The Anonymous Widower

Riding Rail Air Between Reading Station And Heathrow Terminal 5

Today, I rode on a Rail Air coach between Reading station And Heathrow Terminal 5.

I took these pictures as I walked through Reading station and from the coach.

These are my thoughts on various topics.

Catching The Coach At Reading

Consider.

  • The route to Rail Air from the trains at Reading station is well signed.
  • The entrance to the Rail Air terminal at Reading station is behind the M & S Simply Food store.
  • I estimate that the time between arriving at Reading station and the coach leaving was only a few minutes.
  • Rail Air coaches run every twenty minutes.
  • My coach had about ten passengers.
  • My single fare was £17.30 with my Senior Railcard.

It was all a rather painless process.

On The Coach

Consider.

  • The coach was more-or-less what you would expect on a quality route.
  • The view was good.
  • I had a table, with four seats.
  • The table had contactless charging and drink holders.
  • There was no charging for my phone and camera, which use USB or 13 amp plugs.
  • The seat was reasonably comfortable.
  • There was a toilet.
  • There was typical storage for heavy luggage underneath the seats.

I would have thought if Wrightbus fit USB ports on their buses, that they are needed.

The Route

This Google Map shows Reading and Heathrow

Note.

  1. Reading is at the Western end of the map.
  2. Heathrow is at the Eastern end of the map.
  3. The red arrow indicates Winniersh Triangle station on the Eastern side of Reading.
  4. The coaches stop at Reading Cemetery and Winnersh Triangle station.
  5. Most of the route between Winnersh Triangle and Heathrow Airport is on the M4 Motorway or dual-carriageway roads.
  6. The distance appears to be just under 27 miles and is scheduled to take forty minutes.
  7. Click the map to show to a larger scale.

It looks to me that it is an ideal route for a coach.

On The Journey

Consider.

  • Once clear of Reading and past the stop at Winnersh  Triangle, the coach held a good speed all the way to Heathrow, as the motoway was not busy.
  • In the UK coaches under twelve metres long, can run at 70 mph and I estimated that this coach was probably at 60 mph.
  • The stops were called out like stations on a train.
  • Strangely, the roadholding was not as good as that of the Wrightbus hydrogen bus, that I took to Gatwick, a couple of weeks ago.
  • The big problem though was the noise of the diesel engine, which was very loud compared to the noise of the fuel cell and electric transmission of the Wrightbus hydrogen bus.

I suspect that transforming the hydrogen bus into a coach, could result in a very high quality coach, with the performance and range of a diesel coach, without the noise, pollution, vibration and carbon emissions.

March 4, 2025 Posted by | Design, Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Heathrow Rail Link Project Could Be ‘Reopened’

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on the BBC.

This is the sub-heading.

Network Rail has said plans for a rail link between the Great Western mainline and Heathrow Airport could still move forward if funding is found in the future.

These three paragraphs give the current status of the scheme.

The Local Democracy Reporting Service recently reported that the project had been put on hold.

It began in 2012 and involved proposals for a 4 mile (6.5km) rail link to allow train services from Reading and Slough in Berkshire to reach Heathrow using a tunnel.

The £900m scheme would allow people living to the west of Heathrow to travel direct to the airport, instead of having to go into London.

These are some other facts and my thoughts.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) For The Western Rail Link To Heathrow

According to the BBC article, this has now been established and this is said.

Labour MP for Slough, Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi, held a debate in parliament on the western rail link in April and established the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, to make sure it “remains on the government’s agenda”.

He said the project had been “beset by delays and funding challenges” but still had “wide cross-party and local support”.

Parliamentary backing is surely a good thing.

The Current Scheme

The BBC article shows this map with a rail link connecting the Great Western Main Line  to Terminal 5 railway station.

Note.

  1. The rail link starts from East of Langley station.
  2. Terminal 5 station can take full-length Elizabeth Line trains.
  3. Main line trains from Bristol, Cardiff and Wales and the West should be able to access Heathrow.

But I suspect, that there would be extensive changes to Heathrow’s railways to access the other terminals. This would explain the near billion pound cost of the link.

I also suspect that it would take about eight to ten years to build and from what I havc heard, the rail link is urgently needed.

RailAir

RailAir is the current way of travelling between Reading station and Heathrow Airport.

This is the first paragraph of RailAir’s Wikipedia entry.

RailAir describes a number of airport bus and coach services designed to connect the National Rail network to airports in the United Kingdom. Services are currently concentrated on Heathrow Airport, with one other from Luton Airport. RailAir services are operated as public transport services by or on behalf of train operators, where the whole journey is paid for as a through-ticket which combines the railway and bus journey, although journeys can be made using the bus only. As such, many are operated where the train and bus operator are owned by the same company.

Could RailAir be updated to be a more frequent and integrated service?

CoacH2

This page on the Advanced Propulsion Centre UK web site is entitled CoacH2 – Next Generation Hydrogen Fuel-Cell Coach Powertrain Demonstrator.

This is the sub-heading.

Accelerating the development of zero-emission hydrogen fuel-cell electric coaches, with a full on-vehicle technology demonstrator.

These are the first two paragraphs.

Coaches are an integral part of the public transport network, with over 30,000 diesel coaches operating across the UK and Ireland. Due to the specific demands of coach operation (motorway driving, long-range, high passenger and luggage loading capacity) decarbonisation options for this sector are extremely limited with hydrogen fuel-cell technology considered the most viable choice. This project will tackle this difficult to decarbonise sector by developing, testing and validating an innovative hydrogen fuel-cell powertrain suitable for coach applications.

Delivered by a Northern Irish consortium spanning OEM, coach operator and academia, CoacH2 will accelerate the development of zero-emission, fuel-cell electric coaches, with a full on-vehicle technology demonstrator to be manufactured and showcased at Cenex Expo 2024.

As I indicated in British Buses For British Bottoms, Wrightbus build a good well-built, smooth-riding and comfortable bus, so now they can add hydrogen-powered coaches to the product range.

This press release on the Wrightbus web site is entitled Wrightbus Coach Demonstrator Unveiled At Cenex Expo, gives more information on CoacH2.

  • The demonstrator has a power of 300 Kw.
  • It has a range of 1,000 km. on one refueling.
  • An internet search reveals a launch date of 2026 for the hydrogen-powered coach.

I wonder, if RailAir changed their coaches to these new Wrightbus hydrogen-powered coaches, they would transform travel to airports all over the UK.

If the hydrogen-powered coaches are of the same quality of their hydrogen-powered siblings, they will be a quality product with good road-holding, sufficient performance and superb passenger comfort.

RailAir could be the ideal, initial application.

Conclusion

A proper rail link to Heathrow from Reading is needed, but it will take at least ten years to build and cost a billion pounds.

However the RailAir links to Heathrow from Reading and Woking can be improved by using high-performance Wrightbus hydrogen-powered coaches.

 

March 3, 2025 Posted by | Hydrogen, Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

From Reading To Gatwick Airport Along The North Downs Line

After writing Connecting Reading And The West To Gatwick Airport And Eurostar, I decided to go and look at the reality of the North Downs Line between Reading and Gatwick Airport stations.

I took my usual route to Reading, which is to go to Moorgate and get the Elizabeth Line direct to Reading using my Freedom Pass, after having breakfast in the Leon on Moorgate.

  • I then had to leave the station at Reading, so that I could buy my ticket to Gatwick Airport.
  • It would be so much easier, if there ere a couple of ticket machines on the bridge or platform at Reading station, so that passengers, who were changing trains could buy tickets quickly and easily.

In the end, I caught the 11:24 train to Gatwick with only a few minutes to spare.

From Reading To Gatwick Airport Along The North Downs Line

Along the North Downs Line, the train was a well-refreshed Great Western Railway Class 165 train.

These are some of the pictures, that I took on the route.

Note.

  1. The route goes through a lot of typical Surrey heathland.
  2. I noticed several pubs along the way.
  3. I suspect that there are some good walks from the stations.
  4. Reading and Guildford are university cities.
  5. Sandhurst is home to the Royal Military Academy.
  6. Farnborough Airport used to be home to the Royal Aircraft Establishment.
  7. Most of the seats on the train were taken.

I would expect that for a mainly rural route it is fairly busy.

Hitachi’s Intercity Battery Trains

Hitachi have developed an Intercity battery train and it is described on this page on their web site, where this is said about converting the trains to battery-electric operation.

A quick and easy application of battery technology is to install it on existing or future Hitachi intercity trains. Hitachi Rail’s modular design means this can be done without the need to re-engineer or rebuild the train and return them to service as quickly as possible for passengers.

Replacing one diesel engine with just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%. Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance.

That performance is certainly enough for Reading and Ashford via Gatwick, as only 37.7 miles in total, is not electrified.

Does The North Downs Line Mirror The East-West Rail?

Consider.

  • The East West Rail will encircle London to the North, between Oxford and Cambridge.
  • The North Downs Line encircles London to the South, between Reading and Ashford.

They could be considered two complimentary rail lines.

A Milton Keynes And Ashford International Service

Looking at the track layout on OpenRailwayMap, it would appear that one of Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains fitted with dual voltage could pick its way elegantly along the East West Rail and the North Downs Line between Milton Keynes and Ashford International via Oxford, Reading and Gatwick Airport.

An Occasional Sheffield And Ashford International Service

If you could run a service between Milton Keynes and Ashford International, why not extend it to Bedford or even Sheffield in the North?

I believe if you put these Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains on a cross-country route, that they will quickly suffer from London Overground Syndrome. This is my definition of the syndrome.

This benign disease, which is probably a modern version of the Victorian railway mania, was first identified in East London in 2011, when it was found that the newly-refurbished East London Line and North London Line were inadequate due to high passenger satisfaction and much increased usage. It has now spread across other parts of the capital, despite various eradication programs.

Put simply, it can probably be summed up as Quality Attracts Passengers.

Serving Heathrow

There have been various plans to get rail access into Heathrow from the West, but none have so far got off the starting blocks.

It is my view, that in the interim period, after my trip last weekend in the superb Wrightbus hydrogen double deck bus from Sutton to Gatwick, that I wrote about in Sutton Station To Gatwick Airport By Hydrogen-Powered Bus, that we should ask Wrightbus, who are designing a hydrogen-powered coach, to design the ultimate coach to connect rail hubs to major airports.

I would then run these coaches every ten minutes between Reading station and Heathrow Airport.

Serving Attractions

I believe that pairing Hitachi’s proposed Intercity Battery Trains with Wrightbus’s hydrogen coach could be a winner for passengers and operators.

As an example, Lumo are hoping to run an open access service between Paddington and Carmarthen, if Heidi the Spoilsport permits. Would it not be sensible, if one of Wrightbus’s hydrogen coaches did the last mile duties to the ferry for Ireland at Fishguard harbour.

 

March 1, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Connecting Reading And The West To Gatwick Airport And Eurostar

I have just checked the electrification between Reading and Ashford International using OpenRailwayMap.

  • Between Cardiff and Reading the electrification is 25 KVAC overhead.
  • Between Reading and Wokingham the electrification is 750 VDC third-rail.
  • Between Wokingham and Reigate is not electrified.
  • Between Reigate and Gatwick Airport the electrification is 750 VDC third-rail.
  • Between Gatwick Airport  and Ashford International the electrification is 750 VDC third-rail.

Only 37.7 miles is not electrified.

Hitachi’s Intercity Battery Trains, have a range on battery power of seventy kilometres or forty-five miles, so these trains could go between Reading or any station to the West to any station on the North Downs Line, including Guildford, Redhill, Gatwick Airport, Tonbridge and Ashford International stations.

The trains would need to be dual voltage and I’m fairly sure, that no new infrastructure would be needed.

A Green No-Fly Route Between Europe And Ireland

Consider.

  • The Great Western Main Line is electrified to Cardiff.
  • There is no electrification to the West of Cardiff.
  • Cardiff and Fishguard Hsrbour is 115.6 miles.
  • There is a ferry between Fishguard and Rosslare.

I suspect Hitachi could configure one of their Intercity Battery Trains, that could connect Ashford International and Fishguard Harbour stations.

February 28, 2025 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Ashley Down Station Opens On Saturday

Ashley Down station will be Bristol’s latest new station, when it opens this Saturday.

I shall be going, after probably taking the Elizabeth Line to Reading station.

September 23, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , | Leave a comment

Heathrow Rail Link Withdrawn, But MP Vows To Carry On

The title of this post, is the same as that as this article on Rail Magazine.

These are the first three paragraphs.

Hopes for a rail link between the Great Western Main Line and Heathrow Airport appear to have finally ended.

The scheme had been on hold since 2021, when Network Rail staff working on it were transferred to other tasks.

At the time, NR called it a “controlled pause”, but a pre-application process has now been withdrawn, according to the Planning Inspectorate website.

Currently, the two main routes to Heathrow from the Great Western Main Line are.

  • Continue to Paddington and get either the Heathrow Express or the Elizabeth Line to the airport.
  • Use the RailAir bus from Reading to the airport.

Both routes probably encourage passengers and staff to drive to the airport.

I have my thoughts.

Tan Dhesi

The article says this about this MP’s support for the rail link.

However, Slough MP Tan Dhesi, a former shadow transport minister, believes the link still has wide support as it would bring 20% of the UK population within one interchange of its busiest airport.

Dhesi led an All-Party Parliamentary Group for the Western Rail Link to Heathrow before the General Election. He now plans to re-launch the group, as some previous members have since lost their seats.

He has a point, but is this because a large number of his constituents work at Heathrow.

Would an improved local bus service, at least partially serve the need?

RailAir Between Reading And Heathrow

This appears to have two drawbacks.

  • It only runs every thirty minutes.
  • It doesn’t serve Terminal Four.

But at least it runs modern coaches, not buses.

I would increase the frequency to perhaps every twenty or even fifteen minutes, serve Terminal Four and perhaps in the future, switch to Wrightbus’s new hydrogen coaches, which I wrote about in Wrightbus Hydrogen Coach Planned For 2026.

I feel that switching to hydrogen power, may attract more passengers to the route.

Obviously, I feel the other RailAir routes from Guildford, Watford and Woking to Heathrow would also be updated.

Improving The Rail Route Between Reading And Heathrow Via Hayes And Harlington Station

Hayes and Harlington station has the following frequencies to Heathrow and Reading, in trains per hour (tph)

  • Heathrow Terminals Two & Three – 6 tph
  • Heathrow Terminal Four – 4 tph
  • Heathrow Terminal Five – 2 tph
  • Maidenhead – 2 tph
  • Reading – 2 tph

More trains between Reading and Hayes and Harlington might encourage more passengers to use the trains.

Could Hayes And Harlington Station Become A Transport Hub For Heathrow?

This Google Map shows Hayes and Harlington station.

Note.

  1. It has platforms on all four tracks of the Great Western Main Line.
  2. There is a London-facing bay platform to terminate Elizabeth Line trains, if needed.
  3. The land to the North of the station has been developed.
  4. There is land to the South of the station that could be developed.

Could the space above the tracks, with some of the land to the South of the station be developed into a transport hub for Heathrow?

Heathrow Southern Railway

I prefer the Heathrow Southern Railway, which is a comprehensive, privately funded scheme.

 

 

August 31, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Extending The Elizabeth Line – Could Open Access Services Use The Elizabeth Line?

In the February 2024 Edition of Modern Railways, there is an article which is entitled First Bid For Sheffield To King’s Cross Paths.

The article is mainly about FirstGroup’s proposal for a new Sheffield and London service, running under the Hull Trains brand.

But, this is the last paragraph.

Modern Railways understands First is working on a number of proposals for additional open access services, and this is an early statement of intent. Other existing open access proposals include Grand Union Trains’ plans for London to Stirling and Cardiff to Edinburgh services, along with an already approved London to Carmarthen service, and the recently submitted Wrexham, Shropshire and Midland Railway application for a London to Wrexham service. It is understood other organisations, including MTR and Virgin, are also working up plans for new open access services.

The respected Modern Railways magazine seem to think, that we’ll be seeing more open access services on UK railways.

These are my thoughts.

A Simple Example – London Crosslink

In Extending The Elizabeth Line – London Crosslink, I said this.

In the Wikipedia entry for the London Crosslink, this is the introduction.

London Crosslink was a passenger train service operated by Anglia Railways between Norwich and Basingstoke, using the North London Line to bypass central London. Class 170 Turbostar diesel multiple units were used, and the service operated between 22 May 2000 and 28 September 2002, supported by funding from the Strategic Rail Authority through its Rail Passenger Partnership fund.

As it was discontinued and it doesn’t seem to be sadly missed, I’m not advocating its reinstatement, but just looking how it might be run after the full opening of the Elizabeth Line.

But surely, there were good reasons, why the service was run in the first place and there might be a need in the future.

These are some characteristics of the service.

  • There were about half-a-dozen services in both directions every day.
  • At its full length it ran between  Norwich and Basingstoke.
  • Stops included Diss, Stowmarket, Ipswich, Colchester, Witham, Chelmsford, Ingatestone, Romford, Stratford, Highbury & Islington, Camden Road, West Hampstead, Brentford, Feltham, Staines, Woking and Farnborough (Main).
  • Each service seemed to have a different stopping pattern.
  • The timetable wasn’t very regular.
  • The route wasn’t fully electrified.

It appears that it may have been a difficult service to timetable.

I lived North of Ipswich for some years.

I never used the London CrossLink service, as I had moved away before the service started in 2000.

  • I would have found the change to the Central Line at Stratford station useful.
  • I would have found the change to the Victoria Line at Highbury & Islington station useful.
  • I would have found the change to Thameslink at West Hampstead station useful.
  • Basingstoke would have given access to Greater South-West England.
  • I could have got a bus to Heathrow from Feltham.

But getting to Marylebone, Paddington and Waterloo would have still been tedious.

Could a replacement for the London CrossLink be routed via the Elizabeth Line?

  • The service would use the Elizabeth Line between Stratford and Reading.
  • The service would use the Reading and Basingstoke Line between Reading and Basingstoke.

The route has some advantages over the original route.

  • Except for the 13.6 miles between Southcote Junction and Basingstoke, the route is fully-electrified.
  • Whitechapel will give access to London Overground services.
  • Farringdon will give access to Thameslink services.
  • There will be a lot of connections at Tottenham Court Road and Bond Street.
  • Paddington and Reading will give access to Heathrow, Oxford and West of England services.
  • Basingstoke will give access to Greater South-West England.

It is certainly an as-useful route as the original, if not more so.

The Trains

In Extending The Elizabeth Line – Will There Be A Need For Long Distance Class 345 Train?, I set out how a standard Class 345 train could be updated with faster running and a more appropriate interior.

As the Elizabeth Line is likely to need some more trains if High Speed Two is delayed, perhaps some extra trains should be ordered fairly soon.

The Routes

Consider.

  • A terminal station  would probably need to be electrified to the Elizabeth Line route.
  • It would need the infrastructure to turn the trains.

These stations could probably be used as terminal stations.

There will certainly be others.

Why Use Open Access?

Suppose an operator wants to run a service between Bristol Parkway and Northfleet to give the West Country access to European services.

  • The operator takes all the risk and Network Rail get track access charges.
  • Do Transport for London get track access charges for the Elizabeth Line tunnels?
  • If they get their predictions and sums wrong, they lose the money.

But if they get it right, they probably sell it to an infrastructure company at a profit.

Conclusion

I think open access operation might work through the Elizabeth Line Tunnels.

 

January 28, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Leisure Market Boom? GWR’s Vision For Direct Bristol-Oxford Services

The title of this post, is the same as that of this article on Rail Magazine.

This is the first paragraph.

Great Western Railway has hopes on running direct services between Bristol Temple Meads and Oxford from September 14, subject to approval of its new trial proposal by the Department for Transport and Network Rail. The move is a test of growth in demand for leisure travel by train.

It is an interesting idea.

These are some points about the service, given in the article.

  • The route will be via Swindon, Chippenham and Bath Spa.
  • Fastest journey time would be 71 minutes.
  • The route will be aimed at the leisure market.
  • There will be two trains per day (tpd) in each direction on Saturdays.

This is GWR’s handy route map.

These are my thoughts.

Will The Trains Call At Didcot Parkway?

This OpenRailwayMap shows Didcot Parkway station and the large triangular junction, that connects Oxford to the Great Western Main Line.

Note.

  1. The red tracks are the Great Western Main Line.
  2. The blue arrow indicates Didcot Parkway station.
  3. Oxford station is about ten miles to the North.
  4. Chords in the junction allow trains to go between Oxford and Paddington and Oxford and Swindon, with or without a stop at Didcot Parkway station.

The article says that GWR  has asked to run the following services.

  • 1018 Bristol Temple Meads-Oxford – Would arrive at Oxford at 1129.
  • 1155 Oxford-Bristol Temple Meads (via Didcot) – Would arrive at Bristol Temple Meads at 1306.
  • 1518 Bristol Temple Meads-Oxford – Would arrive at Oxford at 1629.
  • 1712 Oxford-Bristol Temple Meads – Would arrive at Bristol Temple Meads at 1823.

Note.

  1. I suspect that the 1155 will reverse at Didcot Parkway station.
  2. There is a two train per hour (tph) service between Didcot Parkway and London Paddington stations.
  3. It looks like the four services could be run by a single train shuttling up the Great Western Main Line.

Would it be sensible if all Oxford and Bristol trains called at Didcot Parkway station, so that travellers could use the London service to their advantage?

But, calling at Didcot Parkway station would slow the service as there would need to be a reverse.

What Class Of Train Would Be Used?

Consider.

  • A Bristol and Didcot Parkway via Bath Spa service takes 55 minutes.
  • This is an average speed of 71.1 mph over a distance of 65.2 miles.
  • 24.4 miles at the Bristol end of the route is not electrified.
  • 10.3 miles at the Oxford end of the route is not electrified.
  • The four services can be run by a single train shuttling up the Great Western Main Line.

It looks to me, that a bi-mode train with good performance is needed.

So I suspect that a five-car Class 800 or Class 802 train will be used.

Will The Train Be Battery-Electric Powered?

This is an interesting possibility.

  • An ideal route for a battery electric train, is surely one with a long electrified section in the middle, which can be used to fully charge the train’s batteries.
  • The train would have to run for 48.8 miles on its own power at the Bristol end of the route.
  • The train would have to run for 20.6 miles on its own power at the Oxford end of the route.

The data sheet for a battery-electric Class 800/802 train can be downloaded from this page on the Hitachi web site.

In a section on the page, which is entitled Intercity Battery Trains, this is said.

A quick and easy application of battery technology is to install it on existing or future Hitachi intercity trains. Adding just one battery reduces emissions by more than 20% and offers cost savings of 20-30%.

Our intercity battery powered trains can cover 70km on non-electrified routes, operating at intercity speeds at the same or increased performance. Hitachi Rail’s modular design means this can be done without the need to re-engineer or rebuild the train and return them to service as quickly as possible for passengers.

The range of 70 km is 43.5 miles, which would appear to be a little bit short to go from the end of the electrification at Chippenham to Bristol Temple Meads and back.

But various measures could be taken to make sure the train can handle the route.

  • The regenerative braking strategy could be used to conserve battery power.
  • A second battery could be added to the train.
  • Methods to charge the train at Bristol Temple Meads could be installed.

As London Paddington and Bristol Temple Meads is an important route, I suspect that Hitachi and Great Western Railway have a strategy to handle trains from Chippenham and sending them back.

Could This Route Be A Trial Route For Battery-Electric Trains?

Consider.

  • Hitachi and Great Western Railway wouldn’t want to introduce an unreliable train without full full testing.
  • Trains can probably limp to either Stoke Gifford or Reading depots, after a battery failure.
  • Great Western Railway could test a new route.
  • A full test only needs one train.
  • Passenger reaction to a battery-electric train can be assessed.
  • Staff need to be trained.
  • The route can be run by a standard bi-mode if required.
  • It could be the world’s first high-speed battery-electric train.
  • Enthusiasts would flock to have a ride.

Could this be a trial service to make sure everything goes right?

 

January 14, 2024 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 12 Comments

Cardiff To Reading In A Class 387 Train

Returning from my trip to Cardiff yesterday, it wasn’t the normal Class 80x train, but a pair of Class 387 trains.

The timings from real time trains, weren’t as bad as some would have expected.

  • Cardiff Central – 16.54 – 16:56
  • Newport – 17:07 – 17:11
  • Bristol Parkway – 17:29 – 17:32
  • Swindon – 17:53 – 17:58
  • Reading – 18:20 – 18:26

Note.

  1. The first time is the scheduled time and the second time is the actual time of the Class 387 trains.
  2. The schedule covers the 109.2 miles in 84 minutes, which is an average speed of 78 mph.
  3. The Class 387 trains covered the 109.2 miles in 90 minutes, which is an average speed of 72.8 mph.

I also arrived in Reading with three or so minutes to catch the Elizabeth Line train.

Are More Elizabeth Line Services Needed To Reading?

In a couple of instances, I’ve waited at Reading for nearly half-an-hour for an Elizabeth Line train.

Currently.

  • The two Elizabeth Line trains take 53 minutes between Reading and Paddington.
  • The two Great Western Main Line trains, that serve Didcot Parkway take 37 minutes between Reading and Paddington.
  • The Great Western Main Line train, that serve Newbury take 25 minutes between Reading and Paddington.

Perhaps four trains per hour (tph) on the Elizabeth Line would be more convenient?

But services wouldn’t be as fast.

November 23, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , | 2 Comments

A Very Busy Paddington – 4th July 2023

On my trip to Marsh Barton station, Paddington was very busy, as these pictures show.

Note.

  1. Trains were leaving to Cheltenham Spa, Great Malvern. Newquay and Paignton, in addition to the more expected destinations of Bristol Temple Meads, Cardiff and Swansea.
  2. I took the Elizabeth Line to the station and it was very busy.

I feel, that action needs to be taken to increase the capacity of the station for both passengers and trains.

These are my thoughts.

Catching Trains From Reading

Recently, if I want to go somewhere, that is within an hour West of Reading station, I’ve started taking the Elizabeth Line to Reading using my Freedom Pass and then buying an Off Peak Day Return ticket from Reading.

  • It saves a few pounds.
  • I can catch the Elizabeth Line train at Moorgate direct to Reading, after having breakfast on Moorgate.
  • Moorgate is an easy bus ride from outside my house.

I suspect some other Freedom Pass holders will start to use Reading station to go West.

The only disadvantages are that you miss the Reading train and have to wait half-an-hour for another and that buying tickets at Reading means leaving the station.

Improvements, I would make would include.

  • Four trains per hour (tph) between Whitechapel and Reading.
  • A ticket machine on the bridge at Reading station, so that those needing a ticket can buy one without leaving the station.

I suspect other improvements could also improve this option.

A Second Concourse At The Western End Of Paddington Station

If you go to Paddington station on the Hammersmith and City Line of the Underground, you can walk across the top of the main station and take stairs down to the platform for your departing train.

There has been talk of improving this area of the station, so that passengers using that route from the Underground have an easier route with more facilities like cafes, shops and toilets.

I’m all for this improvement.

What Is The Point Of Heathrow Express?

On my trip, I watched a Heathrow Express arrive in Paddington and just a few people got off.

I am utterly certain, that the Elizabeth Line is giving Heathrow Express a good kicking, as it is so much better connected to the important destinations within London, like Bond Street, Canary Wharf, Farringdon for Thameslink, Liverpool Street for The City, Stratford for events and Whitechapel for the East London Line.

Discussions of the future of Heathrow Express, must also include the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, which is currently being planned by Network Rail.

This page on the Network Rail web site gives more details, including these benefits for the link.

  • Reduce rail journey times between Reading and Heathrow by delivering a new, faster, frequent, more reliable direct train service to Heathrow with four trains per hour in each direction. All trains would call at Reading and Slough and alternate trains at Twyford and Maidenhead. Journey times could be as short as 26 minutes from Reading and 6 to 7 minutes from Slough.
  • Significantly improve rail connectivity to Heathrow from the Thames Valley, South Coast, South West, South Wales and West Midlands.
  • Provide an alternative form of transport for passengers and the large number of people who work at the airport who are currently travelling by road.
  • Ease congestion on some of the UK’s busiest roads, the M4, M3 and M25 resulting in lower CO2 emissions equivalent to approximately 30 million road miles per year, helping to deliver the UK’s climate change and carbon reduction targets.
  • Generate economic growth and new jobs across the Thames Valley and surrounding areas.
  • Reduce passenger congestion at London Paddington.

There is then the question of who should run the service; Heathrow Express, the Elizabeth Line or both.

At the present time, trains from London to Heathrow are.

  • Elizabeth Line – 2 tph – Shenfield and Terminal 5
  • Elizabeth Line – 4 tph – Abbey Wood and Terminal 4
  • Heathrow Express – 4 tph  – Paddington and Terminal 5

Note.

  1. All trains also serve Heathrow Terminals 2 and 3.
  2. The Piccadilly Line also serves all Heathrow Terminals.
  3. It appears that Terminal 4 is only served by the Elizabeth Line.
  4. Terminal 5 has 6 tph, but the Western Rail Link will be at a frequency of four tph.

Because of the mismatch at Terminal 5 and that two tph will stop at Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford, I suspect we might see the following services on the Western Rail Link

  • Elizabeth Line – 2 tph – Terminal 5 and Reading via Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford
  • Heathrow Express – 2 tph – Terminal 5 and Reading via Slough.

Note.

  1. This would give Reading and Central London, a much-needed four tph on the Elizabeth Line. Two tph would be direct and two tph would be via Heathrow.
  2. It would not require any more paths in the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel, as the 2 tph between Shenfield and Terminal 5 will just be extended to Reading.
  3. Heathrow Express has Western access with a connection to Reading.

It looks like this service pattern could be a good compromise.

I also suspect that this would improve passenger numbers for Heathrow Express.

Could Heathrow Express Run Its Service Using One Platform At Paddington?

I am fairly certain that this would be possible, if passenger access to the platforms at Paddington station were to be improved, by the building of a second concourse at the Western end of the station.

It is also likely, that full digital signalling will be applied between Paddington and Reading and this will surely improve the ease of running four tph into one platform at London Paddington for Heathrow Express.

I can see, that a reorganisation of Heathrow Express after the building of a second Western concourse at Paddington and the Western Rail Link to Heathrow, that Heathrow Express could be able to release a platform.

Could Great Western Railway Reorganise Suburban Services?

These are Great Western Railway’s suburban services, that terminate at Paddington.

  • 1 tph – London Paddington and Oxford via Reading and Didcot Parkway
  • 2 tph – London Paddington and Didcot Parkway via Slough, Maidenhead, Twyford, Reading, Tilehurst, Pangbourne, Goring & Streatley and Cholsey
  • 1 tph – London Paddington and Newbury via Reading, Theale and Thatcham

Note.

  1. The Oxford services, are run by Class 800 trains, running as either five-car, nine-car or ten-car trains.
  2. Oxford is also served by the hourly Paddington and Great Malvern service.
  3. All of the other services, are run by Class 387 trains, running as either four-car or eight-car trains.
  4. There doesn’t seem to be any pattern to the platforms used by these services.

I find the last point very surprising, as my extensive scheduling experience says that it is easier to schedule several similar processes, rather than a number of different ones.

This OpenRailwayMap shows the platforms at Paddington station.

Note.

  1. The platforms are numbered 1 to 14 from South-West to North-East.
  2. Platforms 1 to 12 all appear to long platforms about the same length.
  3. As some platforms can take ten-car Class 800 trains, I wouldn’t be surprised to find out all platforms 1-12 can.
  4. The only short platform is platform 14, which can accommodate an eight-car Class 387 train, which is 163 metres long.

It looks to me, with twelve long similar platforms, they can schedule the platforms on the fly, so perhaps this explains, the randomness of platform allocations.

I think in an ideal world, I would try and organise these services as follows.

  • The Oxford and Great Malvern services could share a platform at Paddington, which would help passengers to find the next Oxford train.
  • The Didcot Parkway and Newbury services could also share a platform at Paddington, for the same reason.
  • Unless Didcot Parkway and Newbury services are occasionally run by a twelve-car train, they could even use the short platform 14.

This would surely be a more efficient use of the platforms at Paddington station.

Could Didcot Parkway Services Become Another Elizabeth Line Destination?

Consider.

  • Didcot Parkway to London Paddington services appear to use the same tracks as Elizabeth Line services between Reading and Southall West Junction, where they change to the main line for Paddington.
  • London Paddington to Didcot Parkway services appear to use the main line from Paddington to Dolphin Junction, which is just to the East of Slough station, where it joins the same tracks as Elizabeth Line services to Reading.
  • Nine-car Class 345 trains are forty metres longer than an eight-car Class 387 train.
  • Class 345 trains are 90 mph trains.
  • Class 387 trains are 110 mph trains.
  • Class 387 trains wouldn’t fit the platform edge doors in the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel.

It would appear that the Didcot Parkway and London Paddington services could be moved to the Elizabeth Line, by doing the following.

  • The Class 387 trains would be replaced by Class 345 trains.
  • Trains to London would go straight on at Southall West Junction and through the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel.
  • Trains from London would emerge from the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel on the right track for Reading.
  • There might be a need to lengthen a few platforms.

Note.

  1. The Didcot Parkway to London Paddington services would not need to use the main line.
  2. 2 tph would be removed from Paddington station.

As one electric train is being replaced by another, there would probably be no need for more electrification.

Could Newbury Services Become Another Elizabeth Line Destination?

Consider.

Freight trains appear to be able to go from Theale station to Platform 5 at Slough station, through Platform 15 at Reading station, which is a possible route that a Newbury to the Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel train would take.

Freight trains appear to be able to go from Platform 4 at Slough station to Theale station, through Platform 15 at Reading station, which is a possible route that an Elizabeth Line Central Tunnel to Newbury train would take.

It would appear that the Newbury and London Paddington services could be moved to the Elizabeth Line, by doing the following.

  • The Class 387 trains would be replaced by Class 345 trains.
  • Trains through Reading would follow the freight route.
  • There might be a need to lengthen a few platforms.

Note.

  1. The Newbury to London Paddington services would not need to use the main line.
  2. 1 tph would be removed from Paddington station.

As one electric train is being replaced by another, there would probably be no need for more electrification.

Conclusion

It looks like the capacity of Paddington station can be increased by the following.

  • Building a new second concourse at the Western end of the station.
  • Heathrow Express releasing a platform.
  • Oxford and Great Malvern services could share a platform at Paddington
  • Moving Didcot Parkway and Newbury services to the Elizabeth Line.

No new electrification would be required.

July 8, 2023 Posted by | Transport/Travel | , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment