The Anonymous Widower

Completing Northern Powerhouse Rail

The Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two Connection To Manchester Airport Station

This OpenRailwayMap shows the rail connections that terminate at Manchester Airport station.

Note.

  1. The two runways are clearly shown.
  2. Manchester Airport station is indicated by the blue arrow near the top of the map.
  3. The orange tracks are rail lines.
  4. The green lines are Manchester Metrolink tracks.
  5. Rail and tram services approach the airport station from the East.
  6. The red dotted line is the current proposed path of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two
  7. The black dotted line appears to be an extension of the tram line to the airport.

This second OpenRailwayMap shows the lines around the airport station to a larger scale.

Note.

  1. Manchester Airport station is indicated by the blue arrow at the bottom of the map.
  2. The orange tracks are rail lines.
  3. The green lines are Manchester Metrolink tracks.
  4. The red dotted line is the current proposed path of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.
  5. The Manchester Metrolink now makes a loop around the Airport.

I think the following will happen.

  • A large proportion of passengers and staff travelling between Manchester Airport and Manchester City Centre will use Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.
  • Passengers and staff, who live locally will use the Manchester Metro loop.
  • Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two will replace some of the current train services.
  • Some services on the Castlefield Corridor will migrate to Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.

There could be as many as twelve trains per hour (tph) between Manchester Airport and Manchester City Centre on Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two. But a new urban line like that, which was mostly in a tunnel could probably handle 20 tph.

Manchester Airport And Crewe

This OpenRailwayMap shows the railways between Manchester Airport and Crewe stations.

Note.

  1. Manchester Airport station is indicated by the blue arrow at the top of the map.
  2. The orange tracks are rail lines.
  3. The red track going down the left hand side of the map is the West Coast Main Line.
  4. The green lines are Manchester Metrolink tracks.
  5. The red dotted line is the current proposed path of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.
  6. Crewe station is at the bottom of the map in the middle.

There could be as many as 12 tph between Manchester Airport and Crewe.

Manchester Airport And Manchester Piccadilly

This OpenRailwayMap shows the railways between Manchester Airport and Manchester Piccadilly stations.

Note.

  1. Manchester Airport station is in the South-West corner of the map.
  2. The orange tracks are existing rail lines.
  3. The green lines are Manchester Metrolink tracks.
  4. The red dotted line going up the middle of the map is the current proposed path of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.
  5. Manchester Piccadilly station is at the Northern end of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the City Centre between Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Victoria stations.

Note.

  1. Manchester Piccadilly station is in the South-East corner of the map.
  2. The red dotted lines creeping into the map is the current proposed path of Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two.
  3. All the platforms in Manchester Piccadilly station can be picked out, with the Castlefield Corridor breaking away to the West.
  4. The current plans will need demolition of buildings to the North of Manchester Piccadilly station.
  5. Manchester Victoria station is in the North-West corner of the map.
  6. The green line of the Manchester Metrolink route picks out the walking route between Manchester’s two main stations.
  7. About halfway between Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Victoria stations is the open space of Piccadilly Gardens.

This Google Map shows Piccadilly Gardens.

Note.

  1. The Manchester Metrolink running through.
  2. There are two Metrolink stops ; Market Street and Piccadilly Gardens, in the area.
  3. It appears any stop on the Manchester Metrolink can be reached with no more than a single change from one of these two stops.

Looking at the map showing Victoria and Piccadilly stations, I wonder, if a Lizzie Line of the North could be built under Manchester City Centre.

  • There would be underground platforms at Piccadilly station, with two through platforms and two to terminate trains from the South.
  • Local services from Piccadilly station could continue as now, although services to Manchester Airport could be simplified.
  • There would be an underground station at Piccadilly Gardens with two through platforms , to connect with an expanded Manchester Metrolink, buses and walking routes.
  • There would be underground platforms at Victoria station, with two through platforms and two to terminate trains from the East.
  • Local services from Victoria could continue as now.
  • There could be as many as 12 tph between Manchester Victoria, Piccadilly Gardens, Manchester Piccadilly and Manchester Airport.

Just as the Lizzie Line was slotted into London, with the minimum of disruption, I am fairly certain, a similar but smaller construction process could be carried out in Manchester City Centre.

  • Manchester doesn’t have an Underground to avoid.
  • The stations could be very similar to each other and like Custom House station on the Lizzie Line, they could be built with giant concrete Lego.
  • There would only be four stations to create.
  • The tunnel would be about fifteen miles at most.
  • The tunnel would not need to be electrified as the trains could run on batteries.

As a Manchester Rail Tunnel has been talked about for decades, I suspect there is a big knowledge base of ground conditions, which would help with the design and construction.

Between Manchester Victoria And Leeds

Consider.

  • The electrification between Manchester Victoria and Stalybridge stations has recently been switched on.
  • Part of the electrification between Leeds and York stations has been switched on.
  • Full electrification is being installed between Leeds and Manchester Victoria stations.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the Huddersfield Line between Manchester Victoria station and a few miles short of Huddersfield station.

Note.

  1. Manchester Victoria station is indicated by the blue arrow in the South-West corner of the map.
  2. Huddersfield station is just off the map in the North-East corner.
  3. Manchester Victoria and Stalybridge stations is fully electrified and shown in red.
  4. Stalybridge and Huddersfield stations is being electrified and is shown as black and red dotted.
  5. Electrification between Huddersfield and Leeds is underway under the TransPennine Upgrade.

This section will be completed, when the Manchester City Centre Rail Tunnel is connected to the Huddersfield Line.

Connecting The Manchester City Centre Rail Tunnel To The Huddersfield Line

This Google Map shows where the Huddersfield Line crosses the M60 Motorway to the West of Ashton-under-Lyme.

Note.

  1. The newly-electrified Huddersfield Line runs across the map.
  2. The M60 Motorway is on the left.
  3. There are facilities for athletics, cricket and football.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the Eastern portal of the Manchester City Centre Rail Tunnel was in this area.

But looking at Google  Maps between this site and Manchester Victoria, there are other sites.

Conclusion

I now feel that it is possible to create a Northern Powerhouse Rail/High Speed Two route using a tunnel under Manchester.

Obviously, there is more work to be done.

August 15, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Could East Midlands Railway Run A St. Pancras And Leeds Service?

East Midlands Railway’s new Class 810 trains have been designed, so that a pair will fit into one platform at St. Pancras.

If we assume one platform at St. Pancras is used for the Corby and Luton Airport Express services, that leaves three platforms for pairs of Class 810 trains to run expresses to the East Midlands.

This could be as many as twelve pairs of five-car trains per hour.

Where wioll they all terminate in the North?

Leeds station must be the obvious new destination.

  • Leeds has the largest population and is the largest commercial and finance centre in Yorkshire and the North-East.
  • Leeds would have gained three trains per hour (tph) from London, two tph from Birmingham and four tph from the East Midlands Hub at Nottinham.
  • Leeds is getting a brand new metro.
  • Leeds is a fully-electrified station, so it could charge the trains before they return to Sheffield, Leicester, Wigston junction and St. Pancras.
  • Leeds and Wigston junction is 107.8 miles, which should be within the range of a battery-electric Class 810 train. If it is too far, an extended stop could be taken at Sheffield to top up the batteries.
  • Note that Stadler hold the Guinness World Record for the greatest distance covered on one charge at 139 miles. Hitachi Rail, who are partnered with JCB’s battery-maker in Sunderland, should be able to smash that.

The Rail Minister; Lord Peter Hendy went to Leeds University.

Which Route Would The Trains Take Between Sheffield And Leeds?

Consider.

  • The fastest trains between Sheffield and Leeds, go via Meadowhall, Barnsley and Wakefield Kirkgate stations.
  • Trains take about an hour.
  • The current frequency is two tph.
  • The distance is 41.1 miles with no electrification.

A frequency of two additional tph between St. Pancras and Leeds would give the following.

  • A nice round four tph between Yorkshire’s two most important cities.
  • Four fast tph between Meadowhall, Barnsley and Wakefield Kirkgate stations, and Leeds and Sheffield.
  • Two direct trains between Meadowhall, Barnsley and Wakefield Kirkgate, and Chesterfield, Derby, Long Eaton, East Midlands Parkway, Loughborough, Leicester and St. Pancras.

It would be complimentary to any Leeds Metro.

Could East Midlands Railways Also Serve Huddersfield?

Consider.

  • Huddersfield is 36.4 miles further than Sheffield on the Penistone Line, which is not electrified.
  • Wigston junctionand Huddersfield station is 105.3 miles.
  • Huddersfield is a Grade I Listed station with two pubs in the middle of the town.
  • Huddersfield station is being fully-electrified in connection with the TransPennine Upgrade.
  • All trains from Sheffield, that use the Penistone Line  terminate in Platform 2 at Huddersfield station.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the position of Platform 2 in the station.

Note.

  1. The red-and-black dotted tracks are being electrified.
  2. The black tracks are not going to be electrified.
  3. Platform 2 is marked 2 in the top-right corner of the map.
  4. Platform 2 looks to be about 90 metres long.
  5. Five-car Class 810 trains are 120 metres long.
  6. From the map, it looks like the platform could be lengthened by the required thirty metres.

I suspect that some form of charger can be squeezed into the available space. After all, you don’t often get the chance to put charging into one of the most grand stations in Europe. Power supply would not be a problem, because of the electrification.

A frequency of twotph between St. Pancras and Huddersfield would give the following.

  • Two fast tph between Meadowhall, and Barnsley, and Huddersfield and Sheffield.
  • Two extra direct trains between Meadowhall and Barnsley, and Chesterfield, Derby, Long Eaton, East Midlands Parkway, Loughborough, Leicester and St. Pancras.

It would connect many stations to the TransPennine Route at Huddersfield station.

What Could The Sheffield and St. Pancras Look Like?

Consider that currently.

  • There are two tph.
  • Trains stop at Leicester, Loughborough (1tph), East Midlands Parkway (1tph), Long Eaton (1tph), Derby and Chesterfield.
  • Trains are five- or seven-cars.

The simplest solution would probably be.

  • A pair of five-car trains run all services.
  • Trains split and join at Sheffield with one train going to Leeds and one going to Huddersfield.

I estimate that the Class 810 trains will offer about thirty more seats in every hour.

July 19, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Problem Of Electrifying Leicester Station

This post is my attempt to try and explain the problem of electrifying the Midland Main Line through Leicester station.

This Google map shows the Southern end of the station.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the station.

Note.

  1. There appear to be five tunnels under the station buildings and London Road.
  2. What is the tunnel going underneath the tracks used for?

Leicester station has a Grade II Listed frontage.

Note.

  1. It is an impressive Victorian station.
  2. The station building is on a bridge over the tracks.
  3. The station is also on one of the main roads through Leicester.
  4. The road layout is very complicated.

This 3D Google Map, shows an aerial view of the station.

Note.

  1. There four platforms, which are numbered 1-4 from the left.
  2. The expresses between London and Derby, Nottingham and Sheffield use the two middle tracks.
  3. Other main line and East-West services  use the outside platforms.
  4. There is an avoiding line for freight services.
  5. 5. The step-free footbridge is clearly visible.

This second 3D Google Map, shows an enlargement of the frontage of the station.

These pictures show what is inside the building at the front of the station.

The building would appear to be a Grade II Listed taxi rank and free twenty-minute car park.

There are plans to increase the capacity of the station.

  • A fifth platform will be added.
  • Three miles of quadruple track will be be built South of the station.
  • The Midland Main Line was also to be electrified.

Real Time Trains indicates that the distance between Leicester and Wigston North  junction is 3.1 miles.

This OpenRailMap shows that section of track.

Note.

  1. Leiester station is at the top of the map.
  2. Wigston junction is the triangular junction at the bottom of the map.
  3. Wigston North Junction is indicated by the blue arrow.
  4. OpenRailwayMap only shows a 100 mph Northbound track and a 90 mph Southbound track on the route.

It looks to me, that four tracks between Leicester and Wigston North  junction would mean that trains could expedite arrivals to and departures from Leicester to and from the South.

South From Wigston Junction

Consider.

  • London St. Pancras and Kettering is a four-track railway as far as the Corby Branch.
  • North of Luton the slowest maximum speed is 100 mph, with much of the line rated at 110 mph plus.
  • Wigston North junction and Luton station is 65.8 miles.
  • Current Class 222 diesel trains typically take 40 minutes.
  • This is an average speed of 98.7 mph.
  • An average speed of  110 mph between Wigston North junction and Luton station would take 36 minutes.
  • An average speed of  125 mph between Wigston North junction and Luton station would take 31.6 minutes.
  • An average speed of  130 mph between Wigston North junction and Luton station would take 30.4 minutes.

I believe with track improvements and digital signalling, there are time savings to be gained between St. Pancras and Leicester stations.

Ultimately, if the 140 mph design speed of the Class 810 trains under digital signalling could be maintained, this would do the following.

  • Push the St. Pancras and Leicester times under an hour.
  • Push the St. Pancras and Nottingham times under ninety minutes.
  • Push the St. Pancras and Sheffield times under two hours.

Batteries would only be used on the three miles between Wigston North junction and Leicester station.

Could Bi-Mode Trains Be Used?

They could be used initially and to prove if the partial electrification works.

But each train has four diesel engines and sometimes they will be working in pairs through the stations between Leicester and Sheffield.

Passengers will take a dim view of being covered in lots of diesel smoke, when they have been promised clean, zero-carbon electric trains.

But the battery-electric trains will be much quieter and pollution-free.

This page on the Hitachi Rail web site is entitled Intercity Battery Trains.

New Infrastructure Needed

The only infrastructure needed will be that which will support the new trains.

The Class 810 trains will be maintained at Etches Park at Derby.

If they are battery-electric trains, there may be some strategically-placed chargers, which typically would be a short length of overhead wire.

 

July 18, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Wigston Junction – 10th July 2025

It now appears that Wigston Junction, is as far North, as electrification will get on the Midland Main Line for some time.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the maximum speeds through the junction.

Note.

  1. Leicester station is to the North.
  2. London is to the South.
  3. Nuneaton is to the West.
  4. South Wigston station is indicated by a blue arrow.
  5. The Midland Main Line goes between the North and South points of the junction.
  6. Trains going North have a maximum speed of 100 mph.
  7. Trains going South have a maximum speed of 80 mph.
  8. Trains going along the North-West leg of the junction have a maximum speed of 40 mph.
  9. Trains going along the South-West leg of the junction have a maximum speed of 30 mph.

It would also appear that trains going North on the Midland Main Line can have a maximum speed of 100 mph or even 110 mph for most of the way between Market Harborough and just before Leicester, whilst going South is perhaps a couple of minutes slower.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the original plan for electrification through the junction.

Note.

  1. Red tracks are electrified.
  2. Black tracks are not electrified.
  3. Black/red dashed tracked were being electrified, but most are now paused.
  4. As before South Wigston station is indicated by a blue arrow.

Only the South point of the junction is electrified.

These pictures were taken from the train, as I passed Southwards from the North point of the junction to Market Harborough station.

Note.

  1. The first three pictures show the chord connecting to South Wigston station and on to Nuneaton.
  2. The next six pictures show the extra single track on the East side of the junction.
  3. There is a third track South of Wigston junction, that is about two miles long and electrified.
  4. All tracks South of Wigston junction are electrified.

It looks like a train could wait in the loop and be passed by a Northbound express.

Could the loop be used to charge trains in an emergency?

Conclusion

It would appear that Wigston junction could be a suitable place for the electrification to be paused.

All services to the North of Wigston junction would be on battery power, unless there is electrification.

July 10, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | Leave a comment

Cameron Bridge Station – 15th May 2025

I took these pictures yesterday at the new Cameron Bridge station yesterday on the Levenmouth Rail Link.

Note.

  1. The station has a car-park on the coming-home-from Edinburgh platform.
  2. There is a bridge over the River Leven, that appears to lead to new housing.
  3. The step-free bridge appears to be used by local residents to cross the railway.
  4. There appears to be a walking route for the nearby factory, which distills Scotland’s national spirit.

But as the pictures show the station has some unusual features for a small station with one train per hour (tph).

Parking

This extract from the Internet describes the parking.

A car park is available for customers with 125 spaces, including Electric Vehicle (EV) charging and blue badge spaces, as well as a drop off/pick up area and motorcycle parking.

They certainly seem to be expecting lots of commuters to Edinburgh, which is 34.5 miles away over the river.

Long Platforms

As the pictures with the three-car Class 170 train show the platforms are long.

I estimate that the platforms could take a pair of four-car Class 385 trains and almost take a nine-car Class 800 or 802 train.

Is this wishful thinking or prudent future-proofing as extending platforms can be a much more difficult exercise, than building them in the first place.

Perhaps, plans include a lot of housing, a major educational establishment, a sports stadium or some large factories to add to the distillery and long trains will be needed to serve the station.

Electrification Foundations

What surprised me, is that the station has been fitted out with the foundations for electrification gantries. There are five pairs all with four strong bolts to support the gantries over the track. This gallery shows some of the foundations.

 

But what also surprised me was that at no other place on the route between Edinburgh and Leven, were any electrification works visible, except where the electrification is completed between Edinburgh and Edinburgh Gateway.

I estimate that the distance between Cameron Bridge and Edinburgh Gateway is about thirty-seven miles as the train travels, which should be in range of one of ScotRail’s Hitachi Class 385 trains, that had been fitted with batteries.

  • The trains would charge their batteries on the run between Edinburgh Waverley and Edinburgh Gateway stations.
  • The trains would run between Edinburgh Gateway and Cameron Bridge stations on battery power. The eight intermediate stations would not have to suffer diesel trains.
  • The trains would put up the pantograph at Cameron Bridge station and charge the batteries on a short length of overhead wires that will be erected there on both platforms.
  • The train would run to Leven station on battery power, where it would reverse, as it does now and then return to Cameron Bridge station.
  • At Cameron Bridge station, it could even pick up more charge if needed.

Note.

  1. The only new electrification needed would be to electrify both lines in Cameron Bridge station.
  2. Supposedly, Hitachi do a nice line in short lengths of electrification and all the electrical gubbins that support them.
  3. Because of the large distillery, Cameron Bridge is not short of electricity, with a large grid connection visible at the Edinburgh end of the station.
  4. No electrification will be needed over the Forth Rail Bridge, to the delight of the Heritage Taliban.

Whoever gets the contract to supply the battery-electric trains and the partial electrification, will be supplying trains that will cross one of most famous railway bridges in the world.

I also predict, that this short rail link between Edinburgh Waverley and Leven will become a tourist attraction and bring prosperity to the area.

Electrifying The Fife Circle

This OpenRailwayMap shows the whole Fife Circle Line.

Note.

  1. Lines shown in red are electrifield, whilst those shown in black are not and lines shown in dotted red-and-black are to be electrified.
  2. Cameron Bridge is marked by the blue arrow, with Leven to its East on the coast.
  3. The Forth Rail Bridge over the Forth of Forth is at the bottom of the map.
  4. To the North of the bridge, the line splits and connects to the large circular railway, which is the Fife Circle Line.
  5. Some trains after crossing the Forth Rail Bridge,come up the East coast via Kirkcaldy to terminate at Leven or Glenrothes with Thornton.
  6. Other trains from Edinburgh take the Western side of the Fife Circle  via Rosyth and Cowdenbeath to Glenrothes with Thornton.

This second Open RailwayMap shows the Fife Circle Line between Cameron Bridge and Glenrothes with Thornton.

Note.

  1. As before, lines shown in red are electrifield, whilst those shown in black are not and lines shown in dotted red-and-black are to be electrified.
  2. Cameron Bridge is marked by the blue arrow, with Leven to its East on the coast.
  3. Glenrothes with Thornton station is in the South-Western corner of the map.
  4. It might even be possible for all trains to terminate on the Levenmouth Rail Link as Leven station has two platforms.
  5. If that is the case, the four tph would make full use of the two long platforms at Leven and Cameron Bridge stations, with the only electrification on the Fife Circle Line at Cameron Bridge station.

This is partial electrification with none of the complexity of full electrication, but with all the power it needs from the electrical connection of a large distillery.

The Wikipedia entry for the Fife Circle Line says this about the electrification.

The £55 million first phase, to electrify 65 miles (104 km) of Fife Circle track, between Haymarket and Dalmeny, for use by battery electric multiple units, was begun by Scottish Powerlines in June 2022 and is due to be completed by December 2024, although this project has been delayed and is expected to completed by December 2025. Further phases will electrify the lines between Kinghorn, Thornton, Ladybank and Lochgelly. This will allow the Fife Circle services to be operated by battery electric multiple units whilst minimising capital expenditure on infrastructure, in particular avoiding the major expense of electrifying the Forth Bridge. Complete electrification would be possible at some future date. The partial electrification was due to be completed by December 2025 but there has been some slippage in these target dates.

This OpenRailwayMap shows Kinghorn, Thornton, Ladybank and Lochgelly.

Note.

  1. Lines shown in red are electrifield, whilst those shown in black are not and lines shown in dotted red-and-black are to be electrified.
  2. Ladybank is at the top of the map indicated by a blue arrow.
  3. Kinghorn is at the bottom of the map on the coast.
  4. Ladybank and Kinghorn are connected by a section of the Aberdeen and Edinburgh Line.
  5. Glenrothes and Thornton are to the West of this line.
  6. The Levenmouth Rail Link runs to the East.
  7. Lochgelly and Cowdenbeath are on the West side of the map.

From what I saw yesterday, I wouldn’t be surprised if the amount of electrification to be performed has been cut back and more reliance is to be placed on on-board batteries.

Class 385 Battery-Electric Trains

The Wikipedia entry for Class 385 trains, says this about battery-electric versions.

During early 2019, Hitachi held a series of discussions with the Scottish Government on the development of a variant of the Class 385, a battery electric multiple unit (BEMU) that would be capable of running on unelectrified sections of line along a route. The installation of batteries was reportedly described as being a relatively straightforward alteration to make; an underfloor battery unit, dependent upon size, would be able to power a trainset over distances of 20 to 60 miles (30 to 100 km). The proposal drew upon Hitachi’s existing experience with battery trains operated in Japan, and had been motivated by a recommendation from the rail decarbonisation task force which advocated that such measures be implemented.

A range on batteries of sixty miles would cover the less than forty miles between Edinburgh Gateway and Ladybank.

I suspect that a range of sixty miles would bridge the gap between Edinburgh Gateway and Perth or Dundee.

Does this mean, that I think it could?

If Hitachi’s testing of their battery-electric Class 802 trains have shown phenomenal distances, then this would fit with the distances shown by Stadler’s Class 777 trains in New Merseyrail Train Runs 135km On Battery.

This leads me to believe that battery-equipped ScotRail Class 385 trains and LNER Class 800 trains are able to electrify the North of Scotland, with a few strategic charging stations like the one at Cameron Bridge station.

 

 

 

May 16, 2025 Posted by | Energy, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Changing Trains At Newcastle Station

In the last few weeks, I have changed trains at Newcastle station between the East Coast Main and the Northumberland Line four times.

I took these pictures on Sunday, when I changed twice.

Note.

  1. On my two train changes yesterday, I needed to buy a ticket for the next leg of my journey and I had to walk miles to the ticket office.
  2. The walk was rather straining on my dodgy knees.
  3. There are no signs to the ticket office and I only found it due to a helful human.
  4. In the morning, I missed my connection and had to wait an hour for the next train.
  5. A lot of these pictures show diesel multiple units, that were working the Northumberland Line to Ashington in Platform 1, surrounded by happy passengers.
  6. Platform 1 appears to be able to take at least a pair of Class 158 two-car diesel multiple units.
  7. Platform 1 appears to be electrified with 25 KVAC overhead wires, even if the Northumberland Line isn’t electrified.
  8. The staff seem extremely pleased with the success of the Northumberland Line.

The staff were very helpful, but it was all very much organised chaos.

But from what I saw yesterday, it appears that something powerful is stirring along the Northumberland Line.

Perhaps what the BBC predicted in Northumberland Line: Railway ‘Could Create Economic Powerhouse’ is starting to happen?

This was the sub-heading of the BBC article.

An “east coast economic powerhouse” stretching from Edinburgh to Leeds could be created if the Northumberland Line rail scheme goes ahead, a public inquiry has been told.

I’m well aware that one busy weekend doesn’t make a powerhouse.

But Northumberland Council must get ready for the next phases of the project.

Larger Zero-Carbon Trains

In Alstom Hydrogen Aventras And The Reopened Northumberland Line, I suggested that Alstom hydrogen trains might be suitable for the Northumberland Line, but these trains have not been seen in the flesh, so they can probably be discounted.

But this is a picture I took yesterday of Platform 1 at Newcastle station.

Note.

  1. The wires of the electrification above the Class 158 diesel multiple unit.
  2. An out and back trip between Newcastle and Ashington is probably less than fifty miles.

In the Wikipedia entry for Merseyrail’s Stadler Class 777 trains, this is said.

In December 2022, a maximum test range of 135 km (84 miles) was achieved, which was “much longer than we expected”.

It would appear that a small fleet of perhaps three trains, that were fitted with pantographs for charging could work the Northumberland Line, without the need for substantial additions to the infrastructure.

In the Wikipedia entry for the new Tyne and Wear Metro’s Stadler Class 555 trains, this is said.

The new trains will be five cars long in fixed formations, with a Jacobs bogie between the inner cars. One centre car will be fitted with a Brecknell Willis pantograph to draw the power from the 1,500 V DC overhead lines. They will also be fitted with regenerative braking technology for greater energy efficiency, and a battery energy storage system that will allow the trains to remain powered and reach the nearest station if the overhead lines fail. This offers the potential to be used on routes that are not fitted with overhead lines that may be added to the network in the future.

As the Class 777 and Class 555 trains appear to be cousins, perhaps those innovative Swiss engineers at Stadler can come up with a 25 KVAC battery-electric Class 555 train, that could charge its batteries in Platform 1 at Newcastle station and then use battery power to get to Ashington and back.

With perhaps a couple of short lengths of 25 KVAC overhead electrification, I feel Stadler could create a battery-electric Class 555 train, that could handle.

How many other branches from electrified main lines in the UK, could be handled by such a train?

How about these routes for starters.

  • Darlington and Bishop Auckland
  • Darlington and Saltburn
  • Preston and Blackpool South.
  • Skipton and Preston via Colne.
  • Lancaster and Morecambe
  • Leeds Metro
  • Llandudno Junction and Blaenau Ffestiniog
  • Middlesbrough and Whitby.
  • Sheffield and Huddersfield
  • Sheffield and Leeds
  • Sheeffield and Manchester Piccaduilly

Sheffield and York

The Class 555 trains would also have other advantages.

  • In the Newcastle area, I’m sure the Tyne and Wear Metro could probably service them.
  • They have the Stadler steps for easy access.
  • Most Stadler trains, tram-trains and trams are good at climbing hills.

Great British Railways could do a lot worse, than buying a reasonable number of Class 555 battery-electric trains.

 

 

March 31, 2025 Posted by | Design, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scotland To Get New Intercity Fleet

The title of this post is the same as that of this press release from Transport Scotland.

These eight paragraphs make up the body of the press release.

The Scottish Government announced today that procurement will begin to replace the trains in its Intercity fleet.

The procurement will seek a replacement for the High Speed Train (HST) fleet of 25 trains which operates on its InterCity routes between Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen, and Inverness.

Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Fiona Hyslop said:

“Resilient, reliable ScotRail services are key to encouraging more people to choose to travel by train for work, leisure and learning.

“Over 4 million passengers travelled on InterCity trains between our key cities in the last year – we want to encourage even more people to do so. This procurement will enable us to replace the current Intercity fleet with trains which provide improved facilities and accessibility.

“Any replacement fleet is expected to be more energy efficient and therefore will significantly reduce emissions, reduce operating costs and be more in line with current passenger expectations, including for accessibility. The procurement process ensures Scottish suppliers will be able to offer to provide their services to potential bidders.

“This latest milestone in our rolling programme of decarbonisation will ensure the reliability of our Intercity routes for the long-term, making Scotland’s railway a more attractive and greener travel choice.”

Further details on this announcement will be shared when the contract is awarded in 2025. It is also expected that the refreshed Decarbonisation Action Plan will be published in Spring 2025, and this will detail updated targets for replacing ScotRail’s existing diesel fleets.

It is a press release full of good intentions, but very few facts.

Is this what Scots get from their political party?

I have a few questions.

Will The Trains Be Built In The UK?

This must surely give some advantages, but will it get the best trains at the best price?

What Will Be The Number And Capacity Of The Trains?

Transport Scotland could go for a like for like number and capacity replacement.

  • But there have been capacity problems in Scotland, which have meant using diesel Class 153 trains as baggage cars.
  • They might also want to add extra services.
  • Will they replace the train lost at Stonehaven?

They could add a few options.

Other Companies May Need Similar Trains

Consider.

  • GWR will need to replace their similar Castles.
  • CrossCountry will need new trains.
  • Grand Central will need new trains.
  • South Western Railway may need new trains for services between Cardiff and Devon.
  • Transport for Wales may need new trains.

Hull Trains and Lumo have recently ordered a selection of new Hitachi Class 802 and 803 trains, which I wrote about in Fourteen New Trains To Drive First Rail Open Access Growth.

I can see an argument for buying more Hitachi Class 80x trains, as it will surely save Great British Railways costs in the long time.

Should The New Trains Be A Forever Solution?

When British Rail electrified to Brighton, Crewe, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Norwich, Portsmouth, Southampton, Weymouth and many other places from London, they saw it as a mode of traction, that would be used forever.

As the trains wore out or got outdated, they would be replaced with trains, which at least could run using the same mode of traction.

Generally, on electrified routes, when British Rail’s electric trains have been replaced, they have been replaced by more modern new electric trains.

The one major exception was on the East Coast Main Line where some InterCity 225 trains were replaced with Hitachi Class 800 and Class 802 diesel bi-mode trains.

But as the Class 800 and Class 802 diesel bi-mode trains were also replacing InterCity125 trains, they were a pragmatic replacement.

The Hitachi trains can be considered a Forever Solution, as bi-mode trains will always be able to work some routes that will never get electrified.

But Hitachi are developing the successor to their  diesel bi-mode train, which is the tri-mode train, capable of running on electrification, diesel or battery power.

  • Diesel power-packs can be swapped for battery packs.
  • The battery packs have the same weight and power as a diesel power-pack.
  • Existing diesel bi-mode  trains can be converted to tri-mode or battery-electric bi-mode trains.
  • A range of over forty miles on a single battery pack has been demonstrated.

Could Hitachi tri-mode trains be The replacements for the Inter7City trains?

Will Some Trains Have A Battery Electric Capability?

I very much believe so, as some routes in Scotland could be decarbonised by battery-electric trains.

What Top Speed Would The Trains Have?

Most of the routes in Scotland, where new modern quality rolling stock is needed, has a top speed of less than 100 mph, but in places the top speed is 125 mph.

I suspect, if trains can run at 125 mph in the places, where it is allowed, could probably save a few minutes on journey times.

Take the Borders Railway.

  • The electrification runs out at Brunstane. Batteries would be charged between Edinburgh and Brunstane using the existing electrification.
  • To go from Brunstane to Tweedbank and return to Brunstane is 63 miles.
  • To work the Borders Railway would need a battery range of 63 miles.

I suspect every route in Scotland could have an electrification strategy for use with battery-electric trains. Some of which would have short lengths of extra electrification.

What Lengths Would The Trains Be?

In my example I used the Borders Railway.

A typical service is run by a three-car Class 170 train or two such trains running as a pair.

Perhaps, a single four- or  five-car train could work the service all day and still provide enough capacity?

Conclusion

I believe, that Scotrail services could be electrified line-by-line.

Some lines would need more or longer trains and an update to the electrification.

December 26, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 11 Comments

FirstGroup Acquires London – South Wales Open Access Business And Plans Lumo To Devon

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.

This is the sub-heading.

‘Growing our open access rail portfolio is a key priority’, FirstGroup CEO Graham Sutherland said on December 5 when the company announced that it had acquired Grand Union Trains GWML Holdings Ltd. GUT holds track access rights to launch an open access passenger service between London and Carmarthen. FirstGroup has also applied for paths to launch a London to Paignton service.

FirstGroup seem to have acted quickly to replace the business that they have lost to the Government.

This is said about the London Paddington  and Carmarthen route.

The London Paddington to Carmarthen service is now expected to launch in December 2027, with GUT having secured track access rights to the end of 2037.

There will be five services each way per day, calling at stations including Bristol Parkway, Newport, Severn Tunnel Junction, Cardiff Central, Gowerton and Llanelli. FirstGroup said it would provide low fares, ‘more customer choice and much-needed additional capacity’.

It is still considering rolling stock options, and ’updates will be provided in due course’. The trains would have one class, free wi-fi and onboard catering.

After the successful trial of battery-powered high speed trains that I wrote about in ‘UK-First’ Intercity Battery Trial Exceeds Expectations, I would suspect that the train would run between London Paddington and Carmarthen like this.

  • Run between London Paddington and Cardiff Central using the 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
  • Whilst running between Paddington and Cardiff Central, the train’s batteries will be fully charged using the overhead electrification.
  • Run between Cardiff Central and Carmarthen using the onboard battery power.
  • Charge the train as required at Carmarthen.

Note.

  1. London Paddington and Cardiff Central is 145.2 miles or 233.7 km.
  2. Cardiff Central and Carmarthen via Gowerton is 75.3 miles or 121.2 km.
  3. In case of disruption, trains could wait at Cardiff Central, until the batteries had enough charge.

A battery capability of 121.2 km will be needed.

This is said about the London Paddington and Paignton route.

An application has been submitted to the Office of Rail & Road for the service to incorporate five return trips per day between London Paddington and Paignton via stations including Bath Spa, Bristol Temple Meads, Taunton, Exeter St David’s and Torquay from May 2028, as well as a sixth path between Highbridge & Burnham and London.

I suspect that the Paignton route will use a similar profile to the Carmarthen route.

  • Run between London Paddington and Chippenham using the 25 KVAC overhead electrification.
  • Whilst running between Paddington and Chippenham, the train’s batteries will be fully charged using the overhead electrification.
  • Run between Chippenham and Paignton using the onboard battery power.
  • Charge the train as required at Paignton .

Note.

  1. London Paddington and Chippenham is 93.5 miles or 233.7 km.
  2. Chippenham and Paignton is 128.6 miles or 207 km.
  3. In case of disruption, trains could wait at Chippenham , until the batteries had enough charge.

A battery capability of 207 km will be needed.

This page on the Hitachi Rail web site is entitled Intercity Battery Trains, where this is a paragraph.

Replacing one diesel engine with just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%. Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance.

I am a Graduate Control and Electrical Engineer and I believe that, if you have a train with two batteries, then by sequencing and managing the power, a range of 140 km. should be possible. As a typical Class 802 train, as used by Hull Trains has three diesel engines, would the train have a range of 210 km., if all three were swapped for batteries?

One fact, that has been disclosed by Hitachi, is that diesel engines and battery packs are identical in weight and power, so train performance and handling is unaffected, by the number of batteries.

If we look at the routes of First Group present and future subsidiaries and how much is on unelectrified track, we can create the following table.

  • Beverley – Hull Trains – 71.3 km.
  • Carmarthen – Lumo – 121.2 km.
  • Hull – Hull Trains – 58,1 km.
  • Paignton – Lumo – 207 km.
  • Rochdale – Lumo – 16.7 km.
  • Sheffield – Hull Trains – 37.5 km.
  • Worksop – Hull Trains – 12.2 km.

Note,

  1. One two or three batteries could be fitted.
  2. Some destinations could be served without any charging at the destination.
  3. Hitachi have proposed short lengths of 25 KVAC overhead line to charge trains.
  4. For some destinations, it may be a more affordable to add another battery than add a charger.

It’s all very modular.

December 5, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

‘UK-First’ Intercity Battery Trial Exceeds Expectations

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from Hitachi.

These three bullet points, act as sub-headings.

  • Intercity battery train completes testing in the north of England, demonstrating superior performance and cost-effectiveness compared to diesel engines.
  • Trial confirms single battery technology can reduce fuels costs between 35%-50% and enter and leave stations in zero-emission mode.
  • Ahead of Railway 200 celebration, this new UK rail innovation is ready to reduce cost and emissions on the railways.

These are the first two paragraphs.

Today, Angel Trains, Hitachi Rail and TransPennine Express are celebrating the successful completion of the UK’s first intercity battery trial in the North of England.

The powerful 700kw battery technology met, and in some cases even surpassed, the key objectives of the trial, including:

  • Fuel costs savings between 35%-50%, surpassing previous predictions of up to 30%.
  • Just one battery has managed to power the train to speeds greater than 75mph, clearly demonstrating this technology can enter, alight and exit stations solely in zero-emission battery-mode to improve air quality and reduce noise pollution.
  • Able to achieve all journey times and performance requirements so can meet operators timetable requirements.
  • The battery matches the weight of a diesel engine and is installed in the same undercarriage space, ensuring no risk of track degradation and no impact on the passenger environment.

Note.

  1. I would expect, that most of the fuel cost savings are due to the use of regenerative braking to the battery.
  2. 75 mph might seem slow, but Hull Trains average slower speeds than this on their diesel sections.
  3. Running in a non-polluting mode in stations and sensitive areas, is not going to be disliked by anyone.
  4. The most powerful diesel engines in Class 800 and Class 802 trains are rated at 700 kW. So with the same weight and power, it is not surprising that the performance is the same.

It looks to me, that Hitachi have designed an efficient battery-electric electric train, that can extend services from electrified main lines onto branch lines without electrification.

The One Battery Test Train And Hull Trains

Hull Trains currently run one service to Hull and Beverley and have applied for another service to serve Worksop, Woodhouse and Sheffield, where the trains would leave the East Coast Main Line at Retford.

Hitachi’s current test train has two diesel engines and one battery pack.

An Electric Service Between London and Hull/Beverley

Distances for the Hull and Beverley service are.

  • ECML  and Hull – 58.1 km. – 3 stops
  • Hull and Beverley – 13.2 km or 26.4 km both ways. – 1 stop

Note.

  1. Trains will be fully-charged, when they leave the ECML.
  2. Trains could be fully-charged, when they leave Hull station, if the platform they use has a charging system.
  3. All Hull Trains call in Platform 7 at Hull station.
  4. The Hitachi press release said “During a trial run, the battery’s impressive power enabled the train to operate solely in battery mode for 70km.” A speed of 75 mph is indicated.
  5. I would assume the Hitachi train used regenerative braking to help recharge the batteries, at the intermediate stops.
  6. Trains average around 57 mph between the ECML and Hull and 38 mph between Hull and Beverley.
  7. Much of the track between the ECML and Hull has a speed limit of 75 mph.
  8. Much of the track between Beverley and Hull has a speed limit of 70 mph or less.

Because of these figures and what Hitachi have said of the train’s performance on batteries, I am convinced that Hull Trains will use an electrified Platform 7 at Hull station to charge the trains.

These pictures show a Hull Trains’s Class 802 train in Platform 7 at Hull station.

Note.

  1. The blue Hull Train is in Platform 7 in the pictures.
  2. Hull station has a classic Victorian cast-iron roof.
  3. Many other similar platforms have been electrified in the UK.

I believe that this platform can be electrified relatively easily with 25 KVAC overhead wires.

An Electric Service Between London and Worksop/Sheffield

Distances for the Worksop and Sheffield service are.

  • ECML  and Worksop – 12.2 km. – 1 stop
  • Worksop and Sheffield- 25.3 km or 50.6 km both ways. – 1 stop

Note.

1. A train from London will leave Retford with a full battery.
2. Retford and Sheffield is only 37.5 km. So the round trip is only 75 km.
3. A full battery will power the train at 75 mph for 70 km – According to Hitachi.
4. Much of the track between Retford and Sheffield is only 60 mph. So going slower will give an energy saving.
5. Slowing at Worksop, Woodhouse and Sheffield will give the batteries a small charge.
6. There are no bridges in the Workshop station area, so a mile or so of electrification could be easy.
7. It’s an easy level route.
8. I’ve read somewhere that Hitachi have a full route simulator.

I calculate, that a two minute charge at Worksop would probably be all the train would need to travel the 75 km. on batteries.

We don’t know if Hitachi have licenced some of Vivarail’s FastCharge technology from FirstGroup. This could enable them to extract the maximum value from each stop at Worksop.

The One Battery Test Train And Lumo

Hitachi’s current test train has two diesel engines and one battery pack.

It is likely that a train with this configuration could be used on Lumo’s new service to Rochdale.

As London Euston and Manchester Victoria is fully electrified, the only unelectrified section is the 16.7 km. between Manchester Victoria and Rochdale. This would mean, that to complete the trip, Lumo’s train would need the ability to do 33.4 km on battery power.

As Hitachi’s test train can do 70 km on a full charge, Lumo could use trains with the standard two diesel engine and one battery pack configuration. The battery would be charged on the electrified sections of the route, between London Euston and Manchester Victoria stations.

It looks to me, to be a superb demonstration of the capabilities of a battery-electric InterCity train with two diesel engines and one battery pack.

The One Battery Test Train And LNER

Hitachi’s current test train has two diesel engines and one battery pack.

It is likely that a train with this configuration could be used on  several LNER services from King’s Cross.

  • Bradford Forster Square – 21.9 km. from Leeds
  • Cleethorpes – 102.5 km. from Newark
  • Grimsby Town – 97.9 km. from Newark
  • Harrogate – 29.4 km from Leeds
  • Lincoln – 26.9 km. from Newark
  • Middlesbrough – 35.2 km. from ECML
  • Cleethorpes – 102.5 km. from ECML
  • Scarborough – 67.8 km. from York

Note.

  1. Some services like those to Bradford Forster Square, Harrogate and Lincoln could be run by only charging on the East Coast Main Line.
  2. Some services like those to Middlesbrough  and Scarborough could be run by charging at the destination.
  3. Other services would need more batteries and/or charging at the destination.

I haven’t put in the Scottish services as running them may be more complicated.

Running Longer Distances On Battery Power

This paragraph is from the original Hitachi press release.

This success demonstrates that Hitachi Rail is ready to deliver the next stage of a full intercity battery-electric train. Based on real-world data, such a train would have a range between 100-150km. These ranges can cover significant sections of non-electrified routes, eliminating the need for wires in tunnels or stations, and potentially saving hundreds of millions of pounds on electrification projects.

Note.

  1. I would assume that as many diesel engines as possible would be replaced with battery packs.
  2. On a typical three-battery Class 800 train, 802 train or Class 805 train, this could be up to three batteries.
  3. But on a four-battery Class 810 train, this could be up to four batteries.

A strategy would need to be developed for all routes and trains would be configured and allocated to the routes accordingly.

November 10, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 7 Comments

IQIP Launches New Piling Technique For Noise-Compliant Installation Of Largest Monopiles

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on offshoreWIND.biz.

This is the sub-heading.

The foundation and installation specialist, IQIP, has put their newly developed piling technique EQ-Piling in action, which the Dutch company claims allows for the noise-compliant installation of even the largest monopiles.

This is the first paragraph.

Conventional impact piling is an established method for installing large monopile foundations at the required depths, but it generates noise that can be harmful to marine life, said the company with headquarters in Sliedrecht, the Netherlands.

The article describes in detail how the technique uses a 1,700 tonne water tank to prolong the impact time, which lowers the noise level.

Application To Railway Electrification

When the Gospel Oak and Barking Line was electrified, there were some complaints about the noise of the piling.

I wonder, if IQIP have a solution for the noise associated with the smaller piles used for railway electrification?

September 6, 2024 Posted by | Energy, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

« Previous Entries     Next Entries »