CAF « The Anonymous Widower

Northern Trains Plans Framework Contract For 450 Multiple-Units

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Gazette.

This is the first paragraph.

Northern Trains has invited expressions of interest in a framework contract covering the supply of up to 450 multiple-units to replace ‘significant quantities of its ageing fleet’.

These are other details.

Firm orders would be placed in phases.
The initial order would be for ‘multi-mode’ multiple-units.
Battery-electric or electric-only trains would be included in subsequent orders.
Trains would have a minimum design life of 35 years from acceptance.
The ability for the multi-mode units to be converted to electric or battery-electric power as part of an ‘in-life decarbonisation’ programme.

These four paragraphs outline the framework agreement between Northern Trains, the train manufacturer and the owners, who will finance the trains.

The framework agreement would run for eight years, with Northern able to order rolling stock in multiple phases.

Each phase would include a train manufacturing and supply agreement and a technical support and spares supply agreement.

The supplier would provide tools and spare parts, and there would be options for the supply of mock-ups and a cab simulator. Northern is to run a separate procurement for an owning party which would purchase each fleet and lease it to the operator.

The owner would be party to each manufacturing and supply agreement, and there may be different owning parties for each order phase.

This is a well-thought out proposal, that would be worth around a billion pounds to the train manufacturer.

It would probably be based around a family of trains like Alstom’s Aventra, CAF’s Civity or Stadler’s FLIRT.

For a series of orders of such a value, I think we will see some excellent proposals.

The deal will transform rail travel in the North.

I have some thoughts.

Which Trains Will Be Replaced?

Northern Trains fleet includes these ageing trains.

Class 150/0 diesel trains – 6 x three-car – 18 cars
Class 150/1 diesel trains – 46 x two-car – 92 cars
Class 150/2 diesel trains – 26 x two-car – 52 cars
Class 155 diesel trains – 7 x two-car – 14 cars
Class 156 diesel trains – 65 x two-car – 130 cars
Class 158/0 diesel trains – 45 x two-car – 90 cars
Class 158/9 diesel trains – 8 x three-car – 24 cars
Class 319 electric trains – 12 x four-car – 48 cars
Class 323 electric trains – 34 x three-car – 102 cars
Class 333 electric trains – 16 x four-car – 64 cars
Class 769 bi-mode trains – 8 x four-car – 32 cars

Note.

These total to 273 trains and 661 cars.
If the 16 Class 170 trains, which are of three-cars, were also to be replaced. that would bring the total trains to be replaced to 289 trains and 709 cars.

I would expect the difference between 273-289 current trains and 450 trains in the article, is explained by new services and increased services on certain routes.

Which Trains Could Be Retained?

Northern Trains fleet includes these new trains.

Class 195 diesel trains – 25 x two-cars – 50 cars
Class 195 diesel trains – 33 x three-cars – 99 cars
Class 331 electric trains – 31 x three-cars – 93 cars
Class 331 electric trains – 12 x four-cars – 48 cars

Note.

These trains were all built by CAF in the last five years.
These total to 101 trains and 290 cars.

But if they have an expected life of 35 years, the diesels will have to be converted to zero-carbon trains.

Will The CAF Trains Be Retained?

Consider.

If all the ageing trains and those not built by CAF were to be replaced then that would be 289 trains and 709 cars.
If the nearly-new CAF trains were also to be replaced that would be 390 trains and 999 cars.
Add in a few more trains for expanded services and you’re got the figure of 450 trains given in this article.
If the CAF trains were to be replaced, then Northern Trains would have an homogenous fleet of new trains from one manufacturer, with all the advantages in operation and maintenance.

On the other hand, I haven’t read any bad criticism of these CAF trains, so I will assume that there is no pressing reason to replace them.

And of course Northern Trains could have an homogenous fleet of new CAF trains.

This is said in the article.

The supplier would provide tools and spare parts, and there would be options for the supply of mock-ups and a cab simulator.

As this is specifically mentioned, do Northern lack a simulator for driver training?

What About The Manchester Bee Network And Other Local Networks?

Will these networks want to take control of their local trains?

If there is an homogenous fleet of new trains from one manufacturer, then surely, it would be easier to give control of some routes to the local transport interests.

Training and driver rostering could be retained in what was left of Northern Trains.

Tram-Trains

Tram trains would be an added complication, but as the South Wales Metro is showing, tram-trains are an interesting way of expanding a network.

August 8, 2023 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Alstom, Aventra, Bee Network, CAF, Civity Train, Northern Trains, South Wales Metro, Stadler Flirt, Tram-Train | 4 Comments

Key Mainline Testing Undertaken In Bi Modal Hydrogen Train Project

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Rail Technology Magazine.

This is a key paragraph.

In the test, lithium-titanate batteries and the hydrogen fuel cells have been retro-fitted to a CAF Civia Class 463 commuter electric unit train. This then has the ability to create a hybrid powertrain which can run on electrified lines alongside standard lines.

This paragraph describes some of the testing.

The new power system has been integrated into the existing vehicle’s traction system and the current tests on the mainline follow closed track testing and static testing at CAF’s plant in Zaragoza. The mainline testing has taken place across lines in Zaragoza, Madrid and Galicia but the crucial test run for the new unit was on the Zaragoza-Canfranc line where it ran in both electric mode on the electrified line before switching to hybrid mode, combining the fuel from hydrogen fuel cells and batteries where needed.

It sounds like this is a better specified hydrogen-powered train than Alstom’s iLint.

June 7, 2023 Posted by AnonW | Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | CAF, CAF Battery-Electric Trains, Canfranc Station, Coradia iLint, ECH2Rail, Hydrogen-Powered Trains | 3 Comments

Regulator Approves New Grand Union Train Service From Carmarthen To London Paddington

The title of this post, is the same as that of this press release from the Office of Rail and Road.

This is the sub-heading of the press release.

The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) has opened up the Great Western Main Line to competition and enabled a significant increase in rail services between London and South Wales.

These points are made in the press release.

The rail regulator has approved the introduction of new train services between London, Cardiff and South West Wales from the end of 2024.
The services will be operated by a new open access operator, Grand Union Trains, bringing competition to the Great Western route out of Paddington.
Passengers travelling between London, Bristol Parkway, Severn Tunnel Junction, Newport, Cardiff, Gowerton, Llanelli and Carmarthen will benefit from an extra five daily return services and greater choice of operator.
The decision opens up the Great Western Main Line to competition for the first time, with potential benefits in terms of lower fares, improved service quality and innovation for all passengers using the route.
The application, submitted to ORR in June 2022, was disputed by Network Rail due to concerns about capacity on the network. But following careful consideration and analysis, ORR has directed Network Rail to enter into a contract with Grand Union.
Grand Union has committed to significant investment in new trains.
As an ‘open access’ train operator, however, it will not get paid subsidies from public funds, unlike current operators along the route.

ORR supports new open access where it delivers competition for the benefit of passengers. In making this decision, the regulator has weighed this up against the impact on Government funds and effect on other users of the railway, both passengers and freight customers.

These are my thoughts.

The Company

Grand Union Trains have certainly persevered to get this approval.

The company was created by Ian Yeowart, who previously created open access operators; Alliance Rail Holdings and Grand Central before selling both to Arriva.
After multiple negotiations with the Office of Road and Rail (ORR), Yeowart must know how to get an acceptable deal.
Grand Union Trains have a similar application for a service between Euston and Stirling with the ORR.

Grand Union Trains also have a web site.

The home page has a mission statement of Railways To Our Core, with this statement underneath.

At Grand Union we are passionate about Britain’s railways. We are committed to the traditional values of providing a high-quality customer service and a comfortable journey experience at a fair price.

I’ll go with that.

The Financial Backing Of The Company

All the UK’s open access operators are well-financed either by Arriva or First Group.

The ORR would not receive any thanks, if they approved an operator, which duly went bust.

So what is the quality of the financing behind Grand Union Trains?

This article on Railway Gazette is entitled RENFE Looks At Entering UK Rail Market Through Open Access Partnership, which starts with this paragraph.

Open access passenger service developer Grand Union Trains is working with Spain’s national operator RENFE and private equity firm Serena Industrial Partners on a proposed service between London and Wales.

That is fairly clear and would surely help in the financing of Grand Union Trains.

The Route

Trains will run between Carmarthen and London Paddington, with stops at Llanelli, Gowerton, Cardiff, Newport, Severn Tunnel Junction and Bristol Parkway.

A new station at Felindre will replace Gowerton at some time in the future.

There will be five trains per day (tpd).

I have some thoughts and questions about the route

Felindre Station

Felindre station is named in Wikipedia as the West Wales Parkway station, where it is introduced like this.

West Wales Parkway is a proposed railway station north of Swansea, near to the boundaries of the neighbouring principal area of Carmarthenshire, and the villages of Felindre and Llangyfelach. The station is proposed to be situated at the former Felindre steelworks, near Junction 46 of the M4 and A48, and near Felindre Business Park and Penllergaer Business Park. The project is in the planning stages, as part of a wider Department for Transport proposal to re-open the Swansea District line to passenger traffic.

This Google Map shows where, it appears the Felindre station will be built.

Note.

The Felindre Business Park in the North-West corner of the map, with a Park-and-Ride.
The M4 running across the bottom of the map.
The Swansea District Line runs East-West between the motorway and the Business Park.

It looks that the new station could be located on the South side of the Business Park.

When High Speed Two Opens Will Trains Call At Old Oak Common?

When High Speed Two opens, all GWR trains will stop at Old Oak Common station for these connections.

Chiltern for for Banbury, Bicester, High Wycombe and the West Midlands
Elizabeth Line for Central and East London and the Thames Valley
Heathrow Airport
High Speed Two for Birmingham and the North
Overground for Outer London

As Old Oak Common will be such an important interchange, I think they should.

Will The Platforms At Carmarthen Station Need Lengthening?

This Google Map shows Carmarthen station.

Note.

The station has two platforms.
There are certainly pictures of the station with an InterCity 125 in the station. There is a picture on the Wikipedia entry for Carmarthen station.

These pictures show the station.

I suspect that the station will be upgraded to accommodate Grand Union Trains.

The Trains

An article in the June 2022 Edition of Modern Railways, which is entitled Grand Union Bids For London To Carmarthen, gives these details of the trains.

Three classes.
2023 start for the service.
Cycle provision.
Vanload freight will be carried.
Electric trains could start between London and Cardiff by 2023.
In 2025, trains could be nine-car bi-modes.
South Wales-based operation and maintenance.
125 full-time jobs created.

It certainly seems to be a comprehensive and well-thought out plan.

I have a few thoughts on the trains.

What Make Of Trains Will Be Procured?

Consider.

Lumo’s Class 803 trains were ordered from Hitachi in March 2019 and entered service in October 2021.
So if they ordered their version of the Hitachi trains by the end of 2022, the trains could be in service by July/August 2025.
It would probably be easier, if the only fast trains on the Great Western Main Line between London and South Wales were all Hitachi trains with identical performance.

But the Spanish backers of Grand Union Trains may prefer Spanish-designed trains assembled in South Wales. So would a bi-mode version of CAF’s Class 397 trains be suitable?

On the other hand, the Carmarthen and Cardiff section of the route without a reverse at Swansea is only seventy-five miles.

This Hitachi infographic shows the Hitachi Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train.

Consider.

Charging could be provided at Carmarthen using a short length of electrification or one of Furrer + Frey standard chargers.
Charging would also use the electrification between London Paddington and Cardiff.
A nine-car Class 800 or Class 802 train has five engines and a five-car train has three engines.
The Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train was announced in December 2022.
In the intervening two years how far has the project progressed?
For the last twelve months, Lumo have been running trains with an emergency battery-pack for hotel power. How are the batteries doing, whilst being ferried up and down, the East Coast Main Line?

Can Hitachi configure a train with more than one battery-pack and a number of diesel engines, that has a range of seventy-five miles? I suspect they can.

I suspect that CAF also have similar technology.

There is also a benefit to Great Western Railway (GWR).

If GWR were able to fit out their Class 802 trains in the same way, they would be able to run between Cardiff and Swansea on battery power.

It is only 45.7 miles.
Charging would need to be provided at Swansea.
GWR could still run their one tpd service to Carmarthen.

It looks like both train operating companies could be able to do as Lumo does and advertise all electric services.

What Could Be The Maxmum Range Of A Hitachi Train On Batteries?

This Hitachi infographic shows the Hitachi Regional Battery Train.

Consider.

It has a battery range of 90 km or 56 miles on the single battery.
I would expect that by a regional train, Hitachi mean a five car Class 800 or 802 train, like those that go to Cheltenham, Lincoln or Middlesbrough.
A five-car Hitachi Regional Battery Train would have a battery that could contain power equivalent to 280 car-miles.
Five-car Class 800 or 802 trains have three engine positions.
These Hitachi trains have a very sophisticated control system, which I wrote about in Do Class 800/801/802 Trains Use Batteries For Regenerative Braking?

I believe the engineers at Hyperdrive Innovation have designed the battery-packs that replace the diesel engines as simulations of the diesel engines, so they can be a direct replacement.

This would mean that battery-packs could be additive, so the following could apply to a five-car train.

Two battery packs could have a range of 112 miles.
Three battery packs could have a range of 168 miles.

GWR generally runs pairs of five-car trains to Swansea, which would be 90 miles without electrification.

If five-car trains with two battery packs, could be given a range of 112 miles, GWR could run an electric service to Swansea.

They could also run to Carmarthen, if Grand Union Trains would share the charger.

What ranges could be possible with nine-car trains, if one battery pack is good for 280 car-miles?

One battery-pack, gives a range of 280/9 = 31 miles
Two battery-packs, give a range of 2*280/9 = 62 miles
Three battery-packs, give a range of 3*280/9 = 93 miles
Four battery-packs, give a range of 4*280/9 = 124 miles
Five battery-packs, give a range of 5*280/9 = 155 miles
Six battery-packs, give a range of 6*280/9 = 187 miles
Seven battery-packs, give a range of 7*280/9 = 218 miles

Note.

I have rounded figures to the nearest mile.
There are five cars with diesel engines in a nine-car train, which are in cars 2,3,5, 7 and 8.
Diesel engines are also placed under the driver cars in five-car Class 810 trains.
For the previous two reasons, I feel that the maximum numbers of diesel engines in a nine-car train could be a maximum of seven.
I have therefor assumed a maximum of seven battery packs.

These distances seem sensational, but when you consider that Stradler’s Flirt Akku has demonstrated a battery range of 243 kilometres or 150 miles, I don’t think they are out of order.

But, if they are correct, then the ramifications are enormous.

Large numbers of routes could become electric without any infrastructure works.
Grand Union Trains would be able to run to Carmarthen and back without a charger at Carmarthen.
GWR would be able to run to Swansea and back without a charger at Swansea.

Prudence may mean strategic chargers are installed.

Rrenewable Energy Developments In South West Wales

In Enter The Dragon, I talked about renewable energy developments in South West Wales.

I used information from this article on the Engineer, which is entitled Unlocking The Renewables Potential Of The Celtic Sea.

The article on the Engineer finishes with this conclusion.

For now, Wales may be lagging slightly behind its Celtic cousin to the north, but if the true potential of the Celtic Sea can be unleashed – FLOW, tidal stream, lagoon and wave – it looks set to play an even more prominent role in the net zero pursuit.

The Red Dragon is entering the battle to replace Vlad the Mad’s tainted energy.

South West Wales could see a massive renewable energy boom.

Grand Union Trains will increase the capacity to bring in more workers to support the developments from South Wales and Bristol.

December 3, 2022 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | Arriva, CAF, Carmarthen Station, Celtic Sea, Class 397 Train, Elizabeth Line, Felindre Station, FirstGroup, Furrer + Frey, Grand Union Trains, Great Western Main Line, Great Western Railway, Heathrow Airport, High Speed Two, Hitachi, Hitachi Intercity Tri-Mode Battery Train, Hitachi Regional Battery Train, Lumo, Office Of Rail And Road, Old Oak Common Station, Open Access Operators, Paddington Station, RENFE, Serena Industrial Partners, South Wales Main Line, Stadler FLIRT Akku, Wales | 5 Comments

Are These Two Stories Related?

These are two stories recently published in Railway Gazette.

Deutsche Bahn Sells Arriva Businesses To Private Equity Holding Company, which starts with this paragraph.

Deutsche Bahn has reached agreement to sell its Arriva local transport activities in Denmark, Poland and Serbia to München-based private equity holding company Mutares SE & Co KGaA.

That is fairly clear and is probably related with the German government’s desire for DB to concentrate on its core business.seren

This article on Railway Gazette is entitled RENFE Looks At Entering UK Rail Market Through Open Access Partnership, which starts with this paragraph.

Open access passenger service developer Grand Union Trains is working with Spain’s national operator RENFE and private equity firm Serena Industrial Partners on a proposed service between London and Wales.

That also is fairly clear and would bring competition to services to and from South Wales.

It would also help in the financing of Grand Union Trains.

The article also says the following.

RENFE seem to be expanding into partnerships to run services outside Spain.
A parkway station at Felindre will be build to avoid the reverse at Swansea, that would save 20 mins.
It will be a high quality service with new electro-diesel trains.
Four trains will be needed.
A 2025 start is envisaged.

Will this partnership with Grand Union Trains proceed with the development of Grand Union Trains’ London and Stirling service?

I have some thoughts and questions.

Will Deutsche Bahn Sell Other Arriva Businesses?

I think this is a reasonable question to ask, especially, as Deutsche Bahn owns two Open Access Operators in the UK; Chiltern Railways and Grand Central Trains.

Both operators have a good reputation.
Both operators need to decarbonise, either by updating their current stock or buying new trains.
Both operators have solid niche markets, where they are often responsible for the stations.
Both operators have expansion plans.

Would RENFE and Serena Industrial Partners be interested in taking over Arriva UK and developing the business?

The Talgo Factory At Longannet

I believe that there is reason to believe that one of Talgo’s reasons for a factory in Scotland, is that it could have been used to build Russian and dual-gauge trains for Eastern Europe. The trains would have been delivered by ferry from Rosyth.

There is also the not-small matter of the fleet for Rail Baltica, for which Talgo will surely be a bidder.

But Russia’s attack on Ukraine has scuppered that plan, or at least delayed it for a few years. But now, there could be a much larger market for trains in Eastern Europe and especially Ukraine.

If RENFE Acquire Open Access Operators In The UK, They Will Need New Trains

They will certainly need new trains for the South Wales operations, if they go ahead, but if they were to decarbonise Chiltern and Grand Central, the order could be substantial.

With one Spanish train factory in the UK and another a possibility, I would suspect any train order would go to a Spanish train-builder.

If the orders fell right, could we see Talgo’s factory at Longannet built after all?

October 1, 2022 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | CAF, Carmarthen Station, DB, Felindre Station, Grand Union Trains, Open Access Operators, Paddington Station, Rail Baltica, RENFE, Russia, Russian Attack On Ukraine, Serena Industrial Partners, Spain, Swansea Station, Talgo | 4 Comments

UK’s First 100mph Battery-Diesel Hybrid Train Enters Passenger Service

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on ITV.

These are the first three paragraphs.

The UK’s first 100mph battery-diesel hybrid train is entering passenger service to cut carbon emissions and boost air quality.

It was developed by adding a powerful battery to a 20-year-old diesel train to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions by 25%, according to owner Porterbrook.

The firm added that the two-carriage train, named HybridFLEX, also provides a 75% decrease in noise and a 70% decrease in nitrogen oxide.

The battery-diesel hybrid transmission is from MTU, who are a Rolls-Royce company and they go further with this press release which is entitled World Premiere: MTU Hybrid PowerPack From Rolls-Royce Enters Passenger Service.

This is the first paragraph.

Rolls-Royce, Porterbrook and Chiltern Railways are making rail history together with a climate-friendly world premiere: A hybrid diesel-battery-electric train that reduces CO2 emissions by up to 25% entered passenger service in the UK today for the first time. The so-called HybridFLEX train is powered by two mtu Hybrid PowerPacks and is operated by Chiltern Railways on the route between London Marylebone and Aylesbury. Together with the leasing company Porterbrook and Chiltern Railways, Rolls-Royce has converted a Class 168 DMU into the HybridFLEX train. The partners are proving that existing rail vehicles can be used in a climate-friendly way without the need to install complex and expensive new infrastructure. It is the world’s first regular passenger operation with mtu Hybrid PowerPacks, of which 13 have already been ordered.

This is significant for the railways of the UK.

The train that has been converted is a Class 168 train, which itself had been converted from a Class 170 train, when it transferred to Chiltern Railways in 2016.

I think this means that all Bombardier Turbostars in Classes 168, 170, 171 and 172 can probably be fitted with MTU Hybrid PowerPacks.

That is the following numbers of trains and cars.

Class 168 – 28 trains – 86 cars
Class 170 – 139 trains – 372 cars
Class 171 – 20 trains – 56 cars
Class 172 – 39 trains – 93 cars

Note.

This totals to 226 trains and 607 cars.
As each car has an engine, this will be an order of 607 PowerPacks, if all trains were to be converted.

This could certainly help to meet the Government’s aim of getting rid of all diesel only trains by 2040.

Can The CAF Civities Be Converted?

There are three Classes of CAF Civity diesel multiple units; 195, 196 and 197, all of which have Rolls-Royce MTU engines.

Could these be converted to hybrid operation by the swapping of the current diesel engines for MTU Hybrid PowerPacks?

I would suspect they could, as the CAF Civity trains might have been designed after MTU disclosed plans of the MTU Hybrid PowerPack to train builders prior to its announcement in September 2018.

Conclusion

MTU Hybrid PowerPacks could go a long way to eliminating diesel-only trains on UK railways. They could even run the diesels on Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO) to lower their carbon-footprint further.

February 10, 2022 Posted by AnonW | Transport/Travel | CAF, Chiltern Railways, Civity Train, Class 168 Train, Class 170 Train, Class 171 Train, Class 172 Train, Class 195 Train, Class 196 Train, Class 197 Train, Diesel/Electric/Battery Hybrid Trains, HybridFLEX Train, Hydrotreated Vegetable Oil (HVO), mtu Hybrid PowerPack, Porterbrook, Rolls-Royce | 23 Comments

Aberdeen’s Hydrogen Buses Taken Off The Road Due To Technical Issue

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the introductory paragraph.

Aberdeen’s fleet of hydrogen buses has been taken off the road due to a “technical issue”.

The technical issue appears not to be hydrogen-related, but with a mounting bracket.

Strange coming after CAF had bracket trouble with their trams and Hitachi had a similar problem with their trains.

Wrightbus, CAF and Hitachi haven’t been using the save dodgy Chinese supplier called El Cheapo Brackets have they?

February 5, 2022 Posted by AnonW | Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | Aberdeen, Buses, CAF, Hitachi, Hydrogen-Powered Buses, Wrightbus | 6 Comments

CAF To Acquire Alstom’s Coradia Polyvalent Platform

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Railway Technology.

It looks like the EC’s conditions of Alstom’s takeover of Bombardier are as follows.

Coradia Polyvalent platform goes to CAF.
French Reichshoffen production site to CAF.
Talent3 platform to CAF.
Rights to the IP involved in the Hitachi/Bombardier joint venture to develop high speed trains goes to Hitachi.

It is interesting that there is no mention of the Aventra. But then in Alstom And Eversholt Rail Sign An Agreement For The UK’s First Ever Brand-New Hydrogen Train Fleet, I talked about Alstom’s new hydrogen-powered train based on the Aventra.

Perhaps, the Aventra was the stand-out design in Bombardier’s portfolio?

After all Alstom have already designed a hydrogen-powered train based on the platform

November 25, 2021 Posted by AnonW | Design, Transport/Travel | Alstom, Alstom Coradia Polyvalent, Alstom Hydrogen Aventra, Aventra, Bombardier, Bombardier Takeover, CAF, European Commission, Hitachi, Hydrogen-Powered Trams, Talent 3 Train | 2 Comments

Electrification Between Clay Cross North Junction And Sheffield Station

Long term readers of this blog, will have noticed that I make regular references to this proposed electrification, that is part of High Speed Two’s proposals to connect Sheffield to the new high speed railway.

So I thought I would bring all my thoughts together in this post.

Connecting Sheffield To High Speed Two

Sheffield is to be accessed from a branch off the Main High Speed Two route to Leeds.

This map clipped from High Speed Two’s interactive map, shows the route of the Sheffield Branch, from where it branches North West from the main Eastern Leg of High Speed Two.

Note.

Orange indicates new High Speed Two track.
Blue indicates track that High Speed Two will share with other services.
The orange route goes North to Leeds, along the M1
The blue route goes North to Chesterfield and Sheffield, after skirting to the East of Clay Cross.
The orange route goes South to East Midlands Hub station.

This second map, shows where the Erewash Valley Line joins the Sheffield Branch near the village of Stonebroom.

Note.

Red is an embankment.
Yellow is a cutting.
The Sheffield Branch goes North-West to Clay Cross, Chesterfield and Sheffield
The Sheffield Branch goes South-East to East Midlands Hub station.
The Sheffield Branch goes through Doe Hill Country Park.
The Sheffield Branch runs alongside the existing Erewash Valley Line, which goes South to Langley Mill, Ilkeston and the Derby-Nottingham area.

The Sheffield Branch and the Erewash Valley Line appear to share a route, which continues round Clay Cross and is shown in this third map.

Note

Doe Hill Country Park is in the South-East corner of the map.
The dark line running North-South is the A61.
Running to the West of the A61 is the Midland Main Line, which currently joins the Erewash Valley Line at Clay Cross North junction.

High Speed Two and the Midland Main Line will share a route and/or tracks from Clay Cross North junction to Sheffield.

This fourth map, shows where the combined route joins the Hope Valley Line to Manchester to the South West of Sheffield.

Note.

Sheffield is to the North East.
Chesterfield is to the South East,
Totley junction is a large triangular junction, that connects to the Hope Valley Line.

These are some timings for various sections of the route.

Clay Cross North Junction and Chesterfield (current) – 4 minutes
Clay Cross North Junction and Sheffield (current) – 17 minutes
Chesterfield and Sheffield (current) – 13 minutes
Chesterfield and Sheffield (High Speed Two) – 13 minutes
East Midlands Hub and Chesterfield (High Speed Two) – 16 minutes
East Midlands Hub and Sheffield (High Speed Two) – 27 minutes

As Class Cross North Junction and Sheffield are 15.5 miles, this means the section is run at an average speed of 53 mph.

Can I draw any conclusions from the maps and timings?

There would appear to be similar current and High Speed Two timings between Chesterfield and Sheffield.
The various junctions appear to be built for speed.

The Midland Main Line will be electrified between Clay Cross North Junction and Sheffield, so that High Speed Two trains can use the route.

What will be the characteristics of the tracks between Clay Cross North Junction and Sheffield?

Will it be just two tracks as it mainly is now or will it be a multi-track railway to separate the freight trains from the high speed trains?
Will it have a high enough maximum speed, so that East Midland Railway’s new Class 810 trains can go at their maximum speed of 140 mph?
Will it be capable of handling a frequency of 18 tph, which is the maximum frequency of High Speed Two?

Surely, it will be built to a full High Speed Two standard to future-proof the line.

Current Passenger Services Between Clay Cross North Junction And Sheffield Station

These trains use all or part of the route between Cross North Junction And Sheffield stations.

CrossCountry – Plymouth and Edinburgh via Derby, Chesterfield, Sheffield and Leeds – 1 tph
East Midlands Railway – London St. Pancras and Sheffield via Derby and Chesterfield – 2 tph
East Midlands Railway – Liverpool Lime Street and Norwich via Stockport, The Hope Valley Line, Sheffield and Chesterfield – 1 tph
Northern Trains – Manchester Piccadilly and Sheffield via the Hope Valley Line – 1 tph
Northern Trains – Leeds and Nottingham via Meadowhall, Sheffield and Chesterfield – 1 tph
TransPennine Express – Manchester Airport and Cleethorpes via Stockport, the Hope Valley Line and Sheffield – 1 tph

Note.

tph is trains per hour.
High Speed Two is currently planning to run two tph to Sheffield, which will run between Cross North junction and Sheffield stations.
The services on the Hope Valley Line run on electrified tracks at the Manchester end.

These services can be aggregated to show the number of trains on each section of track.

Hope Valley Line between Manchester and Totley junction – 3 tph
Totley junction and Sheffield station – 7 tph
Totley junction and Clay Cross North junction via Chesterfield – 4 tph

Adding in the High Speed Two services gives these numbers.

Hope Valley Line between Manchester and Totley junction – 3 tph
Totley junction and Sheffield station – 9 tph
Totley junction and Clay Cross North junction via Chesterfield – 6 tph

This report on the Transport for the North web site, is entitled At A Glance – Northern Powerhouse Rail. It states that Transport for the North’s aspirations for Manchester and Sheffield are four tph with a journey time of forty minutes.

Adding in the extra train gives these numbers.

Hope Valley Line between Manchester and Totley junction – 4 tph
Totley junction and Sheffield station – 10 tph
Totley junction and Clay Cross North junction via Chesterfield – 6 tph

This level of services can be accommodated on a twin-track railway designed to the right high speed standards.

Freight Services Between Clay Cross North Junction And Sheffield Station

The route is used by freight trains, with up to two tph on each of the three routes from Totley junction.

And these are likely to increase.

Tracks Between Clay Cross North Junction And Sheffield Station

I am absolutely certain, that two tracks between Clay Cross North junction And Sheffield station will not be enough, even if they are built to High Speed Two standards to allow at least 140 mph running under digital signalling.

Battery Electric Trains

The only battery-electric train with a partly-revealed specification is Hitachi’s Regional Battery Train, which is described in this Hitachi infographic.

Note.

The train is a 100 mph unit.
Ninety kilometres is fifty-six miles.

I would expect that battery-electric trains from other manufacturers like Alstom, CAF and Siemens would have similar performance on battery power.

In Thoughts On CAF’s Battery-Electric Class 331 Trains, I concluded CAF’s approach could give the following ranges.

Three-car battery-electric train with one battery pack – 46.7 miles
Four-car battery-electric train with one battery pack – 35 miles
Four-car battery-electric train with two battery packs – 70 miles

I was impressed.

These are my thoughts on battery-electric trains on the routes from an electrified Sheffield.

Adwick

Sheffield and Adwick is 22.7 miles without electrification