloucester and Weymouth service using a battery electric train, Yeovil Junction station could be used to charge the train’s batteries.
Vivarail’s Fast Charge System
Vivarail’s Fast Charge system has been patented and demonstrated and this could be used with both the battery electric Class 456 train and Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train.
So it could be used as an initial design for a Universal Fast Charge system.
Conclusion
A mix of these battery electric trains could probably replace the Class 158 and 159 trains.
- Two-car Class 456 train
- Three-car Class 456 train
- Five-car Hitachi Regional Battery Train
- Eight-car Hitachi Regional Battery Train
Note.
- Universal Fast Charge facilities would also be needed at some intermediate and terminal stations like Bristol Temple Meads, Exeter St. Davids, Romsey, Salisbury, Westbury and Yeovil Junction.
- Services between London Waterloo and Basingstoke could be faster.
These rebuilt and new trains would fully decarbonise South Western Railway.
Westbury Station – 30th July 2020
I went to Westbury station today and took these pictures.
I found Westbury station to be a station in extremely good condition.
It also had a buffet, where I was able to purchase a delicious ice cream.
Passenger Services Through Westbury Station
I was at the station for about an hour and several trains passed through.
Great Western Railway services through the station include.
- One train per two hour (tp2h) – London Paddington and Exeter St. Davids – Stops
- One tp2h – London Paddington and Penzance – Passes through
- One tp2h – London Paddington and Plymouth – Passes through
- One train per hour (tph) – Cardiff Central and Portsmouth Harbour – Stops
- One tp2h – Great Malvern and Westbury
- One tp2h – Gloucester and Weymouth – Stops
- One tp2h – Swindon and Westbury
Train classes included Class 800 trains and Class 166 trains.
South Western Railway services through the station include.
- Five trains per day – Salisbury and Bristol Temple Meads – Stops
Train classes include Class 159 trains.
Battery Trains Through Westbury
Hitachi’s Class 800 train with a battery electric capability or Regional Battery Train, is described in this infographic from the company.
The proposed 90 km or 56 mile range could even be sufficient take a train between Westbury and Bristol Temple Meads stations on a return trip.
Many of the trains through Westbury go to the same stations.
Distances are as follows.
- Bristol Temple Meads – 28 miles
- Newbury – 42 miles
- Salisbury – 24 miles
- Swindon – 32.5 miles
- Taunton – 47 miles
It looks like all of these places should be in range of an electric train with a battery capability, providing there is a charging facility at the other end.
An Electrification Island At Westbury Station
I have been advocating an island of electrification around Westbury station for some time and feel about a dozen miles of electrification through the station would be sufficient for Class 800 trains with a battery capability to bridge the gap.
- At Newbury, trains would access the current electrification into London Paddington.
- Between Exeter and Taunton, the rail route runs alongside the M5, so why not electrify this stretch, as the wires will not be so noticeable?
Looking at Westbury, to my untrained eye, it would appear that a short section of electrification around the station, would not be the most challenging of projects.
I believe that discontinuous electrification between Newbury and Exeter would be possible and could gradually be extended across Devon and Cornwall.
It should also be noted that one of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Trains has a range of 56 miles, so that these places from Westbury could be an return trip on batteries, with a well-driven train with excellent energy management.
- Bath Spa – 17 miles
- Bradford-on-Avon – 7 miles
- Bristol Temple Meads – 28 miles
- Chippenham – 16 miles
- Frome – 6 miles
- Salisbury – 24 miles
- Trowbridge – 4 miles
- Warminster – 9 miles
Obviously, the number of stops and the terrain will play a part.
Freight Might Drive Full Electrification Through Westbury Station
As the pictures show, there are heavy freight trains going through the area, which bring long and weighty loads of stone from the Mendips to London.
- There are regularly two or three stone trains in an average hour of the day.
- Like in the picture, I suspect they are usually hauled by a noisy, smelly, polluting and carbon-dioxide emitting Class 66 Locomotive. Not all of these, are as clean and well-maintained, as the one in the picture.
- Some trains start at Merehead Quarry, which is about fifteen miles from Westbury station.
I believe that we must decarbonise freight trains.
But freight and electric haulage is not a simple subject.
- I once had extensive talks with a Senior Crane Driver at the Port of Felixstowe during an Ipswich Town Away match. Ports don’t like overhead wires, as containers do get dropped and fall off rail wagons.
- Suppose a historic line without electrification, like the Settle and Carlisle has a serious land-slip, which it did a couple of years ago. How do you haul in the materials for repair?
- Because freight can be of a random and unpredictable nature, to electrify freight, you probably need to electrify the whole rail network.
For these and other reasons, we need independently-powered freight locomotives and I feel that a new freight locomotive will develop, that will be needed by the rail industry all over the world.
There are several solutions.
Biodiesel
Biodiesel is the simplest solution and would mean that the current diesel locomotives could be used.
In Grant Shapps Announcement On Friday, I talked about Government support for an industrial process, that has been developed by Oxford University and their spin-off company; Velocys, from the the Fischer-Tropsch Process, which can produce, the following fuels from household and industrial waste.
- Aviation biofuel.
- Biodiesel.
A plant to process 500,000 tonnes per year of Lincolnshire finest waste is now being built at Immingham to create 50,000,000 litres of fuel, by Altalto, which is a partnership between Velocys, British Airways and Shell.
If nothing else, waste-to-fuel is the interim solution to the decarbonisation of tricky sectors like heavy rail freight, rail construction, large diesel-powered machines, ships or long-distance aviation.
This fuel could be ideal to haul the heavy stone trains from the Mendips.
Hydrogen
I did think, it would be hydrogen powered, but I’m not so sure now, as hydrogen trains and locomotives seem to have a slow development cycle.
Although, there is one factor, that might influence the use of hydrogen as a fuel, which I wrote about in Thirsty High-Rollers … Mining’s Heavy Haulers Prime Candidates For Hydrogen Conversion.
Mining and quarrying don’t have a good green image, but converting mines and quarries to hydrogen power, would surely have operational and good public relational advantages.
It would also ensure a plentiful and convenient supply of hydrogen, for any hydrogen-powered locomotives.
Hydrogen-powered locomotives, with their electric transmissions, would probably be able to use electrification for traction power, so they would put pressure on the Government to electrify between Westbury and Newbury stations, so that there was a fully-electrified route between the Mendips and London.
Rolls-Royce’s Staggering Development
Staggering is not my word, but that of Paul Stein, who is Rolls-Royce’s Chief Technology Officer.
He used the word in a press release, which I discuss in Our Sustainability Journey.
To electrify aviation, Rolls-Royce has developed a 2.5 MW generator, based on a small gas-turbine engine, which Paul Stein describes like this.
Amongst the many great achievements from E-Fan X has been the generator – about the same size as a beer keg – but producing a staggering 2.5 MW. That’s enough power to supply 2,500 homes and fully represents the pioneering spirit on this project.
This generator is designed for flight and the data sheet for the gas-turbine engine is available on the Internet.
- It has a weight of under a couple of tonnes compared to the thirteen tonnes of the diesel engine and generator in a Class 68 locomotive.
- It is also more powerful than the diesel.
- It looks to be as frugal, if not more so!
- Rolls-Royce haven’t said if this gas-turbine can run on aviation biofuel, but as many of Rolls-Royce’s large engines can, I would be very surprised if it couldn’t!
Rolls-Royce’s German subsidiary is a large producer of rail and maritime diesel engines, so the company has the expertise to customise the generator for rail applications.
I can see this generator ending up in a high-powered heavy independently-powered electric locomotive for hauling stone and inter-modal container trains.
As with hydrogen-powered locomotives, this new breed of gas-turbine locomotive with its electric transmission, will be able to use electrification, where it exists.
So would locomotive developments drive the electrification through Westbury and especially between Westbury and Newbury?
I would rate is likely, that in the future, increasingly rail locomotives will have sophisticated electric transmissions, between their prime motive power of diesel, hydrogen, gas-turbine or whatever and their traction system. All of these locomotives will have pantographs and/or third-rail shoes to access electrification, where it exists.
These locomotives will surely add to pressure to electrify between Westbury and Newbury.
Biodiesel is surely the interim freight solution, if one is needed.
Future Zero-Carbon Passenger Services
Passenger services through Westbury can be divided into three groups.
Great Western Railway’s Services Between London Paddington And Devon And Cornwall
From Beeching Reversal projects put forward over the last few months, it looks like these services will increase and stop at several new and refurbished stations.
I can see discontinuous electrification being used to create a series of electrification islands to allow Class 800 trains, with a battery capability reach the Far South West of Cornwall.
Electrification islands could be at places like
- Around Westbury station.
- Between Taunton and Exeter St. Davids stations alongside the M5.
- Between Plymouth station and the Royal Albert bridge.
- Around Bodmin Parkway station
- Around Truro station
- At Newquay station
- At Penzance station
Obviously, the number and type of the various installations will depend on the methods used and the engineering required.
I do believe that with Hitachi trains, that meet their specification, that trains will be able to travel between Paddington and Penzance without touching a drop of diesel.
Great Western Railway’s Cardiff Central And Portsmouth Harbour Service
The service can be split into the following legs.
- Cardiff Central and Filton Junction – 33 miles – Electrified
- Filton Junction and Bristol Temple Meads – 5 miles – Not Electrified
- Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28 miles – Not Electrified
- Westbury and Salisbury – 24 miles – Not Electrified
- Salisbury and Southampton Central – 15 miles – Not Electrified
- Southampton Central and Portsmouth Harbour – 26 miles – Electrified
It would appear that a train with the performance and range on batteries of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train should be able to handle the route, provided the following conditions are met.
- It can leave the Great Western Main Line at Filton Junction with a full battery.
- It can leave the electrification at Westbury station with a full battery.
- It can leave Southampton Central station with a full battery.
- Third-rail shoes are fitted for working between Southampton Central and Portsmouth Harbour stations.
Recharging batteries at Bristol Temple Meads and Salisbury stations, although probably welcome, are not necessary.
I can envisage Hitachi Class 800 and Class 385 trains being able to fulfil this role, along with Bombardier Electrostars and Aventras and Siemens Desiros.
As Great Western Railway have forty-five Class 387 trains, conversion of some of these to battery electric operation must be a possibility.
Great Western Railway’s Gloucester and Weymouth Service
The service can be split into the following legs.
- Gloucester and Bristol Temple Meads – 39 miles – Not Electrified
- Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28 miles – Not Electrifield
- Westbury and Dorchester Junction – 52 miles – Not Electrified
- Dorchester Junction and Weymouth – 4 miles – Electrified
It would appear that a train with the performance and range on batteries of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train should be able to handle the route, provided the following conditions are met.
- It can leave Gloucester station with a full battery.
- It can leave Bristol Temple Meads with a full battery.
- It can leave Westbury with a full battery.
- It can leave the South Western Main Line at Dorchester Junction with a full battery.
It would be a tight trip for a battery electric train and I suspect, that there would be some extra electrification between Westbury and Dorchester Junction or perhaps charging facilities at Frome or Yeovil Pen Mill stations.
The alternative would be to fit larger batteries on the train.
As to the train to be used, a Class 387 train with a battery capability would surely be ideal.
Great Western Railway’s Swindon and Westbury Service
The service can be split into the following legs.
- Swindon and Chippenham – 16 miles – Electrified
- Chippenham and Westbury- 16 miles – Not Electrified
It would appear that a train with the performance and range on batteries of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train should be able to handle the route, provided the following conditions are met.
- It can leave Chippenham station with a full battery.
This would have sufficient charge to do the thirty-two mile round trip from Chippenham to Westbury and back.
As to the train to be used, a Class 387 train with a battery capability would surely be ideal.
South Western Railway’s Bristol Temple Meads and Salisbury Service
The service can be split into the following legs.
- Bristol Temple Meads and Westbury – 28 miles – Not Electrified
- Westbury and Salisbury- 24 miles – Not Electrified
t would appear that a train with the performance and range on batteries of Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train should be able to handle the route, provided the following conditions are met.
- It can leave Bristol Temple Meads station with a full battery.
- It can leave Westbury with a full battery.
- It can leave Salisbury with a full battery.
But, I do wonder, if with a slightly larger battery, a well-driven train could work the route with only charging the battery at Westbury station?
Conclusion
Could Westbury station develop into a zero-carbon rail transport hub for Wiltshire?
- It has an hourly train service between London Paddington and Exeter St. Davids.
- It has an hourly service between Bristol Temple Meads and Weymouth.
- There are hourly services to stations like Bath Spa, Bradford-on-Avon, Bristol Temple Meads, Chippenham, Dorchester, Frome, Swindon, Taunton, Trowbridge and Yeovil
It could be electrified to charge battery electric trains as they pass through.
South Western Railway Completes Trial Of Class 159 Emission Reducing Technology
The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Rail Advent.
This is Project 4 called Green Rail Exhaust After Treatment, that I wrote about in Grants To Support Low-Carbon Technology Demonstrators.
I also wrote about the project in SWR And Porterbrook Trial New Emission-Slashing Rail Technology.
This paragraph from the Rail Advent article sums up the results.
In partnership with Porterbrook and Eminox, South Western Railway has trialled a new system that has real-world reductions in pollution from nitrous oxides (NOx) by over 80% and hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulate matter (PM) by over 90%.
The technology appears to have performed well in a six-month trial.
As the proof of the pudding is always in the eating, it will be interesting to see how many systems are installed on the two hundred trains in the closely-related Class 158 and Class 159 train fleets.
The Anonymous Widower 